So right now I run the coax from my HF antenna to a point just outside my
window. When I want to operate I crank open the window and connect the coax from my rig to the end of the coax outside the window. I don't really have a way to leave it hooked up all the time because I don't want to leave the ground-level window partially open. I want to run the coax into the house through the wall, up the inside of the wall into the attic above my office, across the floor of the attic and down the inside of a wall to an existing utility box that is where all my phone and network connections are routed. This means I'll have coax running alongside both phone and CAT5. Seems like a lot of RF. I'm only running 100W. I suppose someday I might get some kind of amp but it's not a priority. But I don't want to rule that out simply because of the way I routed my antenna feedline. I can choose a different routing for the feedline and terminate it in a different box that's a few feet away from my CAT5 and phone lines, but I'd prefer not to have to install a new box. So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? Craig NZ0R KX1 #1499 K1 #1966 K2/100 #4941 K3/100 < #200 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Craig Rairdin wrote:
> So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network > connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? If the coax is properly decoupled from the antenna there will be no RF on the outside of it. So it will be no more likely to interfere with anything than a water pipe. 'Properly decoupled' means that if you are feeding a dipole, for example, there should be a balun at the feedpoint and the coax should come away from the antenna at right angles to the elements for as far as possible. A vertical should also have a choke or bead balun at the feedpoint. Finally, if the coax does not run at a right angle for enough distance ('right angle' and 'enough distance' are relative to how much RF on the outside of the coax you can tolerate), you can add a choke or bead balun right outside the box. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Craig Rairdin
Craig,
Theoretically, there should be no radiation outside the coax shield, so you would not have a problem. Practically, you may have common mode currents on the outside of your coax (that is a bad thing), so it would be prudent to install an in-line isolator (same thing as a 1:1 current balun) at the point where the coax enters the building. Provide a ground path for the current to flow - a good low impedance ground, and connect the antenna side of the isolator (and coax shield) to the ground. Lightning protection at the entry point to the dwelling is also prudent - PolyPhaser or other reliable brand of lightning suppressor devices are good. Consider that you may have to defend your choice of protective devices to your insurance adjuster if you ever have a claim involving the feedline entry. 73, Don W3FPR Craig Rairdin wrote: > So right now I run the coax from my HF antenna to a point just outside my > window. When I want to operate I crank open the window and connect the coax > from my rig to the end of the coax outside the window. I don't really have a > way to leave it hooked up all the time because I don't want to leave the > ground-level window partially open. > > I want to run the coax into the house through the wall, up the inside of the > wall into the attic above my office, across the floor of the attic and down > the inside of a wall to an existing utility box that is where all my phone > and network connections are routed. This means I'll have coax running > alongside both phone and CAT5. Seems like a lot of RF. > > I'm only running 100W. I suppose someday I might get some kind of amp but > it's not a priority. But I don't want to rule that out simply because of the > way I routed my antenna feedline. > > I can choose a different routing for the feedline and terminate it in a > different box that's a few feet away from my CAT5 and phone lines, but I'd > prefer not to have to install a new box. > > So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network > connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Craig Rairdin
If it's good coax and you take some simple measures to ensure RF currents on
the *outside* are suppressed, there should be no problem at all, either injecting xmit RF into other circuits or picking up noise from them. That sort of thing is done all the time in commercial layouts. Good coax has dense shield. Cheap coax may have rather loose shielding covering perhaps only 70% or 80% of the inner conductor's insulation. That allows leakage of RF in and out of the shield. Normally it's not enough to cause real trouble, but when you want good shielding you need a good, dense shield. Coax braid should cover well over 90% of the center conductor. Since RF travels on the skin of the conductor, the RF currents on the outside surface of the shield are completely isolated from those on the inside surface (assuming it's good shield). In most Ham installations, RF currents on the outside are hard to avoid, since the end of the coax near the antenna is very close to it! When feeding a balanced radiator, like the center of a dipole, it's often recommended that the coax run away from the antenna at exactly right angles for at least 1/4 wavelength. That's to minimize RF currents on the outside of the coax shield. Strong currents will be induced on the outer shield by the close proximity of the antenna carrying strong RF currents, but, if the coax runs away at exactly right angles, the currents induced in the shield by one side of the antenna will be exactly balanced by the 180 degree out-of-phase currents on the other side of the antenna and no net current will flow on the outside of the shield. Some guys are lucky, but I easily can count the number of times I've been able to do that at home in the HF range: zero! The currents flowing on the outside of the coax can be suppressed though, using ferrite beads that slip over the coax (the famous W2AU balun is just such a device) or coiling the coax into an inductor of sufficient size to choke off the currents. If you do that where the coax enters your home, you should not have significant currents on the outside to bother any other electronics. Ron AC7AC -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Craig Rairdin So right now I run the coax from my HF antenna to a point just outside my window. When I want to operate I crank open the window and connect the coax from my rig to the end of the coax outside the window. I don't really have a way to leave it hooked up all the time because I don't want to leave the ground-level window partially open. I want to run the coax into the house through the wall, up the inside of the wall into the attic above my office, across the floor of the attic and down the inside of a wall to an existing utility box that is where all my phone and network connections are routed. This means I'll have coax running alongside both phone and CAT5. Seems like a lot of RF. I'm only running 100W. I suppose someday I might get some kind of amp but it's not a priority. But I don't want to rule that out simply because of the way I routed my antenna feedline. I can choose a different routing for the feedline and terminate it in a different box that's a few feet away from my CAT5 and phone lines, but I'd prefer not to have to install a new box. So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? Craig NZ0R KX1 #1499 K1 #1966 K2/100 #4941 K3/100 < #200 _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
> So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network
> connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? So far everyone has addressed the issue of your rig interfering with your phone and your network so I won't spend much time on that except to add that, even if there is RF on the outside of the coax it probably isn't going to cause a problem with your networking gear as that uses twisted-pair and RF would show up as common-mode cruft which will get canceled out in the ethernet coupling transformers. OTOH, RF noise from your networking equipment might get coupled to your feedline. Remember you are trying to listen to very weak signals and ethernet, while well-crafted so as not to radiate, does leak just a little. I would probably choose to route my feedline away from my ethernet wiring just to reduce noise pick-up in your rig. 73 de Brian, WB6RQN Brian Lloyd - brian HYPHEN wb6rqn AT lloyd DOT com _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
John, NO8V brought a typo to my attention. I said W2AU instead of W2DU
balun. There more info about the W2DU ferrite bead balun at: http://www.w2du.com/r2ch21.pdf Thanks, John! Ron AC7AC _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Brian Lloyd-6
Brian Lloyd wrote:
> OTOH, RF noise from your networking equipment might get coupled to your > feedline. Remember you are trying to listen to very weak signals and > ethernet, while well-crafted so as not to radiate, does leak just a > little. I would probably choose to route my feedline away from my > ethernet wiring just to reduce noise pick-up in your rig. A balun at the antenna would help with this too. RF from the network (and other local sources) will run up the outside of the feedline; a balun at the top will choke it off so it does not get to the antenna and flow back to your receiver. -- 73, Vic, K2VCO Fresno CA http://www.qsl.net/k2vco _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Craig Rairdin
If you've got 100Mbps Ethernet in your house, you're probably already
hearing noise around 14.031, unless your antenna is far, far away from your networking equipment. It's not just the cables, but also the routers and interface cards that seem to spew this stuff! For a nice discussion of common mode currents and what to do about them, I like the paper by Chuck W1HIS at http://www.yccc.org/Articles/W1HIS/CommonModeChokesW1HIS2006Apr06.pdf Fair-rite makes a snap-on ferrite, p/n 0443164151, which snaps comfortably over three turns of RG-8X. I use two of them to make a choke at the point where my coax enters the house through a window, as well as a coil-wound balun/choke at the base of my vertical. This seems to handle the common mode problems well (but my vertical still picks up all kinds of RF from the neighborhood!) DXEngineering has similar snap-on ferrites in various sizes, too. 73 de chris K6DBG _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
In reply to this post by Craig Rairdin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 One thing you may want to think about is adding ferrite's to the CAT5 cable at the router/switch end and at the PC. If you're antenna isn't quite up to snuff this will keep RF out of the network. Craig Rairdin wrote: > So right now I run the coax from my HF antenna to a point just outside my > window. When I want to operate I crank open the window and connect the coax > from my rig to the end of the coax outside the window. I don't really have a > way to leave it hooked up all the time because I don't want to leave the > ground-level window partially open. > > I want to run the coax into the house through the wall, up the inside of the > wall into the attic above my office, across the floor of the attic and down > the inside of a wall to an existing utility box that is where all my phone > and network connections are routed. This means I'll have coax running > alongside both phone and CAT5. Seems like a lot of RF. > > I'm only running 100W. I suppose someday I might get some kind of amp but > it's not a priority. But I don't want to rule that out simply because of the > way I routed my antenna feedline. > > I can choose a different routing for the feedline and terminate it in a > different box that's a few feet away from my CAT5 and phone lines, but I'd > prefer not to have to install a new box. > > So my question is, is all that RF going to interfere with my network > connection or my phones? Any thoughts or recommendations? > > Craig > NZ0R > KX1 #1499 > K1 #1966 > K2/100 #4941 > K3/100 < #200 > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: [hidden email] > You must be a subscriber to post to the list. > Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > - -- R. Kevin Stover, ACØH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGWZTD11jxjloa2wsRAhRTAJ9vJ3pQ1YIB97BmUp7rVU/Fkyam/gCeL0hH lS1W4nWDX5JJLjw6MTWGm7M= =yaAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [hidden email] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |