Elecraft's published specs rate the KPA-1500 for 1500 watts output on
all modes. In prepping for this weekend's contest, I've been running it at closer to 700 watts, because I've found that even just running on CW, with its much lower duty cycle, my amp reaches 70C quickly. I don't do that much digital contesting, though, so I'm wondering whether 1500 watts output is on digital modes is realistic or a recipe for trouble. -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Pete,
I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but typically set the input power for about 1000 watts output. One of the interesting characteristics of the amp is increased efficiency as power increases. At 600 watts efficiency is only 38%, whereas at 1000 efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. (see screenshots) -larry (K8UT) ------ Original Message ------ From: "N4ZR" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft List" <[hidden email]> Sent: 2019-08-29 07:59:23 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes >Elecraft's published specs rate the KPA-1500 for 1500 watts output on all modes. In prepping for this weekend's contest, I've been running it at closer to 700 watts, because I've found that even just running on CW, with its much lower duty cycle, my amp reaches 70C quickly. I don't do that much digital contesting, though, so I'm wondering whether 1500 watts output is on digital modes is realistic or a recipe for trouble. > >-- >73, Pete N4ZR >Check out the Reverse Beacon Network >at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now >spotting RTTY activity worldwide. >For spots, please use your favorite >"retail" DX cluster. > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by N4ZR
"Elecraft's published specs rate the KPA-1500 for 1500 watts output on all modes. In prepping for this weekend's contest, I've been running it at closer to 700 watts, because I've found that even just running on CW, with its much lower duty cycle, my amp reaches 70C quickly. "
You seem to be assuming that the KPA1500 will run hotter at 1,500 W output than it does at 700 W output. I have no data for the KPA1500 but my data for the KPA500 show peak heating is at about 250 W RF output. If the KPA1500 is similar then 700 W RF output will be close to worst case heating. If you want to reduce heating then ensuring the load is as well matched as possible may be more productive than running at reduced power output. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Larry (K8UT)
It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close
to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full power buys you nothing. 73, Roger On 8/29/2019 8:38 AM, Larry (K8UT) wrote: > Pete, > > I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but typically set the > input power for about 1000 watts output. One of the interesting characteristics > of the amp is increased efficiency as power increases. At 600 watts efficiency > is only 38%, whereas at 1000 efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. > > (see screenshots) > > -larry (K8UT) > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "N4ZR" <[hidden email]> > To: "Elecraft List" <[hidden email]> > Sent: 2019-08-29 07:59:23 > Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes > >> Elecraft's published specs rate the KPA-1500 for 1500 watts output on all >> modes. In prepping for this weekend's contest, I've been running it at closer >> to 700 watts, because I've found that even just running on CW, with its much >> lower duty cycle, my amp reaches 70C quickly. I don't do that much digital >> contesting, though, so I'm wondering whether 1500 watts output is on digital >> modes is realistic or a recipe for trouble. >> >> -- >> 73, Pete N4ZR >> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network >> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now >> spotting RTTY activity worldwide. >> For spots, please use your favorite >> "retail" DX cluster. >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
This was discussed here not long ago, and it is normal for any linear amplifier. It needs to be biased up to be linear, and that bias energy ends up as heat even if you don't use it. I worked as a component engineer at Collins Radio in Cedar Rapids when I first got out of college. One of the low level RF stages (or IF stage, I don't remember for sure) in several of their receivers used a stud-mounted RF power transistor biased up hard enough to discolor them. 73, Dave AB7E On 8/29/2019 6:03 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: > It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close > to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full > power buys you nothing. > > 73, Roger > > > On 8/29/2019 8:38 AM, Larry (K8UT) wrote: >> Pete, >> >> I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but >> typically set the input power for about 1000 watts output. One of the >> interesting characteristics of the amp is increased efficiency as >> power increases. At 600 watts efficiency is only 38%, whereas at 1000 >> efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. >> >> (see screenshots) >> >> -larry (K8UT) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power.
Dave wo2x Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > On Aug 29, 2019, at 1:29 PM, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > This was discussed here not long ago, and it is normal for any linear amplifier. It needs to be biased up to be linear, and that bias energy ends up as heat even if you don't use it. > > I worked as a component engineer at Collins Radio in Cedar Rapids when I first got out of college. One of the low level RF stages (or IF stage, I don't remember for sure) in several of their receivers used a stud-mounted RF power transistor biased up hard enough to discolor them. > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > >> On 8/29/2019 6:03 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: >> It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close >> to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full >> power buys you nothing. >> >> 73, Roger >> >> >>> On 8/29/2019 8:38 AM, Larry (K8UT) wrote: >>> Pete, >>> >>> I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but typically set the input power for about 1000 watts output. One of the interesting characteristics of the amp is increased efficiency as power increases. At 600 watts efficiency is only 38%, whereas at 1000 efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. >>> >>> (see screenshots) >>> >>> -larry (K8UT) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by N4ZR
"They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power. "
You beat me to it. My KPA500, keyed but with no RF input, showed 0.5 A at 76.7 V. That's only 38 W which is a small part of the 400 W plus PA dissipation seen in some operating conditions. All my measurements of PA dissipation take PA DC input and subtract RF output so my data include dissipation in the LPF. It would be interesting to separate the dissipation in the finals from the dissipation in the LPF but I don't know how to do that without modifying the amplifier. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
No one has mentioned amplifier efficiency at differing power levels.
-John NI0K Andy Durbin wrote: > "They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power." > > You beat me to it. My KPA500, keyed but with no RF input, showed 0.5 A at 76.7 V. That's only 38 W which is a small part of the 400 W plus PA dissipation seen in some operating conditions. > > All my measurements of PA dissipation take PA DC input and subtract RF output so my data include dissipation in the LPF. It would be interesting to separate the dissipation in the finals from the dissipation in the LPF but I don't know how to do that without modifying the amplifier. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
My KPA500 runs from a low of 35% to a high of 55% depending on power.
Lower power is least efficient. Thus I always run close or at maximum rated power. Also the load impedance will affect efficiency. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 8/29/2019 2:04 PM, John Simmons wrote: > No one has mentioned amplifier efficiency at differing power levels. > > -John NI0K > > Andy Durbin wrote: >> "They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in >> overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power." >> >> You beat me to it. My KPA500, keyed but with no RF input, showed >> 0.5 A at 76.7 V. That's only 38 W which is a small part of the 400 W >> plus PA dissipation seen in some operating conditions. >> >> All my measurements of PA dissipation take PA DC input and subtract >> RF output so my data include dissipation in the LPF. It would be >> interesting to separate the dissipation in the finals from the >> dissipation in the LPF but I don't know how to do that without >> modifying the amplifier. >> >> 73, >> Andy, k3wyc >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by N4ZR
"No one has mentioned amplifier efficiency at differing power levels."
I have for the KPA500 and I have provided links to test data. I would expect the KPA1500 to have similar characteristics but I'd like to see equivalent test data for it. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
I don't believe this is a class C amp. We should discuss the relevance of different classes of operation of amps, and let's be honest... it will be most efficient at max output regardless of class I believe.
73, Bill K9YEQ https://wrj-tech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Andy Durbin Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:57 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes "No one has mentioned amplifier efficiency at differing power levels." I have for the KPA500 and I have provided links to test data. I would expect the KPA1500 to have similar characteristics but I'd like to see equivalent test data for it. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Roger D Johnson
I just did a quick check:
At 1500 watts eff is 56% and pwr diss is 1179 watts 1000 44 1273 500 30 1120 My Expert 1.3K-FA had 3 voltage levels: 48 volts for full power (1300 watts) 38 800 watts 32 450 I no longer have the amp so I can't check the eff at those voltages and power levels. 73, Roger On 8/29/2019 9:03 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: > It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close > to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full > power buys you nothing. > > 73, Roger ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Dave wo2x
Dear OMs and YLs,
Remember that a small reduction in power, current or voltage for most electronic components gives a manifold increase in reliability. Not only is it better for other users but I will bet the KPA1500 is a lot happier (more reliable) for a 20% drop in output power which is memory serves me right is about 1 dB drop in signal strength. 73 Doug EI2CN -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: 29 August 2019 18:13 To: David Gilbert Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power. Dave wo2x Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > On Aug 29, 2019, at 1:29 PM, David Gilbert <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > This was discussed here not long ago, and it is normal for any linear amplifier. It needs to be biased up to be linear, and that bias energy ends up as heat even if you don't use it. > > I worked as a component engineer at Collins Radio in Cedar Rapids when I first got out of college. One of the low level RF stages (or IF stage, I don't remember for sure) in several of their receivers used a stud-mounted RF power transistor biased up hard enough to discolor them. > > 73, > Dave AB7E > > >> On 8/29/2019 6:03 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: >> It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close >> to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full >> power buys you nothing. >> >> 73, Roger >> >> >>> On 8/29/2019 8:38 AM, Larry (K8UT) wrote: >>> Pete, >>> >>> I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but typically characteristics of the amp is increased efficiency as power increases. At 600 watts efficiency is only 38%, whereas at 1000 efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. >>> >>> (see screenshots) >>> >>> -larry (K8UT) > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Roger D Johnson
If my efficiency screenshots from earlier did not get through the
reflector, you can see the results in a JPG file here: https://hamprojects.info/hamprojects-download-page/#elf_l1_b3RoZXJz -larry (K8UT) ------ Original Message ------ From: "Roger D Johnson" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft List" <[hidden email]> Sent: 2019-08-29 17:44:05 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes >I just did a quick check: > >At 1500 watts eff is 56% and pwr diss is 1179 watts > 1000 44 1273 > 500 30 1120 > >My Expert 1.3K-FA had 3 voltage levels: > >48 volts for full power (1300 watts) >38 800 watts >32 450 > >I no longer have the amp so I can't check the eff at those >voltages and power levels. > >73, Roger > > >On 8/29/2019 9:03 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: >>It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close >>to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full >>power buys you nothing. >> >>73, Roger >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >Message delivered to [hidden email] Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Yes. It has been mentioned on this list that the KPA500 is designed to be most efficient at 500 Watts and running at lower power does not mean saving the amp.
Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Aug 29, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX <[hidden email]> wrote: > > My KPA500 runs from a low of 35% to a high of 55% depending on power. Lower power is least efficient. Thus I always run close or at maximum rated power. Also the load impedance will affect efficiency. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > >> On 8/29/2019 2:04 PM, John Simmons wrote: >> No one has mentioned amplifier efficiency at differing power levels. >> >> -John NI0K >> >> Andy Durbin wrote: >>> "They bias the LDMOS devices at 1 amp each. That is minimal in overall heat when you are pulling over 40 amps at high power." >>> >>> You beat me to it. My KPA500, keyed but with no RF input, showed 0.5 A at 76.7 V. That's only 38 W which is a small part of the 400 W plus PA dissipation seen in some operating conditions. >>> >>> All my measurements of PA dissipation take PA DC input and subtract RF output so my data include dissipation in the LPF. It would be interesting to separate the dissipation in the finals from the dissipation in the LPF but I don't know how to do that without modifying the amplifier. >>> >>> 73, >>> Andy, k3wyc >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> Message delivered to [hidden email] >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by N4ZR
It would be interesting to know the efficiency of the Expert amp at
various voltage/power levels. John KK9A Roger D Johnson n1rj wrote: I just did a quick check: At 1500 watts eff is 56% and pwr diss is 1179 watts 1000 44 1273 500 30 1120 My Expert 1.3K-FA had 3 voltage levels: 48 volts for full power (1300 watts) 38 800 watts 32 450 I no longer have the amp so I can't check the eff at those voltages and power levels. 73, Roger ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
In reply to this post by Roger D Johnson
This is nothing unique to the KPA1500: ALL class AB amplifiers behave
this way. Even an "ideal" class AB amplifier has a maximum dissipation at around half of full output. One thing running at lower output probably will buy you is lower IMD. 73, Scott K9MA On 8/29/2019 08:03, Roger D Johnson wrote: > It's interesting that the heat that has to be dissipated is pretty close > to 1000 watts in all these scenarios! Running the amp at less than full > power buys you nothing. > > 73, Roger > > > On 8/29/2019 8:38 AM, Larry (K8UT) wrote: >> Pete, >> >> I don't run my amp at full legal limit on digital modes, but >> typically set the input power for about 1000 watts output. One of the >> interesting characteristics of the amp is increased efficiency as >> power increases. At 600 watts efficiency is only 38%, whereas at 1000 >> efficiency increases to 50% and at 1500 watts to 60%. >> >> (see screenshots) >> >> -larry (K8UT) >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "N4ZR" <[hidden email]> >> To: "Elecraft List" <[hidden email]> >> Sent: 2019-08-29 07:59:23 >> Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 on digital modes >> >>> Elecraft's published specs rate the KPA-1500 for 1500 watts output >>> on all modes. In prepping for this weekend's contest, I've been >>> running it at closer to 700 watts, because I've found that even just >>> running on CW, with its much lower duty cycle, my amp reaches 70C >>> quickly. I don't do that much digital contesting, though, so I'm >>> wondering whether 1500 watts output is on digital modes is realistic >>> or a recipe for trouble. >>> >>> -- >>> 73, Pete N4ZR >>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network >>> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now >>> spotting RTTY activity worldwide. >>> For spots, please use your favorite >>> "retail" DX cluster. >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >> -- Scott K9MA [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
On 8/31/2019 3:04 PM, K9MA wrote:
> This is nothing unique to the KPA1500: ALL class AB amplifiers behave > this way. Even an "ideal" class AB amplifier has a maximum dissipation > at around half of full output. Yep. These concepts were taught in my EE courses in the early '60s. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
On 8/31/2019 6:02 PM, Roger D Johnson wrote:
> If you design a different class AB amplifier for half the output > of the previous amplifier don't you design it to produce the desired > output into a certain load impedance? Would it not be as efficient > as the first amplifier running at it's designed output? > > So if you redesigned the first amplifier to see the proper load > impedance at half output would not the efficiency be regained? In general, RF power gain stages (the tubes or transistors) are designed to work at some designed power level and impedance. Pi and Pi-L networks in tube amps provide both harmonic filtering and impedance matching. In most solid state amps, the output network provides only filtering, and are designed to work into 50 ohms. K6XX, one of the Elecraft engineers who works on their power amps, gave a talk to our contest club stressing the importance of providing a matched load to the output devices, and to the output itself. He observed distortion increases significantly when that condition is satisfied, whether it is an antenna tuner for a solid state output stage or the Pi or Pi-L in a tube amp. > > Isn't this exactly the way some of the first ham linears were designed > for an input of 2000 watts in SSB and 1000 watts in CW? There > was a switch on the front panel for SSB/CW mode which dropped > the plate voltage for CW mode so that the tubes saw the same > load impedance they did in SSB mode thereby keeping the efficiency > high and not requiring retuning between modes. I don't know, but you could ask K4XU, who designed the Ten Tec power amps and later the RF circuitry in Alpha amps. He told me the 87A was his design (although he made it clear that he did NOT work on the control circuitry). 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Just a reminder to Canadians running the KPA1500 or any other full power
amp in the contest this weekend. Max RF out is limited to 750 watts (not our usual 2250w PEP for SSB). Only CW and SSB get to go above 750 watts. Mike va3mw ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |