[K3] Built-in features and side-effects

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[K3] Built-in features and side-effects

Rick Miller - N1RM
My take on this is the following:

Given that the K3 has a non-scalable user interface with it's fixed LCD panel and silk-screened knob and button labels, providing "convenience" features through the addition of "side-effects" to existing control functions is probably a bad idea.  We may be seeing the limits of the UI on the front panel with knobs that you can turn, tap, press and hold for one second, press and hold for one second then turn, press and hold for three seconds then turn.  (There really is a knob like that!).

The goals should be "minimize surprises" and "do no harm" from pushing a button or turning a knob.  That can probably never be attained, but it should be the goal.  For example, if I set the output power to 10 watts and then switch bands to 80 meters and I'm suddenly running 100 watts, I personally would be surprised - especially if the first indication of the higher power is a sizzling sound.

It is becoming blazingly clear that the processing power and extentensive set of control points in the radio provide far more flexibility than can be easily and intuitively expressed through the front panel.  More customized behavior should be handled through the computer control interface, either with a PC or a purpose-built controller, or through an obvious, logical, but perhaps lengthy, sequence of front panel control actuations.

As the user base becomes larger and more experienced, changes to the behavior of front panel controls should be selectable through the menu system - with the default being the "old" behavior - lest we constantly need to retrain ourselves.

Just my opinion.  Balancing efficiency against intuitive behavior, especially with a user interface that is reaching its limits, is a very hard problem.

73 and have fun!

Rick
AI1V
K3 #728

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

Craig Smith

<> It is becoming blazingly clear that the processing power and extentensive
<> set of control points in the radio provide far more flexibility than can
be
<> easily and intuitively expressed through the front panel.  

I agree, Rick - nicely said.  

Here's how I would like to see it implemented.  We need a "self-contained"
panadaptor option from Elecraft.   By "self-contained" I mean an external
box that connects to the K3 with a single cable and has connectors to plug
in a keyboard, a mouse, and a standard LCD display.  I would like to see the
associated software, in the default mode, dedicate the upper half of the LCD
display to the panadaptor.  The lower half of the display should be a front
panel extension for the K3.  This area can be used for the implementation of
the "overflow" functions that are not possible to implement ergonomically on
the hardware front panel.  These functions can be operated with programmable
keys on the keyboard and/or by mouse clicks.

                73
                         ...   Craig  AC0DS


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

Dan Barker
What you said, except: Touch Screen! Why chase down the mouse?

Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456

<snip>

Here's how I would like to see it implemented.  We need a "self-contained"
panadaptor option from Elecraft.   By "self-contained" I mean an external
box that connects to the K3 with a single cable and has connectors to plug
in a keyboard, a mouse, and a standard LCD display.  I would like to see the
associated software, in the default mode, dedicate the upper half of the LCD
display to the panadaptor.  The lower half of the display should be a front
panel extension for the K3.  This area can be used for the implementation of
the "overflow" functions that are not possible to implement ergonomically on
the hardware front panel.  These functions can be operated with programmable
keys on the keyboard and/or by mouse clicks.

                73
                         ...   Craig  AC0DS
</snip>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

Julian, G4ILO
Dan Barker wrote
What you said, except: Touch Screen! Why chase down the mouse?

Dan / WG4S / K2 #2456

<snip>

Here's how I would like to see it implemented.  We need a "self-contained"
panadaptor option from Elecraft.   By "self-contained" I mean an external
box that connects to the K3 with a single cable and has connectors to plug
in a keyboard, a mouse, and a standard LCD display.  I would like to see the
associated software, in the default mode, dedicate the upper half of the LCD
display to the panadaptor.  The lower half of the display should be a front
panel extension for the K3.  This area can be used for the implementation of
the "overflow" functions that are not possible to implement ergonomically on
the hardware front panel.  These functions can be operated with programmable
keys on the keyboard and/or by mouse clicks.

                73
                         ...   Craig  AC0DS
</snip>
OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. You can already do all that with computer software and an SDR interface to the IF output. I never see a picture of a shack, never mind a DXpedition or contest site, where a computer isn't being used. So why would anyone need a dedicated and probably complex and expensive box?

Okay, perhaps you can't have touch screen just yet, though the next version of Windows is rumored to have this. But in any case, could you click as accurately on a signal with your finger as you could with a mouse?
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392  K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com
* KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html
* KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

Craig Smith

<> OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. You can already do all that
<> with computer software and an SDR interface to the IF output. I never see
a
<> picture of a shack, never mind a DXpedition or contest site, where a
<> computer isn't being used. So why would anyone need a dedicated and
probably
<> complex and expensive box?

Yes, you are correct - It can all be done with an external computer.  But
with how much hassle?  I've been following the first user experiences with
the LP-Pan panadaptor that uses this approach.  I have great respect for
Larry's designs and am convinced that the performance of the panadaptor is
superb - I may even own one someday.  However the email reflector contains
mostly item after item discussing sound card compatability, cabling
connections, operating systems, third party SDR software configurations,
etc. etc. etc.

       I LIKE playing with radios!   I DON'T like playing with computers !!!

The above sentiment is a personal one.  I'm sure there are many others that
enjoy fussing with computers.  I'm just not one of them.

              73
                        ... Craig  AC0DS




<>
<> Okay, perhaps you can't have touch screen just yet, though the next
version
<> of Windows is rumored to have this. But in any case, could you click as
<> accurately on a signal with your finger as you could with a mouse?
<>
<> -----
<> Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
<> G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
<> Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
<> --
<> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-K3--Built-in-features-and-
<> side-effects-tp17762047p17765647.html
<> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
<>
<> _______________________________________________
<> Elecraft mailing list
<> Post to: [hidden email]
<> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
<> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
<>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
<>
<> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
<> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

Bill W4ZV

Craig D. Smith wrote
<> OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. You can already do all that
<> with computer software and an SDR interface to the IF output. I never see
a
<> picture of a shack, never mind a DXpedition or contest site, where a
<> computer isn't being used. So why would anyone need a dedicated and
probably
<> complex and expensive box?

Yes, you are correct - It can all be done with an external computer.  But
with how much hassle?  I've been following the first user experiences with
the LP-Pan panadaptor that uses this approach.  I have great respect for
Larry's designs and am convinced that the performance of the panadaptor is
superb - I may even own one someday.  However the email reflector contains
mostly item after item discussing sound card compatability, cabling
connections, operating systems, third party SDR software configurations,
etc. etc. etc.

       I LIKE playing with radios!   I DON'T like playing with computers !!!

The above sentiment is a personal one.  I'm sure there are many others that
enjoy fussing with computers.  I'm just not one of them.
I feel the same way Craig, but it's not as complex as you think.  Order an LP-PAN ($175 kit or $225 assembled), order one of the *two* recommended sound cards (available for ~$100 shipped) and follow Larry's instructions.  Both Ham Radio Deluxe (used by PowerSDR-IF for rig control) and PowerSDR-IF are free.  I'm using an old 1.1GHz P3 with 1GB RAM and my system works well with PowerSDR at 96 kHz (fine since I'm 99.9% CW).

If your display is large enough, you can do exactly what someone suggested and have both HRD for rig control and the PowerSDR Panadaptor running on the same screen.

73,  Bill
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Built-in features and side-effects

ab2tc
FYI, I have recently installed the LP-PAN and it's working beautifully with my K3. My 2GHz dual core PC has no problem with the full 192kHz scan width. Very nice. I am already completely dependent on a PC for logging, QRZ.COM, DX cluster, so this makes no difference in that regard. I do not think Elecraft is well advised developing boxes with the aim to eliminate a PC which are sold by the millions and provide much more CPU power per dollar.

Knut - AB2TC


Bill W4ZV wrote
Craig D. Smith wrote
<> OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. You can already do all that
<> with computer software and an SDR interface to the IF output. I never see
a
<> picture of a shack, never mind a DXpedition or contest site, where a
<> computer isn't being used. So why would anyone need a dedicated and
probably
<> complex and expensive box?

.
I feel the same way Craig, but it's not as complex as you think.  Order an LP-PAN ($175 kit or $225 assembled), order one of the *two* recommended sound cards (available for ~$100 shipped) and follow Larry's instructions.  Both Ham Radio Deluxe (used by PowerSDR-IF for rig control) and PowerSDR-IF are free.  I'm using an old 1.1GHz P3 with 1GB RAM and my system works well with PowerSDR at 96 kHz (fine since I'm 99.9% CW).

If your display is large enough, you can do exactly what someone suggested and have both HRD for rig control and the PowerSDR Panadaptor running on the same screen.

73,  Bill
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Built-in features and side-effects

Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
In reply to this post by Julian, G4ILO
Julian G4ILO wrote on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 10:55 PM


 > OK, I'm going to play devil's advocate here. You can already do all that
> with computer software and an SDR interface to the IF output. I never see
> a
> picture of a shack, never mind a DXpedition or contest site, where a
> computer isn't being used. So why would anyone need a dedicated and
> probably
> complex and expensive box?

To avoid 'computer problems' :-)

73,
Geoff
GM4ESD

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Built-in features and side-effects

ac0h
In reply to this post by Craig Smith
So, how is adding a keyboard, I assume mouse port for point and click
tuning, and a video output for the much bigger, better, and inevitable
20" LCD display to an Elecraft "box" different than running the LP-PAN
with a computer?

The computer is going to win the performance, flexibility and usability
question every time.

If I was going to do a pan adapter for the K3 I'd run down to Costco,
Sam Club, hell, even Best Buy and pick up a $500 PC, bump the memory up
to 2G, might spend another $100 on improved video system, $100 bucks for
the E-MU 0202 sound card, $175 for the LP-Pan and for less than $1K I've
got a pan adapter which will run circles around anything Elecraft can
put in one box.


Craig D. Smith wrote:

> Yes, you are correct - It can all be done with an external computer.  But
> with how much hassle?  I've been following the first user experiences with
> the LP-Pan panadaptor that uses this approach.  I have great respect for
> Larry's designs and am convinced that the performance of the panadaptor is
> superb - I may even own one someday.  However the email reflector contains
> mostly item after item discussing sound card compatability, cabling
> connections, operating systems, third party SDR software configurations,
> etc. etc. etc.
>
>        I LIKE playing with radios!   I DON'T like playing with computers !!!
>
> The above sentiment is a personal one.  I'm sure there are many others that
> enjoy fussing with computers.  I'm just not one of them.
>
>               73
>                         ... Craig  AC0DS
>
>
>
>
> <>
> <> Okay, perhaps you can't have touch screen just yet, though the next
> version
> <> of Windows is rumored to have this. But in any case, could you click as
> <> accurately on a signal with your finger as you could with a mouse?
> <>
> <> -----
> <> Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
> <> G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
> <> Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
> <> --
> <> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-K3--Built-in-features-and-
> <> side-effects-tp17762047p17765647.html
> <> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> <>
> <> _______________________________________________
> <> Elecraft mailing list
> <> Post to: [hidden email]
> <> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> <> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> <>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> <>
> <> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> <> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>  

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Built-in features and side-effects

Don Wilhelm-4
Kevin,

You are absolutely correct - computers have become quite inexpensive.  I
used to put together my computer systems from the motherboard on up, but
now it is less expensive just to buy a new machine.  I know TigerDirect
has off-lease computers running in the 2 to 3 GHz range for less than
$200 and a new computer can be had for $500 at many places.
Get yourself a good computer plus a capable soundcard and there will be
a LOT less 'playing' with it - load the applications and go.
I believe many of the 'problems' and related forum comments encountered
stems from attempting to use whatever old computer is laying around for
compute intensive operations.  In other words, trying to use that trusty
old 233 MHz computer with 64 Meg of RAM and a 10 GB hard drive running
Windows 95 will just not hack it with the applications needed for SDR
processing.   Attempting to do something similar is a sure recipe for
frustration.

73,
Don W3FPR

Kevin wrote:

> So, how is adding a keyboard, I assume mouse port for point and click
> tuning, and a video output for the much bigger, better, and inevitable
> 20" LCD display to an Elecraft "box" different than running the LP-PAN
> with a computer?
>
> The computer is going to win the performance, flexibility and
> usability question every time.
>
> If I was going to do a pan adapter for the K3 I'd run down to Costco,
> Sam Club, hell, even Best Buy and pick up a $500 PC, bump the memory
> up to 2G, might spend another $100 on improved video system, $100
> bucks for the E-MU 0202 sound card, $175 for the LP-Pan and for less
> than $1K I've got a pan adapter which will run circles around anything
> Elecraft can put in one box.
>
>
> Craig D. Smith wrote:
>> Yes, you are correct - It can all be done with an external computer.  
>> But
>> with how much hassle?  I've been following the first user experiences
>> with
>> the LP-Pan panadaptor that uses this approach.  I have great respect for
>> Larry's designs and am convinced that the performance of the
>> panadaptor is
>> superb - I may even own one someday.  However the email reflector
>> contains
>> mostly item after item discussing sound card compatability, cabling
>> connections, operating systems, third party SDR software configurations,
>> etc. etc. etc.
>>        I LIKE playing with radios!   I DON'T like playing with
>> computers !!!
>>
>> The above sentiment is a personal one.  I'm sure there are many
>> others that
>> enjoy fussing with computers.  I'm just not one of them.
>>
>>               73
>>                         ... Craig  AC0DS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <> <> Okay, perhaps you can't have touch screen just yet, though the
>> next
>> version
>> <> of Windows is rumored to have this. But in any case, could you
>> click as
>> <> accurately on a signal with your finger as you could with a mouse?
>> <> <> -----
>> <> Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
>> <> G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
>> <> Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
>> <> --
>> <> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-K3--Built-in-features-and-
>> <> side-effects-tp17762047p17765647.html
>> <> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> <> <> _______________________________________________
>> <> Elecraft mailing list
>> <> Post to: [hidden email]
>> <> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> <> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>> <>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> <> <> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> <> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: [hidden email]
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>>  
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1497 - Release Date: 6/11/2008 8:32 AM
>  
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Built-in features and side-effects

WA8EBM
In reply to this post by ac0h
Amen to that Kevin!
I picked up a bare bones computer at Circuit City a while back.  Added
memory, SantaCruz soundcard and now a EMU-202 USB soundcard and using it
with LP Pan adapter, sometimes directly into the bare K3or use the  Microham
Microkeyer, Microham  BandDecoder to my PW-1.  Put on a Widescreen monitor
and it is my perfect complement to the K3 along with the digital display to
my ArraySolutions PowerMaster wattmeter. HRD and 780 look great on the
widescreen.
I am sure Elecraft engineers would do a better job than Yaesu did with the
DMU-2000 for the FT-2000 but they could not be anywhere near as flexible as
a PC and peripherals.
                         Mike WA8EBM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Cc: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Built-in features and side-effects


> So, how is adding a keyboard, I assume mouse port for point and click
> tuning, and a video output for the much bigger, better, and inevitable 20"
> LCD display to an Elecraft "box" different than running the LP-PAN with a
> computer?
>
> The computer is going to win the performance, flexibility and usability
> question every time.
>
> If I was going to do a pan adapter for the K3 I'd run down to Costco, Sam
> Club, hell, even Best Buy and pick up a $500 PC, bump the memory up to 2G,
> might spend another $100 on improved video system, $100 bucks for the E-MU
> 0202 sound card, $175 for the LP-Pan and for less than $1K I've got a pan
> adapter which will run circles around anything Elecraft can put in one
> box.
>
>
> Craig D. Smith wrote:
>> Yes, you are correct - It can all be done with an external computer.  But
>> with how much hassle?  I've been following the first user experiences
>> with
>> the LP-Pan panadaptor that uses this approach.  I have great respect for
>> Larry's designs and am convinced that the performance of the panadaptor
>> is
>> superb - I may even own one someday.  However the email reflector
>> contains
>> mostly item after item discussing sound card compatability, cabling
>> connections, operating systems, third party SDR software configurations,
>> etc. etc. etc.
>>        I LIKE playing with radios!   I DON'T like playing with computers
>> !!!
>>
>> The above sentiment is a personal one.  I'm sure there are many others
>> that
>> enjoy fussing with computers.  I'm just not one of them.
>>
>>               73
>>                         ... Craig  AC0DS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <> <> Okay, perhaps you can't have touch screen just yet, though the next
>> version
>> <> of Windows is rumored to have this. But in any case, could you click
>> as
>> <> accurately on a signal with your finger as you could with a mouse?
>> <> <> -----
>> <> Julian, G4ILO  K3 s/n: 222 K2 s/n: 392
>> <> G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com
>> <> Zerobeat Ham Forums: www.zerobeat.net/smf
>> <> --
>> <> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/-K3--Built-in-features-and-
>> <> side-effects-tp17762047p17765647.html
>> <> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> <> <> _______________________________________________
>> <> Elecraft mailing list
>> <> Post to: [hidden email]
>> <> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> <> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>> <>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> <> <> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> <> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Post to: [hidden email]
>> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
>>  http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Post to: [hidden email]
> You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Built-in features and side-effects

Simon (HB9DRV)
I use 24" 1900 x 1200 monitors, although I say it myself DM780 is nice to
use with this resolution.

I also agree that given the cost of PC's the best option is to grab the data
from the radio and put it on a screen - before long we'll have the PC built
into the monitor, probably using an Intel Atom CPU.

FWIW the new IC-7200 has a USB connector providing CAT and soundcard
output - before long we'll have a radio with USB which provides CAT,
soundcard and bandscope data.

Simon Brown, HB9DRV

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Penkas" <[hidden email]>

> I am sure Elecraft engineers would do a better job than Yaesu did with the
> DMU-2000 for the FT-2000 but they could not be anywhere near as flexible
> as a PC and peripherals.
 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com