From the K3 FAQ: >With a first IF of around 8 MHz, how can the receiver be general coverage? Will there not at least be hole in the coverage around the IF frequency? >General does not mean continuous in this case. There is a small gap at 8.215 MHz. You may be able to tune to this frequency, or not, depending on the firmware. There is a trap circuit to suppress response at this frequency, so the receiver won't work very well within several kHz of 8.215 MHz if it does allow you to tune . Count me as one who is thankful I am not forced to pay for General Coverage, FM, AM, ATU, bandscopes and a host of other features I don't need. Of course all of these are possible for extra cost, but I'm not forced to pay for the features I don't need and will never use. Modularization is truly the breakthrough in the K3's design. We only pay for what we need, whether it's high performance RX (contests), true phase-locked diversity Sub RX for low band DX-ing, SWL GC, AM/FM modes, QRP, portability or even a bandscope (eventually). The customer pays for what he needs and *not* for what he never uses. This is how a very high-performance K3 configuration can be so cost competitive. I guarantee the K3 is causing headaches for the competition even as we speak. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Amen to that, Bill.
73, Larry N8LP Bill Tippett wrote: > > Count me as one who is thankful I am not forced to > pay for General Coverage, FM, AM, ATU, bandscopes and > a host of other features I don't need. Of course all of these > are possible for extra cost, but I'm not forced to pay for the > features I don't need and will never use. > > Modularization is truly the breakthrough in the > K3's design. We only pay for what we need, whether it's high > performance RX (contests), true phase-locked diversity Sub > RX for low band DX-ing, SWL GC, AM/FM modes, QRP, portability > or even a bandscope (eventually). The customer pays for what > he needs and *not* for what he never uses. This is how a very > high-performance K3 configuration can be so cost competitive. > I guarantee the K3 is causing headaches for the competition > even as we speak. > > 73, Bill W4ZV > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
Another thing elecraft is doing with the K3 is to put in
ham band only bandpass filters, with general coverage filters optional, but when operating in the ham bands, the ham band filter is switched in. The single conversion is likely the major reason the K3 (and the K2) are so good. My homebrew single conversion receivers seem to work real well, a good 455 KHz filter is all it takes. Ham bands only, very quiet, nothing modern works as well as the homebrew receivers, except maybe the K3! Brett N2DTS _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |