K3 NB problem

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

K3 NB problem

k1uo-Larry
I discovered the source of a “noise” I was complaining about on 80M cw this AM.  I finally noticed that it would always come on at exactly the time VK9WA said “UP”!!   and varied in intensity and duration until he answered someone..at which time the noise was gone and S meter returned to S1!!    Seems like the NB  settings on the K3 are causing IMD and phase noise from the pileup up the Band a bit to sound like rain static and jump to a level of S5-6 on the K3 meter!  Never ran into that before with a K3...  Then again, except for this new electric fence pulse, I never needed to use the NB for anything at this previously dead quiet location.    Any ideas on what settings I should use or try for this electric fence noise?  Possibly the settings that I am using are too aggressive and would cause this?
Regards
Larry  K1UO
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 NB problem

Brian Hunt
I run across this same situation when trying to copy weak signals in the
QRP Fox Hunts.  I rarely use the NB here so it usually surprises me when
it happens.

The K3 NB is made up of two parts:  IF and DSP.  For the IF NB, the
spectrum is sampled ahead of the roofing filter and is quite broad. This
allows the IF NB circuit to take out very short pulses. But when there
is a strong signal (or many in the case of VK9WA) in that bandwidth it
will cause what you are seeing.  The strength of the effect somewhat
depends on the IF NB level setting.

The DSP NB, of course, is implemented in the DSP code which is after the
roofing filter so it's not as susceptible unless the strong signal is
inside the roofing filter passband.  So if you can select a narrower
roofing filter the effect will pretty much go away.

Incidentally, this effect isn't unique to the K3. I've noticed it in my
other receivers as well.

73,

Brian,  K0DTJ


______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 NB problem

Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ
Administrator
In reply to this post by k1uo-Larry
Hi Larry,

For the IF NB I usually use a level of 3, or 4 max, with a narrow typically for
the width. This generally works quite well for me with minimal intermod. More
aggressive thresholds and wider widths significantly increase the likelihood of
nearby strong signal intermod with IF based NBs.

As another poster mentioned, the DSP NB can be cascaded after the IF NB, or just
on its own. So trying different combinations of these may also help in your
situation.

Eric
/elecraft.com/

On 11/20/2015 3:00 PM, Larry - K1UO wrote:
> I discovered the source of a “noise” I was complaining about on 80M cw this AM.  I finally noticed that it would always come on at exactly the time VK9WA said “UP”!!   and varied in intensity and duration until he answered someone..at which time the noise was gone and S meter returned to S1!!    Seems like the NB  settings on the K3 are causing IMD and phase noise from the pileup up the Band a bit to sound like rain static and jump to a level of S5-6 on the K3 meter!  Never ran into that before with a K3...  Then again, except for this new electric fence pulse, I never needed to use the NB for anything at this previously dead quiet location.    Any ideas on what settings I should use or try for this electric fence noise?  Possibly the settings that I am using are too aggressive and would cause this?
> Regards
> Larry  K1UO
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 NB problem

Ralph McClintock-3
Eric,
  A great update to the K3/K3s would be a fully adjustable IF NB Width
control. The available choices now are NAR/MED/WID with 7 degrees of
level. Electric fences are wide pulse. I have observed that width vary
based on the manufacturer and the quality of the installation; read -
all terrible!  This is almost exclusively due to inadequate (_non
existent_) grounds, bare wire nailed to tree trunks, wire connections
that are not really connections at all and the inevitable
brush/branch/grass growth along the wire paths. All the JA manufacturers
since the 1970s built 40lb primary station radios with noise blankers
set to eliminate automobile ignition noise! ICOM with their IC-781 in
the late 1980s added a width control along with the level control.
Besides my K2 & K3 I have an ICOM 7600. The latest iteration of it's
menu system allows adjustable NB level 0-100%, depth 1-10 (still not
sure what it does; I leave it at 4) and width adjustable 0-100. With the
NB Width control set half way at 50, I can eliminate the pulsing with a
Level setting of 50%. If I try that on 160/80 CW chasing DX the pileup
will blow the IF away. Increasing the Width to 75 and reducing the Level
to 20% the fence pulsing is close to non existent but the pile up is not
overloading the IF.
Ralph W1ZK

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: K3 NB problem

Wes (N7WS)
In reply to this post by Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ
I experienced the same phenomenon as did Larry.  Some of this was the "fault"
(i.e. normal operation) of the noise blanker; some of it was due to the
absolutely abysmal quality of too many of the signals. Regrettably, there were
probably some K3s contributing to the mess if some recent QSOs I've had with
other owners are any indication.  Although I often get unsolicited kudos for my
audio, I recently had a 17-meter ragchew with a W6 transplant in GA whose K3
sounded simply awful and looked it on the spectrum scope.

Regarding the K3 NB, frankly, I wonder why, with a radio with so many "smarts"
built in, we have to adjust I-F NB parameters at all.  Setting the threshold
automatically, under most conditions, should be automatic and extending the
blanking pulse width to match the noise impulse duration should be trivial.  
See: http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Noise_Blanker.pdf  for some ancient work.

(I actually wrote this paper as a final exam for a technical writing course I
took.  We were told to write something suitable for publication, including
letters of submission and a release from the company I worked for.  I said to
myself, "Self, you've done all of the work, why not just for the heck of it
submit it to a ham radio publication?  Since the company only gave "published
papers awards" for peer-reviewed publications, I figured I really didn't require
their approval so I sent it to Ham Radio Magazine and they paid me instead.  A
couple of years later a guy said to me, "I see your circuit was published in
Bill Orr's Radio Handbook."  First I knew about it. One would think that a guy
who stole your work would at least give you a free book; but no.)


  On 11/20/2015 8:00 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:

> Hi Larry,
>
> For the IF NB I usually use a level of 3, or 4 max, with a narrow typically
> for the width. This generally works quite well for me with minimal intermod.
> More aggressive thresholds and wider widths significantly increase the
> likelihood of nearby strong signal intermod with IF based NBs.
>
> As another poster mentioned, the DSP NB can be cascaded after the IF NB, or
> just on its own. So trying different combinations of these may also help in
> your situation.
>
> Eric
> /elecraft.com/
>
> On 11/20/2015 3:00 PM, Larry - K1UO wrote:
>> I discovered the source of a “noise” I was complaining about on 80M cw this
>> AM.  I finally noticed that it would always come on at exactly the time VK9WA
>> said “UP”!!   and varied in intensity and duration until he answered
>> someone..at which time the noise was gone and S meter returned to S1!! Seems
>> like the NB  settings on the K3 are causing IMD and phase noise from the
>> pileup up the Band a bit to sound like rain static and jump to a level of
>> S5-6 on the K3 meter!  Never ran into that before with a K3...  Then again,
>> except for this new electric fence pulse, I never needed to use the NB for
>> anything at this previously dead quiet location.    Any ideas on what
>> settings I should use or try for this electric fence noise? Possibly the
>> settings that I am using are too aggressive and would cause this?
>> Regards
>> Larry  K1UO

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]