I have a K3 at a remote site about an hour north of my home so
unfortunately, I cannot quickly investigate an issue that's recently developed. After reviewing the K3 schematics, the root cause is likely isolated to the following parts on the PA board: D36, D37 (BAS70 - Schottky directional coupler sampling diodes), and/or U16 (LM358 dual op-amp used as a voltage-follower). My question: are these three parts leaded or SMT/SMD? Perhaps I'm not looking hard enough on the Elecraft website but I don't see a detailed B.O.M. for the K3/K3s. I want to be ready for replacement without wasting a two-hour trip to/from the site. Thanks. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Paul,
I have not looked to be certain, but there is a 90% probability that they are SMD. Contact [hidden email] to obtain the part numbers. Those are not normally Field Replacable parts. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/21/2018 11:02 AM, Paul Christensen wrote: > I have a K3 at a remote site about an hour north of my home so > unfortunately, I cannot quickly investigate an issue that's recently > developed. After reviewing the K3 schematics, the root cause is likely > isolated to the following parts on the PA board: D36, D37 (BAS70 - Schottky > directional coupler sampling diodes), and/or U16 (LM358 dual op-amp used as > a voltage-follower). > > My question: are these three parts leaded or SMT/SMD? Perhaps I'm not > looking hard enough on the Elecraft website ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
Dick & Don,
Thanks for confirming. Although unlikely to be the source of trouble, It also appears U6 and U8 are in the VFWD and VREF circuit paths. I'll order up everything and have it on hand when I replace this week. It could also be a passive problem like a marginally-corroded connector, or failed resistor. By the way, the problem manifests with high SWR and power set readings that no longer match anything close to actual output power into known good loads. The SWR reading fluctuates excessively with change in the PWR control and slight changes in the control quickly lead to 120W power spikes when the K3 display indicates 15-20W. This tells me the ALC circuit is not getting a good forward power sample. So, it appears the SWR bridge or surrounding circuitry has partially failed. Paul -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 1:18 PM To: 'Paul Christensen' <[hidden email]> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem I don't know where purchasing actually buys the parts, but... D36 and D37 are BAS70INCT Diode, 70V, SOT23, like Digi-Key BAS70INTR-ND U16 is LM358, DUAL OP AMP, SOIC8, SMD, like Digi-Key LM358DR2GOSTR-ND 73 de Dick, K6KR -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Paul Christensen Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 08:02 To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem I have a K3 at a remote site about an hour north of my home so unfortunately, I cannot quickly investigate an issue that's recently developed. After reviewing the K3 schematics, the root cause is likely isolated to the following parts on the PA board: D36, D37 (BAS70 - Schottky directional coupler sampling diodes), and/or U16 (LM358 dual op-amp used as a voltage-follower). My question: are these three parts leaded or SMT/SMD? Perhaps I'm not looking hard enough on the Elecraft website but I don't see a detailed B.O.M. for the K3/K3s. I want to be ready for replacement without wasting a two-hour trip to/from the site. Thanks. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to mailto:[hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Paul,
The diodes are the most likely suspect, so replace them first and re-check. You are correct that the problem is that the wattmeter is not feeding the power back to the MCU and the power becomes uncontrolled. Wattmeter damage is normally a result of static coming in on the antenna feedline. If you do not have an means of disconnecting the antenna when not in use, it would be wise to add that - switching the K3 to a dummy load would be a good addition too. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/21/2018 1:39 PM, Paul Christensen wrote: > Dick & Don, > > Thanks for confirming. Although unlikely to be the source of trouble, It > also appears U6 and U8 are in the VFWD and VREF circuit paths. I'll order > up everything and have it on hand when I replace this week. It could also > be a passive problem like a marginally-corroded connector, or failed > resistor. > > By the way, the problem manifests with high SWR and power set readings that > no longer match anything close to actual output power into known good > loads. The SWR reading fluctuates excessively with change in the PWR > control and slight changes in the control quickly lead to 120W power spikes > when the K3 display indicates 15-20W. This tells me the ALC circuit is not > getting a good forward power sample. So, it appears the SWR bridge or > surrounding circuitry has partially failed. Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Hi Don and all,
