I have used HRD in the past with several rigs - all quite successfully.
Now I am using it with the K3. It seems to me that there are very few of the K3's many features that can be controlled via HRD. I would consider HRD version 6 for purchase - if it is to become K3 feature rich. I posed the question to HRD support and received the following: "We support whatever Eric has in the cat commands, if it's in there, we support it." Currently I am also testing N4PY's software for rig control. I know little about this software - only used it a couple times today. I have 9 more days on the free trial. Perhaps neither is suitable and I should continue twisting knobs. Comments regarding both programs would be greatly appreciated. Bill W2BLC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I use HRD for my station.
I dont do much rig control except for digital modes where the macro function and switching and it works great. I also like the integrated logger. Otherwise I tend to turn knobs on the radio. Just my experience. ~73 Don KD8NNU On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Bill wrote: > I have used HRD in the past with several rigs - all quite > successfully. Now I am using it with the K3. > > It seems to me that there are very few of the K3's many features that > can be controlled via HRD. I would consider HRD version 6 for purchase > - if it is to become K3 feature rich. I posed the question to HRD > support and received the following: "We support whatever Eric has in > the cat commands, if it's in there, we support it." > > Currently I am also testing N4PY's software for rig control. I know > little about this software - only used it a couple times today. I have > 9 more days on the free trial. > > Perhaps neither is suitable and I should continue twisting knobs. > Comments regarding both programs would be greatly appreciated. > > Bill W2BLC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill Clarke
Bill,
As alternatives to HRD, many are using a logging program to provide some element of rig control - N1MM logger is a good example, and seems to be more directed at contests. DXLab Suite includes a number of rig control (and other information and control functions). For Data modes, there is Fldigi which integrates with several logging applications or can be used standalone with RigCAT which provides frequency display and several other functions. Just how much rig control you wish to have will dictate your choice. N4PY's software is quite good and can be kept up to date (with his update subscription plan). I cannot speak for the level of K3 support you will see in HRD 6.0, you will have to ask that in th3 HRD forums. 73, Don W3FPR On 5/22/2012 7:43 PM, Bill wrote: > I have used HRD in the past with several rigs - all quite successfully. > Now I am using it with the K3. > > It seems to me that there are very few of the K3's many features that > can be controlled via HRD. I would consider HRD version 6 for purchase - > if it is to become K3 feature rich. I posed the question to HRD support > and received the following: "We support whatever Eric has in the cat > commands, if it's in there, we support it." > > Currently I am also testing N4PY's software for rig control. I know > little about this software - only used it a couple times today. I have 9 > more days on the free trial. > > Perhaps neither is suitable and I should continue twisting knobs. > Comments regarding both programs would be greatly appreciated. > > Bill W2BLC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by KD8NNU
I have actually seen an increase in the HRD controls for the K3 since
the new ownership took over. Many of the front panel functions can now be activated/deactivated by simply clicking buttons in the HRD rig control interface. Personally, I like HRD/DM780 better than DXLabs for rig control and digital modes. The log books to me are a toss-up. Much of the same information, just presented in different lay-outs. As to some functionality, such as label printing, that is coming in HRD v6.0 later this summer. I will admit, I alpha/beta tested some of the HRD 5.2x releases prior to some family/job situations taking over much of my time. However, I think that, with time, the new ownership will improve HRD's compatibility interface with the K3. Just my two cents' worth. 73, --Ian Ian Kahn, KM4IK Roswell, GA EM74ua [hidden email] K3 #281, P3 #688 HRD v5.x/6.0 Test Team On 5/22/2012 8:22 PM, [hidden email] wrote: > I use HRD for my station. > > I dont do much rig control except for digital modes where the macro > function and switching and it works great. I also like the integrated > logger. > > Otherwise I tend to turn knobs on the radio. > > Just my experience. > > ~73 > Don > KD8NNU > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Bill wrote: > >> I have used HRD in the past with several rigs - all quite >> successfully. Now I am using it with the K3. >> >> It seems to me that there are very few of the K3's many features that >> can be controlled via HRD. I would consider HRD version 6 for purchase >> - if it is to become K3 feature rich. I posed the question to HRD >> support and received the following: "We support whatever Eric has in >> the cat commands, if it's in there, we support it." >> >> Currently I am also testing N4PY's software for rig control. I know >> little about this software - only used it a couple times today. I have >> 9 more days on the free trial. >> >> Perhaps neither is suitable and I should continue twisting knobs. >> Comments regarding both programs would be greatly appreciated. >> >> Bill W2BLC >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |