Hello
Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the following options already installed? KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything inside the K2/100 case if that is possible. Thanks Scott N5SM _________________________________________________________________ Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes. http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextlink3 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Nope. Not enough room. The K2/100 is quite full. BTW, a K2/100
doesn't need the KIO2 option, it is built into the KPA100. Mark AD5SS On 6/28/07, Scott McDowell <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hello > Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the following > options already installed? > KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything inside > the K2/100 case if > that is possible. > Thanks > Scott N5SM _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by N5SM
The KAT2 20W ATU can be installed in the K2 with these options.
The KAT100 is an external only unit. 73, Eric ================ Scott McDowell wrote: > Hello > Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the > following options already installed? > KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything > inside the K2/100 case if > that is possible. > Thanks > Scott N5SM > > _________________________________________________________________ > Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes. > http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextlink3 > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by N5SM
Scott,
If you have the KIO2 installed then you must actually have the KPA100 installed in an external EC2 enclosure - if that is true, then yes, the KPA100 and the KAT100-2 can live together in the external EC2 enclosure. BUT, if you are trying to fit everything into one K2 package with the KPA100 as the top cover on a K2, then neither the KIO2 nor the KAT100 will fit - the KPA100 takes the entire available physical space. The KPA100 does include the KIO2 functions, but not the KIO2 itself. 73, Don W3FPR Scott McDowell wrote: > Hello > Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the following > options already installed? > KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything > inside the K2/100 case if > that is possible. > Thanks > Scott N5SM _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Please, no offense meant, but could Elecraft posters please put the model
name of the subject of your post in the subject line of the message? Much as I should love the K2, I really would rather read only the K3 posts... and a notation in the subject line would let me go to K3 stuff only. A big thank you to one and all.......... 73 Charles Harpole HS0ZCW [hidden email] _________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On Friday 29 June 2007 00:45:44 Charles Harpole wrote:
> Please, no offense meant, but could Elecraft posters please put the model > name of the subject of your post in the subject line of the message? I wish people would understand that hitting "reply" on a message in order to pick up the list address is not the correct way to start a new thread. Charles, your intended top level, new thread, is nested two deep in the KAT100 thread started by Scott. Hitting "reply" and changing the subject does not start a new thread. Threads, (references in the usually invisible headers), are a way to allow changing subjects as topics change and still link to the origins. Hitting "reply" within a thread with an unrelated topic is not only bad netiquette, the sender risks those bored with the thread won't even see it because they don't open the possibly uninteresting thread below which it was posted. Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962 -- _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
On 6/29/07, Ian Stirling <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I wish people would understand that hitting "reply" on a message > in order to pick up the list address is not the correct way to start > a new thread. Hitting "reply" here addresses the reply to the sender of the posting I'm replying to, not the list, which is a real pain as I'm getting too old and stupid to always remember to change the recipient to [hidden email] before hitting "send". By the way, Charles' posting showed up as a new thread for me. 73, -- Julian, G4ILO G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ??? www.Ham-Directory.com: the best ham resources on the net _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html |
In reply to this post by Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ
Eric, I'm glad I saw this KAT100 thread. I wanted to ask if the KAT100 will tune ok on 6m. I looked through the specs and the rest of the manual and could only find reference to 160 through 10. The specs did not include a frequency coverage range.
Stan Rife W5EWA "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" <[hidden email]> wrote: The KAT2 20W ATU can be installed in the K2 with these options. The KAT100 is an external only unit. 73, Eric ================ Scott McDowell wrote: > Hello > Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the > following options already installed? > KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything > inside the K2/100 case if > that is possible. > Thanks > Scott N5SM > > _________________________________________________________________ > Who's that on the Red Carpet? Play & win glamorous prizes. > http://club.live.com/red_carpet_reveal.aspx?icid=REDCARPET_hotmailtextlink3 > > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Don Wilhelm-3
Didn't someone physically attach a KAT100 to the bottom of a K2 a while back. Seems like I saw something about that on the reflector. It made it look like one big cabinet.
Stan Rife W5EWA Don Wilhelm <[hidden email]> wrote: Scott, If you have the KIO2 installed then you must actually have the KPA100 installed in an external EC2 enclosure - if that is true, then yes, the KPA100 and the KAT100-2 can live together in the external EC2 enclosure. BUT, if you are trying to fit everything into one K2 package with the KPA100 as the top cover on a K2, then neither the KIO2 nor the KAT100 will fit - the KPA100 takes the entire available physical space. The KPA100 does include the KIO2 functions, but not the KIO2 itself. 73, Don W3FPR Scott McDowell wrote: > Hello > Can the KAT100 be installed inside the K2/100 when I have the following > options already installed? > KSB2, K160RX, KNB2, KDSP2, and KIO2. I would like to have everything > inside the K2/100 case if > that is possible. > Thanks > Scott N5SM _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Ian Stirling, G4ICV, AB2GR
OK,
I've had this problem since joining the reflector. I just sent a test message to: [hidden email] The message was promptly returned to my inbox with the following notation: QUOTE A message (from <[hidden email]>) was received at 29 Jun 2007 15:11:03 +0000. The following addresses had delivery problems: <[hidden email]> Permanent Failure: Other address status Delivery last attempted at Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:11:03 -0000 END QUOTE I have tried EVERYTHING I can think of to get a message to the list WITHOUT using the reply button on someone else's post (as I did with this message). I know that creates a nesting problem, but don't know how to fix it. Please tell me the single, correct address to send messages to the reflector, and I will use it. Thanks es 73 Tom, KJ3D K2/100 4991 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Julian, G4ILO
On Friday 29 June 2007 03:29:18 Julian G4ILO wrote:
> Hitting "reply" here addresses the reply to the sender of the posting > I'm replying to, not the list, which is a real pain as I'm getting too > old and stupid to always remember to change the recipient to > [hidden email] before hitting "send". > > By the way, Charles' posting showed up as a new thread for me. I do not have a "reply-to" field in my headers, so I suspect strongly that the destination of your reply is determined by your email software setting, nothing to do with my settings. Supporting this notion, when I "reply" to my own posting, the destination is to the list, not to me. And replying to certain members' posts, the destinations are their personal addresses because they have a "reply-to" in their headers, a function of their software settings. Sounds like you aren't displaying threads because Charles's header clearly contains, "In-Reply-To: [Don's message ID] You are probably displaying the messages in subject order, not threads. Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR, K2 #4962 -- _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by srife
Hi Stan,
I believe the KAT100 is only specified for use with the K2 through 10M. (The K3's internal ATU -does- work on 6M.) 73, Eric Stan Rife wrote: > Eric, I'm glad I saw this KAT100 thread. I wanted to ask if the KAT100 will tune ok on 6m. I looked through the specs and the rest of the manual and could only find reference to 160 through 10. The specs did not include a frequency coverage range. > > Stan Rife > W5EWA > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by KJ3D-2
Well, Well...
That did it! I thought all my email was in text, but apparently not. Thanks, Tom -----Original Message----- From: Dave Van Wallaghen [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:34 AM To: 'KJ3D' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] posting style Tom, Not sure if this is the same problem I had or not, but make sure your email editor is set for text only for submitting to the list. I had mine defaulted to HTML and any time I composed a new message and submitted it to the list, it was rejected. Although, I think I got a message stating so. If you reply to the list, the email editor defaults to whatever the originating post was composed with, which is why replies worked for me and not new submittals. 73, Dave W8FGU > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:elecraft- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of KJ3D > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 11:26 AM > To: [hidden email] > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] posting style > > OK, > > I've had this problem since joining the reflector. > > I just sent a test message to: > > [hidden email] > > The message was promptly returned to my inbox with the following notation: > > QUOTE > > A message (from <[hidden email]>) was received at 29 Jun 2007 > 15:11:03 > +0000. > > The following addresses had delivery problems: > > <[hidden email]> > Permanent Failure: Other address status > Delivery last attempted at Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:11:03 -0000 > > END QUOTE > > I have tried EVERYTHING I can think of to get a message to the list > WITHOUT using the reply button on someone else's post (as I did with > this message). > I know that creates a nesting problem, but don't know how to fix it. > > Please tell me the single, correct address to send messages to the > reflector, and I will use it. > > Thanks es 73 > > Tom, KJ3D > K2/100 4991 > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Ian Stirling, G4ICV, AB2GR
On 6/29/07, Ian Stirling <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > I do not have a "reply-to" field in my headers, > so I suspect strongly that the destination of your > reply is determined by your email software setting, > nothing to do with my settings. Supporting this > notion, when I "reply" to my own posting, the > destination is to the list, not to me. And replying > to certain members' posts, the destinations are their > personal addresses because they have a "reply-to" in > their headers, a function of their software settings. > Sounds like you aren't displaying threads because > Charles's header clearly contains, > "In-Reply-To: [Don's message ID] > You are probably displaying the messages in subject > order, not threads. > Your message to me has the headers: From: Ian Stirling <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] The only way I can get a reply to go to the list is to select Reply All, which is hidden in a menu. Then a reply goes to the sender and a separate Cc to the list. You'll probably get two copies of this. :) If anyone knows how to make Reply All the default option in GMail I'd be extremely grateful. GMail does display messages in threads, which is one reason why it is a very good way to read this list. I can see the In-Reply-To:, but GMail is obviously clever enough to know that despite that, if the subject header changes it is probably a new topic. 73, -- Julian, G4ILO G4ILO's Shack: www.g4ilo.com K2 s/n: 392 K3 s/n: ??? www.Ham-Directory.com: the best ham resources on the net _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
Julian, G4ILO. K2 #392 K3 #222 KX3 #110
* G4ILO's Shack - http://www.g4ilo.com * KComm - http://www.g4ilo.com/kcomm.html * KTune - http://www.g4ilo.com/ktune.html |
In reply to this post by Ian Stirling, G4ICV, AB2GR
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 11:36 -0400, Ian Stirling wrote:
> I do not have a "reply-to" field in my headers, > so I suspect strongly that the destination of your > reply is determined by your email software setting, > nothing to do with my settings. Supporting this > notion, when I "reply" to my own posting, the > destination is to the list, not to me. And replying > to certain members' posts, the destinations are their > personal addresses because they have a "reply-to" in > their headers, a function of their software settings. You are correct that you have no reply-to header, but if I reply to your message, it still goes to you, not the list. This is because the message has a bunch of headers telling my mail client that this message is a post to an email list. This is common behaviour for some (perhaps many?) mail clients. I'm not sure which is considered the "correct" behaviour and don't really care enough to go look up the RFC's - assuming they even specify a "correct" behaviour. My mail client, btw, has two ways I can reply: reply (goes to you) and reply to list (goes to the list), which I find to be a very useful way of doing it. > Sounds like you aren't displaying threads because > Charles's header clearly contains, Yep, definitely a reply to Don's message and part of the KAT100 thread and your email client (like mine) is correct in showing it as part of that thread. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Julian, G4ILO
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 17:05 +0100, Julian G4ILO wrote:
> The only way I can get a reply to go to the list is to select Reply > All, which is hidden in a menu. That's gmail's fault for not providing a "reply to list" option. You could send them a feature request (I believe there is an online form for doing this), but I haven't found them very responsive in the past. Maybe they just don't like my feature requests! ;-) > GMail does display messages in threads, which is one reason why it is > a very good way to read this list. Well, it groups them together into what gmail calls "conversations". This is not quite the same as a threading email reader which displays them in a hierarchical tree - and not as useful either. > I can see the In-Reply-To:, but > GMail is obviously clever enough to know that despite that, if the > subject header changes it is probably a new topic. Incorrect (and non-standard) behaviour for a mail client. Threads often drift slowly over time, and eventually someone changes the subject line; or often people will change the subject line to be more specific to their own post which is still about the same topic. I would not want my mail reader displaying these as new threads. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Charly
Also, any AOL users who don't already know, the default reply mode is HTML.
To defeat this and reply in plain text, right click the mouse cursor in the text window (but not on the text) and select the menu item at bottom of list "Compose in Plain Text". Works for v9.x, haven't tried older versions. This needs to be done for each new session, but usually only first response. Al WA6VNN ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |