I'm a SSB operator and am interested in the Low Pass Filter Update/Mod.
Can someone with a pre-Rev D DSP board who has installed the K3DSPLPF speak to the improvements? Thanks. 73, Dick - KA5KKT ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Makes the radio sound a lot quieter and less fatiguing to me.
Honestly I feel much more comfortable for long periods of time behind the K3 after installing the filter. I should state that I changed the filter and several of the output caps at the same time. I even tried to do some filters in the computer to simulate what I should expect and I didn't really hear the difference so much in those files but once the filter was in the radio I noticed a difference. I have pictures of the differences that you can see here: <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/Wide%20Band%">http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/Wide%20Band% 20noise%20injected%202.8Khz%20BW.png <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/1uV%20850Hz%">http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/1uV%20850Hz% 20BW.png <a href="http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/50uV%20Signal%">http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1493706/K3/Audio%20Filter%20Board/50uV%20Signal% 20850Hz%20BW.png In all 3 pictures the green trace is before the LPF board was installed and the red trace is after. I should also note that the sample rate was different between the two captures and that is the reason behind the difference at the very high end... Anyway those are my thoughts... Some subjective and some not so subjective... Hopefully that helps. ~Brett On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 11:40 -0500, Edward Dickinson, III wrote: > I'm a SSB operator and am interested in the Low Pass Filter Update/Mod. > > Can someone with a pre-Rev D DSP board who has installed the K3DSPLPF speak > to the improvements? > > Thanks. > > > 73, > Dick - KA5KKT > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Dick Dickinson
I recently installed the LPF. I did *not* make any other changes
(e.g. to extend the low frequency response.) I work mostly CW but do a fair amount of listening to SSB and SWBC. In my case, the effect is rather subtle and I can't be sure it's not just a placebo effect, but I think CW notes and SSB voices sound a bit smoother. I haven't used it for a long period of time since I installed the LPF, so I can't really tell if it's less fatiguing. Like Brett, I have before and after spectrum plots which clearly show that the aliased passband images centered on 12 kHz are completely gone. However, in my case the 12 kHz clock leakage itself is still there. It must be getting into the output some other way than through the normal audio path. It was one of the more challenging mods that I've done to my K3, mostly due to the fact that 4 of the 6 vias used were filled with solder, two of which have an IC on the other side preventing the use of a hot needle to clear them. And I'm *always* nervous cutting traces. That said, it wasn't really difficult. I took my time and spent about 2 hours from power off to power on. I noticed the price on the LPF board has gone up to $35. When I ordered mine it was $25. Was it worth it? I think so. I wouldn't call it a whole-new-rig difference but I seem to think the rig is a bit more pleasant to listen to. 73 -- Joe KB8AP On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Edward Dickinson, III wrote: > I'm a SSB operator and am interested in the Low Pass Filter Update/ > Mod. > > Can someone with a pre-Rev D DSP board who has installed the > K3DSPLPF speak > to the improvements? > > Thanks. > > > 73, > Dick - KA5KKT > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I also installed the LPF in 2 K3s here this weekend. Although I have
pretty good hearing, I was skeptical about any possible improvement. However, I was surprised when I turned on the 1st unit completed. The improvement was noticeable (I use headphones with a wide frequency response). CW notes are purer, and atmospheric noise less grating. AF output from the headphone jack looks very clean now when viewed on Spectrum Lab, previously the artifacts were no better than 60 dB down with strong signals. There is no change to the line out audio, which uses a separate DAC and audio path. All vias were solder filled on both units, but I was able to clear them with solder wick and the installation went smoothly. The instructions are very clear. I also did not make the change to extend low frequency response. Bob NW8L On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Joe Planisky <[hidden email]> wrote: > I recently installed the LPF. I did *not* make any other changes > (e.g. to extend the low frequency response.) I work mostly CW but do > a fair amount of listening to SSB and SWBC. > > In my case, the effect is rather subtle and I can't be sure it's not > just a placebo effect, but I think CW notes and SSB voices sound a bit > smoother. I haven't used it for a long period of time since I > installed the LPF, so I can't really tell if it's less fatiguing. > > Like Brett, I have before and after spectrum plots which clearly show > that the aliased passband images centered on 12 kHz are completely > gone. However, in my case the 12 kHz clock leakage itself is still > there. It must be getting into the output some other way than through > the normal audio path. > > It was one of the more challenging mods that I've done to my K3, > mostly due to the fact that 4 of the 6 vias used were filled with > solder, two of which have an IC on the other side preventing the use > of a hot needle to clear them. And I'm *always* nervous cutting > traces. That said, it wasn't really difficult. I took my time and > spent about 2 hours from power off to power on. > > I noticed the price on the LPF board has gone up to $35. When I > ordered mine it was $25. Was it worth it? I think so. I wouldn't > call it a whole-new-rig difference but I seem to think the rig is a > bit more pleasant to listen to. > > 73 > -- > Joe KB8AP > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |