|
I just completed an installation of the K3 audio low pass filter board, the
one Lyle put out to individuals who wanted to try it. I was busy until now as the boards came out some time ago. It took a lot longer than expected because all the K3 DSP board holes were full of solder. The instructions seemed to indicate that four of the holes should have been clear, i.e., just stick the leads through. The instructions seemed to be missing a section though as they never suggested soldering four of the wires. I thought maybe a page was missing but the step numbers didn't seem to indicate missing steps. Anyway, solder wick and solder suckers didn't work. The holes are very small and it is tight quarters where a miscue of the soldering iron could cause damage. I finally had to heat the wire I wanted to put in the holes (resistor leads) and heat my way through the soldered holes. For future reference, what would be the right way to do this? I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. The solder leads on one side seemed to be down at the bottom of a narrow canyon caused by interfering components. Mike Scott - AE6WA Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA) NAQCC 3535 K3-100 #508 / KX1 #1311 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
|
In reply to this post by Mike Scott-7
G'day,
What about - how did it perform? Regards, Mike VP8NO ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Scott" <[hidden email]> To: <[hidden email]> Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 4:04 PM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Low Pass Filter |I just completed an installation of the K3 audio low pass filter board, the | one Lyle put out to individuals who wanted to try it. I was busy until now | as the boards came out some time ago. | | It took a lot longer than expected because all the K3 DSP board holes were | full of solder. The instructions seemed to indicate that four of the holes | should have been clear, i.e., just stick the leads through. The instructions | seemed to be missing a section though as they never suggested soldering four | of the wires. I thought maybe a page was missing but the step numbers didn't | seem to indicate missing steps. Anyway, solder wick and solder suckers | didn't work. The holes are very small and it is tight quarters where a | miscue of the soldering iron could cause damage. I finally had to heat the | wire I wanted to put in the holes (resistor leads) and heat my way through | the soldered holes. | | For future reference, what would be the right way to do this? | | I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing | headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked | at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. The | solder leads on one side seemed to be down at the bottom of a narrow canyon | caused by interfering components. | | Mike Scott - AE6WA | Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA) | NAQCC 3535 | K3-100 #508 / KX1 #1311 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by AC7AC
When I installed mine I just filled up the Via's a bit more and then was
able to get it all easily with the solder sucker. Although I was using a sucker connected to house air and capable of RoHS temps (although I'm not sure if I stepped up into those ranges). The board went in quite smoothly and I was very pleased with the sound enhancements. As far as installation I did a lil trick in that I put in the wires (all 6 of them) then cut each wire at a different height. That allows you to align each wire one at a time. Then I used the knurled nut from the headphones jack as a spacer off of the main DSP board before soldering. All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. ~Brett On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 13:39 -0700, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote: > I don't know who wrote the instructions you got. I've not worked on > installing that board. > > It sounds like it uses some open vias (the round 'grommets' that join traces > different opposite layers of the board together. > > I'd bet the person who created the document had a version with open vias. > However, I've noticed that some boards have the vias open and others have > them full of solder. > > Ron AC7AC > > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mike Scott > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 1:05 PM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Low Pass Filter > > I just completed an installation of the K3 audio low pass filter board, the > one Lyle put out to individuals who wanted to try it. I was busy until now > as the boards came out some time ago. > > It took a lot longer than expected because all the K3 DSP board holes were > full of solder. The instructions seemed to indicate that four of the holes > should have been clear, i.e., just stick the leads through. The instructions > seemed to be missing a section though as they never suggested soldering four > of the wires. I thought maybe a page was missing but the step numbers didn't > seem to indicate missing steps. Anyway, solder wick and solder suckers > didn't work. The holes are very small and it is tight quarters where a > miscue of the soldering iron could cause damage. I finally had to heat the > wire I wanted to put in the holes (resistor leads) and heat my way through > the soldered holes. > > For future reference, what would be the right way to do this? > > I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing > headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked > at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. The > solder leads on one side seemed to be down at the bottom of a narrow canyon > caused by interfering components. > > Mike Scott - AE6WA > Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA) > NAQCC 3535 > K3-100 #508 / KX1 #1311 > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
> I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing
> headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked > at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. Patience, good eyesight, a steady hand and a narrow soldering pencil. Removal isn't quite as tricky as replacement with the radial caps. The one thing to keep in mind is that the SMD pads cannot take any lateral stress with leaded components or breakage will surely result. During installation of the new caps, they must be positioned against the headphone jack while heating/soldering with a pencil. Then, a hot glue gun is used to bond the caps against the headphone jack. The caps cannot be "straightened" after heating or the pads will lift. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
G'day,
| All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. | | ~Brett OK, that's couple of positive comments. Is there any technical data on the characteristics of this filter. For example, does it in any way respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise thread of a few weeks ago. I've become rather more interested in this since reactivating my K2 and running it side by side with the K3. The K2 sounds so much nicer even in the presence of a received S3 buzzy background noise. If only the K2 power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my amp a hard time... Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement in the K2 as soon as I installed the analogue af CW filter years ago. In SSB mode the filter just introduces a low pass filter which takes the hiss out of the audio and made it really smooth to listen to. I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and replicated the K2 af spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can make them sound the same but they don't. My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. Regards, Mike VP8NO K2 #1400 K3 #345 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
There has to be a set of SMT caps that will fit back down onto those
pads... Has anyone looked for that yet? If there isn't a set of caps that fit those pads with the right specs then that means that Elecraft had to spin the board when they started putting those caps in there. ~Brett On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 18:37 -0400, Paul Christensen wrote: > > I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing > > headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked > > at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. > > Patience, good eyesight, a steady hand and a narrow soldering pencil. > Removal isn't quite as tricky as replacement with the radial caps. The one > thing to keep in mind is that the SMD pads cannot take any lateral stress > with leaded components or breakage will surely result. > > During installation of the new caps, they must be positioned against the > headphone jack while heating/soldering with a pencil. Then, a hot glue gun > is used to bond the caps against the headphone jack. The caps cannot be > "straightened" after heating or the pads will lift. > > Paul, W9AC > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike Harris-9
Its a low pass filter starting around 3.8Khz or so. I have some before
and after plots. I just need to get around to posting them so I can put them up on the reflector. On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Harris wrote: > G'day, > > | All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. > | > | ~Brett > > OK, that's couple of positive comments. Is there any technical data on > the characteristics of this filter. For example, does it in any way > respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise thread of a few weeks ago. > > I've become rather more interested in this since reactivating my K2 and > running it side by side with the K3. The K2 sounds so much nicer even in > the presence of a received S3 buzzy background noise. If only the K2 > power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my amp a hard time... > > Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement in the K2 as soon > as I installed the analogue af CW filter years ago. In SSB mode the > filter just introduces a low pass filter which takes the hiss out of the > audio and made it really smooth to listen to. > > I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and replicated the K2 af > spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can make them sound the > same but they don't. > > My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. > > Regards, > > Mike VP8NO > K2 #1400 > K3 #345 > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
What is the point of insertion (in terms of the schematic) for this filter?
Bob NW8L On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Brett Howard<[hidden email]> wrote: > Its a low pass filter starting around 3.8Khz or so. Â I have some before > and after plots. Â I just need to get around to posting them so I can put > them up on the reflector. > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Harris wrote: >> G'day, >> >> | All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. >> | >> | ~Brett >> >> OK, that's couple of positive comments. Â Is there any technical data on >> the characteristics of this filter. Â For example, does it in any way >> respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise thread of a few weeks ago. >> >> I've become rather more interested in this since reactivating my K2 and >> running it side by side with the K3. Â The K2 sounds so much nicer even in >> the presence of a received S3 buzzy background noise. Â If only the K2 >> power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my amp a hard time... >> >> Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement in the K2 as soon >> as I installed the analogue af CW filter years ago. Â In SSB mode the >> filter just introduces a low pass filter which takes the hiss out of the >> audio and made it really smooth to listen to. >> >> I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and replicated the K2 af >> spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can make them sound the >> same but they don't. >> >> My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. >> >> Regards, >> >> Mike VP8NO >> K2 #1400 >> K3 #345 >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike Scott-7
Mike,
The method that I use to clear holes in pcbs that are filled with solder is similar to pushing a heated wire through the hole, but I use a sewing needle instead because solder will not stick to a needle. As you did with with the wire, keep heating the needle with an iron while pushing it gently down through the hole, until some of the needle passes through the hole.You will have to get rid of any "blobs" of solder that fall out during the process of course. Working in close quarters is not difficult with this method I keep a number of sewing needles of different diameters/ lengths at hand for this purpose which I "borrowed" temporarily from my XYL many years ago, and to some of them I have added a small diameter grip at the thread end, so that I can hold the needle by hand when I do not want to use needle nose pliars. It is a good idea to keep Vias open and not filled with solder, otherwise they may not function properly in some cases, but be careful not to damage a Via when removing solder. 73, Geoff GM4ESD Mike Scott wrote on Friday, July 03, 2009 at 9:04 PM: >I just completed an installation of the K3 audio low pass filter board, the > one Lyle put out to individuals who wanted to try it. I was busy until now > as the boards came out some time ago. > > It took a lot longer than expected because all the K3 DSP board holes were > full of solder. The instructions seemed to indicate that four of the holes > should have been clear, i.e., just stick the leads through. The > instructions > seemed to be missing a section though as they never suggested soldering > four > of the wires. I thought maybe a page was missing but the step numbers > didn't > seem to indicate missing steps. Anyway, solder wick and solder suckers > didn't work. The holes are very small and it is tight quarters where a > miscue of the soldering iron could cause damage. I finally had to heat the > wire I wanted to put in the holes (resistor leads) and heat my way through > the soldered holes. > > For future reference, what would be the right way to do this? > > I would like to consider making more audio modifications, the one changing > headphone audio coupling capacitors to larger values for example. I looked > at those capacitors and I wondered how I was going to get them out. The > solder leads on one side seemed to be down at the bottom of a narrow > canyon > caused by interfering components. > > Mike Scott - AE6WA > Tarzana, CA (DM04 / near LA) > NAQCC 3535 > K3-100 #508 / KX1 #1311 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Bob Cunnings NW8L
Its installed in the speaker outputs. So it doesn't modify the
headphone circuits but I use it via speaker at home most of the time... I should take a look and see if the headphone output had that 11-12khz stuff on it... ~Brett On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 18:21 -0600, Bob Cunnings wrote: > What is the point of insertion (in terms of the schematic) for this filter? > > Bob NW8L > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Brett Howard<[hidden email]> wrote: > > Its a low pass filter starting around 3.8Khz or so. I have some before > > and after plots. I just need to get around to posting them so I can put > > them up on the reflector. > > > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Harris wrote: > >> G'day, > >> > >> | All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. > >> | > >> | ~Brett > >> > >> OK, that's couple of positive comments. Is there any technical data on > >> the characteristics of this filter. For example, does it in any way > >> respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise thread of a few weeks ago. > >> > >> I've become rather more interested in this since reactivating my K2 and > >> running it side by side with the K3. The K2 sounds so much nicer even in > >> the presence of a received S3 buzzy background noise. If only the K2 > >> power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my amp a hard time... > >> > >> Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement in the K2 as soon > >> as I installed the analogue af CW filter years ago. In SSB mode the > >> filter just introduces a low pass filter which takes the hiss out of the > >> audio and made it really smooth to listen to. > >> > >> I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and replicated the K2 af > >> spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can make them sound the > >> same but they don't. > >> > >> My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Mike VP8NO > >> K2 #1400 > >> K3 #345 > >> > >> ______________________________________________________________ > >> Elecraft mailing list > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
> Its installed in the speaker outputs. That's a shame, It should be in the common feed to both the headphone and speaker amplifiers. > I should take a look and see if the headphone > output had that 11-12khz stuff on it... Yes, it's coming out of the DSP DAC ... it's present on all three (headphone, speaker and line) outputs. 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Brett Howard > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:08 PM > To: Bob Cunnings > Cc: Elecraft > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Low Pass Filter > > > Its installed in the speaker outputs. So it doesn't modify > the headphone circuits but I use it via speaker at home most > of the time... I should take a look and see if the headphone > output had that 11-12khz stuff on it... > > ~Brett > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 18:21 -0600, Bob Cunnings wrote: > > What is the point of insertion (in terms of the schematic) for this > > filter? > > > > Bob NW8L > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Brett > Howard<[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > Its a low pass filter starting around 3.8Khz or so. I have some > > > before and after plots. I just need to get around to > posting them > > > so I can put them up on the reflector. > > > > > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Harris wrote: > > >> G'day, > > >> > > >> | All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. > > >> | > > >> | ~Brett > > >> > > >> OK, that's couple of positive comments. Is there any technical > > >> data on the characteristics of this filter. For > example, does it > > >> in any way respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise > thread of a few > > >> weeks ago. > > >> > > >> I've become rather more interested in this since > reactivating my K2 > > >> and running it side by side with the K3. The K2 sounds so much > > >> nicer even in the presence of a received S3 buzzy > background noise. > > >> If only the K2 power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my > amp a hard > > >> time... > > >> > > >> Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement > in the K2 > > >> as soon as I installed the analogue af CW filter years > ago. In SSB > > >> mode the filter just introduces a low pass filter which > takes the > > >> hiss out of the audio and made it really smooth to listen to. > > >> > > >> I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and > replicated the K2 > > >> af spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can > make them > > >> sound the same but they don't. > > >> > > >> My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Mike VP8NO > > >> K2 #1400 > > >> K3 #345 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike Scott-7
> There has to be a set of SMT caps that will fit back down onto those
pads... Has anyone looked for that yet? ~Brett I've looked. The problem is in getting more than 100 uF of C in the given PCB real estate with SMT components. At 220-330 uF, radial caps are required, unless Elecraft was to redesign the PCB. As much as I like the new low-end warmth, I'm in the minority. Many folks detest bass response in a communications receiver and I completely respect that. In all fairness to Elecraft, I wouldn't change the PCB layout to accommodate the caps unless it was part of some other re-design work. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Is stacking 2 high possible to get enough cap?
Merv KH7C >> There has to be a set of SMT caps that will fit back down onto those >> > pads... Has anyone looked for that yet? ~Brett > > I've looked. The problem is in getting more than 100 uF of C in the given > PCB real estate with SMT components. At 220-330 uF, radial caps are > required, unless Elecraft was to redesign the PCB. > > As much as I like the new low-end warmth, I'm in the minority. Many folks > detest bass response in a communications receiver and I completely respect > that. In all fairness to Elecraft, I wouldn't change the PCB layout to > accommodate the caps unless it was part of some other re-design work. > > Paul, W9AC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
I could be wrong... I'll have to take a closer look... Or I guess I
could just take some audio measurements of the headphones port. ~Brett On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 21:37 -0400, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > Its installed in the speaker outputs. > > That's a shame, It should be in the common feed to both > the headphone and speaker amplifiers. > > > I should take a look and see if the headphone > > output had that 11-12khz stuff on it... > > Yes, it's coming out of the DSP DAC ... it's present on all > three (headphone, speaker and line) outputs. > > 73, > > ... Joe, W4TV > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [hidden email] > > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Brett Howard > > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 9:08 PM > > To: Bob Cunnings > > Cc: Elecraft > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Audio Low Pass Filter > > > > > > Its installed in the speaker outputs. So it doesn't modify > > the headphone circuits but I use it via speaker at home most > > of the time... I should take a look and see if the headphone > > output had that 11-12khz stuff on it... > > > > ~Brett > > > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 18:21 -0600, Bob Cunnings wrote: > > > What is the point of insertion (in terms of the schematic) for this > > > filter? > > > > > > Bob NW8L > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Brett > > Howard<[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > Its a low pass filter starting around 3.8Khz or so. I have some > > > > before and after plots. I just need to get around to > > posting them > > > > so I can put them up on the reflector. > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Harris wrote: > > > >> G'day, > > > >> > > > >> | All in all I'm quite pleased with the sound difference. > > > >> | > > > >> | ~Brett > > > >> > > > >> OK, that's couple of positive comments. Is there any technical > > > >> data on the characteristics of this filter. For > > example, does it > > > >> in any way respond to the "pink" vs. "white" noise > > thread of a few > > > >> weeks ago. > > > >> > > > >> I've become rather more interested in this since > > reactivating my K2 > > > >> and running it side by side with the K3. The K2 sounds so much > > > >> nicer even in the presence of a received S3 buzzy > > background noise. > > > >> If only the K2 power overshoot on 40M SSB didn't give my > > amp a hard > > > >> time... > > > >> > > > >> Now to put this in context, there was a huge improvement > > in the K2 > > > >> as soon as I installed the analogue af CW filter years > > ago. In SSB > > > >> mode the filter just introduces a low pass filter which > > takes the > > > >> hiss out of the audio and made it really smooth to listen to. > > > >> > > > >> I have played with the DSP bandwidth settings and > > replicated the K2 > > > >> af spectrum as displayed in Spectrogram to see if I can > > make them > > > >> sound the same but they don't. > > > >> > > > >> My agc and equalizer settings are nothing unusual or extreme. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Mike VP8NO > > > >> K2 #1400 > > > >> K3 #345 > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
I've been informed Elecraft is already replacing those caps with 100uF
caps in the current production units. ~Brett On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 21:50 -0400, Paul Christensen wrote: > > There has to be a set of SMT caps that will fit back down onto those > pads... Has anyone looked for that yet? ~Brett > > I've looked. The problem is in getting more than 100 uF of C in the given > PCB real estate with SMT components. At 220-330 uF, radial caps are > required, unless Elecraft was to redesign the PCB. > > As much as I like the new low-end warmth, I'm in the minority. Many folks > detest bass response in a communications receiver and I completely respect > that. In all fairness to Elecraft, I wouldn't change the PCB layout to > accommodate the caps unless it was part of some other re-design work. > > Paul, W9AC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
>> There has to be a set of SMT caps that will fit back down onto those
> pads... Has anyone looked for that yet? ~Brett Current production radios use 100 uF capacitors in those positions,using the existing pads. Lyle KK7P (on the road) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
This is described as a low pass filter, so presumably it cuts some of the highs rather than increasing the lows. I think I'm missing the point of this modification. What does this achieve which centering the IF passband at 1.4KHz or lower instead of 1.5KHz or using the RX EQ settings doesn't?
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html |
|
In reply to this post by Brett Howard
> I've been informed Elecraft is already replacing those caps with 100uF
> caps in the current production units. 100 uF is the maximum size compatible with the existing PCB pads for C9/C13 on the main DSP Board. Moving up beyond 100 uF presents a problem. Even at 100 uF, I believe the SMT caps are now rated at close to 10 WVDC. There's just no more scaling back on the SMT cap's voltage rating in order to accommodate a fit with a higher C value above 100 uF. Why would anyone want a higher value than 100 uF at C9/C13? Consider a set of modern, medium-Z headphones with a Z of 32 ohms at 100 Hz. The -3dB turnover point calculates to roughly 150 Hz. Anyone wanting to take full advantage of the lowest vocal fundamental (e.g., AM or ESSB modes) wants that point down to ~ 70 Hz. So, a cap value of 220 uF would be preferred. I went to 330 uF in a radial style to allow extra margin for a wide range of headphone vintages and types. To make most use of the 100 uF coupling caps, I would ensure that my headphones are of the newer, medium Z type and not the older style with 4-8 ohm drivers. My guess is that scaling the caps beyond 100 uF is only of interest to a small minority of ops. The majority will probably be happy with the current choice of 100 uF. Going from 10 uF in the prior design to 100 uF is already a significant step in the right direction. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 11:23 -0400, Paul Christensen wrote:
> > I've been informed Elecraft is already replacing those caps with 100uF > > caps in the current production units. ... > Why would anyone want a higher value than 100 uF at C9/C13? Consider a set > of modern, medium-Z headphones with a Z of 32 ohms at 100 Hz. The -3dB > turnover point calculates to roughly 150 Hz. Actually, 100 uF into 32 ohms gives 50 Hz bandwidth at -3 dB. Into an 8-ohm load you get 200 Hz at -3 dB, still fine for a voice signal although marginal for music. If you want better low-frequency response, just stick a resistor in series with the speaker. That does mean you have to turn up the volume, but you do get plenty of bass (assuming your speaker or phones can go that low). A 33-ohm resistor would give as much bass as your headphones are likely to be able to reproduce. Al N1AL ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
