Tunig increments could be better

[John Kountz]

I love my K3 (#3271), but I have a question and I can't believe I'm alone.
You
 seem to have missed the boat when it comes to tuning increments.  Thus,
why
 is there no actual 'Fast' tuning in the second position of the fast
button?     Rather, while complimenting the cycle by cycle capability
provided in the 'Fine' second position of ten cycle tuning, 'Fast' then
enables tuning in
one hundred cycle increments.  Why doesn't the fast position begin with
hundred cycle increments and in its' second position provide tuning
 increments of one thousand cycles?
John Kountz, KE6GFF/T6EE
 

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Joe Planisky]

See CONFIG:VFO CRS and CONFIG:VFO FST in the manual (page 61)

73
--
Joe KB8AP

On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:24 AM, John wrote:

> I love my K3 (#3271), but I have a question and I can't believe I'm  
> alone.
> You
> seem to have missed the boat when it comes to tuning increments.  
> Thus,
> why
> is there no actual 'Fast' tuning in the second position of the fast
> button?
...
> John Kountz, KE6GFF/T6EE

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[n7ws]

Look in the manual about using CONFIG:VFO CRS.

--- On Fri, 3/19/10, John <[hidden email]> wrote:

> From: John <[hidden email]>
> Subject: [Elecraft] Tunig increments could be better
> To: [hidden email]
> Date: Friday, March 19, 2010, 11:24 AM
> I love my K3 (#3271), but I have a
> question and I can't believe I'm alone.
> You
>  seem to have missed the boat when it comes to tuning
> increments.  Thus,
> why
>  is there no actual 'Fast' tuning in the second position of
> the fast
> button?     Rather, while complimenting
> the cycle by cycle capability
> provided in the 'Fine' second position of ten cycle tuning,
> 'Fast' then
> enables tuning in
> one hundred cycle increments.  Why doesn't the fast
> position begin with
> hundred cycle increments and in its' second position
> provide tuning
>  increments of one thousand cycles?
> John Kountz, KE6GFF/T6EE
>  
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:[hidden email]
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>

     
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[hidden email]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html