K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k

Edward Dickinson, III
Do any field testers care of offer comments on the 2.7 k filter vs. the 2.8
k?


Regards,
Dick - KA5KKT/4

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k

N6TR
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:38:06PM -0400, Edward Dickinson, III wrote:

> Do any field testers care of offer comments on the 2.7 k filter vs. the 2.8
> k?

I believe all of the FT units have the 2.8 kHz filter in it.  So, no
way to compare them.  It works fine.

However, since this is your "roofing" filter - it probably doesn't
matter a whole bunch which one you have.  The DSP does the rest.

73 Tree N6TR
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k

Ed Muns, W0YK
In reply to this post by Edward Dickinson, III
> Do any field testers care of offer comments on the 2.7 k
> filter vs. the 2.8 k?

No 2.7 kHz 5-pole filters have been used in field test yet.

73,
Ed - W0YK

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 2.7 k Filter vs. 2.8 k

Tom Hammond-2
In reply to this post by Edward Dickinson, III
Dick:

I don't think any of us have had a chance to try the 2.7kHz filter.
It was not (yet) available when we received our FT K3s, so we only
had the option of taking the 2.8kHz filter.

73,

Tom Hammond   N0SS


At 12:38 09/18/2007, you wrote:

>Do any field testers care of offer comments on the 2.7 k filter vs. the 2.8
>k?
>
>
>Regards,
>Dick - KA5KKT/4
>
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to: [hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com