Fwd: New Sherwood report

[N8LP]

  I wondered when somebody would comment on that. It seems like it's at
least a tie.

Larry N8LP


On 12/5/2010 5:15 PM, [hidden email] wrote:

> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:28 -0500
> From: "Joe Subich, W4TV"<[hidden email]>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Fwd: New Sherwood report
> To:[hidden email]
> Message-ID:<[hidden email]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> Interesting ... why does Rob put the FT-5000 above the K3?
>
> 2 KHz IMDDR are the same (101 dB) ... FT-5000 filter ultimate
> rejection is*poorer*  than the K3, LO noise is*poorer*  than
> the K3, 100 KHz blocking is*poorer*  than the K3.  Sensitivity
> and noise floor are comparable depending on which preamp is
> active on each radio ... with no preamp the K3 has a lower
> noise floor and greater sensitivity.
>
> Maybe I'm biased but I would still rate the K3 numero uno ..
>
> 73,
>
>      ... Joe, W4TV

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[KK7P]

Please see the occupied spectrum plots of the ARRL Lab tests in QST for
the radios in question.

It can be very informative to compare the plots of various radios.

You may be surprised by what you find.  Or maybe not :-)

73,

Lyle KK7P

PS - while you're at it, look at the broadband Tx noise...

> OK, this has been bashed about pretty good.  So my question is: if someone puts a spectrum analyzer on the CW output of a K3, are key clicks detectable?

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html