Dear Folks:
I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in the field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but am annoyed at how long it takes to set up. I am wondering if you folks have a suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a wire up in a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and so, could I just use a wire? I am contemplating getting some fine gauge wire (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? 73 de Bernie, KF0QS |
Hi Bernie,
You might have to trim the antenna wire a bit so that the autotuners will load it up on all bands, and maybe add one or two extra wires on the ground side. After that you should have yourself a very good, compact antenna. I worked Seychelles on my KX-1 on batteries (2 watts) on 20m years ago with a 24 ft wire and two 8-foot radials that were stretched actoss my 2nd floor bedroom floor. The antenna wire ran out to a tree outside my window. 73, Ken Alexander VE3HLS On 06/05/2012 8:54 PM, Bernie KF0QS wrote: > Dear Folks: > > I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in the > field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but am > annoyed at how long it takes to set up. I am wondering if you folks have a > suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? > > As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a wire up > in a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and so, > could I just use a wire? I am contemplating getting some fine gauge wire > (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC > connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? > > 73 de Bernie, KF0QS > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-easy-button-tp7533480.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
Bernie, I'm no expert but I've been a QRP HF CW addict for 52 years and
one solution I've found that works quite well with all my Elecraft rigs (KX1, K2, K2, and K3) is a simple halfwave vertical with *no* radials or any other ground return except for the coax shield. It's not "perfect" but I've worked a freakin' pile of DX with it and its performance is reliable and repeatable. I'm not looking to start any long threads or get into arguments with hams whose technical education and abilities far exceed mine. I'm just offering a solution that works for me and which might work for you. Let's see...what's that term....Your Mileage May Vary.....? :} See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo 73, Stan WB2LQF KX1 #2411 K1#2994 K2# 6980 K3#5244 K9 #1 (Cocoa the Chihuahua) Everything is QRP, even the dog. On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Bernie KF0QS wrote: > Dear Folks: > > I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in > the > field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but > am > annoyed at how long it takes to set up. I am wondering if you folks > have a > suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? > > As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a > wire up > in a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and > so, > could I just use a wire? I am contemplating getting some fine gauge > wire > (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC > connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? > > 73 de Bernie, KF0QS > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-easy-button-tp7533480.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
Hi Bernie, There will be many opinions, here are mine. There are many different antennas each with its pros and cons. You are looking for something quick. While I have no experience with the Buddi-Pole system it seems to me to be something that should not take a lot of time to set up. Maybe switching between different bands is the issue. A wire of reasonable length (and ground system of some sort) and a good tuner can switch bands fairly rapidly. Your length of 40 feet seems reasonable although other lengths may be a bit better depending on the bands you want to operate on. A problem with a wire antenna is putting it up and taking it down and the need for supports. If you can just toss it up into an available tree it could be a quick thing. If you try to get a rope over a tree and have to walk through nasty vegetation and things get tangled up it might not be so pleasant. Performance wise for a single band I really like a dipole. There are a number of ways to get multiband operation: traps, jumpers to use or isolate portions, and feeding with balanced line and use a tuner. I generally do my portable operation while camping at the same location for several days. Setup time is not so much an issue for me. While some may say having the optimal antenna is the most important thing I think there may be some other perhaps more important considerations for portable operation. One is picking the best band to use on a given outing. Getting a good feel for the bands at home helps a lot, as does checking propagation information. The best antenna you can put up for portable use might be about useless if there band conditions are poor on your band of choice. Once you have a decent antenna selected and have picked a band that will be open the important thing is good operating. One CQ may not get a contact. It could take some effort and time. Bottom line, do planning on what band to use, pick a simple wire antenna, spend a reasonable amount of time and you will get contacts! Good luck and have fun! 73 - Mike WA8BXN -------Original Message------- From: Bernie KF0QS Date: 5/6/2012 8:59:34 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (Is there an "easy" button?) Dear Folks: I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in the Field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but am Annoyed at how long it takes to set up. I am wondering if you folks have a Suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a wire up In a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and so, Could I just use a wire? I am contemplating getting some fine gauge wire (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC Connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? 73 de Bernie, KF0QS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
While I do not have one, I am looking into the alexloop. On eham it has positive reviews. But don't by the MFJ 1899 (it is quick) but pretty well useless unless you are lucky
Robert a 'kosher' ham Sent from my BlackBerry device -----Original Message----- From: Mike WA8BXN <[hidden email]> Sender: [hidden email] Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 22:36:28 To: <[hidden email]>; Bernie KF0QS<[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (Is there an "easy" button?) Hi Bernie, There will be many opinions, here are mine. There are many different antennas each with its pros and cons. You are looking for something quick. While I have no experience with the Buddi-Pole system it seems to me to be something that should not take a lot of time to set up. Maybe switching between different bands is the issue. A wire of reasonable length (and ground system of some sort) and a good tuner can switch bands fairly rapidly. Your length of 40 feet seems reasonable although other lengths may be a bit better depending on the bands you want to operate on. A problem with a wire antenna is putting it up and taking it down and the need for supports. If you can just toss it up into an available tree it could be a quick thing. If you try to get a rope over a tree and have to walk through nasty vegetation and things get tangled up it might not be so pleasant. Performance wise for a single band I really like a dipole. There are a number of ways to get multiband operation: traps, jumpers to use or isolate portions, and feeding with balanced line and use a tuner. I generally do my portable operation while camping at the same location for several days. Setup time is not so much an issue for me. While some may say having the optimal antenna is the most important thing I think there may be some other perhaps more important considerations for portable operation. One is picking the best band to use on a given outing. Getting a good feel for the bands at home helps a lot, as does checking propagation information. The best antenna you can put up for portable use might be about useless if there band conditions are poor on your band of choice. Once you have a decent antenna selected and have picked a band that will be open the important thing is good operating. One CQ may not get a contact. It could take some effort and time. Bottom line, do planning on what band to use, pick a simple wire antenna, spend a reasonable amount of time and you will get contacts! Good luck and have fun! 73 - Mike WA8BXN -------Original Message------- From: Bernie KF0QS Date: 5/6/2012 8:59:34 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (Is there an "easy" button?) Dear Folks: I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in the Field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but am Annoyed at how long it takes to set up. I am wondering if you folks have a Suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a wire up In a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and so, Could I just use a wire? I am contemplating getting some fine gauge wire (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC Connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? 73 de Bernie, KF0QS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by stan levandowski
I'm a big fan of the EFHW (use it on some of my SOTA operations), but that youtube video is a BOGUS comparison. It simply doesn't take into account the radiation pattern of a 135ft OCF dipole on 15M and it's directionality relative to the receive signal. On 15M, the OCF has six narrow lobes with a deep null broadside. Barry N1EU |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
During my hotel ops last summer in westlake village, CA I used a 1:1 dipole balun attached to a MFJ telescopic pole and hung it off a best western balcony. Had a dipole cut for 20 and one for 6m. Worked Europe, south pacific on 20. And was able to work Oregon and Washington with this configuration both were resonant and worked well. Took about ten minutes from hotel room floor to being on the air.
Keith AG6AZ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
Bernie :
One of the most simple and effective portable antennas is the 44 Doublet, sometimes referred to as the Norcal Doublet : http://www.norcalqrp.org/norcaldoublet.htm This should give you coverage from 40m through 10m with the internal ATUs in the Elecraft rigs. I don't like to rely on mother nature for antenna supports so I normally use a 20 foot panfish pole to support the antenna as an inverted vee. Other options would be the bigger DK9SQ mast, the similar model that MFJ sells or the JackKite models (all close to 30 feet when fully extended). Get yourself a Pomona 1296 BNC to Male Binding post adaptor and put Radio Shack solderless Banana Plugs on the ends of the wire feedline, this will allow for quick connect and disconnect of the antenna. I use fishing snap swivels at the center and ends of the antenna and stake the ends of the doublet with some small aluminum tent pegs attached to some lengths of brightly colored nylon cord so the ends of the antenna are visible and present less of a hazard to anyone who might happen by. The 88 foot version of this antenna will give you coverage down to 80m. Its cheap, very portable, easy to deploy and effective. Michael VE3WMB (K1, KX1, K2 builder/owner) P.S. Here is a trick to reduce the strain on the tip of the poles when supporting a doublet (here is a case where a picture is worth 1000 words ) : http://www.qsl.net/v/ve3wmb//VE3WMB/Blog/Entries/2010/9/28_Field_Doublet_centre_support.html >Dear Folks: >I have a K2/10 (#6922) and a K1 (#1024). I have used the latter in the field, and hope to use both portable. I have a Buddi-Pole setup, but am annoyed at how long it takes to set >up. I am wondering if you folks have a suggestion for a really easy portable antenna setup. Anyone? >As a corollary to that question, I hear people say they just "toss a wire up in a tree". Both of my Elecraft rigs have the ATU's installed, and so, could I just use a wire? I am >contemplating getting some fine gauge wire (#24?) and soldering a 40 foot length to the positive pole of a BNC connector and a similar length to the shield. What do you guys think? >73 de Bernie, KF0QS ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by stan levandowski
Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these.
72/73 de Jim - AD6CW On 5/6/2012 6:11 PM, stan levandowski wrote: > Bernie, I'm no expert but I've been a QRP HF CW addict for 52 years and > one solution I've found that works quite well with all my Elecraft rigs > (KX1, K2, K2, and K3) is a simple halfwave vertical with *no* radials or > any other ground return except for the coax shield. It's not "perfect" > but I've worked a freakin' pile of DX with it and its performance is > reliable and repeatable. I'm not looking to start any long threads or > get into arguments with hams whose technical education and abilities far > exceed mine. I'm just offering a solution that works for me and which > might work for you. Let's see...what's that term....Your Mileage May > Vary.....? :} > > See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo > > > 73, Stan WB2LQF > KX1 #2411 K1#2994 K2# 6980 K3#5244 K9 #1 (Cocoa the > Chihuahua) > Everything is QRP, even the dog. > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few
T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and inexpensive. Tnx Stan Tom, WB2QDG K2 1103 On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: > Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. > > 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW > > On 5/6/2012 6:11 PM, stan levandowski wrote: >> Bernie, I'm no expert but I've been a QRP HF CW addict for 52 years and >> one solution I've found that works quite well with all my Elecraft rigs >> (KX1, K2, K2, and K3) is a simple halfwave vertical with *no* radials or >> any other ground return except for the coax shield. It's not "perfect" >> but I've worked a freakin' pile of DX with it and its performance is >> reliable and repeatable. I'm not looking to start any long threads or >> get into arguments with hams whose technical education and abilities far >> exceed mine. I'm just offering a solution that works for me and which >> might work for you. Let's see...what's that term....Your Mileage May >> Vary.....? :} >> >> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >> >> >> 73, Stan WB2LQF >> KX1 #2411 K1#2994 K2# 6980 K3#5244 K9 #1 (Cocoa the >> Chihuahua) >> Everything is QRP, even the dog. >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform quite well
for me. Generally, a coax length between 16 feet and 33 feet works just fine. I've used over 50 feet with no problem. If you encounter "strange" happenings, play with the coax length (+/-). I've found the real appeal includes no radials, a very small footprint, no guying required if your base is hefty enough, no reliance upon trees or other supports, and *probably* good efficiency. The opportunity to use a coax feedline can also be a plus for certain ops in certain circumstances. In fact, I purchased a second push-up pole, another UNUN, and had a friend weld up a nice mount for the back of my car. Now, I can drive to scenic overlooks, state parks, rest stops..... When I get there, I take the pole out of the backseat, drop it into the mount, push up my antenna in about 45 seconds, open the trunk, grab the coax and connect it to the transformer and I'm on the air with a much better 5 watt signal than from a Hamstick. As we all know, antennas are part science and part black magic so I hope you have the same luck and good QRP DX I've been enjoying. 73, Stan WB2LQF On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Tom McCulloch wrote: > After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few > T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and > inexpensive. Tnx Stan > Tom, WB2QDG > > K2 1103 > > On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: >> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. >> >> 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW >> >> On 5/6/2012 6:11 PM, stan levandowski wrote: >>> Bernie, I'm no expert but I've been a QRP HF CW addict for 52 years >>> and >>> one solution I've found that works quite well with all my Elecraft >>> rigs >>> (KX1, K2, K2, and K3) is a simple halfwave vertical with *no* >>> radials or >>> any other ground return except for the coax shield. It's not >>> "perfect" >>> but I've worked a freakin' pile of DX with it and its performance is >>> reliable and repeatable. I'm not looking to start any long threads >>> or >>> get into arguments with hams whose technical education and abilities >>> far >>> exceed mine. I'm just offering a solution that works for me and >>> which >>> might work for you. Let's see...what's that term....Your Mileage >>> May >>> Vary.....? :} >>> >>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >>> >>> >>> 73, Stan WB2LQF >>> KX1 #2411 K1#2994 K2# 6980 K3#5244 K9 #1 (Cocoa the >>> Chihuahua) >>> Everything is QRP, even the dog. >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in my portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the "comparison" featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're remotely aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. Hint, it's NOT broadside.
73, Barry N1EU
|
Here is a good link for the EFHW which details the matching box that is
discussed in the video. I just ordered some supplies today to build one (or two) of these. Burke Jones N0HYD KX1 On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, N1EU <[hidden email]> wrote: > I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in my > portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the > "comparison" > featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're remotely > aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. Hint, it's NOT > broadside. > > 73, > Barry N1EU > > > > stan levandowski wrote > > > > Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform quite well > > for me. > > > > > >> After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few > >> T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and > >> inexpensive. Tnx Stan > > > >> > >> On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: > >>> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. > >>> > > > >>>> > >>>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : > >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 73, Stan WB2LQF > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-easy-button-tp7533480p7539897.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Forgot the link - sorry about that!
http://www.earchi.org/92011endfedfiles/Endfed6_40.pdf On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > Here is a good link for the EFHW which details the matching box that is > discussed in the video. I just ordered some supplies today to build one > (or two) of these. > > Burke Jones > N0HYD > KX1 > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, N1EU <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in my >> portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the >> "comparison" >> featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're remotely >> aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. Hint, it's NOT >> broadside. >> >> 73, >> Barry N1EU >> >> >> >> stan levandowski wrote >> > >> > Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform quite well >> > for me. >> > >> > >> >> After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few >> >> T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and >> >> inexpensive. Tnx Stan >> > >> >> >> >> On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: >> >>> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. >> >>> >> > >> >>>> >> >>>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 73, Stan WB2LQF >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-easy-button-tp7533480p7539897.html >> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
One more question...
Where can I get one of the small ABS boxes like the group sells and is show in the video? Burke Jones N0HYD KX1 On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > Forgot the link - sorry about that! > > http://www.earchi.org/92011endfedfiles/Endfed6_40.pdf > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Here is a good link for the EFHW which details the matching box that is >> discussed in the video. I just ordered some supplies today to build one >> (or two) of these. >> >> Burke Jones >> N0HYD >> KX1 >> >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, N1EU <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in my >>> portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the >>> "comparison" >>> featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're remotely >>> aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. Hint, it's NOT >>> broadside. >>> >>> 73, >>> Barry N1EU >>> >>> >>> >>> stan levandowski wrote >>> > >>> > Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform quite >>> well >>> > for me. >>> > >>> > >>> >> After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few >>> >> T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and >>> >> inexpensive. Tnx Stan >>> > >>> >> >>> >> On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: >>> >>> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 73, Stan WB2LQF >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-easy-button-tp7533480p7539897.html >>> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Burke Jones
The video and website referenced should have some things pointed out. The
video SWR values called out are those obtained through the tuner in the K-2. At times I have had the unused antenna accidentally selected and ran the tuner and got reasonably low swr matches. It found a match but a lot of power would have been dissipated in the tuner. The website for the 9:1 balun nicely does not claim the antenna described using 30 feet of wire as an end fed half wave but rather and end fed antenna On 40 meters that length is near a quarter wave and would need a ground system for good performance. On 20 meters it is near a half wave but not quite. That may be good, making it easier to match. Note a tuner is required Using an antenna like this can make contacts. On most frequencies the swr in the coax from the balun to tuner will be high and thus loss could be high for long runs of lossy coax. For portable operation with a few feet of coax that should not be much of an issue. There is nothing magic about the configuration. It should work better than the greatly shortened wonder antennas. A say 25 foot wire connected to the output of a tuner would probably do as well eliminating the use of the balun A ground system as simple as a single radial will improve results in most cases. 73 - Mike WA8BXN -------Original Message------- From: Burke Jones Date: 5/8/2012 2:22:45 PM To: N1EU Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (Is there an "easy" button?) Forgot the link - sorry about that! http://www.earchi.org/92011endfedfiles/Endfed6_40.pdf On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > Here is a good link for the EFHW which details the matching box that is > discussed in the video. I just ordered some supplies today to build one > (or two) of these. > > Burke Jones > N0HYD > KX1 > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, N1EU <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in my >> portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the >> "comparison" >> featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're remotely >> aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. Hint, it's NOT >> broadside. >> >> 73, >> Barry N1EU >> >> >> >> Stan levandowski wrote >> > >> > Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform quite >> > for me. >> > >> > >> >> After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few >> >> T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward and >> >> inexpensive. Tnx Stan >> > >> >> >> >> On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: >> >>> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. >> >>> >> > >> >>>> >> >>>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 73, Stan WB2LQF >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble >> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Burke Jones
I dont quite get their claim: "The SWR is 1:1".
They are using a tuner, so the question is, what is the SWR on the ANTENNA side of the tuner, not what does the K3 says with the tuner on... Now, can you make 2 of these and place them at a strategic distance between them, making the other one a little longer for a 2 element parasitic array? -Rex- K1HI Rex Lint Merrimack, NH WWW.QRZ.COM/db/k1hi -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Burke Jones Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:47 PM To: N1EU Cc: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Portable Antennas (Is there an "easy" button?) One more question... Where can I get one of the small ABS boxes like the group sells and is show in the video? Burke Jones N0HYD KX1 On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > Forgot the link - sorry about that! > > http://www.earchi.org/92011endfedfiles/Endfed6_40.pdf > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Burke Jones <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Here is a good link for the EFHW which details the matching box that >> is discussed in the video. I just ordered some supplies today to >> build one (or two) of these. >> >> Burke Jones >> N0HYD >> KX1 >> >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:06 PM, N1EU <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >>> I agree that the EFHW is a good performer and it's a main player in >>> my portable arsenal. However, I give little to no credence in the >>> "comparison" >>> featured in that linked video. There's no evidence that they're >>> remotely aware of the azimuthal pattern of the 135ft OCF on 15M. >>> Hint, it's NOT broadside. >>> >>> 73, >>> Barry N1EU >>> >>> >>> >>> stan levandowski wrote >>> > >>> > Tom, it's by no means a perfect antenna but it *does* perform >>> > quite >>> well >>> > for me. >>> > >>> > >>> >> After watching Stan Video last night I placed an order for a few >>> >> T-106-2's to build the transformer...looks pretty straightforward >>> >> and inexpensive. Tnx Stan >>> > >>> >> >>> >> On 5/7/2012 1:43 PM, Jim Lowman wrote: >>> >>> Enjoyed the video, Stan. I may look into one of these. >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>>> >>> >>>> See my "not perfect, but pretty darn good solution at" : >>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWkpQ785Pjo >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> 73, Stan WB2LQF >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Portable-Antennas-Is-there-an-e >>> asy-button-tp7533480p7539897.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing >>> list archive at Nabble.com. >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >>> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Rex,
It could be a 2 element parasitic array for 20 meters - where it is a little shorter than a half wave, but the reflector or director would have to be resonant on the band of operation. A wire of that length would work with a low radiation angle on 15 meters, but the lobes will be at a higher angle on 10 meters where it is approaching a full wavelength. One thing you could do is space 2 of them a ways apart (about 16 feet) and feed both of them with the same length feedline. That will give you a directional pattern that is perpendicular to the plane of the elements (broadside array is a term typically used). Yes, that video is woefully uninformative, all that was accomplished was to demonstrate that the K2 tuner could tune it - note that the K2 tuner has a very wide range. 73, Don W3FPR On 5/8/2012 4:14 PM, Rex Lint wrote: > I don’t quite get their claim: "The SWR is 1:1". > > They are using a tuner, so the question is, what is the SWR on the ANTENNA > side of the tuner, not what does the K3 says with the tuner on... > > Now, can you make 2 of these and place them at a strategic distance between > them, making the other one a little longer for a 2 element parasitic array? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bernie KF0QS
Don, that's my antenna and I shot that video with Tony W1ZMB. All we
wanted to do was publicize a rather inexpensive and workable alternative to those heavily marketed and very expensive shortened antennas that promise the world at your doorstep and often fall short. I used that antenna to earn my QRP WAC Award. My club borrowed it for a recent Special Event conducted from the front porch of Samuel F.B. Morse's Poughkeepsie estate. They didn't want us to put big antennae all over the place. For that event we poured 100 watts into it. Seemed to work quite well. We used an ICOM 746PRO which is known to have a rather narrow internal tuner -- I've been told 3:1. In any case, Don (et al), a half wave end fed antenna is basically a pretty good deal and it works darn well *above* half wave also. Putting it on a pushup pole, using a transformer to bring the impedance down to where *most* tuners can find a match, having a small footprint, and eliminating radials at the halfwave frequency and above (i.e., 20 through 6 meters inclusive) isn't a bad deal, in my opinion, for the ham who may be operating under certain constraints and wants something better than a 10% efficient Hamstick. I apologize if the technical content of our video was either lacking or misleading to anyone. We just know the darn thing works from actual experience. 73, Stan WB2LQF On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Yes, that video is woefully uninformative, all that was accomplished > was to demonstrate that the K2 tuner could tune it - note that the K2 > tuner has a very wide range. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Burke Jones
Another popular way to end-feed a half wave wire is to parallel-tune the
coil to the band in use. The obvious question then is whether that arrangement can result in even higher voltage on the antenna, and thus better results. My guess would be yes, especially if the transformer step-up ratio is made higher, as is commonly the case. Obviously, tuning the coil would defeat the ability to operate multiple bands with just an auto-tuner, and I think that ability is the main feature of the antenna discussed in this thread. However, once a ham has the "easy" button, why not tinker for that little extra on at least one band? 73, Erik K7TV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |