Should the receiver's AGC be disabled when testing a transmitter for
key clicks -- does it matter? Does it make the transmitter "sound" worse or better? Michael N9BDF _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes) wrote:
> Should the receiver's AGC be disabled when testing a transmitter for > key clicks -- does it matter? Does it make the transmitter "sound" worse > or better? I doubt that it matters. What *does* matter is that you must listen *away* from the transmitter's frequency. To check for clicks, use your narrowest filter and tune off the signal frequency, both up and down. If the transmitter is producing clicks, you will hear them when the actual signal is outside the passband. Some rigs produce clicks 3 or more KHz from the frequency. Some people think that you check for clicks by listening to the signal and hearing how 'hard' it sounds. This is not the case; you can easily soften the signal to your ear by using a narrow filter. The real test is "is the transmitter generating click energy away from the signal?" -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes)
Michael N9BDF asked:
Should the receiver's AGC be disabled when testing a transmitter for key clicks -- does it matter? Does it make the transmitter "sound" worse or better? -------------------------------- Yes, AGC can make the clicks worse, but the BIG issue is to avoid putting too much signal into the receiver. Unless your rig is no 'louder' (or registers on the S-meter no higher) than other signals on the band when you key your rig, what you hear is probably not what others hear. You'll hear stuff that's not audible a few hundred feet from your shack. AGC attack characteristics can make clicks worse, and if you are hitting the receiver too hard the receiver itself will produce clicks for you that aren't on your signal. Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes)
Vic, K2VCO wrote:
I doubt that it matters. What *does* matter is that you must listen *away* from the transmitter's frequency......." ========== Well put, Vic. The only thing that should be added to Vic's procedure is that you should keep the power output of the transmitter being tested down enough so that the signal in the monitir receiver is S9 or less. I've tested many rigs for klix monitoring in of my many ham receivers and AGC on/off does not make a bit of difference, as long as you do it as Vic and I described (which is the *only* proper way). BTW, of the many rigs I've checked for klix, the K2 with the click mod is the cleanest of all. I believe the click mod is now incorporated in all new K2 kits. 73, de Earl, K6SE _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Linden, Mike (BRC-Hes)
Thanks, guys. It seems my problem was one of absent mindedness. I had
left the noise blanker on in my 930. The result was that I was hearing K2 key clicks that weren't actually there. Once I disabled the noise blanker, things sounded great. As you two noted, the AGC was not affecting the testing. I also took a look at the RF envelope on my scope and was pleased to see what Elecraft had shown in the key click mod document. -Michael N9BDF ======================================================================== ===== Vic, K2VCO wrote: I doubt that it matters. What *does* matter is that you must listen *away* from the transmitter's frequency......." ========== Well put, Vic. The only thing that should be added to Vic's procedure is that you should keep the power output of the transmitter being tested down enough so that the signal in the monitir receiver is S9 or less. I've tested many rigs for klix monitoring in of my many ham receivers and AGC on/off does not make a bit of difference, as long as you do it as Vic and I described (which is the *only* proper way). BTW, of the many rigs I've checked for klix, the K2 with the click mod is the cleanest of all. I believe the click mod is now incorporated in all new K2 kits. 73, de Earl, K6SE _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |