|
Hello all.. This AM on 160 meters there was a station CQing on 1.820.6 with a fundamental freq signal strength of S9 on my K3. I also found (with the NB on) that I could hear him Q5 but very weak on 1.810.6 and the same S 0 reading but perfectly Q5 on 1.830.6. I turned the noise blanker off and of course the images disappeared. Is this a know problem when using the NB or is this just with my radio after a recent factory alignment? I have had a K3 for years and never noticed anything like that before but then again this AM was very quiet on 160M and I had the NB on because I could hear a distant tick tick of an electric fence.
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Administrator
|
One other note - I see you posted to Elecraft and topband reflectors on your
post. Please do not cross post when posting to the Elecraft list as that in-turn causes a flood of email to the other list and back to here, including bounce messages from non-members that fill our admin emaibox. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 12/8/2015 7:56 AM, Larry - K1UO wrote: > Hello all.. This AM on 160 meters there was a station CQing on 1.820.6 with a fundamental freq signal strength of S9 on my K3. I also found (with the NB on) that I could hear him Q5 but very weak on 1.810.6 and the same S 0 reading but perfectly Q5 on 1.830.6. I turned the noise blanker off and of course the images disappeared. Is this a know problem when using the NB or is this just with my radio after a recent factory alignment? I have had a K3 for years and never noticed anything like that before but then again this AM was very quiet on 160M and I had the NB on because I could hear a distant tick tick of an electric fence. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by k1uo-Larry
Hi Larry,
[This response is posted only to Elecraft Reflector. Posting to more than one reflector with the same email post gets you 1) dunned by the Elecraft Admin -- already done by Eric 2) dunned by experienced general readership of all reflectors, who long, long ago figured out cross-posting just got people confused. Consider yourself (in a kindly way of course) doubly dunned.] To Larry and all other fellow noise sufferers equipped with K3/K3S transceivers... Short Version: See if the AM BC crud goes away when the NB LEVEL has IF set to OFF. The crud is a necessary possible artifact of IF blanking in the K3/K3S. This "IF" process in the K3/K3S is at root the same as 1950's noise blanking in tube gear, but with modern improvements. Long Version: The K3 or K3S (referred to as K3 in the rest of the post) has two separate noise blanker processes: IF and DSP. Depending on settings with a hold on the single NB button [LEVEL] you can have none, just IF, just DSP, or both processes running. If they are both on, they work in series. The IF NB works first, in broadband circuits before the roofing filters. The DSP NB works second, after the RX low IF analog to digital conversion. The DSP NB has algorithms doing its magic, and is buried in the number soup that is SDR. The IF NB is basically the same NB in the tube ham receivers I used as a teenager. A strong pulse is detected early in the RX string, and is used to cut off the incoming broadband signal for the duration of the pulse. There are refinements to that process, but at root blanking cuts off some part of the RF/IF string for the duration of the noise pulse. It is possible for the RF peaks of non-noise signals to trip the blanking threshold. The modern, mostly digital K3 still uses the ancient IF blanking because it still works for certain kinds of noise. Usefully, by messing with preamp/attenuator settings and the width and delay of the blank, the oldie but goodie blanking can be "tuned" to better blank certain kinds of noise. We get to "tinker" with the NB and discover the best setting for a certain kind of noise. But the IF NB still has inescapable aspects of blanking, drawbacks when I was a teen and the same now: modulating the RF or pre-filter IF with the blanking pulse, and MUST have sidebands and intermodulation from the process. Some of those artifacts of blanking will sound like chewed up signals that are NOT in the passband. This is because the blanking pulse has to be applied in a broadband place where the noise pulses are still extremely sharp and narrow. Anything loud making it through the front end bandpass filters can be in the NB IF process blanking artifacts. On 160 meters that easily involves strong local AM broadcast. In CW contests with many strong CW signals around the band, you can hear beeple bopple from intermodulating CW signals or crud from "spread out" QRN. The thinking? The crud, while possibly irritating, is far less of a problem than the line or spark noise that is being blocked. The K3 IF blocking does have sophisticated amenities added to the RF/IF blanking which improve on the old tube type versions which generally were either just on or off with no adjustments. I have found that a pernicious recurring line noise on 160 around my QTH is well dealt with using NB, IF set to narrow-3 and DSP to 1-7 or 2-7. This will produce a variation in effectiveness with frequency, usually with a noise null or two somewhere in the CW frequencies 5-10 kHz wide. The overall noise drop in these nulls is 5, 6, 7 S units, dropping down to the level of regular band noise without the buzz. There will be some blanker trash that comes and goes, but I am rescued from giving up on copying anything not S9 or louder and am able to operate the contest at 93% or so, placing my run frequencies in the K3 NB noise null. To those trying to get rid of a certain noise, remember that there are 21+21+(21x21) combinations of IF and DSP blanking. That's 483 combinations, not counting variations with preamp/normal/atten settings. Hope this has been helpful. 73, Guy K2AV On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Larry - K1UO <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello all.. This AM on 160 meters there was a station CQing on 1.820.6 > with a fundamental freq signal strength of S9 on my K3. I also found (with > the NB on) that I could hear him Q5 but very weak on 1.810.6 and the same S > 0 reading but perfectly Q5 on 1.830.6. I turned the noise blanker off and > of course the images disappeared. Is this a know problem when using the NB > or is this just with my radio after a recent factory alignment? I have > had a K3 for years and never noticed anything like that before but then > again this AM was very quiet on 160M and I had the NB on because I could > hear a distant tick tick of an electric fence. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Great post Guy,
I also encountered occasional noise on 160, (neighborhood Christmas decorations!) during last weekends contest as well. I found similar settings worked as you have described below. In addition, I found that switching in the notch filter and manually adjusting the notch frequency just a couple hundred hertz plus or minus from my CW offset of 600hz, and adding in some NR, I could reduce a bit more of the hash from the NB. I was typically listening on the 250hz roofing filter and narrowed it down with DSP to 200hz. Point being, lots of flexibility in adjustments to kill much of the unwanted hash. 73 Gene, N9TF K3S 10057 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guy Olinger K2AV" <[hidden email]> To: "Larry - K1UO" <[hidden email]> Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 2:45:13 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Noise Blanker problem? Hi Larry, [This response is posted only to Elecraft Reflector. Posting to more than one reflector with the same email post gets you 1) dunned by the Elecraft Admin -- already done by Eric 2) dunned by experienced general readership of all reflectors, who long, long ago figured out cross-posting just got people confused. Consider yourself (in a kindly way of course) doubly dunned.] To Larry and all other fellow noise sufferers equipped with K3/K3S transceivers... Short Version: See if the AM BC crud goes away when the NB LEVEL has IF set to OFF. The crud is a necessary possible artifact of IF blanking in the K3/K3S. This "IF" process in the K3/K3S is at root the same as 1950's noise blanking in tube gear, but with modern improvements. Long Version: The K3 or K3S (referred to as K3 in the rest of the post) has two separate noise blanker processes: IF and DSP. Depending on settings with a hold on the single NB button [LEVEL] you can have none, just IF, just DSP, or both processes running. If they are both on, they work in series. The IF NB works first, in broadband circuits before the roofing filters. The DSP NB works second, after the RX low IF analog to digital conversion. The DSP NB has algorithms doing its magic, and is buried in the number soup that is SDR. The IF NB is basically the same NB in the tube ham receivers I used as a teenager. A strong pulse is detected early in the RX string, and is used to cut off the incoming broadband signal for the duration of the pulse. There are refinements to that process, but at root blanking cuts off some part of the RF/IF string for the duration of the noise pulse. It is possible for the RF peaks of non-noise signals to trip the blanking threshold. The modern, mostly digital K3 still uses the ancient IF blanking because it still works for certain kinds of noise. Usefully, by messing with preamp/attenuator settings and the width and delay of the blank, the oldie but goodie blanking can be "tuned" to better blank certain kinds of noise. We get to "tinker" with the NB and discover the best setting for a certain kind of noise. But the IF NB still has inescapable aspects of blanking, drawbacks when I was a teen and the same now: modulating the RF or pre-filter IF with the blanking pulse, and MUST have sidebands and intermodulation from the process. Some of those artifacts of blanking will sound like chewed up signals that are NOT in the passband. This is because the blanking pulse has to be applied in a broadband place where the noise pulses are still extremely sharp and narrow. Anything loud making it through the front end bandpass filters can be in the NB IF process blanking artifacts. On 160 meters that easily involves strong local AM broadcast. In CW contests with many strong CW signals around the band, you can hear beeple bopple from intermodulating CW signals or crud from "spread out" QRN. The thinking? The crud, while possibly irritating, is far less of a problem than the line or spark noise that is being blocked. The K3 IF blocking does have sophisticated amenities added to the RF/IF blanking which improve on the old tube type versions which generally were either just on or off with no adjustments. I have found that a pernicious recurring line noise on 160 around my QTH is well dealt with using NB, IF set to narrow-3 and DSP to 1-7 or 2-7. This will produce a variation in effectiveness with frequency, usually with a noise null or two somewhere in the CW frequencies 5-10 kHz wide. The overall noise drop in these nulls is 5, 6, 7 S units, dropping down to the level of regular band noise without the buzz. There will be some blanker trash that comes and goes, but I am rescued from giving up on copying anything not S9 or louder and am able to operate the contest at 93% or so, placing my run frequencies in the K3 NB noise null. To those trying to get rid of a certain noise, remember that there are 21+21+(21x21) combinations of IF and DSP blanking. That's 483 combinations, not counting variations with preamp/normal/atten settings. Hope this has been helpful. 73, Guy K2AV On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Larry - K1UO <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello all.. This AM on 160 meters there was a station CQing on 1.820.6 > with a fundamental freq signal strength of S9 on my K3. I also found (with > the NB on) that I could hear him Q5 but very weak on 1.810.6 and the same S > 0 reading but perfectly Q5 on 1.830.6. I turned the noise blanker off and > of course the images disappeared. Is this a know problem when using the NB > or is this just with my radio after a recent factory alignment? I have > had a K3 for years and never noticed anything like that before but then > again this AM was very quiet on 160M and I had the NB on because I could > hear a distant tick tick of an electric fence. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
