On 3/26/2011 11:25 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> ... > The only way I have found (with several email clients including Outlook 2010) is to click "Reply All", and then delete the originators address from the list. > I usually do not bother with that, so the originator receives two copies of my reply - IMHO, that is a minor problem that can be dealt with by a quick press of the delete button on the recipient's computer. Mozilla Thunderbird has a button for "Reply to List" in addition to the "Reply" and "Reply All" buttons. It does exactly what the original poster wants, I believe. Gus Hansen KB0YH ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Ken G Kopp
Does anyone know if Elecraft will be at the big NEARfest
fleamarket in Deerfield, NH, April 29 & 30 ? 73, Gene K1NR --------------------------------------------------------------------- Web mail provided by NuNet, Inc. The Premier National provider. http://www.nni.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS
I'll address this one more time and then let it rest.
SDR = Software Defined Radio. (i.e. the software defines it). The software is "in fact" the radio. It has been a long tradition of ham radio to being able to "build it", yourself. For SDR that includes the software. If a commercial SDR is not open-source it loses part of what being a SDR is all about for hams. That being said, not many hams "build-it" anymore so, thankfully, Elecraft has given considerable attention to the sw (firmware). That is lacking in a lot of other SDR ventures. It also seems ham radio is split into: "programing capable hams" and the rest of us. And one more footnote on my project. I would have had to go with an outside SDR to obtain wide-bandwidth, in any case. the 15-KHz second IF restricts what can be done with wide bw modes or displays. Even Elecraft recognizes this with using the 1st IF for the P3. I think that should finish this topic, OK? ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:51 -0400 From: Ed K1EP <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums? To: "Edward R. Cole" <[hidden email]>,[hidden email] Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 3/27/2011 04:22 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote: >Geoffrey, > >I am in the process of setting up my K3 with two LP-Pan feeding a >M-Audio Delta-44 dual-channel soundcard. The reason for the LP-Pan >is to provide I-Q signals to a computer so that custom SDR sw may be >used (or developed). The K3 has an internal MCU with Elecraft's >proprietary sw, but that is not open for sw developers to >access. Therefore, the standard K3 falls short of its promise as a >SDR. I don't see anywhere in the definition of SDR that the software has to open source. If you wish to develop your own SDR software, the LP-PAN is a perfect add on to allow you access to the IQ outputs for developing your own software or modifying existing open source software. 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 ====================================== BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter? DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email] ====================================== ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS
With all this talk of forums I had another thought. What about seminars or tutorials? We go through many email cycles on the list but how about more directed sessions? 1) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. 2) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on some digital mode for CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. 3) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on SSB for CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. etc. The tutorials could be written by experienced folks in any of the various areas of approximately one page in length. I am sure those will stir many question and answer sessions. Seminars could be run by announcing a topic and then having various list members submit articles on the topic. Again followed by question and answer periods. All of these will be limited in how long they last by our Fearless Moderator Eric. Respectfully submitted, 73, Kevin. KD5ONS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Edward R Cole
*Edward,*
* * *Now that the contest is over the bands should return to normalcy and by this I mean clean clear signals will again be heard.* * * *I wonder how many contesters were using SDR radios?....* * * *Listening to absolutely horrible audio and distorted CQ calls then a voice change when you work the station and find that the PTT audio is almost as bad. In some cases all but impossible to understand what the operator was saying.* * * *Yes the points are all that are important but when did that have to be the overriding factor above a clean signal?* * * *Certainly some stations were using software such as N1MM and wave files for their CQ Contest calls but surely they could take the time to ensure that their audio cables were not affected by RF, mic gain/ comp settings were correct for clear audio and the list goes on I am sure.* * * *One station here in VK was so bad I heard him call for 5 minutes without a response and when I suggested he had an issue he simply ignored my comment and started to CQ again.* * * *The stations in the contest in VK that I know use the K3 were all sounding great.* * * *Maybe SDR means true 'software controlled' with a box minus the knobs and buttons, but I think it would be a handful in a contest and I am not sure I want to place that much faith in a radio dependant entirely on Microsoft etc. A full Linux/Apple OS may be more reliable?* * * *The K3 to my mind IS SDR with a fully operational radio for those of us who dislike the mouse and function key style of operating becoming more popular and you have the option to add programs such as LP-PAN etc.* * * *The simple connections to a PC from the K3 are ideal for the way I operate but these days I have settled on N1MM logging and the K3 for everything else.* * * *I wonder if I am headed for the minority benches?..Grin* * * *I hope all those who played in the contest had a great time, after all, it is just a hobby and a darn fine one at that and enjoyment should be what it's all about, whatever flips your switch!* * * *73's* * * *Gary * On 28 March 2011 04:39, Edward R. Cole <[hidden email]> wrote: > I'll address this one more time and then let it rest. > > SDR = Software Defined Radio. (i.e. the software defines it). The > software is "in fact" the radio. > > It has been a long tradition of ham radio to being able to "build > it", yourself. For SDR that includes the software. If a commercial > SDR is not open-source it loses part of what being a SDR is all about for > hams. > > That being said, not many hams "build-it" anymore so, thankfully, > Elecraft has given considerable attention to the sw (firmware). That > is lacking in a lot of other SDR ventures. It also seems ham radio > is split into: "programing capable hams" and the rest of us. > > And one more footnote on my project. I would have had to go with an > outside SDR to obtain wide-bandwidth, in any case. the 15-KHz second > IF restricts what can be done with wide bw modes or displays. Even > Elecraft recognizes this with using the 1st IF for the P3. > > I think that should finish this topic, OK? > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:51 -0400 > From: Ed K1EP <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums? > To: "Edward R. Cole" <[hidden email]>,[hidden email] > Message-ID: <[hidden email]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > At 3/27/2011 04:22 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote: > >Geoffrey, > > > >I am in the process of setting up my K3 with two LP-Pan feeding a > >M-Audio Delta-44 dual-channel soundcard. The reason for the LP-Pan > >is to provide I-Q signals to a computer so that custom SDR sw may be > >used (or developed). The K3 has an internal MCU with Elecraft's > >proprietary sw, but that is not open for sw developers to > >access. Therefore, the standard K3 falls short of its promise as a > >SDR. > > I don't see anywhere in the definition of SDR that the software has > to open source. If you wish to develop your own SDR software, the > LP-PAN is a perfect add on to allow you access to the IQ outputs for > developing your own software or modifying existing open source software. > > > > > > > 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 > ====================================== > BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com > EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter? > DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email] > ====================================== > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- *VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile Elecraft Equipment K3 #679, KPA-500 #018 Living the dream!!!* ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
*Kevin,*
* * *That seems to me, on the surface at least, a great idea.* * * *I hope someone more learned than I takes it on.* * * *Grin* * * *73's* *Gary * On 28 March 2011 07:38, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]> wrote: > *Edward,* > * > * > *Now that the contest is over the bands should return to normalcy and by > this I mean clean clear signals will again be heard.* > * > * > *I wonder how many contesters were using SDR radios?....* > * > * > *Listening to absolutely horrible audio and distorted CQ calls then a > voice change when you work the station and find that the PTT audio is almost > as bad. In some cases all but impossible to understand what the operator was > saying.* > * > * > *Yes the points are all that are important but when did that have to be > the overriding factor above a clean signal?* > * > * > *Certainly some stations were using software such as N1MM and wave files > for their CQ Contest calls but surely they could take the time to ensure > that their audio cables were not affected by RF, mic gain/ comp settings > were correct for clear audio and the list goes on I am sure.* > * > * > *One station here in VK was so bad I heard him call for 5 minutes without > a response and when I suggested he had an issue he simply ignored my > comment and started to CQ again.* > * > * > *The stations in the contest in VK that I know use the K3 were all > sounding great.* > * > * > *Maybe SDR means true 'software controlled' with a box minus the knobs and > buttons, but I think it would be a handful in a contest and I am not sure I > want to place that much faith in a radio dependant entirely on Microsoft > etc. A full Linux/Apple OS may be more reliable?* > * > * > *The K3 to my mind IS SDR with a fully operational radio for those of us > who dislike the mouse and function key style of operating becoming more > popular and you have the option to add programs such as LP-PAN etc.* > * > * > *The simple connections to a PC from the K3 are ideal for the way I > operate but these days I have settled on N1MM logging and the K3 for > everything else.* > * > * > *I wonder if I am headed for the minority benches?..Grin* > * > * > *I hope all those who played in the contest had a great time, after all, > it is just a hobby and a darn fine one at that and enjoyment should be what > it's all about, whatever flips your switch!* > * > * > *73's* > * > * > *Gary > * > > On 28 March 2011 04:39, Edward R. Cole <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I'll address this one more time and then let it rest. >> >> SDR = Software Defined Radio. (i.e. the software defines it). The >> software is "in fact" the radio. >> >> It has been a long tradition of ham radio to being able to "build >> it", yourself. For SDR that includes the software. If a commercial >> SDR is not open-source it loses part of what being a SDR is all about for >> hams. >> >> That being said, not many hams "build-it" anymore so, thankfully, >> Elecraft has given considerable attention to the sw (firmware). That >> is lacking in a lot of other SDR ventures. It also seems ham radio >> is split into: "programing capable hams" and the rest of us. >> >> And one more footnote on my project. I would have had to go with an >> outside SDR to obtain wide-bandwidth, in any case. the 15-KHz second >> IF restricts what can be done with wide bw modes or displays. Even >> Elecraft recognizes this with using the 1st IF for the P3. >> >> I think that should finish this topic, OK? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 12 >> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:51 -0400 >> From: Ed K1EP <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums? >> To: "Edward R. Cole" <[hidden email]>,[hidden email] >> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed >> >> At 3/27/2011 04:22 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote: >> >Geoffrey, >> > >> >I am in the process of setting up my K3 with two LP-Pan feeding a >> >M-Audio Delta-44 dual-channel soundcard. The reason for the LP-Pan >> >is to provide I-Q signals to a computer so that custom SDR sw may be >> >used (or developed). The K3 has an internal MCU with Elecraft's >> >proprietary sw, but that is not open for sw developers to >> >access. Therefore, the standard K3 falls short of its promise as a >> >SDR. >> >> I don't see anywhere in the definition of SDR that the software has >> to open source. If you wish to develop your own SDR software, the >> LP-PAN is a perfect add on to allow you access to the IQ outputs for >> developing your own software or modifying existing open source software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 >> ====================================== >> BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com >> EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter? >> DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email] >> ====================================== >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > -- > > *VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile > Elecraft Equipment > K3 #679, KPA-500 #018 > Living the dream!!!* > > -- *VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile Elecraft Equipment K3 #679, KPA-500 #018 Living the dream!!!* ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS
I did not do a lot in the contest but just had some fun.
I really had to tighten down the filters to hear anything. What I noticed is that you really had to be on the exact frequency when the filters are tight to hear anything clearly. I did notice that folks were trying to call back and they were off frequency and the copy was difficult. I was able to get fast contacts because I believe that I was carefully matching the calling stations frequency. Anyway I have had a lot of fun. Don KD8NNU On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > *Edward,* > * > * > *Now that the contest is over the bands should return to normalcy and > by > this I mean clean clear signals will again be heard.* > * > * > *I wonder how many contesters were using SDR radios?....* > * > * > *Listening to absolutely horrible audio and distorted CQ calls then a > voice > change when you work the station and find that the PTT audio is almost > as > bad. In some cases all but impossible to understand what the operator > was > saying.* > * > * > *Yes the points are all that are important but when did that have to > be the > overriding factor above a clean signal?* > * > * > *Certainly some stations were using software such as N1MM and wave > files for > their CQ Contest calls but surely they could take the time to ensure > that > their audio cables were not affected by RF, mic gain/ comp settings > were > correct for clear audio and the list goes on I am sure.* > * > * > *One station here in VK was so bad I heard him call for 5 minutes > without a > response and when I suggested he had an issue he simply ignored my > comment > and started to CQ again.* > * > * > *The stations in the contest in VK that I know use the K3 were all > sounding > great.* > * > * > *Maybe SDR means true 'software controlled' with a box minus the knobs > and > buttons, but I think it would be a handful in a contest and I am not > sure I > want to place that much faith in a radio dependant entirely on > Microsoft > etc. A full Linux/Apple OS may be more reliable?* > * > * > *The K3 to my mind IS SDR with a fully operational radio for those of > us who > dislike the mouse and function key style of operating becoming more > popular > and you have the option to add programs such as LP-PAN etc.* > * > * > *The simple connections to a PC from the K3 are ideal for the way I > operate > but these days I have settled on N1MM logging and the K3 for > everything > else.* > * > * > *I wonder if I am headed for the minority benches?..Grin* > * > * > *I hope all those who played in the contest had a great time, after > all, it > is just a hobby and a darn fine one at that and enjoyment should be > what > it's all about, whatever flips your switch!* > * > * > *73's* > * > * > *Gary > * > On 28 March 2011 04:39, Edward R. Cole <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I'll address this one more time and then let it rest. >> >> SDR = Software Defined Radio. (i.e. the software defines it). The >> software is "in fact" the radio. >> >> It has been a long tradition of ham radio to being able to "build >> it", yourself. For SDR that includes the software. If a commercial >> SDR is not open-source it loses part of what being a SDR is all about >> for >> hams. >> >> That being said, not many hams "build-it" anymore so, thankfully, >> Elecraft has given considerable attention to the sw (firmware). That >> is lacking in a lot of other SDR ventures. It also seems ham radio >> is split into: "programing capable hams" and the rest of us. >> >> And one more footnote on my project. I would have had to go with an >> outside SDR to obtain wide-bandwidth, in any case. the 15-KHz second >> IF restricts what can be done with wide bw modes or displays. Even >> Elecraft recognizes this with using the 1st IF for the P3. >> >> I think that should finish this topic, OK? >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 12 >> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 07:11:51 -0400 >> From: Ed K1EP <[hidden email]> >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums? >> To: "Edward R. Cole" <[hidden email]>,[hidden email] >> Message-ID: <[hidden email]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed >> >> At 3/27/2011 04:22 AM, Edward R. Cole wrote: >>> Geoffrey, >>> >>> I am in the process of setting up my K3 with two LP-Pan feeding a >>> M-Audio Delta-44 dual-channel soundcard. The reason for the LP-Pan >>> is to provide I-Q signals to a computer so that custom SDR sw may be >>> used (or developed). The K3 has an internal MCU with Elecraft's >>> proprietary sw, but that is not open for sw developers to >>> access. Therefore, the standard K3 falls short of its promise as a >>> SDR. >> >> I don't see anywhere in the definition of SDR that the software has >> to open source. If you wish to develop your own SDR software, the >> LP-PAN is a perfect add on to allow you access to the IQ outputs for >> developing your own software or modifying existing open source >> software. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 >> ====================================== >> BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com >> EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter? >> DUBUS Magazine USA Rep [hidden email] >> ====================================== >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > -- > > *VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile > Elecraft Equipment > K3 #679, KPA-500 #018 > Living the dream!!!* > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS
I'd rather have the mailing list. 73, tom n4zpt
On 3/27/2011 12:36 AM, Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS wrote: > Okay. Looks like I was testing the waters here a bit. I didn't mean to try to > take away anything from this mailing list. I guess, for myself anyway, would be > more willing to join a discussion forum than a mailing list. Looking through the > archives here, it looks like quite a bit of information goes through here and in > my opinion it would be easier to keep track of everything in a discussion forum. > Only my opinion. I'm not trying to change 'what is', I was merely trying to add > to what is. > > Thanks for the replies! > > 73 > Geoffrey Wolf > AB3LS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by kevinr@coho.net
This idea has been brought up before but I suspect it hasn't been done
because it's labor intensive and needs a devoted and experienced developer to keep the audience glued to their screens. Gary N6LRV -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Kevin Rock Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 2:26 PM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Forums? With all this talk of forums I had another thought. What about seminars or tutorials? We go through many email cycles on the list but how about more directed sessions? 1) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. 2) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on some digital mode for CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. 3) Set up for your K2, K1, KX1, or K3 on SSB for CW for DXing, contesting, or ragchewing. etc. The tutorials could be written by experienced folks in any of the various areas of approximately one page in length. I am sure those will stir many question and answer sessions. Seminars could be run by announcing a topic and then having various list members submit articles on the topic. Again followed by question and answer periods. All of these will be limited in how long they last by our Fearless Moderator Eric. Respectfully submitted, 73, Kevin. KD5ONS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
at which point, if I remember correctly,
someone brought up the idea that, to not over burden any one individual, why not try an open source styled 'wiki like' platform and build the tutorials as a community effort many said yea and agreed (in theory), others felt it could get out of hand .... which brings us full circle to: a wiki was tried before and due to lack of participation it was removed from the guys server as a waste of space and effort maybe the tutorial idea, just needs someone with the energy. to push it as it's head guy, as well as someone that can stir up folks to participate (and who isn't a full time student, needing to hone their knowledge base, for application on future employment issues), hi hi. I think in Debian speak, it's called 'having the ability to herd cats' (sadly I think Linus Torvald already has a project he's working on) ;-) GB & 73 K5OAI Sam Morgan On 3/27/2011 5:56 PM, Gary wrote: > This idea has been brought up before but I suspect it hasn't been done > because it's labor intensive and needs a devoted and experienced developer > to keep the audience glued to their screens. > Gary > N6LRV > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by KD8NNU
On freq does matter. Resisting the urge to mash the PTT instantly by a
couple of seconds also works well. I thought a long time before giving this secret away on the list :-) 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2011 Cal QSO Party 1-2 Oct 2011 - www.cqp.org On 3/27/2011 2:51 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > I was able to get fast contacts because I believe that I was carefully > matching the calling stations frequency. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by k5oai
Let's end this thread.
As noted, the nabble archive of the Elecraft list does an excellent job of providing a web based searchable and organized real time copy of this list. Searchng on 'forum' will yield alethora of past discussion on this topic ;-) We will not be changing the format of the list any time soon. 73, Eric Elecraft List Moderator www.elecraft.com _..._ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Geoffrey Wolf AB3LS
At 00:01 3/27/2011, ROBERT WOLF MD wrote:
>I noticed that there isn't an Elecraft enthusiast forum. There seems >to be some >Elecraft oriented discussion on the QRZ forums. I was wondering if anyone had >set up their own Elecraft discussion forums. I had one online.....it was not used. Asking about a forum in a mailing list might be like asking attendees at the camp meeting about Zen study groups. That being said....I operate both a mailing list and a forum for RL Drake users at www.zerobeat.net. Very few of the mailing list members join the forum, and vice versa. There are a few of us crazies that do walk both sides of the street. 73, Thom k3hrn ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |