K2- setting the filters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K2- setting the filters

Jack-123
I have been operating my K2 as a CW only radio for a few months and have now
just added the KSB2 SSB board.

When I only had CW, I set the filter widths and BFO settings as per the
defaults advised and was very happy with it. However, since setting the
default values suggested in the KSB2 book, I've discovered a few unanswered
issues.

Q1, Do I have to set FL1 to OP1? I was under the impression I had to. But a
friend has set his FL1 to 2.4KHz. I know this is the filter that is used to
transmit. Is it OK to narrow it down? Is there any benefit?

Q2, Why does the book also say FL2 should be set to OP1 on SSB? Is this a
typo?

Q3, I have now set the filters using spectrogram. EVERYONE should do this,
it is so easy and makes a huge difference. And the program is free! Do it
!!!!
I found that the default BFO values in the KSB2 book had CW and USB pretty
much perfect, but LSB was way off (3 or 400Hz). Retuning with spectrogram
has cured that and it sounds great on LSB now. Is it normal to be so far
off?

Q4, The filter widths are actually much wider than that set on the K2
display. ie 2KHz filter is actually about 3KHz wide. To get the same "sound"
as my other HF rigs I am having to set the filter widths much narrower than
expected. ie set the display to 1.2KHz width to get an actual 1.8KHz width
trace on spectrogram. Is this normal? Can this be adjusted? Am I worrying
about nothing? :o)

Overall i am very happy with the recievers performance. The K2 has taken
over as main radio, pushing japanese sets aside.
But if anyone could advise on the above, that would aid my learing process.
Thats one of the reasons why i bought it :o)

Thanks all
73
Jack VK2CJC / MM0AXL
Fists #9666 - CW QRP Club #753 - Elecraft K2 #6404
Mid North Coast Amateur Radio Group www.mncarg.org

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2- setting the filters

Brian Lloyd-6
On May 2, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jack wrote:

> Q4, The filter widths are actually much wider than that set on the  
> K2 display. ie 2KHz filter is actually about 3KHz wide. To get the  
> same "sound" as my other HF rigs I am having to set the filter  
> widths much narrower than expected. ie set the display to 1.2KHz  
> width to get an actual 1.8KHz width trace on spectrogram. Is this  
> normal? Can this be adjusted? Am I worrying about nothing? :o)

Interesting. On our K2 the reported filter width was narrower than  
reported by the K2. I set the 3dB points using an audio spectrum  
analyzer and found that using a setting of almost 1KHz to get a 500Hz-
wide filter. No problem changing widths to anything I want but it  
seems that the reported widths and actual widths vary widely. The only  
way to know for sure is to sweep the filter or dump in noise and  
analyze with the audio spec-A.

BTW, for people using Macs, you can do the same filter setup using  
CocoaModem's spec-A display.

> Overall i am very happy with the recievers performance. The K2 has  
> taken over as main radio, pushing japanese sets aside.

Same here. The IC-706 has been removed from the shack at school and  
has been replaced by the K2 and a cheap 2M mobile FM rig.

>
> But if anyone could advise on the above, that would aid my learing  
> process. Thats one of the reasons why i bought it :o)

I would really like to hear why the actual filter width varies so  
widely from what the radio reports too.

Brian Lloyd
Granite Bay Montessori School          9330 Sierra College Bl
brian AT gbmontessori DOT com          Roseville, CA 95661
+1.916.367.2131 (voice)                +1.791.912.8170 (fax)

PGP key ID:          12095C52A32A1B6C
PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0  CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C




_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2- setting the filters

Brian Lloyd-6
In reply to this post by Jack-123
On May 2, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jack wrote:

> Q4, The filter widths are actually much wider than that set on the  
> K2 display. ie 2KHz filter is actually about 3KHz wide. To get the  
> same "sound" as my other HF rigs I am having to set the filter  
> widths much narrower than expected. ie set the display to 1.2KHz  
> width to get an actual 1.8KHz width trace on spectrogram. Is this  
> normal? Can this be adjusted? Am I worrying about nothing? :o)

Interesting. On our K2 the reported filter width was narrower than  
reported by the K2. I set the 3dB points using an audio spectrum  
analyzer and found that using a setting of almost 1KHz to get a 500Hz-
wide filter. No problem changing widths to anything I want but it  
seems that the reported widths and actual widths vary widely. The only  
way to know for sure is to sweep the filter or dump in noise and  
analyze with the audio spec-A.

BTW, for people using Macs, you can do the same filter setup using  
CocoaModem's spec-A display.

> Overall i am very happy with the recievers performance. The K2 has  
> taken over as main radio, pushing japanese sets aside.

Same here. The IC-706 has been removed from the shack at school and  
has been replaced by the K2 and a cheap 2M

>
> But if anyone could advise on the above, that would aid my learing  
> process. Thats one of the reasons why i bought it :o)

I would really like to hear why the actual filter width varies so  
widely from what the radio reports too.

Brian Lloyd
Granite Bay Montessori School          9330 Sierra College Bl
brian AT gbmontessori DOT com          Roseville, CA 95661
+1.916.367.2131 (voice)                +1.791.912.8170 (fax)

PGP key ID:          12095C52A32A1B6C
PGP key fingerprint: 3B1D BA11 4913 3254 B6E0  CC09 1209 5C52 A32A 1B6C




_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K2- setting the filters

Don Wilhelm-4
In reply to this post by Jack-123
Jack,

The KSB2 will always use its own filter (OP1, OP2 or OP3 - they are all
the same) to transmit.  The important thing is that the K2 will use the
BFO settings associated with FL1 for transmitting.  So if you do not
have the OP1 filter selected for SSB FL1, then the BFO frequencies will
not be correct for the OP1 filter.

It is not unusual for the actual widths of the variable filter to vary
substantially from those 'widths' shown on the K2 display.  That will
depend on the exact crystals used in the filter, the varactor
tolerances, and several other component tolerances.  It is always best
to measure the actual filter width with Spectrogram - that is more true
for the wide filters than the narrow CW filters - any discrepancy seems
to disappear at filter widths of about 400 Hz, which is 'amazingly' the
design center width of the variable filter.

You do not normally have to set FL2 to OP1.  The important filter is FL1
because it is used for transmit.  FL1 can also be used for receive, but
if the best transmitted signal quality results in a less than desirable
receive signal with FL1, then the recourse is to set FL2 to OP1 and use
that for receive.  BTW, I have almost never found that to be necessary
in the many K2s that I have set up for SSB.

As a first trial, set FL1 to OP1, then using Spectrogram, adjust the
BFOs for both LSB and USB so the passband is centered between markers
placed at 300 and 2600 Hz.  Then try using FL1 for both transmit and
receive.  If all is well, then set FL2 thru FL4 as you desire.  If the
transmit signal needs adjustment, set the markers between 250 and 2550
Hz and try again.  If your voice is quite unusually rich in low
frequencies, you could go as low as markers between 200 and 2500 Hz.  
Should you have to go that low on the transmit filter, then you will
likely have to set the FL2 filter to OP1 and adjust the BFOs for the
most pleasant received signal.

Take a look at the K2 dial calibration article on my website
http://w3fpr.qrpradio.com.  Part 3 of that article deals with the
filter/BFO alignment and includes information about setting the SSB filters.

73,
Don W3FPR

Jack wrote:

> I have been operating my K2 as a CW only radio for a few months and
> have now just added the KSB2 SSB board.
>
> When I only had CW, I set the filter widths and BFO settings as per
> the defaults advised and was very happy with it. However, since
> setting the default values suggested in the KSB2 book, I've discovered
> a few unanswered issues.
>
> Q1, Do I have to set FL1 to OP1? I was under the impression I had to.
> But a friend has set his FL1 to 2.4KHz. I know this is the filter that
> is used to transmit. Is it OK to narrow it down? Is there any benefit?
>
> Q2, Why does the book also say FL2 should be set to OP1 on SSB? Is
> this a typo?
>
> Q3, I have now set the filters using spectrogram. EVERYONE should do
> this, it is so easy and makes a huge difference. And the program is
> free! Do it !!!!
> I found that the default BFO values in the KSB2 book had CW and USB
> pretty much perfect, but LSB was way off (3 or 400Hz). Retuning with
> spectrogram has cured that and it sounds great on LSB now. Is it
> normal to be so far off?
>
> Q4, The filter widths are actually much wider than that set on the K2
> display. ie 2KHz filter is actually about 3KHz wide. To get the same
> "sound" as my other HF rigs I am having to set the filter widths much
> narrower than expected. ie set the display to 1.2KHz width to get an
> actual 1.8KHz width trace on spectrogram. Is this normal? Can this be
> adjusted? Am I worrying about nothing? :o)
>
> Overall i am very happy with the recievers performance. The K2 has
> taken over as main radio, pushing japanese sets aside.
> But if anyone could advise on the above, that would aid my learing
> process. Thats one of the reasons why i bought it :o)
>
>
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com