N6KR: >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? This is how I plan to use diversity. One input being my directional TX antenna and the other being a Beverage on the KXV3 RX antenna input. This is a less expensive alternative for a second antenna input if you have no need for the $289 KAT3, as is my case. If I'm wrong, I need to cancel my KXV3 and order a KAT3. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
What protects the KRX3 sub-receiver from RF overload when it gets its
signal from the unused KATS ATU antenna jack? 73, Dick K2ZR Bill Tippett wrote: > > > N6KR: > >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF > path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. > > Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? This > is how I plan to use diversity. One input being my > directional TX antenna and the other being a Beverage > on the KXV3 RX antenna input. This is a less expensive > alternative for a second antenna input if you have no > need for the $289 KAT3, as is my case. If I'm wrong, > I need to cancel my KXV3 and order a KAT3. > > 73, Bill W4ZV > > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
On Aug 9, 2007, at 5:29 AM, K2ZR wrote: > What protects the KRX3 sub-receiver from RF overload when it gets its > signal from the unused KATS ATU antenna jack? > 73, Dick K2ZR > The KRX3's aux RX input includes a carrier-operated relay and gas-dicharge tube. 73, Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
On Aug 9, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Bill Tippett wrote: > > > N6KR: >> The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF path or >> get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. > > Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? Hi Bill, If there's no KAT3 installed, you still have a few options. Normally, the sub will share the RF path of the main receiver, and that includes the RX ANT. I.e., if the main RX is running from the RX antenna jack, then the sub will, too, if it's sharing RF. You can switch the KRX3 to its auxiliary input, but if you don't have a KAT3, the question is what to connect it to. The present KXV3 doesn't have provisions for routing RX ANT only to the sub. But there are three other sources you could use for the KRX3's aux input: (1) the SO239 at ANT2 (normally supplied only with the KAT3, but you could order one and install it just for the sub); (2) a BNC jack, below ANT2 (labeled "AUX RF" and not normally supplied, but we could provide one on request); (3) the BNC jack on the KXV3 normally targeted as the buffered I.F. output (but you'd lose I.F. out capability). Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3. 73, Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
At 07:43 AM 09/08/07, you wrote:
>Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of >the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to >connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3. > >73, >Wayne >N6KR Put me on the demand list! John k7up _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
> N6KR:
> >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's > RF path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. > > Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? Yes, with the KXV3, you can select the RX antenna for either, or both, receivers. 73, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
> Yes, with the KXV3, you can select the RX antenna for either, or both, > receivers. Can you select Main (transmit) antenna on the subreceiver and receive (KXV3 aux) antenna on the main receiver at the same time? Or are you limited to transmit antenna on the Main receiver and RX antenna on the sub receiver if you are not using the same antenna for both receivers? 73, ... Joe, W4TV > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of J. > Edward (Ed) Muns > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2007 10:55 AM > To: 'Bill Tippett' > Cc: [hidden email] > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] K3 question re dual receive > > > > N6KR: > > >The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's > > RF path or get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. > > > > Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? > > Yes, with the KXV3, you can select the RX antenna for either, or both, > receivers. > > 73, > Ed - W0YK > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by John-483
>>Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of
>>the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to >>connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3. >> >>73, >>Wayne >>N6KR >Put me on the demand list! Me too! I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna switching will be crucial. Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are routed. The reason I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX antenna functionality. Basically I want to be able to have my TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice to listen to one or the other or both simultaneously. Should I cancel the KRX3? 73 de Björn /SM0MDG _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I have the same desires.
David G3UNA > > From: Björn Mohr <[hidden email]> > Date: 2007/08/10 Fri AM 09:24:33 BST > To: <[hidden email]> > Subject: SV: [Elecraft] Re: K3 question re dual receive > > >>Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of > >>the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to > >>connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3. > >> > >>73, > >>Wayne > >>N6KR > > >Put me on the demand list! > > Me too! > > I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna switching > will be crucial. > > Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are routed. The reason > I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX antenna functionality. Basically I > want to be able to have my TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice > to listen to one or the other or both simultaneously. > > Should I cancel the KRX3? > > > 73 de Björn /SM0MDG > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bjorn
> I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX
> antenna switching will be crucial. > > Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are > routed. The reason I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX > antenna functionality. Basically I want to be able to have my > TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice to listen to > one or the other or both simultaneously. > > Should I cancel the KRX3? The RX ANT capability comes with the KXV3. 73, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by David Cutter
I hope Elecraft eventually looks into diversity receive.
With 2 receivers in the same box, and all the computer stuff, I would think it would be possible to do some sort of diversity reception, its real handy for swl and AM work, and can help a lot on there modes also. I could hook up the home brew G5RV and the vertical, often one is working much better than the other at any given moment.... I would think diversity would put the K3 well beyond what any other radio could hope for in RX performance. Brett N2DTS _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
I would also like to see a DSP implementation of a noise canceller
similar in concept to the MFJ-1026, which samples QRN on an aux antenna, and subtracts that from the signal on the main antenna. It can be very effective for low band local QRN, but the MFJ implementation is not very convenient or well done. This seems like a perfect fit for DSP, and the hardware is there already. I am posting this to both lists, since my emails to the regular reflector periodically get blocked by the SPAM filter. 73, Larry N8LP Brett gazdzinski wrote: > I hope Elecraft eventually looks into diversity receive. > With 2 receivers in the same box, and all the computer stuff, > I would think it would be possible to do some sort of diversity > reception, its real handy for swl and AM work, and can help > a lot on there modes also. > I could hook up the home brew G5RV and the vertical, often one > is working much better than the other at any given moment.... > > I would think diversity would put the K3 well beyond what > any other radio could hope for in RX performance. > > > Brett > N2DTS > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Brett gazdzinski-2
> I hope Elecraft eventually looks into diversity receive.
This capability is in the initial release, using the KRX3 and KAT3. The KAT3 provides a second SO239 antenna connector and then the ANT button on the front panel allow the operator to select ANT1 or ANT2. The KRX3 can be configured in one of two states. The first state uses the same receive antenna as chosen by the main receiver, i.e., ANT1, ANT2 or RX ANT (if there is a KXV3 installed). The second KRX3 state uses the UNUSED SO239, so if the main RX is set on ANT1, then the KRX3 would use ANT2. This is the basic diversity reception setup with the K3. With a KXV3, you can also do diversity reception with the main receiver using the RX ANT antenna and the KRX3 using the "other" SO239 ANTn connector that the TX is not using. This allows you to have two receiving antennas for diversity reception and yet a third antenna for transmitting. 73, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bjorn
I wrote a week ago or so;
>>> I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna switching will be crucial. Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are routed. The reason I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX antenna functionality. Basically I want to be able to have my TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice to listen to one or the other or both simultaneously. Should I cancel the KRX3? <<< I realize there was an error in my text, I am not questioning my order of the second RX but I what I wonder is if the KXV3 transverter interface will bring anything to the table when it comes to the second RX. I have not ordered the tuner as I don't see any point to tuned on the radio end of the coax... My question is, how do I get the functionality I need as described above. 73 de Björn /SM0MDG _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
> >>> I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna
> switching will be crucial. > > Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are > routed. The reason I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX > antenna functionality. Basically I want to be able to have my > TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice to listen to > one or the other or both simultaneously. The RX Antenna input comes with the KXV3 option, not the KRX3. > Should I cancel the KRX3? <<< Having the KRX3 in a K3 could be based on a lot of things. But, if the absolutely only reason you ordered it was to get the RX Antenna capability, then what you need instead is the KXV3. > I realize there was an error in my text, I am not questioning > my order of the second RX but I what I wonder is if the KXV3 > transverter interface will bring anything to the table when > it comes to the second RX. I have not ordered the tuner as I > don't see any point to tuned on the radio end of the coax... The KXV3's capability with the second receiver is still not fully defined. What is defined is that the RX ANT input will be routed to both the main and second receiver if the KRX3 is configured for "shared mode". If the KRX3 is in "auxiliary mode", then it uses the input connected to the KRX3 secondary coax, normally the non-TX SO239 on the KAT3. But, as Wayne has discussed several times on this reflector, that KRX3 secondary coax could be connected to another location, such as a BNC installed in the currently vacant AUX RF position on the rear panel. That would allow you to have a different RX antenna on the second receiver than what is on the main receiver. It would also allow you to have a RX antenna on the second receiver, while the main receiver uses the TX antenna for receive. An example of what is not yet determined in the KXV3 functionality is whether duplex TX/RX can be done with the transverter input and output. > My question is, how do I get the functionality I need as > described above. I'm hesitant to say with certainty because there is a lot of information missing from these emails. But, I "think" all you need is the KXV3 option if all you want is to have a separate RX antenna from your transmit antenna. But, there are many uses of a second receiver, e.g., diversity reception that has also been discussed on this reflector, and I can't tell from your emails how the KRX3 would be useful to you. 73, Ed - W0YK _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Bjorn
This is what Wayne posted on Aug 9th.
73, Ken K3IU ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Aug 9, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Bill Tippett wrote: >/ />/ />/ N6KR: />>/ The KRX3 subreceiver can either share the main receiver's RF path or />>/ get its signal from the unused KAT3 ATU antenna jack. />/ />/ Can't we use the RX antenna port on the $79 KXV3? / Hi Bill, If there's no KAT3 installed, you still have a few options. Normally, the sub will share the RF path of the main receiver, and that includes the RX ANT. I.e., if the main RX is running from the RX antenna jack, then the sub will, too, if it's sharing RF. You can switch the KRX3 to its auxiliary input, but if you don't have a KAT3, the question is what to connect it to. The present KXV3 doesn't have provisions for routing RX ANT only to the sub. But there are three other sources you could use for the KRX3's aux input: (1) the SO239 at ANT2 (normally supplied only with the KAT3, but you could order one and install it just for the sub); (2) a BNC jack, below ANT2 (labeled "AUX RF" and not normally supplied, but we could provide one on request); (3) the BNC jack on the KXV3 normally targeted as the buffered I.F. output (but you'd lose I.F. out capability). Also, if there's enough demand for an antenna-switch-only version of the KAT3, we could offer one in the future. You'd then be able to connect the KRX3 to the unused antenna jack, as with the KAT3. 73, Wayne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N6KR Björn Mohr wrote: > I wrote a week ago or so; > > >>>> I plan to use my K3 primarily for low band dxing, so RX antenna >>>> > switching will be crucial. > > Actually I am a little confused as to how RX signals are routed. The reason > I ordered the KRX3 option was to get RX antenna functionality. Basically I > want to be able to have my TX and RX antenna separated and have the choice > to listen to one or the other or both simultaneously. > > Should I cancel the KRX3? <<< > > > I realize there was an error in my text, I am not questioning my order of > the second RX but I what I wonder is if the KXV3 transverter interface will > bring anything to the table when it comes to the second RX. I have not > ordered the tuner as I don't see any point to tuned on the radio end of the > coax... > > My question is, how do I get the functionality I need as described above. > > > 73 de Björn /SM0MDG Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |