K2 #6980 Current Errata

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K2 #6980 Current Errata

VK7JB


Hi Stan,

Please could you point me in the direction of the revision G-11 of March 10?   I
have #6998.  It was delivered with the G-10 errata, but looking on the Elecraft
website in the manual section, it’s only rev G-10 of October 20 2009 listed as
current. Is the new revision hidden somewhere else?

Many thanks,

John
VK7JB





Message: 46
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:34:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: stan levandowski <[hidden email]>
Subject: [Elecraft] K2 #6980 Current Errata
To: [hidden email]
Message-ID:
        <[hidden email]>
       
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=no

Current kits are apparently being shipped with Errata dated Rev. G-10,
October 20, 2009  enclosed when in fact the current errata is Rev. G-11
dated March 10.  My #6980 was shipped July, 2010, well after the March
revision.

I incorrectly assumed G-10 was OK and it resulted in some inventory
problems for me.

Anyone with a recent kit would be well advised to check this out



Stan Levandowski WB2LQF
HF QRP CW -- Doing more with less for over 50 years!
QCWA #35038   OOTC #4558   NAQCC #4740   SKCC #6488   FISTS #(Pending)









------------------------------------------------------------
This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2 #6980 Current Errata

Don Wilhelm-4
  John,

I don't understand the rationale behind your quest.

Normally, one should use the errata sheet that is packed with your kit.
Unless some error was made in packing, that errata pertains to your kit
at the time it was packed. Attempting to use an errata sheet that
applies to kits packed later can lead to confusion.

Consider that many (most) errata items cover parts changes rather than
procedural changes, if parts changes happened after your kit was packed,
a later errata sheet will not be correct for your kit.

If you have specific questions about a part when you do the inventory,
then pose those questions to [hidden email] and you should obtain
a specific answer.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 9/10/2010 4:31 AM, [hidden email] wrote:

>
> Hi Stan,
>
> Please could you point me in the direction of the revision G-11 of March 10?   I
> have #6998.  It was delivered with the G-10 errata, but looking on the Elecraft
> website in the manual section, it’s only rev G-10 of October 20 2009 listed as
> current. Is the new revision hidden somewhere else?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> John
> VK7JB
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2 #6980 Current Errata

stan levandowski
In reply to this post by VK7JB
Don and John, the source of the G11 Errata was Gary Surrency of
Elecraft.  G10 was packed with my kit; G10 is also the only one on the
Elecraft website.  Thus, there is no "source" to which I can point you
to download a copy other than to contact [hidden email].  As a
customer, I had no way of knowing there was a G11.

The reason I became embroiled in this is because after my inventory, I
ended up with six .001 capacitors and no designations for them.  G11
fixes that problem.

I did not mean to cause any confusion here.

73

Stan Levandowski WB2LQF
HF QRP CW -- Doing more with less for over 50 years!
QCWA #35038   OOTC #4558   NAQCC #4740   SKCC #6488   FISTS #(Pending)


On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:

> John,
>
> I don't understand the rationale behind your quest.
>
> Normally, one should use the errata sheet that is packed with your
> kit. Unless some error was made in packing, that errata pertains to
> your kit at the time it was packed. Attempting to use an errata sheet
> that applies to kits packed later can lead to confusion.
>
> Consider that many (most) errata items cover parts changes rather than
> procedural changes, if parts changes happened after your kit was
> packed, a later errata sheet will not be correct for your kit.
>
> If you have specific questions about a part when you do the inventory,
> then pose those questions to [hidden email] and you should
> obtain a specific answer.
>
> 73,
> Don W3FPR
>
> On 9/10/2010 4:31 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stan,
>>
>> Please could you point me in the direction of the revision G-11 of
>> March 10?   I
>> have #6998.  It was delivered with the G-10 errata, but looking on
>> the Elecraft
>> website in the manual section, it’s only rev G-10 of October 20 2009
>> listed as
>> current. Is the new revision hidden somewhere else?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> John
>> VK7JB
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html