I really don't understand why static build up on the antenna should be a problem with the K3. Due to the (good) design of the SWR bridge (a two transformer design with a voltage transformer right across the output) the antenna port presents a dead short circuit at DC both in receive and transmit. I just verified this with an ohm-meter (in receive only - no need to check in transmit since the SWR bridge is surely present then - don't want to kill my DMM). Maybe we are talking semantics here but it appears to me that the cause of diode damage in the SWR bridge circuit is more likely caused by transients induced into the antenna system by nearby lightning strikes than static buildup. Knut - AB2TC Don Wilhelm wrote > Paul, > > The diodes are the most likely suspect, so replace them first and > re-check. > > You are correct that the problem is that the wattmeter is not feeding > the power back to the MCU and the power becomes uncontrolled. > > Wattmeter damage is normally a result of static coming in on the antenna > feedline. If you do not have an means of disconnecting the antenna when > not in use, it would be wise to add that - switching the K3 to a dummy > load would be a good addition too. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > <snip> -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the
culprit. I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor lines enter the house. I prefer Polyphaser devices. Don't buy cheap or ham fest bargain table crap! Your radio and your house depends on it. I don't disconnect antennas nor do I ground antennas. I protect for lightning outside and prefer to choose methods where it will not be allowed in the house. And I'm on a hill and have two towers which are 500 ft above average terrain out to some 35 miles. I understand lightning and what it can do. As to lightning, mitigation is the approach, elimination is not physically possible. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 1/21/2018 3:42 PM, ab2tc wrote: > Hi Don and all, > > I really don't understand why static build up on the antenna should be a > problem with the K3. Due to the (good) design of the SWR bridge (a two > transformer design with a voltage transformer right across the output) the > antenna port presents a dead short circuit at DC both in receive and > transmit. I just verified this with an ohm-meter (in receive only - no need > to check in transmit since the SWR bridge is surely present then - don't > want to kill my DMM). > > Maybe we are talking semantics here but it appears to me that the cause of > diode damage in the SWR bridge circuit is more likely caused by transients > induced into the antenna system by nearby lightning strikes than static > buildup. > > Knut - AB2TC > > > Don Wilhelm wrote >> Paul, >> >> The diodes are the most likely suspect, so replace them first and >> re-check. >> >> You are correct that the problem is that the wattmeter is not feeding >> the power back to the MCU and the power becomes uncontrolled. >> >> Wattmeter damage is normally a result of static coming in on the antenna >> feedline. If you do not have an means of disconnecting the antenna when >> not in use, it would be wise to add that - switching the K3 to a dummy >> load would be a good addition too. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> <snip> > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
I strongly agree with Bob's advice, EXCEPT that I've gotten really tired
of replacing Polyphasers on my high wire dipoles. I've recently switched to the arrestors that Array Solutions sells, both because I like the circuit better and because the gas discharge tubes are user replaceable. The Polyphasers are feed-through types mounted to the entry panel. The Array Solutions are mounted in a big Hoffman box, for which W6GJB built some custom mounting brackets. It's mounted to the wall next to the plate with the Polyphasers, with two 2-in PVC conduit stubs going through the wall and holes drilled at the bottom of the enclosure for coax entry. 73, Jim K9YC On 1/21/2018 2:14 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the > culprit. I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all > coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor > lines enter the house. I prefer Polyphaser devices. Don't buy cheap > or ham fest bargain table crap! Your radio and your house depends on it. > > I don't disconnect antennas nor do I ground antennas. I protect for > lightning outside and prefer to choose methods where it will not be > allowed in the house. And I'm on a hill and have two towers which > are 500 ft above average terrain out to some 35 miles. I understand > lightning and what it can do. As to lightning, mitigation is the > approach, elimination is not physically possible. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by ab2tc
Knut and all,
Yes, BUT... Lightning is a static charge which *will* produce transients in the antenna system. As will wind static, rain static and snow static. Large voltages can build up on the antenna and feedline, and will remain until dissipated. Sort of like a charged capacitor that holds that charge until dissipated. Some of those events can produce very large voltages. So yes, I believe it is a matter of semantics. Charges of any kind on the antenna feedline can cause damage. The K3 has more protection than the K2/KPA100, but that does not make it immune to all events. Have you ever touched across the terminals of a feedline after a nearby lightning event and felt a 'tickle' or even worse? I have, and it is not nice. A bleeder resistor of 2500 ohms to 50k across the feedline will bleed off a static charge in short order. Even with a lightning suppression device in the feedline, there is still a threshold voltage that it responds to. At voltages less than that threshold, the protection device will not be of any assistance in bleeding off the charge. 73, Don W3FPR On 1/21/2018 4:42 PM, ab2tc wrote: > Hi Don and all, > > I really don't understand why static build up on the antenna should be a > problem with the K3. Due to the (good) design of the SWR bridge (a two > transformer design with a voltage transformer right across the output) the > antenna port presents a dead short circuit at DC both in receive and > transmit. I just verified this with an ohm-meter (in receive only - no need > to check in transmit since the SWR bridge is surely present then - don't > want to kill my DMM). > > Maybe we are talking semantics here but it appears to me that the cause of > diode damage in the SWR bridge circuit is more likely caused by transients > induced into the antenna system by nearby lightning strikes than static > buildup. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm
>"From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the
culprit." Highly unlikely. Clear skies for days. No lightning activity here in a long time here. Two years ago, I had a similar problem with static-damaged Schottky diodes in an Alpha 9500. Those diodes are used to sample RF for the amp's EBS circuit. >"I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor lines enter the house. I prefer Polyphaser devices." Already installed and we never disconnect at the remote site. The site conforms to Motorola R56. No lightning-induced damage in almost 3 years of operation in a very lightning-intense location near the Okefenokee Swamp. High power Alpha-Delta arc-plug devices are located at the master ground bus where all coaxial and control lines enter the station. Low power (200W) Alpha-Delta devices are installed between the K3 and amplifiers. The Alpha-Delta devices use field-replaceable arc-plugs. Like Polyphaser, these devices are intended to mitigate lightning-induced charge, not necessarily antenna static charge. Still, it's possible that one or more of the Alpha-Delta arc plugs has failed, leaving the K3 vulnerable to static damage. In looking at the K3 SWR bridge circuit, both sides of the Schottky diodes have a reasonably low impedance to chassis ground. One side is slightly less than 22K-ohm. However, it may not be low enough. To supplement protection, I may add a pi-section 1 mH choke between T3 and the chassis. It's the same choke used as a static drain in the Alpha 89 and 87A amplifiers to prevent static-induced PIN diode damage, and the type used at the output of many vacuum tube amps to function as a safety device in the event a plate blocking capacitor fails in a shorted condition that would otherwise allow high-voltage on the output network, transmission line, and antenna. Although fun to discuss and contemplate fixes, it's conjecture until validated and the root-cause may not be related to any of this. Paul, W9AC ly failed. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
I bought a couple of these (TT3G50) from DX Engineering. Unscrewed the gas
discharge plug, took a look and some photos of the inside construction, and sent them back. Simply awful, (Alpha-Delta, not DX Engineering) BTW, the only "protection" is a 1000V breakdown gas discharge tube with questionable contact to the coax center conductor. Wes N7WS On 1/21/2018 5:12 PM, Paul Christensen wrote: > [snip] High power Alpha-Delta arc-plug devices are located at the master ground bus where all coaxial and control lines enter the station. Low power (200W) Alpha-Delta devices are installed between the K3 and amplifiers. The Alpha-Delta devices use field-replaceable arc-plugs. Like Polyphaser, these devices are intended to mitigate lightning-induced charge, not necessarily antenna static charge. Still, it's possible that one or more of the Alpha-Delta arc plugs has failed, leaving the K3 vulnerable to static damage. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
I missed the original post that began this thread, so the following may or may not be relevant. I gather the question is about voltage spikes on the antenna or feedline that damaged something nearer the transmitter end. If that is so, I would ask the original submitter if they are using a remote antenna switch that couples the relay DC through the feedline. If so, you might examine the switch to see if the proper diode protections are present on the remote relays. Some time ago I had the PA transistors in a new K2 blown away three times, until Don Wilhelm put me onto an investigation in which I saw on a scope very high voltage short-time-rise spikes on the line when the relay coil fields collapsed, from an MFJ remote switch system that was sold before MFJ changed its design to include those protections. Just a thought from a bad experience.
Ted. KN1CBR ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 16:14:55 -0600 From: Bob McGraw K4TAX <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem Message-ID: <[hidden email]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the culprit.?? I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor lines enter the house.? I prefer Polyphaser devices.?? Don't buy cheap or ham fest bargain table crap!? Your radio and your house depends on it. I don't disconnect antennas nor do I ground antennas.? I protect for lightning outside and prefer to choose methods where it will not be allowed in the house.??? And I'm on a hill and have two towers? which are? 500 ft above average terrain out to some 35 miles.? I understand lightning and what it can do.? As to lightning, mitigation is the approach, elimination is not physically possible. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 1/21/2018 3:42 PM, ab2tc wrote: > Hi Don and all, > > I really don't understand why static build up on the antenna should be a > problem with the K3. Due to the (good) design of the SWR bridge (a two > transformer design with a voltage transformer right across the output) the > antenna port presents a dead short circuit at DC both in receive and > transmit. I just verified this with an ohm-meter (in receive only - no need > to check in transmit since the SWR bridge is surely present then - don't > want to kill my DMM). > > Maybe we are talking semantics here but it appears to me that the cause of > diode damage in the SWR bridge circuit is more likely caused by transients > induced into the antenna system by nearby lightning strikes than static > buildup. > > Knut - AB2TC > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by P.B. Christensen
Paul:
I had a problem with my K2 with the same identical symptoms you are describing. The fault was diagnosed to an intermittent ground/shield connection in the RF output Cable going to my amplifier. It was an old cable that was out in the weather and when I took it apart you could see the corrosion in the PL259 inside the holes for grounding. This cable worked for me for several years but recently failed. Bring some extra jumper coax with you. Karin Anne Johnson P.E. K3UU Palm Harbor, FL --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm
Epilog: Today, I replaced both BAS70 Schottky diodes (D36/D37) and now the K3 SWR readings are stable and the internal ALC is working as expected. At this time, it appears diode failure was caused by antenna static.
A suggestion to those who may run into this problem in the future: it turns out that D36 and D37 are easily accessible by removing only the bottom rear plate. Access could not be easier. The diodes are SMT/SMD and so great care must be exercised in the rework process. What should have taken me less than 30 minutes turned into several hours. I had convinced myself that the diodes were either on the PA module or KAT3 and so I had disassembled much of the K3. The K3 block diagram doesn’t show a module where the SWR bridge resides. The schematic indicates "K3 RF Board," but that's not the PA module. The RF Board is actually the flat motherboard that the PA module and KAT3 plug into. Once that detail was figured out, I reassembled the K3, leaving only the bottom plate open for the repair. Paul, W9AC -----Original Message----- From: Paul Christensen [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 7:12 PM To: '[hidden email]' <[hidden email]> Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 Power Reading/SWR/ALC Problem >"From experience, I'd say nearby lightning strikes would be the culprit." Highly unlikely. Clear skies for days. No lightning activity here in a long time here. Two years ago, I had a similar problem with static-damaged Schottky diodes in an Alpha 9500. Those diodes are used to sample RF for the amp's EBS circuit. >"I strongly urge everyone to use protection devices on all coax and balanced lines at the point where the feed lines and rotor lines enter the house. I prefer Polyphaser devices." Already installed and we never disconnect at the remote site. The site conforms to Motorola R56. No lightning-induced damage in almost 3 years of operation in a very lightning-intense location near the Okefenokee Swamp. High power Alpha-Delta arc-plug devices are located at the master ground bus where all coaxial and control lines enter the station. Low power (200W) Alpha-Delta devices are installed between the K3 and amplifiers. The Alpha-Delta devices use field-replaceable arc-plugs. Like Polyphaser, these devices are intended to mitigate lightning-induced charge, not necessarily antenna static charge. Still, it's possible that one or more of the Alpha-Delta arc plugs has failed, leaving the K3 vulnerable to static damage. In looking at the K3 SWR bridge circuit, both sides of the Schottky diodes have a reasonably low impedance to chassis ground. One side is slightly less than 22K-ohm. However, it may not be low enough. To supplement protection, I may add a pi-section 1 mH choke between T3 and the chassis. It's the same choke used as a static drain in the Alpha 89 and 87A amplifiers to prevent static-induced PIN diode damage, and the type used at the output of many vacuum tube amps to function as a safety device in the event a plate blocking capacitor fails in a shorted condition that would otherwise allow high-voltage on the output network, transmission line, and antenna. Although fun to discuss and contemplate fixes, it's conjecture until validated and the root-cause may not be related to any of this. Paul, W9AC ly failed. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |