K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

Darwin, Keith
I recently added this filter to my K3 to go with the 2.7 KHz and 500 Hz filters it already has.  These are roofing filters so there is a question of whether or not they're needed - or even if they make a difference you can hear.
 
I've spent time tuning the bands (mostly 40) with my filter width set to 1.1 KHz and 1.0 KHz, listening to the difference as the crystal filter is engaged.  Is it needed?  I'd usually no.  Does it make a difference?  Most definitely!
 
I greatly prefer to operate with the 1.0 KHz filter engaged.  I can keep my DSP bandwidth wider while still rejecting noise from 2 KHz away.  The overall level of grunge in the receiver goes down when the crystal filter kicks in.  I used to run with the DSP set to about 700 Hz to get the overall sound I wanted.  With the crystal filter, I can open the DSP to 1000 Hz and get the same or more rejection of signals several KHz away. 
 
- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

Allan Taylor
I also have the 1.0 filter in my K3 (#740) and use it almost always
when in CW (in other words, all
the time!). I had a 1.0 filter in the main IF on my OmniVI and it was
great on CW. I only wished that
INRAD had made a matching 1.0 filter for the bandpass IF! I got the
matching set for the subrx, too
(2.7, 1.0, .4, .25).

Allan K7GT

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Darwin, Keith
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> I recently added this filter to my K3 to go with the 2.7 KHz and 500 Hz
> filters it already has.  These are roofing filters so there is a question of
> whether or not they're needed - or even if they make a difference you can
> hear.
>
> I've spent time tuning the bands (mostly 40) with my filter width set to 1.1
> KHz and 1.0 KHz, listening to the difference as the crystal filter is
> engaged.  Is it needed?  I'd usually no.  Does it make a difference?  Most
> definitely!
>
> I greatly prefer to operate with the 1.0 KHz filter engaged.  I can keep my
> DSP bandwidth wider while still rejecting noise from 2 KHz away.  The
> overall level of grunge in the receiver goes down when the crystal filter
> kicks in.  I used to run with the DSP set to about 700 Hz to get the overall
> sound I wanted.  With the crystal filter, I can open the DSP to 1000 Hz and
> get the same or more rejection of signals several KHz away.
>
> - Keith N1AS -
> - K3 711
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

N5GE
In reply to this post by Darwin, Keith
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:37:21 -0700, you wrote:

>I recently added this filter to my K3 to go with the 2.7 KHz and 500 Hz
>filters it already has.  These are roofing filters so there is a
>question of whether or not they're needed - or even if they make a
>difference you can hear.
>
>I've spent time tuning the bands (mostly 40) with my filter width set to
>1.1 KHz and 1.0 KHz, listening to the difference as the crystal filter
>is engaged.  Is it needed?  I'd usually no.  Does it make a difference?
>Most definitely!
>
>I greatly prefer to operate with the 1.0 KHz filter engaged.  I can keep
>my DSP bandwidth wider while still rejecting noise from 2 KHz away.  The
>overall level of grunge in the receiver goes down when the crystal
>filter kicks in.  I used to run with the DSP set to about 700 Hz to get
>the overall sound I wanted.  With the crystal filter, I can open the DSP
>to 1000 Hz and get the same or more rejection of signals several KHz
>away.  
>
>- Keith N1AS -
>- K3 711 -

With the selectivity the K3 has the 1k filter opens up just enough to
allow you not to miss weak stations while moving the vfo up and down
the band.  That's what I use it for.

Tom, N5GE

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

Buck - k4ia
In reply to this post by Darwin, Keith
And - remember you can set the filter to engage at a different DSP  width.  
Since the roofing filter has a fairly wide skirt you might want it  to engage
earlier.   For example, I have my 500hz filter engage when  the DSP is at
750hz.  That way, I get the roofing advantage earlier but can  still hear signals
in the DSP passband.

Alternatively you might want the  roofer to engage later.  I can see not
engaging the 1khz filter until you  got the DSP down below 1khz.  
 
Buck
k4ia
K3# 101


In a message dated 1/12/2009 5:22:38 P.M. Eastern  Standard Time,
[hidden email] writes:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:37:21 -0700, you  wrote:

>I recently added this filter to my K3 to go with the 2.7 KHz  and 500 Hz
>filters it already has.  These are roofing filters so  there is a
>question of whether or not they're needed - or even if they  make a
>difference you can hear.
>
>I've spent time tuning  the bands (mostly 40) with my filter width set to
>1.1 KHz and 1.0 KHz,  listening to the difference as the crystal filter
>is engaged.  Is it  needed?  I'd usually no.  Does it make a difference?
>Most  definitely!
>
>I greatly prefer to operate with the 1.0 KHz filter  engaged.  I can keep
>my DSP bandwidth wider while still rejecting  noise from 2 KHz away.  The
>overall level of grunge in the receiver  goes down when the crystal
>filter kicks in.  I used to run with the  DSP set to about 700 Hz to get
>the overall sound I wanted.  With the  crystal filter, I can open the DSP
>to 1000 Hz and get the same or more  rejection of signals several KHz
>away.  
>
>- Keith  N1AS -
>- K3 711 -

With the selectivity the K3 has the 1k filter  opens up just enough to
allow you not to miss weak stations while moving the  vfo up and down
the band.  That's what I use it for.

Tom,  N5GE


**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

Darwin, Keith

-----Original Message-----
And - remember you can set the filter to engage at a different DSP
width.  Alternatively you might want the  roofer to engage later.

Buck - k4ia - K3# 101
--------------------------

Yes, one of the games I wanted to play is to delay the 1000 Hz filter
until maybe 500 Hz. Then I can listen to how the filter really affects
the signals and junk that is in the DSP stop band.  Not that it really
matters a whole lot, since I'm really enjoying my K3 at bandwidths of
700 to 1000 Hz with the filter engaged.

- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 1.0 KHz filter for CW - Needed?

AD4C
In reply to this post by Darwin, Keith
I ordered my K3 #2192 with 6.0, 2.8, 2.1, 1.0 and 500Hz and I do use daily the 1.0 engaged with the DSP at 800Hz and it reject pretty good stations close moving the shift down some,besides it sounds very nice to my ears,only use the 500Hz roofing when band get too crowded.

AD4C



Darwin, Keith wrote
I recently added this filter to my K3 to go with the 2.7 KHz and 500 Hz
filters it already has.  These are roofing filters so there is a
question of whether or not they're needed - or even if they make a
difference you can hear.
 
I've spent time tuning the bands (mostly 40) with my filter width set to
1.1 KHz and 1.0 KHz, listening to the difference as the crystal filter
is engaged.  Is it needed?  I'd usually no.  Does it make a difference?
Most definitely!
 
I greatly prefer to operate with the 1.0 KHz filter engaged.  I can keep
my DSP bandwidth wider while still rejecting noise from 2 KHz away.  The
overall level of grunge in the receiver goes down when the crystal
filter kicks in.  I used to run with the DSP set to about 700 Hz to get
the overall sound I wanted.  With the crystal filter, I can open the DSP
to 1000 Hz and get the same or more rejection of signals several KHz
away.  
 
- Keith N1AS -
- K3 711 -

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com