|
Bug users,
A few months ago Jim, W0EB, posted a notice offering a device called a "dot stabilizer" to bug users. I have purchased and installed one of these on my ancient Vibroplex Champion. It is quite amazing. Gone are "scratchy dots" and sending is smoother and more regular. Before Jim's post I did not know that such a device existed. No bug user should be without one. The CW Police may still not like my occasionally intentional long dashes and sometimes Lake Erie swing - sorry about that decoder-users, but my dots, smoothness and error-free sending have significantly improved. 73, Buzz W3EMD ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
All electronic keyers should come with a Lake Erie Swing mode. Makes
more sense than having two iambic modes. Eric KE6US On 7/4/2014 10:55 AM, James Beitchman wrote: > Bug users, > > > > A few months ago Jim, W0EB, posted a notice offering a device called a "dot > stabilizer" to bug users. I have purchased and installed one of these on my > ancient Vibroplex Champion. It is quite amazing. Gone are "scratchy dots" > and sending is smoother and more regular. Before Jim's post I did not know > that such a device existed. No bug user should be without one. The CW > Police may still not like my occasionally intentional long dashes and > sometimes Lake Erie swing - sorry about that decoder-users, but my dots, > smoothness and error-free sending have significantly improved. > > > > 73, > > > > Buzz > > W3EMD > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
As long as the Iambic mode you replace isn't *my* Iambic mode. :-) Why
is it called "Lake Erie Swing?" For that matter, why are there two Iambic modes in the first place? 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 - www.cqp.org On 7/4/2014 11:57 AM, EricJ wrote: > All electronic keyers should come with a Lake Erie Swing mode. Makes > more sense than having two iambic modes. > > Eric > KE6US ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by James Beitchman
Here's a couple of recordings of W0BMU and the Lake Erie swing that Buzz
mentions. Listen online or d/l them. The bands used to be full of interesting and quirky fists and styles like this. Not unlike speech patterns some were quite beautiful, some were in-your-face obnoxious. That was before non-meat code readers and (gakk!) keyboards. I always thought the Lake Erie swing was easy to copy in the speed range of most ham QSOs. It has an informal chatty feel to it. Anyway, for those who want to remember and for those who never knew: https://archive.org/details/W0bmuHowardtexHarveyW0bmu Eric KE6US On 7/4/2014 10:55 AM, James Beitchman wrote: > Bug users, > > > > A few months ago Jim, W0EB, posted a notice offering a device called a "dot > stabilizer" to bug users. I have purchased and installed one of these on my > ancient Vibroplex Champion. It is quite amazing. Gone are "scratchy dots" > and sending is smoother and more regular. Before Jim's post I did not know > that such a device existed. No bug user should be without one. The CW > Police may still not like my occasionally intentional long dashes and > sometimes Lake Erie swing - sorry about that decoder-users, but my dots, > smoothness and error-free sending have significantly improved. > > > > 73, > > > > Buzz > > W3EMD > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by k6dgw
> Why is it called "Lake Erie Swing?" Who knows? I always heard it called a "banana boat swing" but then my CW mentors were from around Lake Erie <G>. > For that matter, why are there two Iambic modes in the first place? The original "Curtis" Iambic mode completed the element (dot or dash) being sent when [both] paddles were released at the same time. The iambic mode in the AccuKeyer had a logic error - the element memories were set as soon as the previous element completed - that completed the element being sent and then sent the *opposite* element if both paddles were released at the same time. This became known as Iambic B to distinguish it from the original Curtis iambic (Iambic A) mode. Those who learned on an AccuKeyer generally have problems with Curtis and vice versa. For an Iambic B (Accukeyer) user, trying to use an Iambic A keyer generally results in problems with incomplete letters (C, K, R, etc.) while for an Iambic A user trying to use an Iambic B keyer, the problems are generally more severe with extra elements added to the end of nearly any character which ends in alternating elements. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2014-07-04 3:29 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > As long as the Iambic mode you replace isn't *my* Iambic mode. :-) Why > is it called "Lake Erie Swing?" For that matter, why are there two > Iambic modes in the first place? > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > - Northern California Contest Club > - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 > - www.cqp.org > > On 7/4/2014 11:57 AM, EricJ wrote: >> All electronic keyers should come with a Lake Erie Swing mode. Makes >> more sense than having two iambic modes. >> >> Eric >> KE6US > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by k6dgw
It is in what the keyer does when both are pushed:
http://www.palm-radio.de/pdf/IambicPaddleModeAorBfunction-1.pdf ================== JHR ======================== On 7/4/2014 3:29 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > As long as the Iambic mode you replace isn't *my* Iambic mode. :-) Why > is it called "Lake Erie Swing?" For that matter, why are there two > Iambic modes in the first place? > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by EricJ-2
OK, thanks for the recordings Eric. It isn't unique to hams, or to Erie
Canal RO's. I worked Coastal Marine from So California in 56-57 while I was a senior in high school. That "swing" was fairly common, as were a large number of fists I can only categorize as "truly sloppy," like an air traffic controller giving a clearance with a mouthful of marbles. His signal was clean however, and very easy to copy. Transmitters afloat were usually powered by M-G sets which often modulated the carrier with a whine. MCW from an audio oscillator was common on 500 Kc [emergency receivers afloat were usually unpowered crystal sets with no BFO], and key down dragged the M-G down. The result was a carrier that chirped, sometimes through the passband of my receiver, a steady whine that chirped, and the MCW audio that chirped, each in it's own key and tempo. I sort of assumed the name came from the RO's on the freighters in the Great Lakes, but never really knew. 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 - www.cqp.org On 7/4/2014 12:39 PM, EricJ wrote: > Here's a couple of recordings of W0BMU and the Lake Erie swing that Buzz > mentions. Listen online or d/l them. The bands used to be full of > interesting and quirky fists and styles like this. Not unlike speech > patterns some were quite beautiful, some were in-your-face obnoxious. > That was before non-meat code readers and (gakk!) keyboards. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
I knew there was a history to this. Related question: About the end of
1956, I and a couple of my teen friends built "electronic keyers" from some magazine article which is long gone from my memory. I remember they had 8 or so dual triodes [12AT7's/12AU7's ??], had self-completing dots and dashes, and nothing else. With the power supply, mine weighed about a small brick and was similar in size. Used a relay for the then-ubiquitous cathode keying. We modified our bugs to key them. I'm fairly certain the design pre-dated the TO-Keyer, I think the TO came about 10 years later, and as I recall used fewer tubes. If any OT's remember the 50's well enough to identify my keyer, I'd appreciate hearing from you. I had an opportunity to operate as HS1FJ for a few weeks in the mid-60's, Dad sent me my keyer and Lionel J-36, and when we went back to war, I never saw either of them again. 73, Fred K6DGW - Northern California Contest Club - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 - www.cqp.org On 7/4/2014 12:49 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >> For that matter, why are there two Iambic modes in the first place? > > The original "Curtis" Iambic mode completed the element (dot or dash) > being sent when [both] paddles were released at the same time. The > iambic mode in the AccuKeyer had a logic error - the element memories > were set as soon as the previous element completed - that completed the > element being sent and then sent the *opposite* element if both paddles > were released at the same time. This became known as Iambic B to > distinguish it from the original Curtis iambic (Iambic A) mode. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Probably the All-Electronic Ultimatic. Kaye, John W6SRY QST April 1955 p 11 and QST May 1955 P 36. Four 12AU7 and four 12AT7. Built on a 4x4x3 base.
David K0LUM On Jul 4, 2014, at 5:48 PM, Fred Jensen <[hidden email]> wrote: > I knew there was a history to this. Related question: About the end of 1956, I and a couple of my teen friends built "electronic keyers" from some magazine article which is long gone from my memory. I remember they had 8 or so dual triodes [12AT7's/12AU7's ??], had self-completing dots and dashes, and nothing else. With the power supply, mine weighed about a small brick and was similar in size. Used a relay for the then-ubiquitous cathode keying. We modified our bugs to key them. > > I'm fairly certain the design pre-dated the TO-Keyer, I think the TO came about 10 years later, and as I recall used fewer tubes. If any OT's remember the 50's well enough to identify my keyer, I'd appreciate hearing from you. I had an opportunity to operate as HS1FJ for a few weeks in the mid-60's, Dad sent me my keyer and Lionel J-36, and when we went back to war, I never saw either of them again. > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > - Northern California Contest Club > - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 > - www.cqp.org > > On 7/4/2014 12:49 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > >>> For that matter, why are there two Iambic modes in the first place? >> >> The original "Curtis" Iambic mode completed the element (dot or dash) >> being sent when [both] paddles were released at the same time. The >> iambic mode in the AccuKeyer had a logic error - the element memories >> were set as soon as the previous element completed - that completed the >> element being sent and then sent the *opposite* element if both paddles >> were released at the same time. This became known as Iambic B to >> distinguish it from the original Curtis iambic (Iambic A) mode. > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by k6dgw
Fred, Here's a short bibliography from the 1960 Handbook ... Brann, "In search of the Ideal Electronic Key", Feb 1951 Bartlett, "Compact Automatic Key Design", Dec 1951 Kaye, "All-Electronic 'Ultimatic' Keyer", April & May 1955. I'd bet you're looking for the Kaye articles - all of 1955 is here: https://archive.org/details/qstamer00amer 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2014-07-04 6:48 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > I knew there was a history to this. Related question: About the end of > 1956, I and a couple of my teen friends built "electronic keyers" from > some magazine article which is long gone from my memory. I remember > they had 8 or so dual triodes [12AT7's/12AU7's ??], had self-completing > dots and dashes, and nothing else. With the power supply, mine weighed > about a small brick and was similar in size. Used a relay for the > then-ubiquitous cathode keying. We modified our bugs to key them. > > I'm fairly certain the design pre-dated the TO-Keyer, I think the TO > came about 10 years later, and as I recall used fewer tubes. If any > OT's remember the 50's well enough to identify my keyer, I'd appreciate > hearing from you. I had an opportunity to operate as HS1FJ for a few > weeks in the mid-60's, Dad sent me my keyer and Lionel J-36, and when we > went back to war, I never saw either of them again. > > 73, > > Fred K6DGW > - Northern California Contest Club > - CU in the 2014 Cal QSO Party 4-5 Oct 2014 > - www.cqp.org > > On 7/4/2014 12:49 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > >>> For that matter, why are there two Iambic modes in the first place? >> >> The original "Curtis" Iambic mode completed the element (dot or dash) >> being sent when [both] paddles were released at the same time. The >> iambic mode in the AccuKeyer had a logic error - the element memories >> were set as soon as the previous element completed - that completed the >> element being sent and then sent the *opposite* element if both paddles >> were released at the same time. This became known as Iambic B to >> distinguish it from the original Curtis iambic (Iambic A) mode. > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
