Just ran the RF gain calibration with the new Mac K3 Utility and an XG2. I did it
a few times because I would get an ERR DSE error message when calibrating the SUB rx on occasion. I then went back and re-calibrated the S meter. I've noticed three things. 1) The rx seems considerably "quieter." The PRE is needed now where I seldom used it before. 2) Turning RF gain to minimum quiets the rx but the S meter only advances to S-5 3) I calibrated the S meter with PRE on and SMTR MD set to normal as Wayne recommended. When I change the MD setting to ABS, the 50uv signal drops to S-6 and cannot be adjusted up to S-9 with SMTR OF. I would appreciate any help here. I'm tempted to go back redo the RF gain calibration using the factory defaults option.
73,
Gary W7TEA K3 #1001, #5763 |
Hi,
Go back and redo the calibration! Make sure to follow the instructions exactly and pay special attention to ensure you have test signal centered in the passband. This is critical since the instructions call for a 100Hz bandwidth. I had similar symptoms as you until I did this the 3rd time. 3 times makes perfect and my S-meter is not dead on at 1uV, S9 and S9+40, the three easy cal points I have. Backing off the RF gain, S-meter rises smoothly to S9+60 and the radio gets deadly quiet. AB2TC - Knut
|
Uh typo: Make it read "my S-meter is *now* dead on...."
<quote author="ab2tc"> Hi, Go back and redo the calibration! Make sure to follow the instructions exactly and pay special attention to ensure you have test signal centered in the passband. This is critical since the instructions call for a 100Hz bandwidth. I had similar symptoms as you until I did this the 3rd time. 3 times makes perfect and my S-meter is not dead on at 1uV, S9 and S9+40,<snip </quote> |
In reply to this post by Gary, W7TEA
I agree. Something is not right here.
I just tried the RF gain calibration (3 times) with the Mac K3 Utility. I followed the instructions presented by the program to the letter. I then proceeded to do the S-meter calibration as specified in the manual. Immediately after RF gain and S-meter calibration, everything seemed fine. Sensitivity seemed normal, s-meter responded to signals as expected, turning RF gain full CCW resulted in an s- meter reading of S9+50. After turning the rig off and back on, however, things are about like W7TEA reports: sensitivity seems reduced, turning the RF gain fully CCW gives an S-meter reading of S3, and a 50uV signal now gives an S5 reading (with preamp on.) I borrowed a Windows computer and repeated the exercise. This time, all was well even after a power cycle. It seems like the problem is with the Mac version of the K3 Utility. 73 -- Joe KB8AP On Oct 31, 2009, at 9:48 AM, W7TEA wrote: > > Just ran the RF gain calibration with the new Mac K3 Utility and an > XG2. I > did it > a few times because I would get an ERR DSE error message when > calibrating the SUB rx on occasion. I then went back and re- > calibrated the > S meter. I've noticed three things. > > 1) The rx seems considerably "quieter." The PRE is needed now where I > seldom > used it before. > > 2) Turning RF gain to minimum quiets the rx but the S meter only > advances to > S-5 > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
I believe I've discovered a subtle bug in the RF Gain calibration code that could possibly cause the problem you're describing. Please try this version and let me know if it solves the problem.
http://sight.net/K3/K3Util/10-27-2009/K3UtilityOSX.zip (7.5MB) tnx, David, W4SMT > I agree. Something is not right > here. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Re-calibrated a couple more times with this version and all seems to
be working here as advertised! No ERR returns with the SUB either. Really appreciate the quick work, David! 73, Gary--W7TEA On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:47 AM, David Fleming wrote: > I believe I've discovered a subtle bug in the RF Gain calibration > code that could possibly cause the problem you're describing. Please > try this version and let me know if it solves the problem. > > http://sight.net/K3/K3Util/10-27-2009/K3UtilityOSX.zip > (7.5MB) > > tnx, > > David, W4SMT > >> I agree. Something is not right >> here. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
73,
Gary W7TEA K3 #1001, #5763 |
I've been having trouble calibrating with the Windows version, but
probably I'm doing something wrong. I have an XG-2 connected to the receive antenna input. Does it really have to be connected to Antenna 1? Dick, KA1SA At 04:24 PM 11/1/2009, Gary Tuck wrote: >Re-calibrated a couple more times with this version and all seems to >be working here as advertised! >No ERR returns with the SUB either. > >Really appreciate the quick work, David! > >73, Gary--W7TEA > >On Nov 1, 2009, at 11:47 AM, David Fleming wrote: > > > I believe I've discovered a subtle bug in the RF Gain calibration > > code that could possibly cause the problem you're describing. Please > > try this version and let me know if it solves the problem. > > > > http://sight.net/K3/K3Util/10-27-2009/K3UtilityOSX.zip > > (7.5MB) > > > > tnx, > > > > David, W4SMT > > > >> I agree. Something is not right > >> here. > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:[hidden email] > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ================================================== Richard S. Lindzen Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Sciences Office: 54-1720, MIT Cambridge, MA 02139 USA 1 (617) 253-2432 (voice) 1 (617) 253-6208 (fax) Temporary Home: 100 Memorial Drive Apt. 2-2a Cambridge, MA 02142 USA 1 (617) 945-5784 (voice) ================================================== ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
> I've been having trouble calibrating with the Windows version, but
> probably I'm doing something wrong. I have an XG-2 connected to the > receive antenna input. Does it really have to be connected to Antenna 1? Yes. The software was written that way because it is the only antenna connection that is available on every variant of the radio. You must use Antenna 1. 73, Lyle KK7P ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by David Fleming-2
Dear Lyle,
I've connected the XG-2 to Ant 1, and gone through the calibration routine. I've turned off the preamp (and the attenuator), and used the utility to calibrate. The s-meter still reads S7 for the XG-2, though it rises to s8+ when I turn on the preamp. This also puzzles me. When I first used the K3, I was under the impression that the s-meter reading was independent of whether the preamp was on or not. Have recent firmware changes alterred this? More likely, I'm doing something wrong. Incidentally, how close to the stated frequencies are the crystals in the XG-2? 73, Dick KA1SA At 06:03 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote: >>I've been having trouble calibrating with the Windows version, but >>probably I'm doing something wrong. I have an XG-2 connected to >>the receive antenna input. Does it really have to be connected to Antenna 1? > >Yes. The software was written that way because it is the only >antenna connection that is available on every variant of the >radio. You must use Antenna 1. > >73, > >Lyle KK7P ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Dick,
The RF Gain calibration provided by K3 Utility is entirely different than the S-meter calibration. Do the S-meter calibration (see the manual) after running the RF Gain calibration. The only commonality is that the XG2 (or other source of a 50 uV signal) is used for both. If you want S-meter readings independent of the preamp and attenuator settings, you must set CONFIG: SMTR MD to AbS - if set to 'nor', the attenuator and preamp will change the S-meter response. 73, Don W3FPR Richard S. Lindzen wrote: > Dear Lyle, > > I've connected the XG-2 to Ant 1, and gone through the calibration > routine. I've turned off the preamp (and the attenuator), and used > the utility to calibrate. The s-meter still reads S7 for the XG-2, > though it rises to s8+ when I turn on the preamp. This also puzzles > me. When I first used the K3, I was under the impression that the > s-meter reading was independent of whether the preamp was on or > not. Have recent firmware changes alterred this? More likely, I'm > doing something wrong. Incidentally, how close to the stated > frequencies are the crystals in the XG-2? > > 73, > > Dick > KA1SA > > At 06:03 PM 11/1/2009, you wrote: > >>> I've been having trouble calibrating with the Windows version, but >>> probably I'm doing something wrong. I have an XG-2 connected to >>> the receive antenna input. Does it really have to be connected to Antenna 1? >>> >> Yes. The software was written that way because it is the only >> antenna connection that is available on every variant of the >> radio. You must use Antenna 1. >> >> 73, >> >> Lyle KK7P >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.45/2476 - Release Date: 11/02/09 07:51:00 > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |