The K2 and RTTY

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

The K2 and RTTY

k0wa@swbell.net
 
   
  Well, I am getting back into RTTY and PSK31 after a couple of years away from the modes.  I have my IC756PROII set up for AFSK and going to FSK using MMTTY on RTTY (only)
   
  What I "hate" about the PROII is when you are using RTTY I have to use AFSK Keying and the receiver's bandpass is less that ideal.  This is why I am going to FSK so I can used the great filters on the PROII.
   
  Well, I never thought about using the K2/100 as an RTTY rig.  I know it has RTTY filters...but I am sure it does not use FSK, but uses AFSK through the RTTY Filters?  Right?
   
  Could somebody who has used the K2 on RTTY and PSK31 eludicate me on their experience with the rig and the mode?
   
  Lee - K0WA
   


In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is Common Sense devine?
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE:The K2 and RTTY

Steven Pituch-2
Hi Lee,
Not too much experience with RTTY yet, but the K2 filters seem to be very
good.  I have pictures atL
http://www.pituch.net/personal/Steve's%20Page/Radio/RTTY/RTTY.html
Or go to
http://www.pituch.net/personal/ and drill down through the menus.
I used MixW to align the filters.

Steve, W2MY

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/594 - Release Date: 12/20/2006
3:54 PM
 

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The K2 and RTTY

Logan Zintsmaster
In reply to this post by k0wa@swbell.net
I have had excellent success with the K2/100 and RTTY.  Worked several
contests with it.  Elecraft does not recommend running at full power,
but under contest conditions, the exchanges are so short you can get
away with it, most of the time.

I have had some problems with RF getting onto the K2 data bus, but
reducing power solves the problem.  I do not have all of the K2/100
shielding upgrades installed, yet.

As always, "your mileage may vary."

Logan
KZ6O, # 1609


Lee Buller wrote:

>
>  
>  Well, I am getting back into RTTY and PSK31 after a couple of years away from the modes.  I have my IC756PROII set up for AFSK and going to FSK using MMTTY on RTTY (only)
>  
>  What I "hate" about the PROII is when you are using RTTY I have to use AFSK Keying and the receiver's bandpass is less that ideal.  This is why I am going to FSK so I can used the great filters on the PROII.
>  
>  Well, I never thought about using the K2/100 as an RTTY rig.  I know it has RTTY filters...but I am sure it does not use FSK, but uses AFSK through the RTTY Filters?  Right?
>  
>  Could somebody who has used the K2 on RTTY and PSK31 eludicate me on their experience with the rig and the mode?
>  
>  Lee - K0WA
>  
>
>
>In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply.  If you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it.  If you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has some Common Sense.  Is Common Sense devine?
>_______________________________________________
>Elecraft mailing list
>Post to: [hidden email]
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   
>
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: The K2 and RTTY

Don Wilhelm-3
In reply to this post by k0wa@swbell.net
Lee,

The K2 does not do FSK.  It would take some major mods to make that happpen.
The RTTY mode could likely be better labeled 'DATA' or 'DIGI' because to is
well suited to use with the soundcard digital modes.

Unlike your PROII, the K2 offers more control over the filters by offering a
separate set of filters for RTTY mode.

73,
Don W3FPR

> -----Original Message-----

>   Well, I am getting back into RTTY and PSK31 after a couple of
> years away from the modes.  I have my IC756PROII set up for AFSK
> and going to FSK using MMTTY on RTTY (only)
>
>   What I "hate" about the PROII is when you are using RTTY I have
> to use AFSK Keying and the receiver's bandpass is less that
> ideal.  This is why I am going to FSK so I can used the great
> filters on the PROII.
>
>   Well, I never thought about using the K2/100 as an RTTY rig.  I
> know it has RTTY filters...but I am sure it does not use FSK, but
> uses AFSK through the RTTY Filters?  Right?
>
>   Could somebody who has used the K2 on RTTY and PSK31 eludicate
> me on their experience with the rig and the mode?
>
>   Lee - K0WA
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.26/594 - Release Date: 12/20/2006
3:54 PM

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The K2 and RTTY

SHEAJOHNW
In reply to this post by Logan Zintsmaster
I have made several thousand RTTY Contest QSOs using the K2/100.  It is
AFSK only.  My TX power out is about 90 watts usually into a low
Diamond verticle antenna rated for 200 watts.  Receive works OK for me
considering the limitations of the antenna.  Transmit works well for me
on search and pounce.  I leave the fan speed set high during contests.  
The limitation of my antenna have kept my rate at 100 - 200 QSOs per
contest.  If I had better antennas, a higher S&P QSO rate might result
in over heating.

I have tried running mode but find that the rig starts to get
unacceptably hot after several minutes of CQing.  During very good band
conditions, my hourly S&P rate was high enough to damage the 40M and
20M matching components in the Diamond antenna.  I now must restrict
the Diamond antenna to 80M and 15M use and use a low Alpha Delta DX-CC
fan dipole for 40M and 20M.

I set the K2 AGC off and control RX signal strength into the computer
sound card using RF gain.  AGC off prevents pumping that can depress
weak signals when a strong signal comes onto the passband.  Under
crowded conditions, I use AFil to narrow bandwidth with 1000 Hz being
used as my center frequency.  RTTY AFil is set to opt1 with the strong
right third of the filter passband aligned with 1000 HZ.  I always try
to TX at 1000 HZ to keep the TX signal strength consistent.  I use
narrowed CW filters centered on 1000 Hz when needed.

Reducing RF gain is more beneficial for copying weak signals that using
narrow DSP filters.  Problems copying weak signals appear to be more
related to the background noise level than adjacent signal
interference.  The narrow DSP filters work FB to eliminate unwanted
signals within a wider passband with the AGC off to prevent signal
strength depression by the AGC.  I avoid XFil because I find the small
frequency shift annoying on digital modes when switching between the
XFil used on RX and the Opt1 fil always used on TX.

I hope to make the following future changes:
-higher and better antennas to improve my QSO rate,
-an external amplifier so that I can use lower power on the K2/100 to
enable run mode without significant heating,
-an external muffin fan to improve K2 cooling efficiency.

I have never had a heating problem using typically lower power PSK31.  
AGC pumping can be challenging on PSK 31 because of the narrow signal
and closeness of adjacent signals.

HTH 73 de KB1IKD

 
Lee Buller wrote: 
 
> > > Well, I am getting back into RTTY and PSK31 after a couple of
years away from the modes. I have my IC756PROII set up for AFSK and
going to FSK using MMTTY on RTTY (only) 
> > What I "hate" about the PROII is when you are using RTTY I have to
use AFSK Keying and the receiver's bandpass is less that ideal. This is
why I am going to FSK so I can used the great filters on the PROII. 
> > Well, I never thought about using the K2/100 as an RTTY rig. I know
it has RTTY filters...but I am sure it does not use FSK, but uses AFSK
through the RTTY Filters? Right? 
> > Could somebody who has used the K2 on RTTY and PSK31 eludicate me
on their experience with the rig and the mode? 
> > Lee - K0WA 
> > 

>In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in short supply. If
you don't have any Common Sense - get some Common Sense and use it. If
you can't find any Common Sense, ask for help from somebody who has
some Common Sense. Is Common Sense devine? 

>_______________________________________________ 
>Elecraft mailing list 
>Post to: [hidden email] 
>You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
>Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > 
>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
>Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


> > 
 
_______________________________________________ 
Elecraft mailing list 
Post to: [hidden email] 
You must be a subscriber to post to the list. 
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft  
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm 
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com 


________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: The K2 and RTTY

VR2BrettGraham
In reply to this post by k0wa@swbell.net
K0WA asked:

>   Could somebody who has used the K2 on RTTY and PSK31 eludicate me
> on their experience with the rig and the mode?

Compared to the other two rigs I use for RTTY operating
(mostly contests):

1. KPA gets warm pretty easily if you need more than
35 watts from it, especially if duty cycle goes up (say
a string of unanswered CQs).  Small fan is not enough,
especially if room temp warm to begin with.  Easy to
deal with, but so important must be mentioned.

2. The difference between where you transmit & where
you receive becomes a bit obvious when running on
the K2 - I use the RIT on the other rigs for the
occasional guy who comes back slightly off... on the
K2 the RIT is used all the time as everybody is
slightly off.  Nature-of-beast issue, tends to get you
when you forget & start calling others, who then do
not hear you so well as now you're the one slightly off.

3. Unless you can change the mark/space tones for
whatever does the RTTY stuff, you are not likely to be
able to set the K2's filters for say four increasingly
narrower BWs & be able to use those on all bands.
About 1 kc (displayed) is the limit on my K2.

4. By far & away the reason to use a rig with FSK on
RTTY (mentioned by K0WA, but snipped from above)
is the ability (on all the rigs I have, at least) to use the
rig's CW filters.  The Big Three's OEM filters are probably
a tad bit better than the K2's & if you have fitted
after-market filters then this difference is even greater.

Depending on how you operate, these points may or
may not be a concern & might not even be noticed.
None of my RTTY operation is "pedestrian" & I must
admit item #4 is very, very obvious & more than just
a bit annoying when combined with #3.

73, VR2BrettGraham

_______________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: [hidden email]
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft   

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com