Hi all,
I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some detective work, I have been unable to locate the source. I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to use the bands at the home QTH. Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this list use one and if so, how effective are they? Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions before I buy one. Thanks, Mark M5MDH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Hi Mark,
I use a Timewave ANC-4 which is very effective against certain types of noise (e.g. my neighbours plasma TV) but not sure about wideband noise - best bet is to see if you can try one on loan). It needed a bit of tweaking with the sense antenna to get the best out of it. Other units to consider are the MFJ one and DX engineering have released on as well. Can't comment of these but if DXE's other products are anything to go by it should be the dog's b's 73 Paul M1PAF -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Mark Hampton Sent: 22 September 2007 11:40 To: Elecraft list Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? Hi all, I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some detective work, I have been unable to locate the source. I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to use the bands at the home QTH. Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this list use one and if so, how effective are they? Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions before I buy one. Thanks, Mark M5MDH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
In a recent message, Mark Hampton <[hidden email]> wrote ...
>I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to >use the bands at the home QTH. > >Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this >list use one and if so, how effective are they? It might be wise to hold off buying one for a while, Mark. I believe there has been discussion on here about the possibility of a noise canceller being built into the K3, possibly as an optional module. That would indeed be very useful for people in situations like your own. 73 -- David G4DMP Leeds, England, UK ------ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Mark Hampton wrote:
> I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some detective > work, I have been unable to locate the source. Noise cancelers would better be described as interference cancelers. They work by creating a null in the antenna pattern. They cannot suppress thermal or undirected sky noise. As such, if you don't know the direction of the source now, but successfully "noise" cancel it, you will have established some information about the direction, and could, in theory, have used other means to do that more directly. A possible other approach would be to use a separate, receive antenna, positioned for minimum interference. My impression is that noise cancelers only work well at frequencies where external noise and interference dominate receiver noise, so one should not need as efficient an antenna for receive as one does for transmit. > Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions > before I buy one. I've removed the OT tag, as this appears, to me, to be on topic according to the guidelines, which allow more than just Elecraft hardware related articles. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Hi Mark.
The noise canceling units use phase inversion to cancel noise. They work okay on noise coming from a singe point source. However, they don't seem to work well on noise generated from multiple sources or a spread out source as noise will then arrive in different phases. DX Engineering's '2 Channel' feature might allow canceling from a second source, but that's a bit beyond my understanding. If it is possible to determine the type of noise you are receiving, you may save yourself some money. Some investigation with some noise detecting equipment (if you don't have to pay for the equipment) may be fruitful. Regards, Dick - KA5KKT/4 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Mark, I would get a hold of your power company and ask for the Ghost Squad. Here is the Wichita Kansas area there is a dedicated truck and two guys that look for power line noise from anywhere. They will track it down to a pole...and fix it....or they will track it down to a house and tell you where it is coming from. I think that most power companies worth their salt have a Ghost Squad that tracks these things down. I had the problem too....and they found quite a few bad poles. The crew fixed it pronto because they are wasting power before it gets to the meter so you have to pay for it. I have a quite location now right in town. Lee - K0WA In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense. Is Common Sense divine? _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Hi Mark
If you cannot locate the noise source, can you at least determine it's direction from you? A simple untuned loop should allow you to do that. An antenna noice canceller (ANC) works best if you can get a pickup antena as close as possible to the source, relative to the communication antenna, even if it is just to the edge of your property. I have both the ANC-4 and the MFJ-1026, and they both work well on a single noise source. They can't cope with multiple noise sources, though, or a single source spread out over an area, such a power line that is radiating along its length. Good luck and 73 Bob N6WG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:39 AM Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? Hi all, I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some detective work, I have been unable to locate the source. I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to use the bands at the home QTH. Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this list use one and if so, how effective are they? Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions before I buy one. Thanks, Mark M5MDH _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Bob
Wonder if you (or anyone) has mixed the outputs from 2 or more noise cancellers, perhaps using different antennas for each. David G3UNA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[hidden email]> To: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]>; "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 2:36 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > Hi Mark > If you cannot locate the noise source, can you at least > determine it's direction from you? A simple untuned > loop should allow you to do that. > An antenna noice canceller (ANC) works best if you > can get a pickup antena as close as possible to the > source, relative to the communication antenna, even > if it is just to the edge of your property. > I have both the ANC-4 and the MFJ-1026, and they > both work well on a single noise source. They can't > cope with multiple noise sources, though, or a single > source spread out over an area, such a power line > that is radiating along its length. > Good luck and 73 > Bob N6WG > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]> > To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:39 AM > Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > > > Hi all, > I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some > detective > work, I have been unable to locate the source. > > I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to > use > the bands at the home QTH. > > Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this > list > use one and if so, how effective are they? > > Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions before > I > buy one. > > Thanks, Mark M5MDH > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Mark Hampton wrote:
> I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some detective > work, One other thing to consider is whether the interference is actually coming in on the "earth" connection. With the K2, on 80m, I find that the noise drops drastically when I disconnect from the mains power supply (a very old one that has high leakage and therefore needs to be earthed and the secondary side) and run on a battery. It drops from about S9 to about S2 (although my S meter calibration is suspect). This is using a crude indoor doublet, with a BL-1 and with a clamp on ferrite ring on five or six turns of the DC supply cable. My impression is that the BL-1 isn't terribly effective on an electrically short (about 10m either side, although not in a straight line) antenna at 80m, even though the KAT-2 can tune it. I'm going to have to do more research on indoor antennas. I'm in a first floor flat and running a separate functional (RF) earth is not possible, and it would be electrically long if I ran it, anyway. Note, make sure that you understand the issues about protective multiple earthing, and know how your electricity supply is done, before providing any alternative earthing. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by David Cutter
No, David, can't say I've done that.
I don't think it would be too successful, though, because when you tune away from the frequency where you have nulled a noise source, it comes back. The null will only hold over a certain frequency spread, sepending on the band. Then you have to redo the null. So with two nulls on two sources, when you move into one null you would be moving out of another. The noise might not show any improvement overall. 73, Bob N6WG ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Cutter" <[hidden email]> To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:08 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > Bob > > Wonder if you (or anyone) has mixed the outputs from 2 or more noise > cancellers, perhaps using different antennas for each. > > David > G3UNA > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[hidden email]> > To: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]>; "Elecraft list" > <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 2:36 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > > > > Hi Mark > > If you cannot locate the noise source, can you at least > > determine it's direction from you? A simple untuned > > loop should allow you to do that. > > An antenna noice canceller (ANC) works best if you > > can get a pickup antena as close as possible to the > > source, relative to the communication antenna, even > > if it is just to the edge of your property. > > I have both the ANC-4 and the MFJ-1026, and they > > both work well on a single noise source. They can't > > cope with multiple noise sources, though, or a single > > source spread out over an area, such a power line > > that is radiating along its length. > > Good luck and 73 > > Bob N6WG > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]> > > To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> > > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:39 AM > > Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > > > > > > Hi all, > > I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some > > detective > > work, I have been unable to locate the source. > > > > I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to > > use > > the bands at the home QTH. > > > > Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this > > list > > use one and if so, how effective are they? > > > > Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions > > I > > buy one. > > > > Thanks, Mark M5MDH > > _______________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Post to: [hidden email] > > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Post to: [hidden email] > > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Mark Hampton
Mark Hampton wrote:
> Hi all, I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some > detective work, I have been unable to locate the source. > > I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order > to use the bands at the home QTH. > > Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to > this list use one and if so, how effective are they? > > Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions > before I buy one. I have the MFJ. It is quite effective for noises generated by nearby sources, although you have to fiddle with the knobs a bit for each individual noise. The biggest problem is that it has to be in the line to the antenna and has to switch itself in and out on receive/transmit. This may not be a big problem with PTT SSB, but it's a bother on CW and pretty much prevents QSK -- unless you have a rig like the K3 with KXV3 which has receiver antenna in and out connections. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by n6wg
Yes, I appreciate that controls have to be adjusted for each QSY, but when
trying to hear that weak signal amongst QRM you would be on one frequency and spend time to set up the controls, (eg 3B7C). It seems intuitive to me that with more than one rx antenna and mixers it should be possible to null more than one signal. David G3UNA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[hidden email]> To: "David Cutter" <[hidden email]>; "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:44 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > No, David, can't say I've done that. > I don't think it would be too successful, though, > because when you tune away from the frequency > where you have nulled a noise source, it comes > back. The null will only hold over a certain > frequency spread, sepending on the band. Then > you have to redo the null. So with two nulls > on two sources, when you move into one null you > would be moving out of another. The noise might > not show any improvement overall. > 73, Bob N6WG > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Cutter" <[hidden email]> > To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:08 AM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? > > >> Bob >> >> Wonder if you (or anyone) has mixed the outputs from 2 or more noise >> cancellers, perhaps using different antennas for each. >> >> David >> G3UNA >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Robert Tellefsen" <[hidden email]> >> To: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]>; "Elecraft list" >> <[hidden email]> >> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 2:36 PM >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? >> >> >> > Hi Mark >> > If you cannot locate the noise source, can you at least >> > determine it's direction from you? A simple untuned >> > loop should allow you to do that. >> > An antenna noice canceller (ANC) works best if you >> > can get a pickup antena as close as possible to the >> > source, relative to the communication antenna, even >> > if it is just to the edge of your property. >> > I have both the ANC-4 and the MFJ-1026, and they >> > both work well on a single noise source. They can't >> > cope with multiple noise sources, though, or a single >> > source spread out over an area, such a power line >> > that is radiating along its length. >> > Good luck and 73 >> > Bob N6WG >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Mark Hampton" <[hidden email]> >> > To: "Elecraft list" <[hidden email]> >> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:39 AM >> > Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Anyone use a noise canceller? >> > >> > >> > Hi all, >> > I have a S-9 noise level across the bands and despite some >> > detective >> > work, I have been unable to locate the source. >> > >> > I feel that I may have to resort to using a noise canceller in order to >> > use >> > the bands at the home QTH. >> > >> > Before I purchase one, I'm wondering if any of the subscribers to this >> > list >> > use one and if so, how effective are they? >> > >> > Apologies for the off-topic post but I though I'd canvass opinions > before >> > I >> > buy one. >> > >> > Thanks, Mark M5MDH >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Post to: [hidden email] >> > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Post to: [hidden email] >> > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Post to: [hidden email] >> You must be a subscriber to post to the list. >> Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): >> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm >> Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by David Woolley (E.L)
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Hello David etc,
When you use two noise cancellars to get rid of two noise sources, either noise will be present at the output of one of the two cancellars, so nothing is gained. On an other note, as a lot of local noise is common mode noise, the first thing to do is to establish if this is the case or not. Noise can also be picked up on the shield of the coaxial feedline. I am using a battery operated receiver outdoors for this purpose as a lot of noise is contained inside a building. Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt Middelburg, Netherlands JO11tm -- Mijn Postvak In wordt beschermd door SPAMfighter. 386 spam-mails zijn er tot op heden geblokkeerd. Download de gratis SPAMfighter via deze link: http://www.spamfighter.com/lnl _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by David Cutter
David Cutter wrote:
> and spend time to set up the controls, (eg 3B7C). It seems intuitive to me > that with more than one rx antenna and mixers it should be possible to null > more than one signal. It's not that intuitive. The sense antenna inputs will combine linearly, which means that if you just control phase and amplitude, the combination will be a third combination of them, not both simultaneously. If you want to cancel both simultaneously, you will have to find two other variables, which would in practice, have to be the antenna locations (x and y). As the effect would be in wavelengths, you would have to move at least one sense antenna with frequency. You need two independent parameters for each simultaneously cancelled source. Getting the sense antennas close to the two sources will help, as once you attenuate the sense signal to match the main signal, it will re-introduce relatively little of the other interfering signal which will not originate close to that sense antenna. -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
|
Ron D'Eau Claire <[hidden email]> wrote:
Those interested in noise canceling might be interested in what the rest of the communications industry is doing with exotic integrated circuit systems that kill noise by inverting and adding it to the signal at the antenna input. <snip> The bad news for the casual homebrewer is that the chip measures less than 1mm (<0.04") on a side. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Thank you for the bad news Ron :-) A circuit working at IF which involves splitting, hard clipping, phasing and summing used in CW reception to reduce zero beat QRM shows promise with noise, but much work still to be done for use as a noise canceller. 73, Geoff GM4ESD _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |