Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am now wondering how do you settle on "Normal", "Heavy" and simply "Flat out" to come up with a "design limitation?" From the factory?
Much conjecture and pure guesswork has been written in recent posts as well as some very informative opinions on the cooling system used by Elecraft. Perhaps we should hear from Elecraft on what design criteria was used when the decision was made to use the existing cooling arrangement. Does the addition of the KPA-3 and now the 2m option board alter the effectiveness of the cooling system as designed? Just how *heavy* is heavy?..use or perhaps abuse..? Feeling around a radio as soon as you power down appears to me to be the same as sticking your fingers on a radiator of a car immediately after switching off. These days a lot of cars run electric fans to allow an even cool down period after running. To make my point clearer, when I use the ride-on mower for an hour or more, I run the motor for a few minutes after I finish to effect a cooling down of the motor, I do not run my K3 (or any other radio) for RTTY then pull the power, call me cautious perhaps, but it just seems logical to me. I hope Wayne, Eric and Lyle et al post a response in depth on this topic as many of us have differing points of view. My two cents worth, or was that a Nickel? Gary VK4WT K3 s/n 679 Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The fail temperature of the PA's is going to be well known and
documented. Then a safety factor is added. But I seem to recall that early comments on heat design criteria was for 10m key down, 100% duty cycle, without damage. But that is just the memory talking. YMMV 73 Dave Wilburn NM4M [hidden email] wrote: > I am now wondering how do you settle on "Normal", "Heavy" and simply "Flat out" to come up with a "design limitation?" From the factory? > > Much conjecture and pure guesswork has been written in recent posts as well as some very informative opinions on the cooling system used by Elecraft. > > Perhaps we should hear from Elecraft on what design criteria was used when the decision was made to use the existing cooling arrangement. > > Does the addition of the KPA-3 and now the 2m option board alter the effectiveness of the cooling system as designed? > > Just how *heavy* is heavy?..use or perhaps abuse..? > > Feeling around a radio as soon as you power down appears to me to be the same as sticking your fingers on a radiator of a car immediately after switching off. These days a lot of cars run electric fans to allow an even cool down period after running. > > To make my point clearer, when I use the ride-on mower for an hour or more, I run the motor for a few minutes after I finish to effect a cooling down of the motor, I do not run my K3 (or any other radio) for RTTY then pull the power, call me cautious perhaps, but it just seems logical to me. > > I hope Wayne, Eric and Lyle et al post a response in depth on this topic as many of us have differing points of view. > > My two cents worth, or was that a Nickel? > > Gary > VK4WT > K3 s/n 679 > Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ... [show rest of quote] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
David Wilburn wrote:
> The fail temperature of the PA's is going to be well known and > documented. Then a safety factor is added. But I seem to recall that Things aren't as simple as that. Mean time between failure tends to have an inverse exponential relationship with temperature, so any temperature higher than the minimum possible will compromise lifetime. Even in terms of the manufacturer's never exceed temperature, this is specified inside the device, at a point where the thermal time constant may be quite small, so if you operator too close to TjMax, it may not need much of a transient to exceed it. TjMax is typically a round number so is probably significantly less than the temperature at which the device sustains a phase change (e.g melts), and exceeding it may simply compromise MTBF. (It may represent a point where a lower activation energy failure mode becomes dominant, or may just represent the point where the manufacturer considers MTBF unacceptable.) > early comments on heat design criteria was for 10m key down, 100% > duty cycle, without damage. But that is just the memory talking. YMMV -- David Woolley "The Elecraft list is a forum for the discussion of topics related to Elecraft products and more general topics related ham radio" List Guidelines <http://www.elecraft.com/elecraft_list_guidelines.htm> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by dave.wilburn
WHAT heat problem?
Currently there are over a hundred K3's I know about from all over the serial number range. NO burnups, NO burnt hands. Includes one who got up and left it on TUNE which resulted in NO burned up K3. I'm still asking about what happened to the dummy load though. NO KPA3 final failures. And this from a group of contesters who are notorious abusers of equipment, including quite some few who run the K3 at 120 watts in contests. If the K3 was a burn-it-up item with an inherent heat design flaw, like some other rigs, amps, power supplies, etc, this push-everything-to-the-limits group would have toasted it by now. I might have missed one, but I don't think so. They DO have a LIST of other rigs, amps, power supplies, etc, that they HAVE turned into toast. This group is capable of toasting Alphas, and has. This group meets once a month just to trade contesting gossip, experience, yada, yada. One may be assured that setting a K3 on fire (or any other mode of heat related destruction) would have been a prime topic. Telling stories on others who set things on fire in contests is such fun : >) One chapter has an annual "flaming balun" award just for the best of such delicacies. It is for sure that Wayne is a lot more concerned about heat than any of them. For myself, the K3 has the largest heat sink transfer area I've seen on a 100 watt amplifier in an HF rig. It has by far the beefiest air flow at max cooling of any HF rig. And it runs at a very quiet fan speed 1 during most of my operation. What heat problem? No heat problem. 73, Guy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Wilburn" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft Discussion List" <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:00 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Heat The fail temperature of the PA's is going to be well known and documented. Then a safety factor is added. But I seem to recall that early comments on heat design criteria was for 10m key down, 100% duty cycle, without damage. But that is just the memory talking. YMMV 73 Dave Wilburn NM4M [hidden email] wrote: > I am now wondering how do you settle on "Normal", "Heavy" and simply "Flat > out" to come up with a "design limitation?" From the factory? > > Much conjecture and pure guesswork has been written in recent posts as > well as some very informative opinions on the cooling system used by > Elecraft. > > Perhaps we should hear from Elecraft on what design criteria was used when > the decision was made to use the existing cooling arrangement. > > Does the addition of the KPA-3 and now the 2m option board alter the > effectiveness of the cooling system as designed? > > Just how *heavy* is heavy?..use or perhaps abuse..? > > Feeling around a radio as soon as you power down appears to me to be the > same as sticking your fingers on a radiator of a car immediately after > switching off. These days a lot of cars run electric fans to allow an even > cool down period after running. > > To make my point clearer, when I use the ride-on mower for an hour or > more, I run the motor for a few minutes after I finish to effect a cooling > down of the motor, I do not run my K3 (or any other radio) for RTTY then > pull the power, call me cautious perhaps, but it just seems logical to me. > > I hope Wayne, Eric and Lyle et al post a response in depth on this topic > as many of us have differing points of view. > > My two cents worth, or was that a Nickel? > > Gary > VK4WT > K3 s/n 679 > Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ... [show rest of quote] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On Fri, 15 May 2009 10:53:10 -0400, Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote:
>What heat problem? No heat problem. Guy said it well. I'm a member of the Northern California Contest Club, one of the largest. Our members probably own at least 100 K3s. I own two. My neighbor K6XX owns four, and is a very sharp engineer who works for Elecraft. He says the the K3 is very well protected, and that there is no heat problem. Several of our members were early beta testers. Many of our members, especially those owning K3s, are very agressive contesters -- that is, we transmit a lot. Some contests require that we run barefoot, including several RTTY contests. W0YK is one of our more agressive members, a world champion RTTY contester, and an early beta tester. His response to this thread, before he hurried off to Dayton, was the same as Guy's -- there is no heat problem. He should know. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 10:53:10 -0400, Guy Olinger, K2AV wrote: > >> What heat problem? No heat problem. > > W0YK is one of our more agressive members, a world champion RTTY > contester, and an early beta tester. His response to this thread, > before he hurried off to Dayton, was the same as Guy's -- there is > no heat problem. He should know. Well, you're all ignoring the longevity reduction with heat. I'm sure if you have several K3's, you can afford to replace your rigs quite often and probably do, but there are guys who are still running their Drake twins and Collins 75A-3's. And I'm sure that means there are people who want to run their K3's for as long a time as well. If this was a K2, I'd say buy spare chassis parts and mount weird fans to your heart's content. I'm not sure you can do that with a K3. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [hidden email] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by rfenabled
I also have never noticed a problem due to "heat" buildup in the K3. A good cup of coffee is about 140 degrees F or 60 degrees C - well below the failure point and within the "normal" operating limits of most solid state devices. That temperature would leave your fingers red if you placed them on an object that hot, I don’t think you could place your hand on it for more than a brief period of time. I have never felt anything near that warm. I have never noticed an area on the K3 near the temperature of bath water. Even hot bath water is less than 110 F (43 C) and that is within the "expected" operating temperature of most equipment. It would get hotter than that in your car.
Along the topic of this thread, I built an EICO Kit Stereo amp and tuner while in high school. Now this was a piece of equipment that ran HOT - several areas could burn your hand. While in college I discovered that if I kept my coffee cup on the amp it would keep the coffee warm all evening. That amp and tuner still works today, but I don’t use it for a coffee warmer any more - it must have more than 100,000 hours on it, way beyond expected life expectancy. Rich, KE0X |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Hisashi T Fujinaka
On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT), Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>Well, you're all ignoring the longevity reduction with heat. I'm certainly not, and I doubt that the designers of the radio have either. K6XX, an engineer who has looked carefully at the design, considers it very well designed from the point of view of heat and ventilation. The lead engineer is the same guy who designed the K2/100. They've sold close to 7,000 of them, and I've never heard of a problem with heat. Those who talk about cutting holes to "help" ventilate the radio are probably forgetting the very well controlled heat flow that has been established by the design. One side of the radio runs warm because it is the heat sink for a couple of transistors. The bottom of the chassis runs warm because it is a heat sink for the driver transistors. This is very solid EE design. It is NOT indicative of a problem, or of operation that will cause premature failure. If you want to be super conservative, set up a small muffin fan to blow cool air on the radio. And, of course, calibrate the temperature sensors properly. But don't mess with the design. There's far more to it than meets the eye, especially the eye of someone who isn't an EE with this sort of design experience under his belt. 73, Jim Brown K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On Sat, 16 May 2009, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT), Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote: > >> Well, you're all ignoring the longevity reduction with heat. > > I'm certainly not, and I doubt that the designers of the radio have > either. K6XX, an engineer who has looked carefully at the design, > considers it very well designed from the point of view of heat and > ventilation. The lead engineer is the same guy who designed the > K2/100. They've sold close to 7,000 of them, and I've never heard > of a problem with heat. Creative snipping, I'm going to do it too. I was talking about 80-year old radios, and keeping the radio running for that long. You're talking about 10, maybe? > If you want to be super conservative, set up a small muffin fan to > blow cool air on the radio. And, of course, calibrate the > temperature sensors properly. But don't mess with the design. > There's far more to it than meets the eye, especially the eye of > someone who isn't an EE with this sort of design experience under > his belt. And that's me, as I did semiconductor design. I'm just saying, if you want fans, use fans. Let people mess with the radio if they want. That's why I liked the K2, and one of the reasons I don't have a K3 yet. (The real reason is that I had to take my antenna down and so $2k seemed a bit much when I don't have anything to connect the radio to.) Also, you said you had several K3's. You're in a whole different league than people who just have one and want to screw around with it. People do mods to their FT1000's too, and those rigs are meant to keep their lids on. One reason I think screwing around with the radio is good is because that's how you learn things. Another is that it's fun. Sure you violate the warranty, but that's the price of admission. I know the designers made some tradeoffs in this radio; there's no way around that. What's wrong with second-guessing them and doing experiments as long as you keep your signal clean and within regulations? -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [hidden email] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
> Creative snipping, I'm going to do it too.
> > I was talking about 80-year old radios, and keeping the radio running > for that long. You're talking about 10, maybe? Maybe not creative. Maybe factual? I have a 56 year old Collins 75A3. And a Johnson Ranger and Viking Courier just slightly younger, all working. I can assure you that any of them run half a day will be far warmer above and below the chassis than anywhere in/on my K3. There is no fan in a 75A3 or Ranger. There is a fan in the Courier, but it blows the air off the 811's around inside the box, not immediately to the outside like the K3. The heat melted a crayon on top of a friend's Collins and it dripped down on the chassis. He never got that out of the paint. Used to keep my coffee warm over the 6146's in the Ranger. > I'm just saying, if you want fans, use fans. Let people mess with the > radio if they want. That's why I liked the K2, and one of the reasons I > don't have a K3 yet. So you've never actually felt a K3 for heat and fan cooling air movement? One of the great things about the newer transistor gear vs. the half century old 18 tube top of line stuff is how COOL (less heat) they are compared to the classic tube stuff. My K2/10 gets warmer on the bottom than my K3 gets on the front right side. I did a full A to B upgrade on it recently and enjoyed every minute of it. But the K3 is telling me that I have to get VERY technical on really tiny stuff to mess with it and not make it worse. We're not saying not to mess with a K3. It's their property and they can do whatever. They can measure their K3's chassis strength by throwing it out of an airplane if they want. Just pointing out that people are going after a heat problem that doesn't exist. And in an era where Google searches fork up all text equally, if it isn't challenged here, folks just casually reading the reflector will accept that the K3 has a cooling problem, which it doesn't. 73, Guy. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In reply to this post by Hisashi T Fujinaka
On Sat, 16 May 2009 15:03:07 -0700 (PDT), Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
>Also, you said you had several K3's. You're in a whole different >league I'm not sure what that means. I'm a working stiff, but semi-retired. I'm a contester, so I have two K3s, one with a second RX, so I can do SO2R. I sold an MP, an 850, and a K2/100 so I could buy them. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |