Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts concerning
filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW operator, mostly chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm looking for recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter for contesting and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for casual looking around and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY [hidden email] Syracuse, New York, USA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Robert,
Since you are an experienced CW operator you already know what bandwidth(s) you like. For the K3 you need the roofing filters for those bandwidths, just like a transceiver without DSP. If your Roofing filter is too wide, you'll be in trouble if signals nearby are stronger than about S9+20. If those strong sigs pass through your roofing filter, the DSP will not take them out completely and your agc will be pumped up, often sounds like keyclicks. As soon as the roofing filter keeps the strong signals out, the K3 is super! My filters: 400Hz 8-pole and 200Hz 5-pole. Did the CQ160cw with this config last weekend at clubstation PI4D. We had a very good time! 73 Arie PA3A Op 3-2-2012 21:14, Robert G. Strickland schreef: > Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts concerning > filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW operator, mostly > chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm looking for > recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter for contesting > and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for casual looking around > and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. > > ...robert ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by RobertG
You don't say whether you have a subreceiver (and the potential need to match filter offsets) but I'd recommend the Inrad 500 Hz filter (a bit wider than the 400) for general use and the Elecraft 200 Hz filter when you want the maximum selectivity. If you weren't 98% CW and there was a concern for RTTY, I'd have suggested the INRAD 400 Hz filters as having a bit better performance for RTTY at the cost of being marginally tight for general CW. I found that having both the Elecraft 400 Hz (430-450 Hz nominal) and 250 Hz (350-370 Hz nominal) a complete waste of the second filter as there is not enough difference to notice. Even though the shape factor of Elecraft 200 Hz 5-pole filter is not as good as Inrad's 250 Hz 8 pole filter, the 5-pole filter is still narrower than the 250 Hz filter at all points on the skirts. If you don't have the subreceiver and don't plan on getting one, the pair pf Elecraft 500/200 Hz 5-pole filters offers excellent performance at a cost effective price compared to the more expensive 8 pole filters. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2/3/2012 3:14 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote: > Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts concerning > filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW operator, mostly > chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm looking for > recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter for contesting > and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for casual looking around > and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. > > ...robert ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by RobertG
Hi Robert,
I just bought the K3 in December and I also work mostly CW. I also work mostly QRP anymore so, I have the 400 and 200Hz roofing filters. They work super for me! Gary, N7HTS On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:14:31 +0000 "Robert G. Strickland" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts concerning > filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW operator, mostly > chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm looking for > recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter for contesting > and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for casual looking around > and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. > > ...robert > -- > Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY > [hidden email] > Syracuse, New York, USA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by RobertG
Robert, you don't say what you are replacing which would be helpful to compare. I came from a TS-850SAT and elected the standard filter, a 500 Hz 5 pole and a 200 Hz. I am not sure that I have ever needed the 200 Hz filter, but once it is installed you can't use a very narrow DSP filter without the 200 Hz roofer kicking in, so you can't tell what a 100 Hz DSP filter would do without it. When I want wider than 500 Hz (rarely), I am happy with the DSP filter. I am also primarily a CW operator, but probably less than 98%. Also, if you change your mind, it is easy to add filters.
Willis 'Cookie' Cooke K5EWJ & Trustee N5BPS, USS Cavalla, USS Stewart ________________________________ From: Robert G. Strickland <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 2:14 PM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 CW filters advice Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts concerning filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW operator, mostly chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm looking for recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter for contesting and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for casual looking around and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY [hidden email] Syracuse, New York, USA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Gary D Krause
Hi Robert,
I work 100% CW, and in my K3 have a 1KHz, 400Hz, & 250Hz. Now, I know it's a lot of redundancy, but I figured for the couple of extra bucks, what the heck! You just might want to go with the 400Hz & 250Hz. Most on this reflector will say that being as close in bandwidth as they are, to forget the 250Hz and go with the 200Hz. Personally, I chose the 250Hz because it is a 8-pole filter and the 200Hz is a 5-pole. Good luck in your purchase, you will not be sorry choosing a K3! 73 de Jim - KE8G -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gary D Krause Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 4:57 PM To: Robert G. Strickland; Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 CW filters advice Hi Robert, I just bought the K3 in December and I also work mostly CW. I also work mostly QRP anymore so, I have the 400 and 200Hz roofing filters. They work super for me! Gary, N7HTS On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:14:31 +0000 "Robert G. Strickland" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Well, I've decided to get the K3. I've been reading all posts > concerning filters [and everything about filters]. I'm a 98% CW > operator, mostly chasing DX and contesting [little pistol]. I'm > looking for recommendations for (1) a "brick wall" narrow CW filter > for contesting and weak signal work, and (2) something wider for > casual looking around and rag chewing. What should I buy? Thanks for any and all comments. > > ...robert > -- > Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY [hidden email] Syracuse, > New York, USA > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |