|
GPS time is extremely accurate. If you have multiple computers, you can
run your own NTP server synced to GPS. On 6/27/2015 4:32 PM, WA8JXM wrote: > Any suggestions to handle the delay caused by satellite internet > access (typical 800 ms ping time)? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by KEN-3
So you are saying that NTP should still synchronize my computer clock
accurately? On 27/06/2015 20:06, Walter Underwood wrote: > This is exactly what NTP was designed to handle, synchronizing clocks with long latency. If the variance is small, NTP can sync clocks very accurately. > > wunder > K6WRU > CM87wj > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > On Jun 27, 2015, at 4:32 PM, WA8JXM<[hidden email]> wrote: > >> >Any suggestions to handle the delay caused by satellite internet access (typical 800 ms ping time)? >> > >> > >> > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Gentlemen,
I have today tried each and every one of your suggestions for a "correct" server to sync and ever one of them has failed for me. While I am truly happy these options work for you, they do not work for this computer or any of the other computers I use. The 3rd party software, however, does work without a hiccup on this computer. My only interest in my original posting of this was to provide information to any of us who have difficulties in syncing their computer to the correct time, so they will know a viable option to deal with this problem. I suspect this has been beaten to death and Eric will be soon telling us to can it, so lets let it go at this point. 73, Gary KA1J --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Smith-2
I also use tick.nobs.navy.mil for several years (2003) with my xp32
machine using D4 (mainly for JT65 on eme). I have a frequent sync rate so time is rarely off more than 0.020s. Dimension-4 is freeware and easy to setup. I tried some other NIST programs in the past returned to using D4. Its my belief that it is used by very many eme'rs so not sure where the comment by GIMHU came from that represented "most eme'rs having switched away from D4". I was never asked in any survey about what I am using. 73, Ed - KL7UW --------------- Myself, I use tick.nobs.navy.mil with no problems at all. It's at the US Naval Observatory and is one of the group used to determine NIST time. My first engineering job was at the US Naval Research Laboratory so I have a (misplaced ?) loyalty to NObs ! :) Happy Hamming. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT
If you are using pool servers, best practice is to specify at least four
(that's the reason for having 1., 2., etc., so that you can select four different ones). That way, if one of the them goes rogue it will be exlcuded from the time solution but you will still have enough for a correct time (there is a theory as to why three isn't enough). I believe that Windows supports the use of multiple servers and the NTP mitigation rules for deciding which ones are good, but you will probably have to go to the registry. If you want to use a single server, almost always the best one to use is the one run by your ISP. More ISPs run these than advertise the fact, and they are almost always time.<isp> or time1.<isp>, time2.<ips> etc. Note that time server addresses are normally resolved at start up. The latest reference implementations of ntpd will re-resolve pool servers that stop responding, but I don't think that w32time has any specific pool server support. However, if you are radio amateur, and serious about time, you should be using a local radio clock. The NTP reference version supports this, even on Windows, although you are likely to need a non-USB serial port for best performance. GPS receivers with pulse per second outputs are available for a few tens of USD. <http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/NTP-on-Windows-serial-port.html> Times accurate to single figure microseconds are possible on Linux, but one should really expect Windows to do better than single figure milliseconds. (The figures in the article are likely to be for an unloaded system and applications programmes can't normally read the time to that high a resolution. They are also really repeatability, rather than absolute accuracy, measurements. You need an even more accurate clock to measure those.) The GPS L1 Coarse/Acquisition signal should be able to obtain time transfer accuracies of around 50ns, so GPS itself is not the weak link. -- David Woolley Owner K2 06123 On 28/06/15 00:02, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT wrote: > The "pool" has a whole bunch of time servers, run by different > organizations. The people who run them can add them to the pool, or > remove them from the pool when they're about to be shut down. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Edward R Cole
I use D4 as well.
It synch's on boot and every 15 minutes thereafter. The longer you leave the computer on the more accurate the system clock. I just checked and the last synch adjusted the system clock by .006 seconds. The computer rebooted three days ago. That's plenty good enough for me. On 6/28/2015 2:35 AM, Edward R Cole wrote: > I also use tick.nobs.navy.mil for several years (2003) with my xp32 > machine using D4 (mainly for JT65 on eme). > I have a frequent sync rate so time is rarely off more than 0.020s. > Dimension-4 is freeware and easy to setup. > > I tried some other NIST programs in the past returned to using D4. > Its my belief that it is used by very many eme'rs so not sure where > the comment by GIMHU came from that represented "most eme'rs having > switched away from D4". I was never asked in any survey about what I > am using. > > 73, Ed - KL7UW > --------------- > Myself, I use tick.nobs.navy.mil with no problems at all. It's at the > US Naval Observatory and is one of the group used to determine NIST > time. My first engineering job was at the US Naval Research Laboratory > so I have a (misplaced ?) loyalty to NObs ! :) > > Happy Hamming. > > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane > Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > > 73, Ed - KL7UW > http://www.kl7uw.com > "Kits made by KL7UW" > Dubus Mag business: > [hidden email] > -- R. Kevin Stover AC0H ARRL FISTS #11993 SKCC #215 NAQCC #3441 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Smith-2
Gary,
Is there any chance that perhaps your firewall might be blocking the traffic on that NTP port? This thought was triggered by the fact that all your computers were having problems. From what I’ve found on Google doing a quick search that NTP can use port 123 (IMCP, which is also used by pPing), port 37 (but seems to be disfavored) and port 13. See: http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi Cheers and hope you find the problem, -rick, K7LOG On Jun 27, 2015, at 8:24 PM, Gary Smith <[hidden email]> wrote: Gentlemen, I have today tried each and every one of your suggestions for a "correct" server to sync and ever one of them has failed for me. While I am truly happy these options work for you, they do not work for this computer or any of the other computers I use. The 3rd party software, however, does work without a hiccup on this computer. My only interest in my original posting of this was to provide information to any of us who have difficulties in syncing their computer to the correct time, so they will know a viable option to deal with this problem. I suspect this has been beaten to death and Eric will be soon telling us to can it, so lets let it go at this point. 73, Gary KA1J --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Smith-2
I don't recall anyone mentioning it but I've had very good luck using Meinberg NTP on everything from XP to Windows 8.1.
73 Don AC2EV > On Jun 28, 2015, at 18:00, [hidden email] wrote: > > Re: [Elecraft] OT setting your computer to NIST ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
FWIW, the one glitch I encountered when I joined the Win10 beta was that the user account I created for the Meinberg NTP service did not get transferred over from my Win81 install.
Hopefully this will be cleared up before Win10 goes live. -- Michael Adams | [hidden email] -------- Original message -------- From: Frontier ac2ev <[hidden email]> Date: 2015/06/28 19:13 (GMT-05:00) To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT setting your computer to NIST I don't recall anyone mentioning it but I've had very good luck using Meinberg NTP on everything from XP to Windows 8.1. 73 Don AC2EV > On Jun 28, 2015, at 18:00, [hidden email] wrote: > > Re: [Elecraft] OT setting your computer to NIST ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Robin Moseley
On Fri,6/26/2015 6:54 PM, Robin Moseley wrote:
> most EME stations There are several good applications that do this. I've used NetTime for several years. http://www.timesynctool.com/ It runs in the background, can be set to sync at intervals that make sense for your PC. BTW -- the accuracy of the clock in a computer is NOT a function of battery condition, but rather the temperature in your shack and the temperature stability of the clock. One of my computers needed a sync every half hour to be good enough for WSJT modes, while others can go for days. With NetTime, you can see the time correction applied at each sync. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
On 15-06-27 02:00 PM, Harry Yingst wrote:
> I used a Raspberry Pi and made a NTP server to hook to my GPSDO > > I didn't really need one but I had the GPSDO with the NMEA and PPS output > and a spare Raspberry Pi I also have a GPSDO that provides NMEA data and PPS output. It makes sense for one to provide data that can also be used when you need accurate time. They can also make for extremely accurate frequency sources for Elecraft radios that accept 10MHz reference signals from an external source. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include <disclaimer/favourite> | --Chris Hardwick ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
