|
I have a new tower and have a grounding question. My tower is on the west side of the house. The service entrance is on the east side of the house and the house is about 55 feet long.
I understand I should tie together the tower ground rod and the service ground rod. The question is about how best to accomplish this with two options apparent to me. 1. Run a ground wire into the house and connect to the water pipes. This is about a 10 foot run to the water pipes which are tied to the service entrance ground at the other end of the house. 2. Bury a wire around the house to tie the two together. This would be about a 75 foot run. Asking the collective wisdom here- option 1 or option 2?
73,
Joe, W8JH K3s, KPA 500, KAT 500 and KX3 happy user. |
|
This would be a very good question for the Tower Talk mailing list, where there are plenty of experts who can help you.
TowerTalk is hosted at the lists.contesting.com web site. Jack Brindle, W6FB Sent from my iPad On May 9, 2013, at 11:16 AM, W8JH <[hidden email]> wrote: > I have a new tower and have a grounding question. My tower is on the west > side of the house. The service entrance is on the east side of the house > and the house is about 55 feet long. > I understand I should tie together the tower ground rod and the service > ground rod. The question is about how best to accomplish this with two > options apparent to me. > 1. Run a ground wire into the house and connect to the water pipes. This is > about a 10 foot run to the water pipes which are tied to the service > entrance ground at the other end of the house. > 2. Bury a wire around the house to tie the two together. This would be > about a 75 foot run. > > Asking the collective wisdom here- option 1 or option 2? > > > > > > ----- > 73, > > Joe, W8JH > K3 1713, KPA 132 > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/OT-Tower-grounding-tp7573525.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by W8JH
Joe,
Option 2 only. In fact, if you want to make it even better, run a #6 copper wire all around the perimeter of the house with a driven ground rod anywhere it makes a turn more than 30 degrees. That perimeter wire provides a path for lightning instead of allowing it to punch a hole in your building foundation. I would also suggest at least 3 radial wires from the tower (length at least 1/2 the tower height) with driven ground rods spaced twice the length of the ground rod. There is good information on grounding at the Polyphaser website. 73, Don W3FPR On 5/9/2013 2:16 PM, W8JH wrote: > I have a new tower and have a grounding question. My tower is on the west > side of the house. The service entrance is on the east side of the house > and the house is about 55 feet long. > I understand I should tie together the tower ground rod and the service > ground rod. The question is about how best to accomplish this with two > options apparent to me. > 1. Run a ground wire into the house and connect to the water pipes. This is > about a 10 foot run to the water pipes which are tied to the service > entrance ground at the other end of the house. > 2. Bury a wire around the house to tie the two together. This would be > about a 75 foot run. > > Asking the collective wisdom here- option 1 or option 2? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On 5/9/2013 11:57 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
> Option 2 only. > In fact, if you want to make it even better, run a #6 copper wire all > around the perimeter of the house with a driven ground rod anywhere it > makes a turn more than 30 degrees. That perimeter wire provides a > path for lightning instead of allowing it to punch a hole in your > building foundation. > > I would also suggest at least 3 radial wires from the tower (length at > least 1/2 the tower height) with driven ground rods spaced twice the > length of the ground rod. I like this advice, BUT -- also make sure that ALL other grounds are also bonded to this ground. That includes the common connection of all the gear in your shack (which should have a bond from one chassis to another for each piece of gear), the antenna entry point, cable TV system, telephone system, cold water (it it's metallic), structural steel if there is any, and the green wires for all the outlets in your shack. A quibble though -- the "green wires" for all the outlets must be bonded to the enclosure of the main breaker panel, and they MUST be connected to your gear via the power cord. That combination of wires IS a connection through the house, although it's not a very good one, both because the conductors are small and they're long, so they're inductive. SO -- my advice, and what I've done in MY shack (where power is on one side of the building and the shack is on the other), is to do BOTH the perimeter wire (#4) with rods at multiple points along the run, and bonding the steel conduit (EMT) that carries wiring for the shack to the operating desk common point, and to the coax entry point. The fundamental concept is that you want to provide a robust, short path to earth for the strike (which can come in on your antennas, the tower, a phone line, a CATV cable, the power line, and even the wiring inside your home), and for everything in your premises to stay as close to the same potential as possible. To accomplish that, you want multiple paths to earth (ideally close to every entry point), and the lowest possible IMPEDANCE between everything in the premises, with conductors large enough that they can carry as much current as practical before they melt. :) Because lightning is an RF event, with a very broad energy peak around 1 MHz, the impedance is mainly INDUCTANCE, not resistance, which is why "short" matters, and why more parallel inductors are better than one. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
