K2: DSP for CW ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
11 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K2: DSP for CW ?

Simon (HB9DRV)
On behalf of a 'friend' - if you are only using the K2 for portable CW is
the DSP really beneficial?

He is not thinking about the 100 watt option, just the basic radio for
portable use.

He has the T1 ATU, are any other options essential?

Simon 'Just say no!' Brown
---
www.hb9drv.ch www.laax.ch

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: DSP for CW ?

KK7P
> On behalf of a 'friend' - if you are only using the K2 for portable CW
> is the DSP really beneficial?

I'll let others chime in, but one feature the DSP provides is
particularly useful when the bands are not terribly busy.  You can ten
widen the IF pasband, activate the denoiser, and listen to the silence.
  When a CW signal enters the passband (perhaps in response to your CQ),
the denoiser will pass it through while still keeping band noise
suppressed.  Thus, you can monitor without fatigue.

73,

Lyle KK7P (who views the K2 as a valuable accessory for the DSP :-)

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: DSP for CW ?

Leigh L. Klotz Jr WA5ZNU
Administrator
In reply to this post by Simon (HB9DRV)
The NB is really inexpensive and can be valuable even in the field, as
noisy airplanes sometimes fly overhead and the NB takes care of them.

Also, the SSB board is useful for data modes which can make for fun
portable operation.  There is some nice PSK software out there...

More seriously, the HFPack folks are working with others to develop
self-spotting software, so you can post your QRV info: think of a cross
between APRS and DX spots.  The goal is to this eventually without a
computer, either using ALE or some other data mode, so an SSB board will
have utility beyond voice and digimode chat.

Leigh / WA5ZNU

On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 9:40 am, Simon Brown (HB9DRV) wrote:
> On behalf of a 'friend' - if you are only using the K2 for portable CW
> ...are any other options essential?
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K2: DSP for CW ? - Curious

crmabbott
In reply to this post by KK7P
K2 Question [cause I don't know]
Past experience with 'other' DSP options and CW if I have a CW signal buried
[way] down in the noise level and DSP is activated the CW signal will
sometimes be cut back or disappear along with the noise.

So just out of curiousity how does the K series work with respect to you can
here the signal faintly amidst the noise levels?

---
Chuck AA8VS

"Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take
 your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they
 will steal your HONOR. That awful power, the public
opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of
ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditching
and shoemaking and fetched up in journalism on their way
to the poorhouse."
--Mark Twain.


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K2: DSP for CW ? - Curious

Steven Pituch
Hi Chuck,
I was a bit skeptical also about purchasing the K2DSP,  It seemed that when
using the MFJ DSP with my TS850 (pre-K2), I was never able to hear more with
the MJF DSP than without it.  I ended up selving the MFJ DSP.  However, I
never really liked the 270 Hz crystal filter on the TS850 as I always had to
tune off of zero beat to hear better.

Anyway I finally bought the K2DSP and it is excellent.  You can crank in
some audio amplification at the narrower band widths and it really makes the
listening easier as the signals will pop out of the noise.  In cases where
there is no agc pumping the K2DSP is probably better than the IF filter.
But to crank in both filters is very nice.  Two weeks ago in the foxhunt I
had the IF at 200 Hz and the DSP at 100 Hz and I swear it kept me from going
insane.  In fact I got both foxes at that setting. ;8)  I don't use the
denoiser at narrow CW bandwidths, but I am still experimenting with it.

Its funny, a friend who is now into QRP has an ICOM 703.  He says he can't
operate cw because he doesn't have a crystal filter.  I asked why he wasn't
using the dsp.  He said he was but it wasn't very effective.  I checked out
his radio and the manual and it seems that the 703 dsp only does noise
reduction.  It does not do narrow bandpass at all.  He was using the noise
reduction to make the cw more readable.  It wasn't working out too well.
Makes me appreciate the K2-K2DSP.

Regards,
Steve, W2MY/5

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.4/176 - Release Date: 11/20/2005
 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: RE: K2: DSP for CW ? - Curious

KK7P
> ... I don't use the
> denoiser at narrow CW bandwidths, but I am still experimenting with it.

The denoiser is not effective at really narrow bandwidths.  It is more
effective with wider bandwidths, in which case it can suppress noise and
let the CW signals pop out of a quieter background.

With a very narrow filter already in place, noise looks more and more
like a signal because many of its random characteristics have already
been suppressed.

Think of the denoiser as a filter, looking for "signatures" that look
like signals.  When it finds one, it builds a filter around that
frequency and the signal then appears.

If you have already selected a narrow filter, the "denoising" has
already been done.

73,

Lyle KK7P

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K2: DSP for CW ?

n6wg
In reply to this post by Simon (HB9DRV)
Hello Simon
I think the KDSP2 is beneficial under all conditions.
It provides three features, any one of which can be important
at a given moment.
The most obvious one is audio filtering, supplementing the
internal crystal filter.
The next obvious feature is Noise Reduction, not necessarily
a problem in the field, but it could be.
The final feature, not always recognized, is a small amount
of additional audio gain when DSP is engaged.  It is set
during the setup process, and can compensate for audio level
lost in narrower bandwidths.
I have my KDSP2 engaged when I'm out on our annual ARRL Field
Day every year.
Good luck and 73
Bob N6WG
The Little Station with Attitude

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Simon Brown
(HB9DRV)
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 9:39 AM
To: Elecraft
Subject: [Elecraft] K2: DSP for CW ?


On behalf of a 'friend' - if you are only using the K2 for portable CW is
the DSP really beneficial?

He is not thinking about the 100 watt option, just the basic radio for
portable use.

He has the T1 ATU, are any other options essential?

Simon 'Just say no!' Brown
---
www.hb9drv.ch www.laax.ch

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K2: DSP for CW ? - Curious

n6wg
In reply to this post by crmabbott
Hi Chuck
I run my KDSP2 all the time, and vary the
NR setting according to the noise I hear.
Sometimes I get improved results by adding the Attenuator
or the Preamp.  It all depends on the type of noise
and its amplitude relative to the desired signal.
You really do have to experiment a bit to find the
best settings at any given time.

The tightest IF selectivity and DSP selectivity
often make a big difference too.  Try everything
and see what works best in your situation.

Good luck and 73
Bob N6WG
The Little Station with Attitude

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]]On Behalf Of Chuck Mabbott
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:41 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: [Elecraft] K2: DSP for CW ? - Curious


K2 Question [cause I don't know]
Past experience with 'other' DSP options and CW if I have a CW signal buried
[way] down in the noise level and DSP is activated the CW signal will
sometimes be cut back or disappear along with the noise.

So just out of curiousity how does the K series work with respect to you can
here the signal faintly amidst the noise levels?

---
Chuck AA8VS

"Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take
 your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they
 will steal your HONOR. That awful power, the public
opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of
ignorant, self-complacent simpletons who failed at ditching
and shoemaking and fetched up in journalism on their way
to the poorhouse."
--Mark Twain.


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: DSP for CW ?

Simon (HB9DRV)
In reply to this post by n6wg
Thanks to you and all who have replied. Due to Elecraft's modular design I
could always buy this later - but for $219 I would probably buy at the same
time.

[1] Does the DSP2 add significant extra current drain in RX? This is an
important criteria as I'll be using batteries / solar cells and will have up
to 6 AH of battery with me (2 x 3AH).
[2] Would the T1 be OK with the basic K2 (I assume so)?

Hope to have K1 finished late next week so K2 would be a Christmas / New
Year project.

I will look for extra / larger batteries at Friedrichshafen 2006 but my 2 x
Ni-MH 3 AH are very good and light. I would like to be able to use my IC-703
portable but it requires up to 600 mA on receive.

Simon Brown
---
www.hb9drv.ch www.laax.ch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[hidden email]>


> Hello Simon
> I think the KDSP2 is beneficial under all conditions.
> It provides three features, any one of which can be important
> at a given moment.
> The most obvious one is audio filtering, supplementing the
> internal crystal filter.
> The next obvious feature is Noise Reduction, not necessarily
> a problem in the field, but it could be.
> The final feature, not always recognized, is a small amount
> of additional audio gain when DSP is engaged.  It is set
> during the setup process, and can compensate for audio level
> lost in narrower bandwidths.
> I have my KDSP2 engaged when I'm out on our annual ARRL Field
> Day every year.

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: DSP for CW ?

KK7P
> [1] Does the DSP2 add significant extra current drain in RX? This is an
> important criteria as I'll be using batteries / solar cells and will
> have up to 6 AH of battery with me (2 x 3AH).

The KDSP2 has a "bypass" mode where the DSP itself goes to sleep and the
CODEC is in analog loopback mode.  The added current drain in this
configuration is about 10 mA.

When it is operational, the KDSP2 adds about 60 mA to the base K2, or 50
mA more than bypass mode.

73,

Lyle KK7P

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: DSP for CW ?

Simon (HB9DRV)
Thanks, sadly this looks like a DSP2 will be part of the order. Please
inform my bank manager :-)

Simon Brown
---
www.hb9drv.ch www.laax.ch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lyle Johnson" <[hidden email]>


>> [1] Does the DSP2 add significant extra current drain in RX? This is an
>> important criteria as I'll be using batteries / solar cells and will have
>> up to 6 AH of battery with me (2 x 3AH).
>
> The KDSP2 has a "bypass" mode where the DSP itself goes to sleep and the
> CODEC is in analog loopback mode.  The added current drain in this
> configuration is about 10 mA.
>
> When it is operational, the KDSP2 adds about 60 mA to the base K2, or 50
> mA more than bypass mode.
>
> 73,
>
> Lyle KK7P
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com