|
What is new/ old QSK ? I cannot find such a menu/ config
setting. Barry Simpson VK2BJ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
Barry Simpson wrote:
> What is new/ old QSK ? I cannot find such a menu/ config setting. Hi Barry, Go to CONFIG and select CW WEIGHT. Then press the "3" key on the numeric keypad to toggle it. It doesn't seem to make much of a difference for me. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Barry Simpson
See the K3 owner’s manual revision
D-1, page 53, under the “CW WGHT” topic. “Tap 3 to select OLD or NEW QSK
(default). NEW QSK reduces keying artifacts in the presence of QRN or QRM. OLD
mutes/unmutes slightly faster.” Dick, K6KR From:
[hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On
Behalf Of Barry Simpson What is new/ old QSK ? I cannot find
such a menu/ config setting. Barry Simpson VK2BJ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Vic K2VCO
> Go to CONFIG and select CW WEIGHT. Then press the "3" key on the numeric
> keypad to toggle it. > It doesn't seem to make much of a difference for me. > 73, > Vic, K2VCO Using the most current K3 F/W, I compared the New versus Old QSK configuration using a dual-trace scope and an external keyer modified with a buffered output for scope triggering. Under the "Old" QSK setting, the CW envelope rises ~ 15 ms after contact closure versus ~ 19 ms for "New." Under "Old," the keyed RF envelope more closely matches the external contact closure duration. Listening in the headphones, I detect little difference in weighting and T/R recovery time. I haven't had time to compare the two modes under varying AGC and band conditions, but unless I detect some anomaly, I am leaving my K3 set for "Old. QSK." Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
> Listening in the headphones, I detect little difference in weighting and
> T/R recovery time. I made that comparison while listening to the side-tone. When listening to my K3'd off air CW signal on another receiver, the weighting difference between New QSK and Old is certainly perceptible. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
I agree that the weighting is too light with the New QSK enabled.
Barry Simpson VK2BJ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
Paul, how does this compare with using Semi QSK with .01 delay. It sounds
very similar to me--by ear--but I do not have the equipment to look at the issues you've investigated. Thank you, Gary W7TEA
73,
Gary W7TEA K3 #1001, #5763 |
|
> Paul, how does this compare with using Semi QSK with .01 delay. It sounds
> very similar to me--by ear--but I do not have the equipment to look at the > issues> you've investigated. Thank you, Gary W7TEA FYI - The New/Old selection also applies to the external key line. Regardless of the delay setting, the CW transmit waveform does not change between QSK and Semi-QSK. The Semi-QSK waveform still follows the Old/New selction as it does for full QSK. To my ears, receive recovery time under Semi-QSK at 0.01 is still noticeably longer than under full QSK in either New or Old modes. Also, in QSK, I don't detect any receiver recovery time difference between New/Old. The only difference I've noticed so far is that keyed weighting is lighter under New by 4 ms, and at the moment of key closure, the RF envelope time starts at about 19ms versus 15 ms under Old. The 4 ms difference is exactly the delta of the RF envelope duration between New and Old modes. So far, I've not heard any anomaly that would cause me to switch from the Old to the New mode. In a nutshell, I much prefer the Old mode and hope it does not go away in a future F/W release. Paul, W9AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
