_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
----- Original Message -----
From: Lee Buller > Any comments? I know people who have cooked FT-2000, ProSisTel rotator controllers, Linear Amps - you name it, they've cooked it with too much RF. Simon Brown, HB9DRV www.ham-radio-deluxe.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by k0wa@swbell.net
_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by k0wa@swbell.net
Lee,
I usually have trouble with my DSL connection when I operate high power on 160 and 80, even though the antenna is 200 feet from the shack. I have been attributing it to RF pickup by the long-ish phone lines and AC wiring in the house.
This weekend, I had trouble with my amp, so I moved it onto the bench a few feet away from the main operating position where I could observe it in action. Surprisingly, the DSL connection worked flawlessly!! The only thing that changed was the positioning of the cables from the rig to the amp and from the amp to the window sash through which the cables exit.
The lesson I take from this is that there must be enough RF current on the coax shields that they radiate enough to disrupt "sensitive" electronics. Perhaps ferrites over the coax would prevent this happening to you again.
Brian K1LI
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Lee Buller <[hidden email]> wrote:
_______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
|
In reply to this post by Simon (HB9DRV)
That would be a very good arguement for qrp....wouldn't it?
I have yet to cook anything with my K2, and I used to run a full ... no.. a full kw, on each band, 160 through 10... but cooked lots of things.. NOT with the K2 at 5 watts ... or less... yet the fun meter is higher.. and antennas are more fun... and contests are even more fun... some like it hot.. some don't... I think qrp is COOL!!!! *G* I worked WAS in the 160 test a few years ago... with a KW... I worked WAS minus DE and RI this weekend with 5 watts..... I needed 1495 watts more when I didn't hear them? Not one usb device was cooked this weekend... and not one tree was hurt sending this email... just a whole bunch of electrons got slighty irritated. --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy Windows Live™ Hotmail®:…more than just e-mail. Check it out. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
