I have just returned from a few days away in Italy with my xyl. Being
limited with what we could take (we were flying, usually we drive), I took along my KX-1. It was the first time that I had used it this year- blame the K3 for that! When I used it last (in CT and EA in summer 2008) I posted to the reflector that I had suffered Broadcast interference on 20m after the radio had suffered a rather severe blow caused by my son tripping up over the antenna wire and launching the KX-1 some distance! As a result of this mishap I discovered that I had a broken bnc socket which I have since replaced. I imagined that this might have been at the root of the problem and that all would be well. However, on the aforementioned trip I threw about 10m of wire out of the hotel window (just to listen) and was surprised to find three or four strong broadcast stations around 14.2MHz, so strong in fact that they were badly interfering with QSOs. I cannot help but think that there is something else awry with the KX-1. I have checked the filter alignment and all seems okay according to the manual. Is there anything else I should check for? I don't expect the kind of performance I get from the K2 or K3, but it seems to me that the KX-1 should be performing better than this. It also seems a little quiet. Any suggestions appreciated 73 Stephen G4SJP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
"...three or four strong broadcast stations around 14.2MHz"
Harmonics of 40 meter BC stations..? Best regards, Dick - KA5KKT ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Hi Dick
Maybe they are, but I don't hear anything on the K3 (or even my FT-817) on a much bigger antenna, and anyway there is not much BC activity I can hear on 7.1MHz these days. I should add that the KX-1 has the 30/40 board and the internal ATU fitted. 73 Stephen On 27/10/2009 20:35, "Edward Dickinson, III" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > "...three or four strong broadcast stations around 14.2MHz" > > Harmonics of 40 meter BC stations..? > > > Best regards, > > Dick - KA5KKT > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Stephen Prior
Hi Stephen,
The KX1, like most low-current QRP transceivers, uses an active mixer in the front end. IMD products can appear in the mixer's output spectra when large signals are present at the input, especially if the LO (local oscillator) injection is insufficient. Try backing down the RF GAIN control on the KX1. If the "breakthrough" signals you're referring to decrease in amplitude faster than the desired signals, chances are you're hearing IMD. If all signals decrease in amplitude at about the same rate, you could have a problem with LO injection, or the 20-m band-pass filter may need realignment. The KX1's DDS LO has some level of harmonic content, and if the input filtering is not sufficient, LO harmonics might mix with very strong signals to produce outputs that show up in the ham band. If you have an oscilloscope I can give you a few test points to look at. But you could also try peaking the band pass filter per the KX1 owner's manual. 73, Wayne N6KR On Oct 27, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Stephen Prior wrote: > ...I threw about 10m of wire out of the > hotel window (just to listen) and was surprised to find three or > four strong > broadcast stations around 14.2MHz... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Stephen Prior
Stephen,
The first thing I would suggest is to see if the KX1 is really receiving on 20 meters, or perhaps on some other frequency band. What I am thinking is that the firmware chip may not be fully seated in the socket, which will cause to DDS output to be on some unknown frequency. Another thing that could cause similar problem is a distorted DDS output waveshape - check inductors L4 and L5 for damage and capacitors C50, C51 and C52. The other possibility is that the KX1 was actually responding to the image. When tuned to USB at 14.2, the DDS output is 4.9 kHz below the received frequency, and there could be leak-through of strong signals near 4.4 MHz. 73, Don W3FPR Stephen Prior wrote: > I have just returned from a few days away in Italy with my xyl. Being > limited with what we could take (we were flying, usually we drive), I took > along my KX-1. It was the first time that I had used it this year- blame > the K3 for that! > > When I used it last (in CT and EA in summer 2008) I posted to the reflector > that I had suffered Broadcast interference on 20m after the radio had > suffered a rather severe blow caused by my son tripping up over the antenna > wire and launching the KX-1 some distance! As a result of this mishap I > discovered that I had a broken bnc socket which I have since replaced. I > imagined that this might have been at the root of the problem and that all > would be well. > > However, on the aforementioned trip I threw about 10m of wire out of the > hotel window (just to listen) and was surprised to find three or four strong > broadcast stations around 14.2MHz, so strong in fact that they were badly > interfering with QSOs. I cannot help but think that there is something else > awry with the KX-1. I have checked the filter alignment and all seems okay > according to the manual. Is there anything else I should check for? I > don't expect the kind of performance I get from the K2 or K3, but it seems > to me that the KX-1 should be performing better than this. It also seems a > little quiet. > > Any suggestions appreciated > > 73 Stephen G4SJP > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.34/2462 - Release Date: 10/27/09 07:38:00 > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Many thanks Don, I have also had some input from Wayne on this one and have
some things to check with the scope. I shall combine your reply with his and see where it takes me. Thanks again 73 Stephen On 27/10/2009 21:57, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Stephen, > > The first thing I would suggest is to see if the KX1 is really receiving > on 20 meters, or perhaps on some other frequency band. What I am > thinking is that the firmware chip may not be fully seated in the > socket, which will cause to DDS output to be on some unknown frequency. > > Another thing that could cause similar problem is a distorted DDS output > waveshape - check inductors L4 and L5 for damage and capacitors C50, C51 > and C52. > > The other possibility is that the KX1 was actually responding to the > image. When tuned to USB at 14.2, the DDS output is 4.9 kHz below the > received frequency, and there could be leak-through of strong signals > near 4.4 MHz. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Good morning all,
I assume there is nothing defect nor misalignment in the KX1 but a special situation as we find it in some European Areas during winter conditions. At different places in Europe we have different levels of Broadcast signals. It depends on the distance between your actual location and the BC stn location. Especially BC stn located somewhere in Russia can produce extreme high field strength in the evening because if it is the right distance and if it is darkness between them and you. For example I measured more the 350mV sum RF at 50 Ohm using a 2x 20m dipole here in Berlin. The KX1 is an excellent little transceiver but for such situations it´s preselect ion sometimes is not good enough to handle such strong off band signals without producing some intermodulations. Remember, even for the much bigger K2 we published a "European 40m Band Modification" because in seldom cases even the fantastic K2 suffered by Intermodulations. The KX1 is as it is, it would be a hard job to give it some extra front end selectivity, but an easy way to avoid this intermodulations is to use a selective ATU. Normal T or L ATU designs do add only poor extra selectivity, but if you use a parallel design like the ZM2 or ZM4 (http://www.qrpproject.biz/UK/ZM4.html) or the "Fuchs ATU" (http://www.qrpproject.biz/UK/multifuchs.htm) you will have the same amount of selectivity as with a complete preselector. 73/2 de Peter, DL2FI > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] [mailto:elecraft- > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Stephen Prior > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:02 PM > To: [hidden email]; elecraft > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX-1: Broadcast breakthrough on 20m > > Many thanks Don, I have also had some input from Wayne on this one and > have > some things to check with the scope. I shall combine your reply with > his > and see where it takes me. > > Thanks again > > 73 Stephen > > > On 27/10/2009 21:57, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > Stephen, > > > > The first thing I would suggest is to see if the KX1 is really > receiving > > on 20 meters, or perhaps on some other frequency band. What I am > > thinking is that the firmware chip may not be fully seated in the > > socket, which will cause to DDS output to be on some unknown > frequency. > > > > Another thing that could cause similar problem is a distorted DDS > output > > waveshape - check inductors L4 and L5 for damage and capacitors C50, > C51 > > and C52. > > > > The other possibility is that the KX1 was actually responding to the > > image. When tuned to USB at 14.2, the DDS output is 4.9 kHz below > the > > received frequency, and there could be leak-through of strong signals > > near 4.4 MHz. > > > > 73, > > Don W3FPR > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I have to confirm that.
It would not surprise me if the voltage on the front end of a radio device went higher than a volt given conditions and antenna, particularly so in Europe. One time quite a while ago at W4BVV in northern Virginia, we measured 5 volts RF on an oscilloscope attached to the feedline coming in from a 3 element 40m yagi up 70m pointed at Europe. Was back in the day of megawatt transmitters into 20 plus dB curtain arrays from Radio Moscow and VOA and such. On that band we put a series trap in front of the RX tuned to 7125 to quiet things 7050 and below. That made a difference even for Collins 75S gear. I still see very high miscellaneous signal voltage on antennas for other frequencies at locations well distanced from metropolitan areas. 73, Guy. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Peter, DL2FI <[hidden email]> wrote: > Good morning all, > I assume there is nothing defect nor misalignment in the KX1 but a special > situation as we find it in some European Areas during winter conditions. At > different places in Europe we have different levels of Broadcast signals. > It > depends on the distance between your actual location and the BC stn > location. Especially BC stn located somewhere in Russia can produce extreme > high field strength in the evening because if it is the right distance and > if it is darkness between them and you. For example I measured more the > 350mV sum RF at 50 Ohm using a 2x 20m dipole here in Berlin. > > The KX1 is an excellent little transceiver but for such situations it´s > preselect ion sometimes is not good enough to handle such strong off band > signals without producing some intermodulations. Remember, even for the > much > bigger K2 we published a "European 40m Band Modification" because in seldom > cases even the fantastic K2 suffered by Intermodulations. > > The KX1 is as it is, it would be a hard job to give it some extra front end > selectivity, but an easy way to avoid this intermodulations is to use a > selective ATU. Normal T or L ATU designs do add only poor extra > selectivity, > but if you use a parallel design like the ZM2 or ZM4 > (http://www.qrpproject.biz/UK/ZM4.html) or the "Fuchs ATU" > (http://www.qrpproject.biz/UK/multifuchs.htm) you will have the same > amount > of selectivity as with a complete preselector. > > 73/2 de Peter, DL2FI > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [hidden email] [mailto:elecraft- > > [hidden email]] On Behalf Of Stephen Prior > > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 11:02 PM > > To: [hidden email]; elecraft > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX-1: Broadcast breakthrough on 20m > > > > Many thanks Don, I have also had some input from Wayne on this one and > > have > > some things to check with the scope. I shall combine your reply with > > his > > and see where it takes me. > > > > Thanks again > > > > 73 Stephen > > > > > > On 27/10/2009 21:57, "Don Wilhelm" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Stephen, > > > > > > The first thing I would suggest is to see if the KX1 is really > > receiving > > > on 20 meters, or perhaps on some other frequency band. What I am > > > thinking is that the firmware chip may not be fully seated in the > > > socket, which will cause to DDS output to be on some unknown > > frequency. > > > > > > Another thing that could cause similar problem is a distorted DDS > > output > > > waveshape - check inductors L4 and L5 for damage and capacitors C50, > > C51 > > > and C52. > > > > > > The other possibility is that the KX1 was actually responding to the > > > image. When tuned to USB at 14.2, the DDS output is 4.9 kHz below > > the > > > received frequency, and there could be leak-through of strong signals > > > near 4.4 MHz. > > > > > > 73, > > > Don W3FPR > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |