Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Bruce Beford-4
If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I guess.
I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run on both
sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself. (not
that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions.

-Bruce N1RX

K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...)

 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Carl Jón Denbow
Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response.  I guess I'll wait for a few
minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with
the main receiver.  73 de Carl, N8VZ

> Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]>
> Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM
> If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I
> guess.
> I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run
> on both
> sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself.
> (not
> that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions.
>
> -Bruce N1RX
>
> K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...)
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]

--
=================================================
Carl Jón Denbow, N8VZ
17 Coventry Lane
Athens, Ohio 45701-3718

[hidden email]
www.n8vz.com
EM89wh

IRLP 4533   Echolink 116070

PSK and JT65 Forever!
=================================================

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Matt Zilmer-3
My reasoning for this:  You'll always have the main receiver enabled
but probably not the Sub-Receiver.  Few of us run them both 100% of
the time.

73,
matt
W6NIA

On Sun, 17 May 2015 16:49:10 -0400, you wrote:

>Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response.  I guess I'll wait for a few
>minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with
>the main receiver.  73 de Carl, N8VZ
>
>> Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM
>> If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I
>> guess.
>> I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run
>> on both
>> sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself.
>> (not
>> that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions.
>>
>> -Bruce N1RX
>>
>> K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...)
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
Matt Zilmer, W6NIA
--
"Always store beer in a dark place."  -R. Heinlein

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Bruce Beford-4
        Agreed. Perhaps another argument for placing it in the main RX, as
The sub RX has to be removed to install it. Best to get that out of the way
while you have it open... If you add a second one later, in the subRX, that
module would need to be pulled to install the BPF3 in it.
        Also, with the (potential) new allocations for 137 and 475 KHz,
these may well become "main band" RX/TX functions in the future. (Of course,
the filter mods currently being beta-tested will need to be installed, and
some form of outboard TXPA driven by the transverter interface added for
those bands to get the full benefit...)

73,
Bruce N1RX

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Zilmer [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:25 PM
To: Carl Jón Denbow
Cc: Bruce Beford; [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or
Subreceiver

My reasoning for this:  You'll always have the main receiver enabled
but probably not the Sub-Receiver.  Few of us run them both 100% of
the time.

73,
matt
W6NIA

On Sun, 17 May 2015 16:49:10 -0400, you wrote:

>Thanks, Bruce, for your prompt response.  I guess I'll wait for a few
>minutes and see if anyone has a differing opinion, and if not, go with
>the main receiver.  73 de Carl, N8VZ
>
>> Bruce Beford <mailto:[hidden email]>
>> Sunday, May 17, 2015 4:43 PM
>> If you only have 1 bpf module, I'd probably install it in the main, I
>> guess.
>> I added a second one for my sub RX later. Opinions will probably run
>> on both
>> sides, but I'd like to hear the arguments one way or the other myself.
>> (not
>> that it really matters to me- as I said, I have it in both positions.
>>
>> -Bruce N1RX
>>
>> K3 #559 (real serial number, not a contest exchange...)
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to [hidden email]
Matt Zilmer, W6NIA
--
"Always store beer in a dark place."  -R. Heinlein




______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Edward R Cole
In reply to this post by Bruce Beford-4
Another vote for the main Rx:

I ordered the KBPF3 with my radio in 2010 and installed it in the
main Rx.  I am on 600m already so it made sense to me to have it in
the main Rx.  I didn't install one in the KRX3, which I also part of
my original order, as I expected to only use it for diversity
reception on eme which does not use the KPBF3.

Therefore, I will modify my KPBF3 when I order and install the two
Synth boards.  Main purpose for getting the Synth boards is to be
able to operate on 630m (472-479-KHz).  Of course it will help all
reception.  I will be interested to see if this will lower the level
I can decode JT65 signals (typ -28 is lowest).  Sorry, I drifted off topic.

73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
     "Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
     [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Craig-AE6RR
I would also vote for main as I prefer to tune with the BIG knob.  The Sub
knob is too crowded for my fat fingers and I frequently bump the RIT/XIT
knob causing undesired effects.

73,
- Craig, AE6RR

-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Edward
R Cole
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:28 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or
Subreceiver

Another vote for the main Rx:

I ordered the KBPF3 with my radio in 2010 and installed it in the main Rx.
I am on 600m already so it made sense to me to have it in the main Rx.  I
didn't install one in the KRX3, which I also part of my original order, as I
expected to only use it for diversity reception on eme which does not use
the KPBF3.

Therefore, I will modify my KPBF3 when I order and install the two Synth
boards.  Main purpose for getting the Synth boards is to be able to operate
on 630m (472-479-KHz).  Of course it will help all reception.  I will be
interested to see if this will lower the level I can decode JT65 signals
(typ -28 is lowest).  Sorry, I drifted off topic.

73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
     "Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
     [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: KBPF3 General Coverage Receiver -- Main or Subreceiver

Carl Jón Denbow
Thanks to everyone who responded to my query -- both on and off the
list.  My hand has actually been forced a little on this issue, as the
KRX3 had a bad female TMP connection.  It appeared distorted in shape
when I tried to replace the male connector.  I then took the cover off
the KRX3 and discovered that the TMP female in question had never been
installed correctly and was actually a clear open.  Some other aspects
of the board looked questionable to me, so I'm going to return it to
Elecraft for a repair and complete checkout.  So far, everything else in
the rig seems to check out OK, though I haven't finished the shakedown
cruise yet.  I'm also going to contact the seller and see if he'll pay
for the Elecraft repair.   The unit was advertised on QTH.com as being
in excellent working and cosmetic condition.   The one board seems to
have been otherwise, as I do not see how the second receiver could have
worked with all of its functions with one TMP coaxial connector
basically MIA.

73,

Carl

=================================================
Carl Jón Denbow, N8VZ
17 Coventry Lane
Athens, Ohio 45701-3718

[hidden email]
www.n8vz.com
EM89wh

IRLP 4533   Echolink 116070

PSK and JT65 Forever!
=================================================

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]