Rethinking filters

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Rethinking filters

Jim AB3CV
I've got my K3S on order and was planning to transfer some of my filters
from my K3 before selling it but after reviewing the filter specs along
with my past experience I'm rethinking the narrow end.

I've got a 13Khz filter which I'll transfer but I'm thinking of selling the
250 8p pair in favor of a 400hz 4p pair. Also thinking of getting rid of my
singleton 200hz 4p and getting a matched pair of 200hz 4p.

I find that the 250hz 8p (actually 350hz) are a bit narrow for RTTY so I
often open the filter window to 400+ hz.

I've been using the 200hz 4p primarily for ekeing out the last bit of
signal on 160m and I'm planning to go diversity this next season. So I'd
like to combine diversity with the 200hz bandwidth.

Comments welcome.

73

jim ab3cv
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Jim Brown-10
On Fri,5/15/2015 3:39 PM, Jim Miller wrote:
> I've got my K3S on order and was planning to transfer some of my filters
> from my K3 before selling it but after reviewing the filter specs along
> with my past experience I'm rethinking the narrow end.

In his annual Dayton talk yesterday, Rob Sherwood said that he had seen
some serious IM issues with some Elecraft roofing filters. I would hold
off on buying any new filters for a while until I knew a lot more about
that issue.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Joe Subich, W4TV-4

> In his annual Dayton talk yesterday, Rob Sherwood said that he had
> seen some serious IM issues with some Elecraft roofing filters.

I've been e-mailing with Rob - some of my spare filters have been among
his test subjects.  The issue is passive IMD in the filter itself ...
in essence when the interfering signal levels get high enough, the
filters start to behave as non-linear devices and seem to develop a
short term "memory."   This applies to both the 5 pole and 8 pole
filters.

Of note is that the signal levels necessary to generate this passive
IMD is nearly 10dB higher than the former reciprocal mixing (phase
noise) limited dynamic range values with the "old" synthesizer.  It is
much like pealing an onion ... once one limitation is removed another
item in the signal chain becomes the weak link.

It may be necessary to test filters to a higher standard.  I understand
some test systems are already under development.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-05-15 8:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

> On Fri,5/15/2015 3:39 PM, Jim Miller wrote:
>> I've got my K3S on order and was planning to transfer some of my filters
>> from my K3 before selling it but after reviewing the filter specs along
>> with my past experience I'm rethinking the narrow end.
>
> In his annual Dayton talk yesterday, Rob Sherwood said that he had seen
> some serious IM issues with some Elecraft roofing filters. I would hold
> off on buying any new filters for a while until I knew a lot more about
> that issue.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to [hidden email]
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Bill W4ZV
In reply to this post by Jim AB3CV
Jim AB3CV wrote
I've been using the 200hz 4p primarily for ekeing out the last bit of
signal on 160m and I'm planning to go diversity this next season. So I'd
like to combine diversity with the 200hz bandwidth.
I use matched 200 Hz filters in diversity (Beverages + RX4SQ) and APF nearly 100% of the time on 160...even when doing S&P in contests.  I can get away with this because CW Skimmer allows me to exactly zero beat when jumping from one station to another in Blind Mode (i.e. as a bandscope without decoding).  Although I also have dual Inrad 500 Hz filters, I find I seldom use them.

73,  Bill  W4ZV
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Jim Brown-10
In reply to this post by Joe Subich, W4TV-4
On Fri,5/15/2015 6:14 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
> Of note is that the signal levels necessary to generate this passive
> IMD is nearly 10dB higher than the former reciprocal mixing (phase
> noise) limited dynamic range values with the "old" synthesizer. It is
> much like pealing an onion ... once one limitation is removed another
> item in the signal chain becomes the weak link.

Exactly!  Quite common in the field of engineering, especially EMC --
slaying some of the larger dragons exposes smaller ones nipping at our
heels.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Robert .
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
This IM issue was 1st reported in the Jan 2009 QST review on K3
Sidebar "A Close Look at K3 Roofing Filters"
The 200hz filter was not included in write up & the issue seemed to be the
1800hz filter which if I recall - Elecraft said was issue with the supplier
& it was resolved...  
Hope Rob will post his data here or his web pages!

K4TV - thanks for input on use of the dual 200hz, nice

on the subject of K3 & K3S
Great rigs for sure except operator interface still lacking, no attempt to
get dedicated band stacking buttons

OK

73 Robert W5AJ
 






-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim
Brown
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 7:02 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Rethinking filters

On Fri,5/15/2015 3:39 PM, Jim Miller wrote:
> I've got my K3S on order and was planning to transfer some of my
> filters from my K3 before selling it but after reviewing the filter
> specs along with my past experience I'm rethinking the narrow end.

In his annual Dayton talk yesterday, Rob Sherwood said that he had seen some
serious IM issues with some Elecraft roofing filters. I would hold off on
buying any new filters for a while until I knew a lot more about that issue.

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to [hidden email]

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Jim Brown-10
On Fri,5/15/2015 8:27 PM, Robert Wood wrote:
> This IM issue was 1st reported in the Jan 2009 QST review on K3
> Sidebar "A Close Look at K3 Roofing Filters"

Thanks., Robert. That's something I either missed or forgot. :)

> The 200hz filter was not included in write up & the issue seemed to be the
> 1800hz filter which if I recall - Elecraft said was issue with the supplier
> & it was resolved...

That would be Inrad for the 8-pole filters. They're a good company, so
I'd bet it will be this time around too.  Bob, Wayne, and Eric are all
in Dayton, so there's a good chance they will huddle.

> on the subject of K3 & K3S
> Great rigs for sure except operator interface still lacking, no attempt to
> get dedicated band stacking buttons

I'm happy with the user interface. What are "dedicated band stacking
buttons?

73, Jim K9YC
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Wes (N7WS)
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
Old subject.

http://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/IF_filters.html

There is some fantastic info in these papers.

Wes  N7WS


On 5/15/2015 5:02 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

> On Fri,5/15/2015 3:39 PM, Jim Miller wrote:
>> I've got my K3S on order and was planning to transfer some of my filters
>> from my K3 before selling it but after reviewing the filter specs along
>> with my past experience I'm rethinking the narrow end.
>
> In his annual Dayton talk yesterday, Rob Sherwood said that he had seen some
> serious IM issues with some Elecraft roofing filters. I would hold off on
> buying any new filters for a while until I knew a lot more about that issue.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Rethinking filters

Wes (N7WS)
Further to this, for those who believe that down-conversion is a must for good
RX performance here is some food for thought.

http://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/g3sbi_intro.html

On 5/16/2015 7:49 AM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
> Old subject.
>
> http://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/IF_filters.html
>
> There is some fantastic info in these papers.
>
> Wes  N7WS
>

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [hidden email]