|
I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and I was
trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely outstanding. The auto spot is equally outstanding. At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more away from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. The real problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely swamped weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband just blanked out. No band noise and no DX station. And there was no recovery between dits and dahs. It was actually easier to copy the DX station when people were calling directly on top of him. You could at least hear him between the dits. (Obviously if I was calling CQ instead of S&P I would have a wider passband and I would have just worked the stronger off frequency station). For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I tried AGC-F and AGC-S but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and AGC SLP. I tried NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT off and on. I tried riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband but shift doesn't work well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing helped. I also tried opening up the passband. That didn't help either but I don't remember the results. This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 different times on different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was just wondering what operational trick is available to compensate. 73, Mike K2MK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
What IF filters do you have installed?
jim ab3cv
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
This is more than likely due to dirty signals on the TX end. I was
using a QS1R connected to the K3 IF and measured the width of some of the strong signals. Some were as wide as 2.6 kHz!!!! Not very good for a CW signal. In this case there is just not much you can do. 73 Greg AB7R On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P > and I was > trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely > outstanding. The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off > frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or > more away > from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. > The real > problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely > swamped > weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband just blanked out. No > band > noise and no DX station. And there was no recovery between dits and > dahs. It > was actually easier to copy the DX station when people were calling > directly > on top of him. You could at least hear him between the dits. > > (Obviously if I was calling CQ instead of S&P I would have a wider > passband > and I would have just worked the stronger off frequency station). > > For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I tried AGC-F > and AGC-S > but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and AGC SLP. > I tried > NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT off and on. > I tried > riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband but shift doesn't > work > well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing helped. I also tried > opening up > the passband. That didn't help either but I don't remember the > results. > > This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 different > times on > different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was just > wondering what > operational trick is available to compensate. > > 73, > Mike K2MK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
It seems that soundcard based "AFCW" has become popular with some
contesters, for reasons which elude me. There is great opportunity to transmit wide, distorted cw signals if things are poorly adjusted. Bob W2WG -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Gregory Fischer Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:59 PM To: K2MK Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest This is more than likely due to dirty signals on the TX end. I was using a QS1R connected to the K3 IF and measured the width of some of the strong signals. Some were as wide as 2.6 kHz!!!! Not very good for a CW signal. In this case there is just not much you can do. 73 Greg AB7R On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P > and I was > trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely > outstanding. The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off > frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or > more away > from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. > The real > problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely > swamped > weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband just blanked out. No > band > noise and no DX station. And there was no recovery between dits and > dahs. It > was actually easier to copy the DX station when people were calling > directly > on top of him. You could at least hear him between the dits. > > (Obviously if I was calling CQ instead of S&P I would have a wider > passband > and I would have just worked the stronger off frequency station). > > For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I tried AGC-F > and AGC-S > but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and AGC SLP. > I tried > NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT off and on. > I tried > riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband but shift doesn't > work > well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing helped. I also tried > opening up > the passband. That didn't help either but I don't remember the > results. > > This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 different > times on > different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was just > wondering what > operational trick is available to compensate. > > 73, > Mike K2MK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
The behavior you are describing is almost the same thing I
complained about a couple weeks ago. In my case I was trying to sort out several signals calling me in a pileup, but it's the same basic situation. Fast agc, even with the highest threshold and slp=0, compressed them all into an indecipherable mush. I'll tell you how I deal with it, but I'm not recommending this for everybody: agc off config af lim = 30 (tech mode) use preamp on 20m and higher no preamp on 40 no preamp + attenuator on for 80/160 plug headphones into speaker jack, so you don't hit the AF Limiter threshold. (There will be some hiss, but not too bad.) RF gain as low as possible AF gain as low as possible to protect your ears. WATCH OUT FOR YOUR EARS WITH THIS SETUP!! I am hoping that the Elecraft folks will raise the AF limiter threshold or allow disabling the limiter. If the limiter is activated, all signals are horribly distorted. Limiter threshold is abrupt and hard. This setup is probably not for everybody, but it works great for me. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "K2MK" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:45 AM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest >I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I >do S&P and I was > trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely > outstanding. The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call > off frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be > 70Hz or more away > from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz > passband. The real > problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They > completely swamped > weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband just blanked > out. No band > noise and no DX station. And there was no recovery between > dits and dahs. It > was actually easier to copy the DX station when people > were calling directly > on top of him. You could at least hear him between the > dits. > > (Obviously if I was calling CQ instead of S&P I would have > a wider passband > and I would have just worked the stronger off frequency > station). > > For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I > tried AGC-F and AGC-S > but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and > AGC SLP. I tried > NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT > off and on. I tried > riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband but > shift doesn't work > well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing helped. I also > tried opening up > the passband. That didn't help either but I don't remember > the results. > > This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 > different times on > different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was > just wondering what > operational trick is available to compensate. > > 73, > Mike K2MK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I saw the same thing with a huge fairly weak pileup on 20m's today. This
really needs to get fixed asap. It makes working a pileup almost impossible. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Dave Hachadorian Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 6:26 PM To: Elecraft reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest The behavior you are describing is almost the same thing I complained about a couple weeks ago. In my case I was trying to sort out several signals calling me in a pileup, but it's the same basic situation. Fast agc, even with the highest threshold and slp=0, compressed them all into an indecipherable mush. I'll tell you how I deal with it, but I'm not recommending this for everybody: agc off config af lim = 30 (tech mode) use preamp on 20m and higher no preamp on 40 no preamp + attenuator on for 80/160 plug headphones into speaker jack, so you don't hit the AF Limiter threshold. (There will be some hiss, but not too bad.) RF gain as low as possible AF gain as low as possible to protect your ears. WATCH OUT FOR YOUR EARS WITH THIS SETUP!! I am hoping that the Elecraft folks will raise the AF limiter threshold or allow disabling the limiter. If the limiter is activated, all signals are horribly distorted. Limiter threshold is abrupt and hard. This setup is probably not for everybody, but it works great for me. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "K2MK" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:45 AM Subject: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest >I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and >I was trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely >outstanding. The auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off > frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more > away from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz > passband. The real problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. > They completely swamped weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband > just blanked out. No band noise and no DX station. And there was no > recovery between dits and dahs. It was actually easier to copy the DX > station when people were calling directly on top of him. You could at > least hear him between the dits. > > (Obviously if I was calling CQ instead of S&P I would have a wider > passband and I would have just worked the stronger off frequency > station). > > For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I tried AGC-F and > AGC-S but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and AGC > SLP. I tried NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT > off and on. I tried riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband > but shift doesn't work well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing > helped. I also tried opening up the passband. That didn't help either > but I don't remember the results. > > This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 different times > on different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was just > wondering what operational trick is available to compensate. > > 73, > Mike K2MK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
Mike,
The K3 is virtually desense-proof, with a BDR of ~140 dB. But to take advantage of this, you need a narrow crystal filter -- the closer to the DSP bandwidth the better. This is exactly the situation that we had in mind when we designed the 200-Hz 5-pole filter. For CW pileups, you can't beat it. What crystal filter were you using at the time? Of course if the transmitting stations are "wide" due to key clicks, there may be situations where no amount of filtering can help (for any receiver). The DSP noise blanker and NR may be useful sometimes -- you might give this a try. Wayne N6KR On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and > I was > trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely outstanding. > The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more > away > from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. The > real > problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely swamped > weaker DX stations. --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I have the 200, 400, 1000 and 2.7
I do not recall which one I was using at the time. At least the 400hz. Keep in mind these signals were all s7 and below, most well below. I was fresh blood on 20m this morning and got spotted. It was an ugly pileup. The adjacent qrm was not an issue. When I could get one letter and had one or two people calling it was fine when 5 or more the signals all were the same strength and as Dave said mushy like. I did have to rit off and pick off those not zero beat. All my pileup training goes against having super narrow filters as you want to hear those on your sides too. This issue had nothing to do with wide signals or clicks. I don't think it is desense either it is more of an overload of the audio circuitry where all the signal levels are being capped or captured to a specific level. While the pileup was maybe S3 when I picked out station and he was all alone the signal would come up considerably. Why I don't know. There was no local noise issues and no hams close by causing issues. Just passing on what I experienced. Overall the radio is great on CW. I worked so many very weak stations easily that I contribute to the fine receiver in the K3. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of wayne burdick Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:27 PM To: K2MK Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest Mike, The K3 is virtually desense-proof, with a BDR of ~140 dB. But to take advantage of this, you need a narrow crystal filter -- the closer to the DSP bandwidth the better. This is exactly the situation that we had in mind when we designed the 200-Hz 5-pole filter. For CW pileups, you can't beat it. What crystal filter were you using at the time? Of course if the transmitting stations are "wide" due to key clicks, there may be situations where no amount of filtering can help (for any receiver). The DSP noise blanker and NR may be useful sometimes -- you might give this a try. Wayne N6KR On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and > I was trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely > outstanding. > The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more > away from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz > passband. The real problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. > They completely swamped weaker DX stations. --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
I think what they are seeing is this: Strong signals that fall slightly
outside the DSP's audio passband are still pumping the S-meter and the AGC is desensing the receiver. The DSP is acting more like and audio filter than an IF DSP. In other words, the DSP's audio bandpass is very steep but it's IF bandpass is broad. This is with the 200Hz roofing filter installed but we are dealing with this 50Hz issue. To illustrate, tune in an S-9 carrier using the 50Hz filter. Tune off his signal 60Hz. The audio is gone but the S meter still reads S-9 telling me that the slopes for audio and IF are different. Also, at 50Hz BW the Passband tuning is indeed useless since it tunes in 50Hz increments. Can that be reduced? Steve Ellington [hidden email] ----- Original Message ----- From: "wayne burdick" <[hidden email]> To: "K2MK" <[hidden email]> Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 9:27 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest > Mike, > > The K3 is virtually desense-proof, with a BDR of ~140 dB. But to take > advantage of this, you need a narrow crystal filter -- the closer to > the DSP bandwidth the better. This is exactly the situation that we had > in mind when we designed the 200-Hz 5-pole filter. For CW pileups, you > can't beat it. > > What crystal filter were you using at the time? > > Of course if the transmitting stations are "wide" due to key clicks, > there may be situations where no amount of filtering can help (for any > receiver). The DSP noise blanker and NR may be useful sometimes -- you > might give this a try. > > Wayne > N6KR > > On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > >> I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and >> I was >> trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely outstanding. >> The >> auto spot is equally outstanding. >> >> At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. >> Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more >> away >> from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. The >> real >> problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely swamped >> weaker DX stations. > > --- > > http://www.elecraft.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by w0mu
Have to ditto whats been said, I have to run with AGC off, audio set
about
3 o'clock and use the RF gain. That seems to work fairly well, I use the 400HZ filter most of the time. Not sure what the problem is but the audio goes to pot in a hurry in a pile up. Sounds strange and no pure tone to the signals. Was beginning to chalk it up as my problem with old age, not knowing how to set parameters or ?? I have bought new headphones of several types thinking it was an audio problem here, but so far nothing works, I agree mine does not seem to be desense as I can get within a few hundred HZ of very strong signals and copy a single weak signal fine. Merv KH7C I have the 200, 400, 1000 and 2.7 I do not recall which one I was using at the time. At least the 400hz. Keep in mind these signals were all s7 and below, most well below. I was fresh blood on 20m this morning and got spotted. It was an ugly pileup. The adjacent qrm was not an issue. When I could get one letter and had one or two people calling it was fine when 5 or more the signals all were the same strength and as Dave said mushy like. I did have to rit off and pick off those not zero beat. All my pileup training goes against having super narrow filters as you want to hear those on your sides too. This issue had nothing to do with wide signals or clicks. I don't think it is desense either it is more of an overload of the audio circuitry where all the signal levels are being capped or captured to a specific level. While the pileup was maybe S3 when I picked out station and he was all alone the signal would come up considerably. Why I don't know. There was no local noise issues and no hams close by causing issues. Just passing on what I experienced. Overall the radio is great on CW. I worked so many very weak stations easily that I contribute to the fine receiver in the K3. "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [[hidden email]] On Behalf Of wayne burdick Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:27 PM To: K2MK Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest Mike, The K3 is virtually desense-proof, with a BDR of ~140 dB. But to take advantage of this, you need a narrow crystal filter -- the closer to the DSP bandwidth the better. This is exactly the situation that we had in mind when we designed the 200-Hz 5-pole filter. For CW pileups, you can't beat it. What crystal filter were you using at the time? Of course if the transmitting stations are "wide" due to key clicks, there may be situations where no amount of filtering can help (for any receiver). The DSP noise blanker and NR may be useful sometimes -- you might give this a try. Wayne N6KR On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I believe that I encountered this a couple of times while in VP5 last fall... there wasn't a roar of stations, the radio just sort of sat there and 'hummed'. I turned the radio off, then back on, rechecked all of the settings, and kept going. Brian N9ADG --- On Sun, 2/22/09, Merv Schweigert <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Merv Schweigert <[hidden email]> > goes to pot in a hurry in a pile up. Sounds strange and no > pure tone to the > signals. Was beginning to chalk it up as my problem with \ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Merv Schweigert
Merv
Try going into the Config and setting your AGC THR
down to 003 and see if that improves. I had mine too high at one time and it
caused stronger stations to distort.
Steve Ellington
[hidden email]
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Merv Schweigert
> When I could get one letter and had one or two people calling it was > fine. > When 5 or more the signals all were the same strength.... I'll discuss this with Lyle, KK7P (our DSP engineer). I don't think this has anything to do with "desensing" if a narrow filter is being used. I can't imaging what might cause it with lower-level signals. The ADC has plenty of resolution, and the DSP has plenty of horsepower, so there should be no difficulty in separating out multiple stations in close proximity. There are only two things I can think of: the AGC may be set too "flat", or, if a speaker is being used at moderate to high output, that perhaps the RFC47 mod hasn't been done (on the RF board). In any case, we'll look into it. tnx Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Wayne,
100 percent headphone operation here. I have not done the RFC47 Mod. I have it but I was not going to tear the radio apart with no backup. I have my 2nd K3 on the way in the brown truck. I am going to build that first and then do the mods on the older K3. Any suggested settings for serious contester types for the radio? I am not sure what AGC PLS does but mine was set to auto. Maybe off would be better? AGC Thr was 5 I will try 3 as suggested. AGC fast was 120 maybe faster? "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over." Ben Franklin -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of wayne burdick Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 9:58 PM To: 'Elecraft Reflector' Subject: [Elecraft] K3 receiver & CW contest condx -- AGC settings, etc. > When I could get one letter and had one or two people calling it was > fine. > When 5 or more the signals all were the same strength.... I'll discuss this with Lyle, KK7P (our DSP engineer). I don't think this has anything to do with "desensing" if a narrow filter is being used. I can't imaging what might cause it with lower-level signals. The ADC has plenty of resolution, and the DSP has plenty of horsepower, so there should be no difficulty in separating out multiple stations in close proximity. There are only two things I can think of: the AGC may be set too "flat", or, if a speaker is being used at moderate to high output, that perhaps the RFC47 mod hasn't been done (on the RF board). In any case, we'll look into it. tnx Wayne N6KR --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
Mike I believe there are two separate parts to your post:
> At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more away from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. The real problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely swamped weaker DX stations. Sound within the passband just blanked out. No band noise and no DX station. And there was no recovery between dits and dahs. It was actually easier to copy the DX station when people were calling directly on top of him. You could at least hear him between the dits. The K3 will desense for signals about S9+25 that fall *within* the roofing filter but *outside* the DSP WIDTH passband. Elecraft made a modification ("hardware AGC" in the mod kits list) about a year ago which improved this problem and raised the threshold from a little over S9 to S9+25 (or maybe +30). I don't know your S/N but if it's ~280 or less you should install this mod. In my opinion, the threshold for this mod could still be raised a little more based on my experience with Orion which has a very similar front end to the K3. You didn't mention which filter you were using but even if you had the 200 Hz filter installed, you could have desense from S9+25 signals about +/- 150 Hz from your center frequency. There's simply not much that can be done about this until SHIFT resolution is changed from 50 Hz to 10 Hz. Then you could possibly use SHIFT to put the strong interfering signal on the XFIL passband slope. > For my style of operating this was a disappointment. I tried AGC-F and AGC-S but I forgot to try AGC off. I also varied the AGC THR and AGC SLP. I tried NR off and on. (I was not using NB). I tried PRE and ATT off and on. I tried riding the RF gain. I tried shifting the passband but shift doesn't work well when the width is only 50Hz. Nothing helped. I also tried opening up the passband. That didn't help either but I don't remember the results. > This was not a one time thing. It happened at least 20 different times on different bands. I guess this is perfectly normal. I was just wondering what operational trick is available to compensate. This could be a second issue (i.e. separating multiple strong stations) which Dave K6LL has identified. I haven't experienced it as yet because unfortunately I haven't had many pileups of strong stations calling me! However I believe Dave W6NL has determined that AGC THR and AGC SLP settings of 5 and 5 are best for this separation issue. I leave my AGC PLS set to NOR and have not experienced any problems that I felt were related to it. As an aside, I never use AGC-S for any mode and have AGC-F set to 120. Using Extreme Isolation EX-29 headphones, I select AF GAIN LO in the CONFIG menu, set my front panel AF GAIN to 9 o'clock (NEVER higher than 11 o'clock), set PRE/ATT so I can hear band noise when antennas are selected and then back off the front panel RF GAIN to a comfortable audio level. In the contest this weekend with ATT on my TX array and PRE on my Beverages (using both antennas for diversity), I typically had RF GAIN for both Main/Sub set from 2 o'clock to noon. The K3 was wonderful on Topband in the contest, especially the first night when QRN was low enough to use both my directional TX array and Beverages in diversity. It appears I set a new USA record with 434 QSOs and 79 countries for 102,858 points, breaking the old record of 81k set by N4PN at W8JI's station in 2006. 73, Bill |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
Hi Wayne and all:
My filters are 200, 400, 1.0, 1.8 and 2.7 and they are all CW enabled. I was using headphones and my sub RX was off. My serial number is 2208 and the radio was factory assembled (including the sub RX). I did not hear key clicks when this was happening. The off frequency transmissions were clean. I also made a point of observing the signal strength of the offending stations and they were usually S8 or S9. Not the 20db or 40db over S9 that I was expecting. I thought it was interesting that recovery was noticeably slow on the DX station's frequency when this was happening. However, under normal conditions when US stations were calling directly on top of the DX station, recovery was fast. Hence the ability to copy the DX station through the dits when the QRM was on frequency. Maybe a passband shift could of helped. I would like to see the shift limits changed to something less than 50Hz. Maybe 10Hz on CW and 50Hz on other modes. I appreciate the interesting ideas from K6LL and W4ZV. Unfortunately I'll have to wait for the next busy contest to try them out. This just isn't the type of condition you can experience under normal band conditions. 73, Mike K2MK wayne burdick Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:26:03 -0800 Mike, The K3 is virtually desense-proof, with a BDR of ~140 dB. But to take advantage of this, you need a narrow crystal filter -- the closer to the DSP bandwidth the better. This is exactly the situation that we had in mind when we designed the 200-Hz 5-pole filter. For CW pileups, you can't beat it. What crystal filter were you using at the time? Of course if the transmitting stations are "wide" due to key clicks, there may be situations where no amount of filtering can help (for any receiver). The DSP noise blanker and NR may be useful sometimes -- you might give this a try. Wayne N6KR On Feb 22, 2009, at 4:45 PM, K2MK wrote: > I had a great time with my K3 during the ARRL DX contest. I do S&P and > I was > trolling around with my filter width at 50Hz. Absolutely outstanding. > The > auto spot is equally outstanding. > > At 50Hz width it was quite clear that many stations call off frequency. > Using RIT, I could see that it was typical for them to be 70Hz or more > away > from the DX station but I could not hear them in my 50Hz passband. The > real > problem was when one of them was S9 or greater. They completely swamped > weaker DX stations. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Mike this definitely sounds like desense but I'm surprised you experienced it with only S8-9 signals. I'm not sure what you mean about differing conditions on and off the center frequency. Desense will affect everything inside the roofing filter. What speed AGC were you using (F or S) and what were your AGC-F and AGC-S CONFIG settings? I NEVER use AGC-S on either CW or SSB and like at least 120 dB/sec for AGC-F. Also, help your AGC do its job by not running RF GAIN fully clockwise (as mentioned in my previous message). 73, Bill P.S. As I said before my K3 worked extremely well coping weak signals in the midst of massive ones on 160 this weekend. I smiled when I saw the following comment from OL0W(OK1DSZ): "Only for fun, when the band was already closing, I decided to try what I will be able to work with QRP. Using longer callsign OK1DSZ and the power reduced to 5W I spend about 10 minutes calling several east coast big guns. The award for the best ears goes to W4ZV, who was worked as easily as with the kilowatt earlier in the night. K8PO and W2FU were worked with several repeats. The others just kept CQing without any reaction with exception of K1TTT, who apparently heard something, but not enough for the QSO." |
|
In reply to this post by Bill W4ZV
I don't see why SLP of 0 and THR of 8 wouldn't be the best settings in this case, in order to minimize compression? Perhaps Wayne/Lyle could weigh in on this. I have to echo W0MU and K6LL's experience - I was using AGC-F, 500hz filter@300-400hz dsp. I've noticed it in previous contests and the past weekend as well. For whatever reason, the 40M/20M pileups this weekend were HUGE at times, the biggest I've ever encountered. My typical experience was that I could work off the s8+ callers (thanks to SLP 0), but was eventually left with a sea of "mush". I easily could read the first character or two of the early callers but they were soon swallowed up by the "mush". It was impossible to pick out an individual caller, even after reducing RF Gain. 73, Barry N1EU |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
Hi Bill:
Here are my CONFIG settings related to the AGC. The only ones I played with during the contest were SLP and THR. I always use AGC-F but did occasionally try AGC-S. AGC-HOLD 000 AGC-PLS NOR AGC-SLP 010 AGC-THR 005 AGC-F 120 AGC-S 020 The differing conditions I described were the situation of everyone calling the DX close to his frequency versus one strong station calling 70Hz off frequency. When even strong stations called the DX right on frequency I was able to hear signals through the QRM. When strong stations called 70Hz off of the DX frequency the receiver went quiet and took about 1/4 to 1/2 second to recover after he stopped sending. 73, Mike K2MK Bill W4ZV Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:31:37 -0800 K2MK wrote: > > I thought it was interesting that recovery was noticeably slow on the DX > station's frequency when this was happening. However, under normal > conditions when US stations were calling directly on top of the DX > station, > recovery was fast. Hence the ability to copy the DX station through the > dits > when the QRM was on frequency. > Mike this definitely sounds like desense but I'm surprised you experienced it with only S8-9 signals. I'm not sure what you mean about differing conditions on and off the center frequency. Desense will affect everything inside the roofing filter. What speed AGC were you using (F or S) and what were your AGC-F and AGC-S CONFIG settings? I NEVER use AGC-S on either CW or SSB and like at least 120 dB/sec for AGC-F. Also, help your AGC do its job by not running RF GAIN fully clockwise (as mentioned in my previous message). 73, Bill ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Having 1/4 to 1/2 second recovery time does not sound like AGC-F. By
chance, did you have the CW text decode feature engaged? Did you have NR engaged? - Keith N1AS - - K3 711 - -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of K2MK Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 11:00 AM To: [hidden email]; Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 receiver desensing on CW during contest Hi Bill: Here are my CONFIG settings related to the AGC. The only ones I played with during the contest were SLP and THR. I always use AGC-F but did occasionally try AGC-S. AGC-HOLD 000 AGC-PLS NOR AGC-SLP 010 AGC-THR 005 AGC-F 120 AGC-S 020 The differing conditions I described were the situation of everyone calling the DX close to his frequency versus one strong station calling 70Hz off frequency. When even strong stations called the DX right on frequency I was able to hear signals through the QRM. When strong stations called 70Hz off of the DX frequency the receiver went quiet and took about 1/4 to 1/2 second to recover after he stopped sending. 73, Mike K2MK Bill W4ZV Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:31:37 -0800 K2MK wrote: > > I thought it was interesting that recovery was noticeably slow on the > DX station's frequency when this was happening. However, under normal > conditions when US stations were calling directly on top of the DX > station, recovery was fast. Hence the ability to copy the DX station > through the dits when the QRM was on frequency. > Mike this definitely sounds like desense but I'm surprised you experienced it with only S8-9 signals. I'm not sure what you mean about differing conditions on and off the center frequency. Desense will affect everything inside the roofing filter. What speed AGC were you using (F or S) and what were your AGC-F and AGC-S CONFIG settings? I NEVER use AGC-S on either CW or SSB and like at least 120 dB/sec for AGC-F. Also, help your AGC do its job by not running RF GAIN fully clockwise (as mentioned in my previous message). 73, Bill ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
