Re: CW WGT observations and measurements

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CW WGT observations and measurements

Ralph Parker
>I normally keep the K3's CW WGT setting at 1.0 because I like the 3:1
>Dah:Dit ratio and the 1:1 Dit:Space ratio. When I tried that with the
>KX3 it sounded horrible to my ears - very choppy.

With all due respect to Fred, I think that's because the K3 (and probably
the KX3) weight adjustment seems not to change the weight at all, just the
ratio.

'Weight' will add a bit of time to each dot/dash character equally, and
preserve the 1:3 and 1:1 ratios. (Am I opening a can of worms here?)

I use a version of the Super CMOS keyer, and like to add a bit of weight.
I can also do it within the control software for my microHam keyers.

Another reason to use an external keyer, IMHO.

Ralph, VE7XF

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CW WGT observations and measurements

Cady, Fred
Hi Ralph,
You know, I've always thought that weighting referred to the Dah:dit
ratio, and some references out there in googleland say that. Others
(K1EL winkey documentation has a good explanation) support that it is
the Dit:space ratio that changes. In any event, the K3 and the KX3 are
different and they don't preserve the 3:1 Dah:dit that I like to hear.

Cheers and 73,
Fred
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [hidden email]
[mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Ralph Parker
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 7:21 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] CW WGT observations and measurements

>I normally keep the K3's CW WGT setting at 1.0 because I like the 3:1
>Dah:Dit ratio and the 1:1 Dit:Space ratio. When I tried that with the
>KX3 it sounded horrible to my ears - very choppy.

With all due respect to Fred, I think that's because the K3 (and
probably the KX3) weight adjustment seems not to change the weight at
all, just the ratio.

'Weight' will add a bit of time to each dot/dash character equally, and
preserve the 1:3 and 1:1 ratios. (Am I opening a can of worms here?)

I use a version of the Super CMOS keyer, and like to add a bit of
weight.
I can also do it within the control software for my microHam keyers.

Another reason to use an external keyer, IMHO.

Ralph, VE7XF

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CW WGT observations and measurements

Vic Rosenthal
In reply to this post by Ralph Parker
'Weight' is dot to space ratio. The duration of the dots is derived from the speed and the dot-space ratio, and the dash duration is then derived from the dot duration and the dot-dash ratio.

Although there seems to be disagreement about the most pleasing weight, most CW operators prefer a precise 1-3 dot-dash ratio.

Vic K2VCO

On Nov 10, 2012, at 4:20 AM, Ralph Parker <[hidden email]> wrote:

>> I normally keep the K3's CW WGT setting at 1.0 because I like the 3:1
>> Dah:Dit ratio and the 1:1 Dit:Space ratio. When I tried that with the
>> KX3 it sounded horrible to my ears - very choppy.
>
> With all due respect to Fred, I think that's because the K3 (and probably
> the KX3) weight adjustment seems not to change the weight at all, just the
> ratio.
>
> 'Weight' will add a bit of time to each dot/dash character equally, and
> preserve the 1:3 and 1:1 ratios. (Am I opening a can of worms here?)
>
> I use a version of the Super CMOS keyer, and like to add a bit of weight.
> I can also do it within the control software for my microHam keyers.
>
> Another reason to use an external keyer, IMHO.
>
> Ralph, VE7XF
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: CW WGT observations and measurements

dmb@lightstream.net
In reply to this post by Ralph Parker
I've tried using an external Logikey K-3 w/ my K3 (one would think that
would be a perfect match ;-) ), but when QRQ is turned off, the K3 can't
follow the external keyer past about 38 WPM. That's a problem because
QRQ is disabled when operating split, and that's frequently when higher
cw speed is needed in chasing DX in a pileup situation.

The internal keyer works much better in this regard though the weight
setting with the internal keyer has to be changed depending upon QRQ or
not QRQ, and if QRQ is off, the weight has to be adjusted to a higher
number with higher cw speeds compared to the setting required for speeds
around 25 wpm.

I would very much like to take advantage of the auto-spacing
functionality of the Logikey K-3, but when QRQ is turned off or
disabled, the K3 keying weight lightens up too much as the speed is
increased -- and falls apart completely at about 38 wpm. (at least mine
does...)

I would guess that the K3's microprocessor has greater control over the
keying when using the internal keyer as opposed to an external keyer.

73, Dale
WA8SRA

On 11/9/2012 9:20 PM, Ralph Parker wrote:
> .....  Another reason to use an external keyer, IMHO. Ralph, VE7XF
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list Home:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help:
> http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email]
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html