K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

jperelst
I'm running a K2 (with KPA100) with an MFJ941E Versatuner.

My antenna is a multi-band Windom that will load up on 80, but is less than a
half-wave on 80.  On most bands, lowest SWR per the tuner coincides with the
highest output power showing on the K2 (usually 20 or 21 watts).  However, when
in TUNE mode in the CW portion of 80, the lowest SWR per the tuner shows a
reduced power output per the K2 (about 16 or 17 watts).  In that portion of 80,
I get the maximum power output showing at about a 2.5:1 SWR per the K2.  The
readings on the tuner's forward and reflected power meters are consistent with
what the K2 is showing, with a noticeable dip in forward power when I get
minimum SWR.

Receive signal strength is also consistent with what the K2 is showing.  By ear,
received signal strength is lower at the minimum SWR point than at about a 2.5:1
SWR setting.  Similarly, the K2's S-Meter shows that the received signals are
about 1 S-Unit lower at lowest SWR than they are when I tune for that 2.5:1 SWR
setting.

I understand that this antenna is not "optimal" for the lower stretches of 80,
but given that it's all I can put up at the moment, am I better off tuning for
the best output power or for the lowest SWR?  If I tune for the best output, how
much should I back off on the output power to adjust for the fact that I'm
getting more reflected power coming back into the rig?

Thanks

Jon
KB1QBZ
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

Don Wilhelm-4
  Jon,

You will have to fix something, but I am not sure what.
The KPA100 will throttle back power if the SWR exceeds 2.0 (as indicated
by its wattmeter).  So that is the reason you have to fix it.
Two questions arise.  First (and most likely), what kind of tuner?  Is
it a T-match tuner?  If so, be aware that you may be setting the tuner
to a setting where the tuner is creating the loss - a T-match tuner can
have multiple positions which give a low SWR, but they are not all
optimal.  You could also be exceeding the range of the tuner on 80 meters.

Secondly, is the wattmeter in your KPA100 properly balanced (nulled) and
calibrated for forward power and SWR?  Since your external meter and the
KPA100 indicate about the same, I don't think this is likely the
problem, but since it is a possibility, I mention it.

Merry Christmas for all who celebrate it, for those who do not - Happy
Holidays - and a very Happy New Year for all those on the Elecraft
reflector.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 12/25/2010 5:12 AM, Jon Perelstein wrote:

> I'm running a K2 (with KPA100) with an MFJ941E Versatuner.
>
> My antenna is a multi-band Windom that will load up on 80, but is less than a
> half-wave on 80.  On most bands, lowest SWR per the tuner coincides with the
> highest output power showing on the K2 (usually 20 or 21 watts).  However, when
> in TUNE mode in the CW portion of 80, the lowest SWR per the tuner shows a
> reduced power output per the K2 (about 16 or 17 watts).  In that portion of 80,
> I get the maximum power output showing at about a 2.5:1 SWR per the K2.  The
> readings on the tuner's forward and reflected power meters are consistent with
> what the K2 is showing, with a noticeable dip in forward power when I get
> minimum SWR.
>
> Receive signal strength is also consistent with what the K2 is showing.  By ear,
> received signal strength is lower at the minimum SWR point than at about a 2.5:1
> SWR setting.  Similarly, the K2's S-Meter shows that the received signals are
> about 1 S-Unit lower at lowest SWR than they are when I tune for that 2.5:1 SWR
> setting.
>
> I understand that this antenna is not "optimal" for the lower stretches of 80,
> but given that it's all I can put up at the moment, am I better off tuning for
> the best output power or for the lowest SWR?  If I tune for the best output, how
> much should I back off on the output power to adjust for the fact that I'm
> getting more reflected power coming back into the rig?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
> KB1QBZ
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

jperelst
In reply to this post by jperelst
I think maybe some people missed something in my original post

The output power I'm reporting is in TUNE mode, which is nominally 20 watts
output.  It's not my output during normal operation.

Jon
KB1QBZ
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

AC7AC
In reply to this post by jperelst
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2: Tune For Low SWR or Max Power?

AC7AC
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.