New Amplifiers ...

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
14 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

New Amplifiers ...

Dave White-3
I know that information on the new Elecraft amplifiers is scarce, but does
anyone know if the K2 (15W) will be able to provide sufficient drive or will
the KPA 100 be required?

I'm trying to plan my future purchases ...

Thanks

Dave, VE6DRW


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Amplifiers ...

Don Brown-4
Hi

I have no information on this but I think there is a specification from the
FCC that any external HF band amplifier must require at least 50 watts of
drive for full output. This is to keep the CB'ers from using the amps with
the 4 watt CB rigs. There was even a lot of discussion about the KPA100 but
it was approved because it can only driven with a K2 because of the tightly
integrated control structure. It is really considered a part of the K2 not
an external amp. I would expect the power amps to require the KPA100
although Elecraft has a way of surprising us in good ways when new products
come out. There always seems to be more performance than you expect when
final product is announced.

Don Brown

KD5NDB





----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave White" <[hidden email]>
To: <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:59 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] New Amplifiers ...


> I know that information on the new Elecraft amplifiers is scarce, but does
> anyone know if the K2 (15W) will be able to provide sufficient drive or
> will
> the KPA 100 be required?
>
> I'm trying to plan my future purchases ...
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave, VE6DRW
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: New Amplifiers ...

wayne burdick
Administrator
In reply to this post by Dave White-3
Dave White wrote:

> I know that information on the new Elecraft amplifiers is scarce, but
> does anyone know if the K2 (15W) will be able to provide sufficient
> drive or will the KPA 100 be required?

Dave,

The K2 by itself cannot legally drive an amplifier to full power; the
rule states that at least 50 watts of drive must be required.

That said, you'd still get hundreds of watts out  :)

By the way, I replied to you twice on this subject already (when you
e-mailed me directly). Looks like there's problem problem at either
your server or mine.

73,
Wayne
N6KR


---

http://www.elecraft.com

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Darrell Bellerive
How about a version for all of us not in the USA that are not encumbered by
FCC regulations?

Take the K2's 10 watt PEP or 15 Watt CW output and generate somewhere in the
neighborhood of 400 watts PEP or CW. Perhaps a KPA400 would solve the FCC
problem. And of course we would need a matching KAT400, BL4,...

Darrell  VA7TO  K2 #5093

On February 1, 2006 08:48 am, wayne burdick wrote:
> The K2 by itself cannot legally drive an amplifier to full power; the
> rule states that at least 50 watts of drive must be required.

--
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Stations VA7TO and VE7CLA
Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Ron D'Eau Claire-2
In previous comments here on the reflector, Wayne said that the new amps
will develop several hundred watts output when driven by a K2 at 10 watts or
so and:

"...will accept band change data from most popular transceivers, as well as
computers, or via complete manual controls on the front panel. It also has a
large, easy-to-read, 20-character alphanumeric LED display that shows what
rig you're using (A or B), the antenna (complete with names, e.g. "YAGI"),
PA temperature, and PA current drain. There's a full menu system, etc., etc.
Details pending!"

Ron AC7AC


-----Original Message-----
How about a version for all of us not in the USA that are not encumbered by
FCC regulations?

Take the K2's 10 watt PEP or 15 Watt CW output and generate somewhere in the

neighborhood of 400 watts PEP or CW. Perhaps a KPA400 would solve the FCC
problem. And of course we would need a matching KAT400, BL4,...

Darrell  VA7TO  K2 #5093

On February 1, 2006 08:48 am, wayne burdick wrote:
> The K2 by itself cannot legally drive an amplifier to full power; the
> rule states that at least 50 watts of drive must be required.

--
Darrell Bellerive

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Darrell Bellerive
Yes, but with all those features and SO2R, and the capability of 1 or 2 KW,
the price will be high. I'd love to see a 400 watt or so integrated amp for
the basic K2 with no frills. A KPA400 option rather than a KPA100. A separate
box would be okay, like some have done with the KPA100 in an EC2 case, but
still with full control from the K2.

Darrell  VA7TO   K2 #5093

On February 4, 2006 10:05 am, Ron D'Eau Claire wrote:

> In previous comments here on the reflector, Wayne said that the new amps
> will develop several hundred watts output when driven by a K2 at 10 watts
> or so and:
>
> "...will accept band change data from most popular transceivers, as well as
> computers, or via complete manual controls on the front panel. It also has
> a large, easy-to-read, 20-character alphanumeric LED display that shows
> what rig you're using (A or B), the antenna (complete with names, e.g.
> "YAGI"), PA temperature, and PA current drain. There's a full menu system,
> etc., etc. Details pending!"
>
> Ron AC7AC
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Roger Marrotte
Something like that just might just get me to sell my 200W Yaesu FT-1000MP
Mark V.  I love my K2 but I use the FT-1000 when I need more power.  A 400
watt K2 would do it all.  Have you ever looked inside an FT-1000 or other
similar radio.  I wouldn't know where to begin to repair one. It's difficult
just seeing the components.  A K2 and a 400 watt amp that you could build
and repair.  What could be better.  

Roger, W1EM

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Darrell Bellerive
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:40 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: New Amplifiers ...


Yes, but with all those features and SO2R, and the capability of 1 or 2 KW,
the price will be high. I'd love to see a 400 watt or so integrated amp for
the basic K2 with no frills. A KPA400 option rather than a KPA100. A
separate
box would be okay, like some have done with the KPA100 in an EC2 case, but
still with full control from the K2.

Darrell  VA7TO   K2 #5093


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Re: New Amplifiers ...

N2TK
In reply to this post by Ron D'Eau Claire-2
Does it cover 6M?
N2TK, Tony

 -----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]]  On Behalf Of Ron D'Eau Claire
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 1:05 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Re: New Amplifiers ...

In previous comments here on the reflector, Wayne said that the new amps
will develop several hundred watts output when driven by a K2 at 10 watts or
so and:

"...will accept band change data from most popular transceivers, as well as
computers, or via complete manual controls on the front panel. It also has a
large, easy-to-read, 20-character alphanumeric LED display that shows what
rig you're using (A or B), the antenna (complete with names, e.g. "YAGI"),
PA temperature, and PA current drain. There's a full menu system, etc., etc.
Details pending!"

Ron AC7AC


-----Original Message-----
How about a version for all of us not in the USA that are not encumbered by
FCC regulations?

Take the K2's 10 watt PEP or 15 Watt CW output and generate somewhere in the

neighborhood of 400 watts PEP or CW. Perhaps a KPA400 would solve the FCC
problem. And of course we would need a matching KAT400, BL4,...

Darrell  VA7TO  K2 #5093

On February 1, 2006 08:48 am, wayne burdick wrote:
> The K2 by itself cannot legally drive an amplifier to full power; the
> rule states that at least 50 watts of drive must be required.

--
Darrell Bellerive

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Darrell Bellerive
In reply to this post by Darrell Bellerive
First off, I didn't mean to imply that Elecraft shouldn't continue on their
path to the big amplifiers that they are building. Sorry if anyone had that
impression. My hope was that a lower priced, lower power version would also
become available.

I can't help but wonder if some of the technology in the new amps could result
in such an amplifier as I propose. Just like the K1 uses a lot of the design
and technology of the K2, but in a simpler context.

To get a solid state amp of kilowatt proportions, it must have at least a few
individual power amplifiers combined into one output. My hope was that
perhaps one or two of these individual power amps could form the basis of a
KPA400.

I also didn't realize that the FCC restricted manufacturer of amplifiers with
certain power specifications, I thought that they merely resticted the sale
or importation of such devices and it would be okay for Elecraft to build an
amplifier for export only. I have since been educated. Therefore a KPA400
option looks like the most practical option.

73,
Darrell  VA7TO   K2 #5093O

on February 4, 2006 08:33 am, Darrell Bellerive wrote:

> How about a version for all of us not in the USA that are not encumbered by
> FCC regulations?
>
> Take the K2's 10 watt PEP or 15 Watt CW output and generate somewhere in
> the neighborhood of 400 watts PEP or CW. Perhaps a KPA400 would solve the
> FCC problem. And of course we would need a matching KAT400, BL4,...
>
> Darrell  VA7TO  K2 #5093
>
> On February 1, 2006 08:48 am, wayne burdick wrote:
> > The K2 by itself cannot legally drive an amplifier to full power; the
> > rule states that at least 50 watts of drive must be required.

--
Darrell Bellerive
Amateur Radio Stations VA7TO and VE7CLA
Grand Forks, British Columbia, Canada
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Vic K2VCO
Darrell Bellerive wrote:

> Therefore a KPA400
> option looks like the most practical option.

I think the main problem would be commercial.  Although 400 watts would
make a noticeable difference, most hams who are in the market for an
amplifier want at least 800w.
--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Darrell Bellerive
Let's see:
K2 + KPA400  vs.  K2 + KPA100 + 800 watt amplifier.
What would be the $/watt?

You're right 800 watts is a very nice power level, but there have been a few
transceivers that have featured 200 to 400 watts output like the Yaesu
FTdx-400 or some versions of the FT-1000. Niche market to be sure.

On February 4, 2006 07:16 pm, Vic K2VCO wrote:
> Although 400 watts would make a noticeable difference, most hams who are in
> the market for an amplifier want at least 800w.

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Bekir Kemal Ataman
In reply to this post by Dave White-3
>I think the main problem would be commercial.  Although 400 watts would
>make a noticeable difference, most hams who are in the market for an
>amplifier want at least 800w.

Anything above 400W is illegal in this part of the world.

73!
BKA (TA2RX)

----------------------------------
Bekir Kemal Ataman
ArchiMac BBS Sysop & Webmaster <http://www.archimac.org/>


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Thom LaCosta
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, Bekir Kemal Ataman wrote:

>> I think the main problem would be commercial.  Although 400 watts would
>> make a noticeable difference, most hams who are in the market for an
>> amplifier want at least 800w.
>
> Anything above 400W is illegal in this part of the world.

What a refreshing thing.....although the AFA(amateurs for aligators) might
object to not being able to run high power.

They may cite the EDBOFTC(Every DB or Fraction Thereof Counts).

73,Thom-k3hrn
www.zerobeat.net Home of QRP Web Ring, Drakelist home page,Drake Web Ring,
QRP IRC channel, Drake IRC Channel,Elecraft Owners Database
www.tlchost.net/hosting/  ***  Web Hosting as low as 3.49/month
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Re: New Amplifiers ...

Bekir Kemal Ataman
In reply to this post by Bekir Kemal Ataman
400W PEP (26dBW)

73!
BKA (TA2RX)



> What are you all talking about with 400/800...... Peak or key down. I
>have had
>probably a half dozen amplifiers in the last 50 years., 2 of which were
>home brew...
>They would put out 500-600 watts key down. That was always enough for me!!
><g>
>I think I could be satisfied with 400 watts Key down.
>   Paul Gates, KD3JF Elecraft Kits:
>K1 #0231
>KX1 #1186
>XG1: Signal Generator
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Bekir Kemal Ataman <[hidden email]>
>To: [hidden email]
>Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 10:03:49 AM
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: New Amplifiers ...
>
> >I think the main problem would be commercial.  Although 400 watts would
>>make a noticeable difference, most hams who are in the market for an
>>amplifier want at least 800w.
>
>Anything above 400W is illegal in this part of the world.
>
>73!
>BKA (TA2RX)

----------------------------------
Bekir Kemal Ataman
ArchiMac BBS Sysop & Webmaster <http://www.archimac.org/>


_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com