FYI
Paul, sorry but I disagree. For HF mobile installation, GM and others recommend that the radio NOT be grounded in the cabin. Both battery leads should be fused at the battery. The reason for the negitive side fuse is in the event that the battery ground lead to the engine block should go open or have a high resistance there will be very high current trying to find ground when you start the engine. Starter motor current can be in the hundreds of amps. You do NOT want that amount of current flowing thru your rig! 73, Bill - K6WLM <home-run to the battery posts. If the negative fuse blows and the positive <fuse remains closed -- and *if* the radio chassis is common to negative <power with grounded connectors (e.g., SO-239) via a ground return through <the vehicle chassis, then the coax braid and other supplemental grounded <leads on the radio chassis will carry the full rig current. <Seems like in all cases where the rig chassis is common to the negative <power lead, the negative lead wiring should go un-fused at or very close to <the negative battery post. <Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
> K6WLM:
> "For HF mobile installation, GM and others recommend that the radio NOT be > grounded in the cabin. Both battery leads should be fused at the battery. > The reason for the negitive side fuse is in the event that the battery > ground lead to the engine block should go open or have a high resistance > there will be very high current trying to find ground when you start the > engine. Starter motor current can be in the hundreds of amps. You do NOT > want that amount of current flowing thru your rig!" Fair enough concerning the grounding point, but the negative radio lead should be *unfused* and then bond close to the point where the battery bonds to the vehicle chassis. In the case above, it would still be best to unfuse the negative radio lead in instances where the radio chassis and negative power lead are DC-common. The danger in your proposal of fusing the negative lead is exactly as stated in my last message: That an opening of the radio's negative fuse line will cause the radio's return current to complete through the radio's grounded connectors where the chassis of the radio and the negative power leads are common. Now you have an electrical insulation burn issue to deal with in your vehicle if the negative fuse blows and the positive radio fuse remains intact. For a 100W-class HF transceiver, that's roughly 20A of current during TX in wiring not meant to carry a high DC current load. Paul, W9AC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill - K6WLM
What you say about current through the radio is true, but is exactly why you *should not* run the radio negative to the battery. The only thing connected to the battery negative post should be the cable that connects the battery to the chassis. If you want to carry the radio negative lead to this point fine, but it should be un-fused.
For DC the negative lead is in parallel with the coax shield that is (should be) grounded at the antenna. It is pointless (and hazardous) to fuse the negative return only to have the connection continue to be made through the coax. --- On Wed, 3/17/10, Bill Miner <[hidden email]> wrote: > From: Bill Miner <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Connecting Transceivers in Vehicles - Change > To: [hidden email] > Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2010, 10:55 AM > FYI > > Paul, sorry but I disagree. > > > For HF mobile installation, GM and others recommend that > the radio NOT be grounded in the cabin. Both battery leads > should be fused at the battery. The reason for the > negitive side fuse is in the event that the battery > ground lead to the engine block should go open or have a > high resistance there will be very high current trying to > find ground when you start the engine. Starter motor > current can be in the hundreds of amps. You do NOT want > that amount of current flowing thru your rig! > > 73, Bill - K6WLM > > <home-run to the battery posts. If the negative fuse > blows and the positive > <fuse remains closed -- and *if* the radio chassis is > common to negative > <power with grounded connectors (e.g., SO-239) via a > ground return through > <the vehicle chassis, then the coax braid and other > supplemental grounded > <leads on the radio chassis will carry the full rig > current. > > <Seems like in all cases where the rig chassis is common > to the negative > <power lead, the negative lead wiring should go un-fused > at or very close to > <the negative battery post. > > <Paul, W9AC > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
In reply to this post by Bill - K6WLM
For HF mobile installation, GM and others recommend that the
radio NOT be grounded in the cabin. Both battery leads should be fused at the battery. The reason for the negitive side fuse is in the event that the battery ground lead to the engine block should go open or have a high resistance there will be very high current trying to find ground when you start the engine. Starter motor current can be in the hundreds of amps. You do NOT want that amount of current flowing thru your rig!>> The problem actually comes from what is inside the radio, not what GM thinks is inside our radios or how GM thinks the system works. The main problem is connecting the radio negative lead to the battery negative terminal. That's a bad idea, and it applies to our station wiring as well as car wiring. We can have similar destructive ground loops in station wiring. Our radios and accessories have small thin foil traces and small components like RF chokes on the ground leads of many accessories connectors. Blow a negative fuse or lose a ground connection on the negative supply lead and you can damage components inside the radio. The jacks and plugs become the negative high current return path. Our power supplies either need to be ground isolated, which they often can't be, or they need to bond the negative into a solid ground buss, and all the negative supply leads need to connect solidly to that buss. Otherwise we risk damaging our equipment from something as simple as a bad connection or blown fuse. In your car, the battery should have a heavy return to the engine for alternator or starter current. It should have a lighter, but still reasonably heavy, connection at the battery to the chassis. The radio should be grounded on the same sheet metal near the point, but not on the point, where the battery is grounded to the chassis. There should be no negative fuse. It should be a solid connection and NOT common with the bolt grounding the battery. Then if the battery negative comes loose, current will never flow through the radio or radio wiring. It can't set the car on fire, it can't blow out automotive electronics, and it can't damage the radio. Every passenger area accessory connects to the chassis as a return, and so do the lights and other things. They would never run their stuff, other than the starter and alternator back to a negative battery post, so why should we do that with our radios? It is foolish and unsafe to ground radio to the battery post upstream of the vehicle chassis ground, just as it is unsafe to ground equipment at home directly to the negative rail of high current 12 V supplies instead of a ground buss or common ground point, no matter who says otherwise. Without a common reference point all it takes is a high current load negative to come detached, or a positive lead low resistance fault to ground, and we have equipment damage. I learned this years ago when my radio lost the keying line ground trace on a circuit board because the radio negative lead fuse developed a bad connection, and the radio primarily grounded through the keyer path. 73 Tom ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |