|
Good morning all, just wanted to resurrect an idea that has been tossed around the reflector. The combination of mouse-based point-and-click tuning within the P3's fixed-tune mode. I am a 100% CW op and this would be great to have if possible. Point and click feature would be great during a contest situation.
Mike VE3WDM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Hi Mike,
Your question is interesting. If you're in a contest you must be using a contest program. Do you want another program running on the PC that would require you to leave the confines of your contest program? I think not. You would probably want the contest program to have a direct tie-in to the P3 over the existing K3/P3 serial link. Something like holding the shift key causes the mouse to talk to the P3. Releasing the shift key returns control to the contest program. That could be interesting but would involve the contest program developer(s). I suppose the alternative is a corded or wireless USB mouse connected directly to the back of the P3. Then you would have two mice on your desk which is probably even less desirable during the heat of a contest (unless you're ambidextrous). 73, Mike K2MK
|
|
In reply to this post by VE3WDM
When I use my PC for PSK, the "click-to-tune" mode includes
automatic fine tuning, much like the spot function of the K3. Automatic fine tuning would be a useful addition for CW, RTTY, and PSK31 modes. (I think it is unnecessary for AM and FM and not implementable for SSB.) I've been operating PSK from a easy chair in the parlor with the lap top on my lap. (The only radio control I need to access is the receive volume control on the SignaLink, and it is close to hand.) Cheers - Bill, AE6JV On 4/30/13 at 3:43 AM, [hidden email] (Mike Weir) wrote: >Good morning all, just wanted to resurrect an idea that has >been tossed around the reflector. The combination of >mouse-based point-and-click tuning within the P3's fixed-tune >mode. I am a 100% CW op and this would be great to have if >possible. Point and click feature would be great during a >contest situation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | "I wish there was a knob on the TV to turn up the 408-356-8506 | intelligence. There's a knob called "brightness", but www.pwpconsult.com | it doesn't work. -- Gallagher ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
Mike is right, I use N1MM for contest logging and if you move the mouse out
of the "logging box" you lose that function cus the mouse is in the wrong place...you lose the focus of the mouse. It would be nice to be able to do it another way. NF8J Paul On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Mike K2MK <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Your question is interesting. If you're in a contest you must be using a > contest program. Do you want another program running on the PC that would > require you to leave the confines of your contest program? I think not. > > You would probably want the contest program to have a direct tie-in to the > P3 over the existing K3/P3 serial link. Something like holding the shift > key > causes the mouse to talk to the P3. Releasing the shift key returns control > to the contest program. That could be interesting but would involve the > contest program developer(s). > > I suppose the alternative is a corded or wireless USB mouse connected > directly to the back of the P3. Then you would have two mice on your desk > which is probably even less desirable during the heat of a contest (unless > you're ambidextrous). > > 73, > Mike K2MK > > > VE3WDM wrote > > Good morning all, just wanted to resurrect an idea that has been tossed > > around the reflector. The combination of mouse-based point-and-click > > tuning within the P3's fixed-tune mode. I am a 100% CW op and this would > > be great to have if possible. Point and click feature would be great > > during a contest situation. > > Mike > > VE3WDM > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-point-and-click-with-mouse-tp7573259p7573260.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- Paul VanOveren 5911 Snow Av Alto, Mi 49302 (616) 868-7149 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Mike K2MK
>
>Your question is interesting. If you're in a contest you must be using a >contest program. Do you want another program running on the PC that >would require you to leave the confines of your contest program? I think >not. > No, not another program. What's being requested is a standalone function of the P3 that does not add to the complications of running existing PC software. >You would probably want the contest program to have a direct tie-in to the >P3 over the existing K3/P3 serial link. Something like holding the shift key >causes the mouse to talk to the P3. Releasing the shift key returns control to >the contest program. That could be interesting but would involve the contest >program developer(s). > No, definitely not that - for exactly the reasons you state. >I suppose the alternative is a corded or wireless USB mouse connected >directly to the back of the P3. Ah, now you're getting there! >Then you would have two mice on your desk >which is probably even less desirable during the heat of a contest (unless >you're ambidextrous). > The people requesting the function have thought the issues through. We are quietly confident that the human race can handle the Two Mouse Problem, because many of us have been doing it in the work environment for years. Also, the reasons for requesting this feature are by no means exclusively related to contesting. Any time that the mouse can <jump> you to the right frequency before you (or the other guy) could get there by spinning the knob, that's a feature worth having. It would certainly have many uses in DXing, particularly in pileups or where the band is barely open and sparsely occupied. Another example: in the big 6m Es opening this morning, I had the P3SVGA displaying the whole of the bottom 200kHz of the band, trying to identify each new amateur signal as it emerged out of the video QRM. It would have been very handy - and very much quicker - to be able to hop around the display using the mouse, instead of having to spin the dial. For the record, I believe that the feature being requested is to QSY VFOA with a left-click, and VFOB separately with a right-click, using a mouse plugged into the USB port of the P3SVGA (as an alternative to a keyboard or the USB drive). 73 from Ian GM3SEK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
OOH, yes please
73 de David, M0XDF (K3 #174, P3 #108) -- Unix is basically a simple operating system, but you have to be a genius to understand the simplicity. -- Dennis Ritchie On 30 Apr 2013, at 17:51, Ian White wrote: > For the record, I believe that the feature being requested is to QSY > VFOA with a left-click, and VFOB separately with a right-click, using a > mouse plugged into the USB port of the P3SVGA (as an alternative to a > keyboard or the USB drive). ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Yes. That is the way I would like to see it work.
73, Tom Amateur Radio Operator N5GE ARRL Lifetime Member QCWA Lifetime Member On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:16:04 +0100, "David Ferrington, M0XDF" <[hidden email]> wrote: >OOH, yes please >73 de David, M0XDF (K3 #174, P3 #108) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
|
In reply to this post by VE3WDM
Some great ideas and suggestions coming back, I would be in favour of the mouse coming off the USB port on the P3. This does not tie up the PC's performance but this would involve 2 mice! Which for me is not a problem the PC mouse can run N1MM and the other mouse and search and pounce me around the contest. I have 3 24 inch flat screen monitors. One for the P3, one for the contest programs and the final monitor for MRP40 CW decode (for the 40wpm plus contesters), Google and so on.
I hope those at Elecraft consider this idea. Mike VE3WDM |
|
In reply to this post by VE3WDM
Hi Ian and all. What you depicted Ian is what any FLEX-RADIO radio could do. It could be really useful for phone and somewhat interesting for other modes. Having a span of 200 KHz is really a big chunk of data to be shown and not all humans could drive safely over it, let me say, with a monitor smaller than 20/25" (still small I think). To have, at this wide span, a smooth usage for any signal mode you also will need such a bigger than big monitor. Phone would leave the largest trace, so it could be viewed even in smallest monitor. Having a waterfall to look at could be even a more interesting thing, as it add persistence and we could recognize those persistent patterns much well. So also CW and other tight modes may take advantages on what you pictured out, even with the smaller screens, but still not < 20"/19". But then we will frantically run on each signal pattern, clicking it and also spinning that VFO knob to get onto each signal as to decode it. It could be that having such a span or a smaller span would not permit you to check into what you see in a way good enough to decode, by ears and, worse, by machine. I could imagine that it would not be easy onto smallest, or even smaller, monitors give the touch and feel of point and click smoothness to everyone. (BTW the bigger the screen, the bigger distance from it that anybody would need to see it all, without having to turn the head head or it will will me a great ergonomic exercise) A second mouse, not contesting (but ... follow me), would not be a problem. Part of the solution could be to have a trackball/s, instead of two mouse. This woult at times, limit the real eastae needed on our desk and give a precise place where the mouse live. Not having it running all the way on top of the desk (this late sound as a cage(?)). I had used two PCs and one single PC to do SO2R RTTY, WAE and JARTS, the second solution is much more agreeable for me. But this is a whole different story as the devices for two PC are a bunch compared to just one mouse more. I am coming from almost 3 years of FLEX usage and RTTY contesting, so my experience couldn't be enough to se all the scenario. Anyway those are my two cents. Let me grab some more space of a fringe items that already popped out here ... About programs, loggers, and radios it's a whole different story. About this I am not only driven by my short FLEX and RTTY contesting background. We don't have right now loggers that could be enough inside any radio as to give a single point of focus, BTW on the PC. Action is there on the screen, eyes, and in our hears. Hands are to be moved by the small possible amount. Right now we are still traveling a lot, if not too much, in between the radio front panel, the mouse (guess what I use), the keyboard and the screen. So giving that elusive multiplier or DX signal all the time to disappear. Even when we could use external VFO knobs that could live on the desk we are still prone to some programmers that misunderstand the whole approach forcing us to focus and un-focus, back and forth several times, un-synced at all, the logger and the virtual knob application. Now, since Tmate and brand specific products, those virtual knobs are much better. Somebody that wrote the software was listening, at last. It's really a hard world, good products, but with near zero integration. RS232 isn't anymore a great form of digital data (not signals!) transport for integration, foggy me. IMHO by now the K3/P3 represent , with its intrinsics good RF qualities and its large catalog of CAT commands one of the best best in class for RTTY contests (let me try it in the VOLTA). But only if you have enough MACRO buttons that could accommodate the CAT commands as I need. Not all Loggers are make in the same way, several of those out they still mimics old Borland interfaces and DOS commands ... just because this was the way, that "was" is gone since then, but it seems to me that nobody cares of. Ian your suggestion, view, is a great idea to be used from inside the radio, with just some personal concerns about screen real estate and the usefulness of the rendering on small, <20" screens. I vote for it, if it's the case. It could be a way as more people get acquainted to something new. I wold also vote to have more granularity, atomicity, stepping, in the Filter Width knob, 50 Hz seems to much, half of it would be better at half the times. Hope my poor English would make all this sound to anybody not too stinky. 73 de iw1ayd Salvo BTW I would also vote, too much(?), for a TMATE like for the K3/P3, why not! But from inside it, not from the PC! I could see myself running SO2R, with two of those toys under the left hand, short move to reach each of the two. With one trackball and two screens, all the CAT commands needed MACROed. OK, OK, I will stay asleep. The front panel is definitively gone for the most repetitive tasks. Almost all is on the desk. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
