K3 still at top. 7600 rated #15 for dynamic range. Even an old TS-830 tops
it! http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Steve N4LQ [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Guess which radio has the best 100 kHz blocking dynamic range (146 dB),
actually 6 dB better than the K3? ... Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over 30 years ago! Of course, with its wide roofing filter the close-in dynamic range is much worse and it doesn't have microprocessor control and all the bells and whistles of a modern rig. But for raw performance, it's still pretty hard to beat. Al N1AL On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 00:15 -0400, Steve Ellington wrote: > K3 still at top. 7600 rated #15 for dynamic range. Even an old TS-830 tops > it! > http://www.sherweng.com/table.html > > > Steve > N4LQ > [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:21:48 -0700, Alan Bloom <[hidden email]> wrote:
>Guess which radio has the best 100 kHz blocking dynamic range (146 dB), >actually 6 dB better than the K3? > >... > >Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over 30 years ago! > >Of course, with its wide roofing filter the close-in dynamic range is >much worse and it doesn't have microprocessor control and all the bells >and whistles of a modern rig. But for raw performance, it's still >pretty hard to beat. > >Al N1AL > Have one and the R-7 RX also. Awesome old time rigs! Tom, N5GE [hidden email] K3 #806, K3 #1055, PR6, XV144, XV432, KRC2, W1 and other small kits. http://www.n5ge.com http://www.swotrc.net ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
In reply to this post by Steve Ellington
Besides RX dynamic range there are a lot of things by which one can
compare a good transceiver. I am sure that many people will love the ic7600. It has some very nice features. 73, Arie PA3A -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- K3 still at top. 7600 rated #15 for dynamic range. Even an old TS-830 tops it! ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by N5GE
Hi Tom
And who can ignore the TS830S! 30 years old and its giving the $10K IC7800 and most other modern radios a good run for their money. It can even have a bandscope WOW, amazing for a $500 dollar radio thats so old. Bye golly by gosh you will even be able to fix it, and it has all the right "numbers" on both RX and TX. The FT102 would be another good candidate. Now why does some entrepreneur not manufacturer the TS830S in China? Add a bandscope and a 200 watt solid state amplifier and you will have lots of change left over from $10k. ChIcom sounds like a good name! Juergen --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Radio Amateur N5GE <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Radio Amateur N5GE <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 VS 7600 Sherwood List > To: [hidden email] > Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 10:51 PM > On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:21:48 -0700, > Alan Bloom <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > >Guess which radio has the best 100 kHz blocking dynamic > range (146 dB), > >actually 6 dB better than the K3? > > > >... > > > >Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over > 30 years ago! > > > >Of course, with its wide roofing filter the close-in > dynamic range is > >much worse and it doesn't have microprocessor control > and all the bells > >and whistles of a modern rig. But for raw > performance, it's still > >pretty hard to beat. > > > >Al N1AL > > > [snip] > > Have one and the R-7 RX also. Awesome old time > rigs! > > Tom, N5GE > > [hidden email] > K3 #806, K3 #1055, PR6, > XV144, XV432, KRC2, > W1 and other small kits. > http://www.n5ge.com > http://www.swotrc.net > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Now, if manufacturers would put their analyzers aside, and just sit down and LISTEN to those grand old rigs.... And make dsp models with the same characteristics and sound.
What a wonderful world it would be ;-) I wouldn't mind a TS-830 replica with all dsp inside. 73' Paul PD0PSB <quote author="juergen piezo"> Hi Tom And who can ignore the TS830S! 30 years old and its giving the $10K IC7800 and most other modern radios a good run for their money. It can even have a bandscope WOW, amazing for a $500 dollar radio thats so old. Bye golly by gosh you will even be able to fix it, and it has all the right "numbers" on both RX and TX. The FT102 would be another good candidate. Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over > 30 years ago! > Have one and the R-7 RX also. Awesome old time > rigs! |
In reply to this post by N5GE
The TR-7 also had awesome key clicks! 73, Bill |
In reply to this post by Alan Bloom
Totally useless in today's crowded bands dx work.
AD4C "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits". -- Albert Einstein --- On Sat, 9/5/09, Alan Bloom <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Alan Bloom <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 VS 7600 Sherwood List To: "Steve Ellington" <[hidden email]> Cc: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 5:21 AM Guess which radio has the best 100 kHz blocking dynamic range (146 dB), actually 6 dB better than the K3? ... Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over 30 years ago! Of course, with its wide roofing filter the close-in dynamic range is much worse and it doesn't have microprocessor control and all the bells and whistles of a modern rig. But for raw performance, it's still pretty hard to beat. Al N1AL On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 00:15 -0400, Steve Ellington wrote: > K3 still at top. 7600 rated #15 for dynamic range. Even an old TS-830 tops > it! > http://www.sherweng.com/table.html > > > Steve > N4LQ > [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Arie Kleingeld PA3A-2
The small MCF (monolitic ceramic filters) used by Icom at the 7600,7700
and the 7800 at the first IF will never compete in selectivity with the REAL roofing filters used in our K3's.That's why their dynamic range at 2Khz will never be even close. AD4C "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits". -- Albert Einstein --- On Sat, 9/5/09, Arie Kleingeld PA3A <[hidden email]> wrote: From: Arie Kleingeld PA3A <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 VS 7600 Sherwood List To: "'Steve Ellington'" <[hidden email]>, [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 8:28 AM Besides RX dynamic range there are a lot of things by which one can compare a good transceiver. I am sure that many people will love the ic7600. It has some very nice features. 73, Arie PA3A -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- K3 still at top. 7600 rated #15 for dynamic range. Even an old TS-830 tops it! ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by pd0psb
TS-830 was the best radio ever built by Kenwood but the best feature it had was the TX speech processor which was the most efficient in its class,it made the radio sound like a KW and with a pure punchy clean audio.
AD4C "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits". -- Albert Einstein --- On Sat, 9/5/09, pd0psb <[hidden email]> wrote: From: pd0psb <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K3] K3 VS 7600 Sherwood List To: [hidden email] Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 10:49 AM Now, if manufacturers would put their analyzers aside, and just sit down and LISTEN to those grand old rigs.... And make dsp models with the same characteristics and sound. What a wonderful world it would be ;-) I wouldn't mind a TS-830 replica with all dsp inside. 73' Paul PD0PSB Hi Tom And who can ignore the TS830S! 30 years old and its giving the $10K IC7800 and most other modern radios a good run for their money. It can even have a bandscope WOW, amazing for a $500 dollar radio thats so old. Bye golly by gosh you will even be able to fix it, and it has all the right "numbers" on both RX and TX. The FT102 would be another good candidate. Answer: The Drake TR-7, which was introduced over > 30 years ago! > Have one and the R-7 RX also. Awesome old time > rigs! -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/K3-VS-7600-Sherwood-List-tp3583857p3584765.html Sent from the [K3] mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |