|
My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability.
Ted, KN1CBR >Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:33:20 -0000 >From: "Ian White" <[hidden email]> >To: <[hidden email]>, <[hidden email]> >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Ubdate >Message-ID: <003301d011ad$0a749010$1f5db030$@co.uk> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > >Don W3FPR wrote: > >> >>A parallel example is my requests that the K2/K3/KX3 keying include >>Ultimatic mode. I have been told in the past that it is being >>considered, but it has not yet materialized. I do not think of that as >>making the K3 internal keyer "incomplete" - only that other things need >>attention from the limited Elecraft engineering staff than my request >>for Ultimatic keying. >> ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I would like to second that! If I had to pick a single mod I wanted,
that would be it for today... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info for Dopplergram information see: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info for MM-SSTV see: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 15:40 +0000, Dauer, Edward wrote: > My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability. > > Ted, KN1CBR > > > >Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 23:33:20 -0000 > >From: "Ian White" <[hidden email]> > >To: <[hidden email]>, <[hidden email]> > >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 Ubdate > >Message-ID: <003301d011ad$0a749010$1f5db030$@co.uk> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > >Don W3FPR wrote: > > > >> > >>A parallel example is my requests that the K2/K3/KX3 keying include > >>Ultimatic mode. I have been told in the past that it is being > >>considered, but it has not yet materialized. I do not think of that as > >>making the K3 internal keyer "incomplete" - only that other things need > >>attention from the limited Elecraft engineering staff than my request > >>for Ultimatic keying. > >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Edward A. Dauer
On Sun,12/7/2014 7:40 AM, Dauer, Edward wrote:
> My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability. That feature came with my first memory keyers back in the 70s, which was a very big deal before the days of computer logging. 40 years later, why should Elecraft burn processor cycles doing something that every contest logging program does? 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Or, consider the compact outboard device, the Ham Central Terminal,
which will do that.. (generate serial numbers) as well as log QSOs. It's a lot smaller (and uses less power) than the smallest portable computer (or netbook). I have one, and find it very handy as an accessory for the KX3. Even if I get a PX3, I expect to keep the HCT, since it logs and has an extended display, which can hold up to 480 characters. And you can scroll back to view prior characters, while new data is added. Standard disclaimer: No connection, etc... just a happy customer. 73 de Ray K2ULR KX3 #211 On Dec 7, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > On Sun,12/7/2014 7:40 AM, Dauer, Edward wrote: >> My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability. > > That feature came with my first memory keyers back in the 70s, which > was a very big deal before the days of computer logging. 40 years > later, why should Elecraft burn processor cycles doing something > that every contest logging program does? > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Or consider the CW Machine which does more than any other product
currently on the market, including contest serial numbers, ultimatic keying, bug emulation, self-contained log book, mill function, call sign lookups to QRZ, automatic ADIF generation and updates to eQSL and LoTW, and much more. Soon to be released - an enhancement that will permit fully automatic logging through parsing keywords. I use it with my KX3/KXPA100 and my station's Windows laptop. I couldn't live without it ;-) {Non-Standard Disclaimer: I own one, which I paid for, and I'm a friend of the inventor but not otherwise connected and I benefit in no way} 73, Stan WB2LQF On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 02:43 PM, Ray Sills wrote: > Or, consider the compact outboard device, the Ham Central Terminal, > which will do that.. (generate serial numbers) as well as log QSOs. > It's a lot smaller (and uses less power) than the smallest portable > computer (or netbook). I have one, and find it very handy as an > accessory for the KX3. Even if I get a PX3, I expect to keep the HCT, > since it logs and has an extended display, which can hold up to 480 > characters. And you can scroll back to view prior characters, while > new data is added. > > Standard disclaimer: No connection, etc... just a happy customer. > > 73 de Ray > K2ULR > KX3 #211 > > On Dec 7, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > >> On Sun,12/7/2014 7:40 AM, Dauer, Edward wrote: >>> My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability. >> >> That feature came with my first memory keyers back in the 70s, which >> was a very big deal before the days of computer logging. 40 years >> later, why should Elecraft burn processor cycles doing something that >> every contest logging program does? >> >> 73, Jim K9YC >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Edward A. Dauer
Does that mean you're paper logging your contests? Barry W2UP |
|
Ouch... Good thought! Back to the computer for me.
-- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info for Dopplergram information see: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info for MM-SSTV see: http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 06:18 -0700, Barry wrote: > Dauer, Edward wrote > > My vote would be for an on-board contest serial number capability. > > > > Ted, KN1CBR > > Does that mean you're paper logging your contests? > Barry W2UP > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-Keyer-tp7595617p7595694.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
