|
If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I guess.
I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run on both sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. (not that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions. -Bruce N1RX K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...) ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response. I guess I'll wait for a few
minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with the main receiver. 73 de Carl, N8VZ > Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]> > Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM > If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I > guess. > I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run > on both > sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. > (not > that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions. > > -Bruce N1RX > > K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...) > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] -- ================================================= Carl Jón Denbow, N8VZ 17 Coventry Lane Athens, Ohio 45701-3718 [hidden email] www.n8vz.com EM89wh IRLP 4533 Echolink 116070 PSK and JT65 Forever! ================================================= ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
My reasoning for this: You'll always have the main receiver enabled
but probably not the Sub-Receiver. Few of us run them both 100% of the time. 73, matt W6NIA On Sun, 17 May 2015 16:49:10 -0400, you wrote: >Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response. I guess I'll wait for a few >minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with >the main receiver. 73 de Carl, N8VZ > >> Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]> >> Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM >> If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I >> guess. >> I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run >> on both >> sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. >> (not >> that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions. >> >> -Bruce N1RX >> >> K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...) >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] -- "Always store beer in a dark place." -R. Heinlein ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Agreed. Perhaps another argument for placing it in the main RX, as
The sub RX has to be removed to install it. Best to get that out of the way while you have it open... If you add a second one later, in the subRX, that module would need to be pulled to install the BPF3 in it. Also, with the (potential) new allocations for 137 and 475 KHz, these may well become "main band" RX/TX functions in the future. (Of course, the filter mods currently being beta-tested will need to be installed, and some form of outboard TXPA driven by the transverter interface added for those bands to get the full benefit...) 73, Bruce N1RX -----Original Message----- From: Matt Zilmer [mailto:[hidden email]] Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:25 PM To: Carl Jón Denbow Cc: Bruce Beford; [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver My reasoning for this: You'll always have the main receiver enabled but probably not the Sub-Receiver. Few of us run them both 100% of the time. 73, matt W6NIA On Sun, 17 May 2015 16:49:10 -0400, you wrote: >Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response. I guess I'll wait for a few >minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with >the main receiver. 73 de Carl, N8VZ > >> Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]> >> Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM >> If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I >> guess. >> I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run >> on both >> sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. >> (not >> that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions. >> >> -Bruce N1RX >> >> K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...) >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:[hidden email] >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to [hidden email] -- "Always store beer in a dark place." -R. Heinlein ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Bruce Beford-4
Another vote for the main Rx:
I ordered the KBPF3 with my radio in 2010 and installed it in the main Rx. I am on 600m already so it made sense to me to have it in the main Rx. I didn't install one in the KRX3, which I also part of my original order, as I expected to only use it for diversity reception on eme which does not use the KPBF3. Therefore, I will modify my KPBF3 when I order and install the two Synth boards. Main purpose for getting the Synth boards is to be able to operate on 630m (472-479-KHz). Of course it will help all reception. I will be interested to see if this will lower the level I can decode JT65 signals (typ -28 is lowest). Sorry, I drifted off topic. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I would also vote for main as I prefer to tune with the BIG knob. The Sub
knob is too crowded for my fat fingers and I frequently bump the RIT/XIT knob causing undesired effects. 73, - Craig, AE6RR -----Original Message----- From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Edward R Cole Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:28 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver Another vote for the main Rx: I ordered the KBPF3 with my radio in 2010 and installed it in the main Rx. I am on 600m already so it made sense to me to have it in the main Rx. I didn't install one in the KRX3, which I also part of my original order, as I expected to only use it for diversity reception on eme which does not use the KPBF3. Therefore, I will modify my KPBF3 when I order and install the two Synth boards. Main purpose for getting the Synth boards is to be able to operate on 630m (472-479-KHz). Of course it will help all reception. I will be interested to see if this will lower the level I can decode JT65 signals (typ -28 is lowest). Sorry, I drifted off topic. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Thanks to everyone who responded to my query -- both on and off the
list. My hand has actually been forced a little on this issue, as the KRX3 had a bad female TMP connection. It appeared distorted in shape when I tried to replace the male connector. I then took the cover off the KRX3 and discovered that the TMP female in question had never been installed correctly and was actually a clear open. Some other aspects of the board looked questionable to me, so I'm going to return it to Elecraft for a repair and complete checkout. So far, everything else in the rig seems to check out OK, though I haven't finished the shakedown cruise yet. I'm also going to contact the seller and see if he'll pay for the Elecraft repair. The unit was advertised on QTH.com as being in excellent working and cosmetic condition. The one board seems to have been otherwise, as I do not see how the second receiver could have worked with all of its functions with one TMP coaxial connector basically MIA. 73, Carl ================================================= Carl Jón Denbow, N8VZ 17 Coventry Lane Athens, Ohio 45701-3718 [hidden email] www.n8vz.com EM89wh IRLP 4533 Echolink 116070 PSK and JT65 Forever! ================================================= ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
