|
Or, when they're patting your face with a shovel saying, "I wish I'd spent more
time working QRP." On 7/20/2014 12:36 PM, Edward R Cole wrote: > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 power out - key down > Message-ID: <011e01cfa426$5fba6f80$1f2f4e80$@wjschmidt.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Have you ever listened to the interviews of the Indy car drivers after a > race? Do they say: "I wish I had a less powerful engine to make it a more > challenging race."? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Bill Turner-2
Sounds good to me. http://sadxa.org/n7ws.html#amp
On 7/20/2014 2:09 PM, Bill Turner wrote: > ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) > > On 7/20/2014 12:36 PM, Edward R Cole wrote: >> The software provides about 10-dB better SNR (making the 10w JT65 signal >> equivalent to 100w CW). > > REPLY: > > I find an 8877 provides about 22 dB SNR over ten watts. :-) > > 73, Bill W6WRT > > ___________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Wes (N7WS)
On 7/20/2014 10:32 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
> Not if exchanging call signs takes 10 minutes instead of ten seconds. There are excellent reasons for QRP. As chance would have it, I spent an hour or two today at the NCDXC club picnic chatting with AF6RT, who spent Friday and Saturday lighting up a very rare grid on 6M (CM79, I think) that involves lots of hiking over rough terrain carrying your gear, then making additional round trips to get more gear. The hike is on the order of 2-3 hours one way. He's not a CW op, and he said he ran down his batteries calling CQ. The objective is to pass out this very rare grid (99.99% is water) to those pursuing the Fred Fish Award to work all grids in the US. One of my suggestions was to encourage him to use JT9 (24dB of noise rejection referenced to a 2.8 kHz bandwidth) and a strategy where he announces (on the Ping Jockey JT65 chat) a JT9 window where the deserving will call him, and he will respond only to those who he hears. W7GJ/KH8 is successfully using this strategy on a moon-bounce expedition to American Samoa. I also suggested that he try to use the KX3 barefooot when the indicated S/N is better than about -10 dB, and use only enough amp to make the Q. The objective, of course, is to minimize current drain, and thus maximize operating time. The WSJT-X software has a multii-decoder, and gives a readout of the S/N for each signal it copies. I also encouraged him to replace his K3 with a KX3 and KXPA100, because of the KX3's greatly reduced current drain on RX (250 mA as opposed to about 1A for a K3). I'm looking at Li-Ion battery packs that we might pitch in and buy for him, and that raises a few questions for Wayne. I can find nice Li-Ion packs with 3 cells (11.1V nominal) or 4 cells (14.8V nominal). 1) Can the KXPA100 and KX3 tolerate the higher voltages of a fully charged 14.8V battery pack? (In the range of 16V). 2) Do the KX3 or KX3 pull proportionally less current for the same power output from a 4-cell pack as compared to a 3-cell pack? 3) I'm seeing some 20Ah packs rated for a max of 10A and 14A load current, with active protection to limit the current to those levels. How would the KXPA100 react to that, if he wanted to run 40-50W? 4) Where can we access a graph of KXPA100 load current vs. 6M power out, not considering tolerances from one piece to another? 5) Am I correct that a KX3 does not benefit from an outboard preamp in this application? That is, a very quiet QTH, he's current starved, the guys who want to work him have power and big antennas (but probably more RX noise), and he's got to fight for every dB. Weight for a K3 as compared to a KX3 + KXPA100 is about equal, especially when interconnect cables are taken into account. The advantage is current drain, and is a big deal if 90% of your time is RX. He's already carrying a very nice M-Squared antenna and mast to hold it, and LMR-400 to feed it. Those reading the mail should appreciate this as a very practical engineering problem. :) We don't need fast response on this -- thanks to work commitments, his next window of opportunity is Memorial Day 2015. :) 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Wes (N7WS)
On 7/20/2014 10:42 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
> Sounds good to me. http://sadxa.org/n7ws.html#amp Beautiful work, Wes 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
Two answers below.
73, Lyle KK7P > 1) Can the KXPA100 and KX3 tolerate the higher voltages of a fully > charged 14.8V battery pack? (In the range of 16V). No. The products are not guaranteed to FAIL if you apply 16 V, but they are not designed to operate from 16 V, either. > 2) Do the KX3 or KX3 pull proportionally less current for the same > power output from a 4-cell pack as compared to a 3-cell pack? The KX3 low voltage supplies are primarily switching supplies, so current drain at a higher input voltage will be less than the current drain at low supply voltage. The PA (KX3 or KXPA100) operates directly off the supply power and current is proportional to power level and drive, but not supply voltage. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
Very FB, Wes, and it has the requisite two meters: plate current and
grid current. 73, Paul N6LL On 7/21/2014 9:38 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > On 7/20/2014 10:42 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: >> Sounds good to me. http://sadxa.org/n7ws.html#amp > > Beautiful work, Wes > > 73, Jim K9YC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Lyle Johnson
On 7/21/2014 9:51 AM, Lyle Johnson wrote:
> The PA (KX3 or KXPA100) operates directly off the supply power and > current is proportional to power level and drive, but not supply voltage. Thanks, Lyle. The additional question I was asking here is if the KXPA100 pull proportionally less current from a 14.8V supply to achieve the same output power than from an 11.1V supply? (The difference is one less cell in the Li-Ion pack.) The calculation I'm getting at here is for a given pack weight, do 11.1V or 14.8V packs give me the most power out per pound? 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Wes (N7WS)
I think some where my original question go lost. Can the K3 operate key
down at 100W's. I did get an answer, yes - 120w for 24hr's... So the answer is yes. I complicated things by adding JT65 and that I operate at 0.5 to 2 watts with my KX3, but up to 20w with an IC-706. Yes, if I am -25db at 0.5 watts, I can/should up the power so the "guy" at the other end can hear me better. Yes, it IS weak signal not low power... The NAQP contest this past weekend was fun (I used the O2). It has been a few years since I got the chance to operate a digital mode contest. The great receiver in the O2 did fine and is why I would only think of replacing the O2 with a K3. everyone have a great day! steve WB3LGC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Wes (N7WS)
Well, yes... {less powerful engine} After the late 60's the rules were
changed to require all cars to operate under the same limits. NO more turbine cars... (for a $6 ball bearing...) steve WB3LGC > On 21-Jul-14 1:34 AM, Wes (N7WS) wrote: >> Or, when they're patting your face with a shovel saying, "I wish I'd >> spent more time working QRP." >> >> On 7/20/2014 12:36 PM, Edward R Cole wrote: >>> Do they say: "I wish I had a less powerful engine to make it a >>> more challenging race."? >> > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
