On Tue,2/17/2015 4:17 PM, Jim Miller wrote:
> What are folks using for their two antennas to provide improved reception on 160m?
I'd guess as many options as there are stations. :) It all depends on
what is available.
Remember that one of the major reasons for diversity is that the
antennas be spatially separated from each other to neutralize the
effects of selective fading. When we receive both a direct and
reflected signal from the DX station, the two arrivals can be more
nearly in phase at one antenna location when they are more out of phase
at the other antenna. That's not the only reason for diversity, of
course, but it's a major one.
Some hams believe that differently polarized antennas should be used, or
that one antenna have a high angle major lobe and the other have a low
angle major lobe. Some of the best 160M ops I know rearrange their
stations for 160M events by bringing all of their antennas to a big
patch panel so they can switch between them to RX any signal that
they're trying to work. It is well known, for example, that signals for
a given path may be high angle at one part of the opening and low angle
at another time.
73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraftHelp:
http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htmPost: mailto:
[hidden email]
This list hosted by:
http://www.qsl.netPlease help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.htmlMessage delivered to
[hidden email]
Locked
