|
http://www.wa1mba.org/UHFconn.htm
OK you made me dig this out Bob K3DJC On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:05:53 -0700 Walter Underwood <[hidden email]> writes: > On Apr 26, 2013, at 8:57 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > > > The UHF connecor will handle more power than a type N,,, has > negligable > > loss through 450 Mhz > > The N connector handles higher voltages and thus more power than > UHF. > > BNC is 500V peak: > http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/bnc.asp?N=0&sid=5179C380537E17F& > UHF is 500V peak: > http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/uhf.asp?N=0&sid=5179C3807BBEE17F& > Type N is 1500V peak: > http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/typen.asp?N=0&sid=5179C38028A2E17F& > > The UHF connector has substantial loss at 450 MHz, 1dB per connector > pair. > > http://www.qsl.net/vk3jeg/pl259tst.html > > wunder > -- > Walter Underwood > K6WRU > CM87wj > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On 4/27/2013 8:10 AM, [hidden email] wrote:
> http://www.wa1mba.org/UHFconn.htm This is an excellent piece of work, Bob. Very solid science and very good practical application of it. Many thanks for posting it. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
More on his other page http://www.wa1mba.org/rfconn.htm
Joe KK5NA -----Original Message----- From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jim Brown Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:33 AM To: [hidden email] Subject: Re: [Elecraft] UHF CONNECTORS On 4/27/2013 8:10 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > http://www.wa1mba.org/UHFconn.htm This is an excellent piece of work, Bob. Very solid science and very good practical application of it. Many thanks for posting it. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by riese-k3djc
In response to the Dick Knadle (K2RIW) article concerning UHF connector losses at VHF/UHF frequencies, local Fauquier Amateur Radio Association club member John Huggins, KX4O wrote:
"I challenge it because I did make the measurements... http://www.hamradio.me/connectors/uhf-connector-test-results.html " John's test results and graphics make for even more interesting reading on the topic of UHF connectors. 73, Rich - K1HTV = = = On 4/27/2013 8:10 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > http://www.wa1mba.org/UHFconn.htm This is an excellent piece of work, Bob. Very solid science and very good practical application of it. Many thanks for posting it. 73, Jim K9YC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
This discussion is getting VERY far afield from the topic of connectors
used on HF equipment. However, the analysis in this tome is rather flawed, which renders the conclusion the author draws misleading at best. The flaw is that the author measures the impedance bump at the connector, computes a quantity called "mismatch loss" that is fictional in most ham antenna systems, and decides that there is massive power loss in the system. Most of us who do anything serious on 2M and above use BNCs and Ns at those frequencies. But I've visited several big contesting stations built by very good engineers, and UHFconnectors are the weapon of choice. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/28/2013 2:31 PM, Rich - K1HTV wrote: > In response to the Dick Knadle (K2RIW) article concerning UHF connector losses at VHF/UHF frequencies, local Fauquier Amateur Radio Association club member John Huggins, KX4O wrote: > > "I challenge it because I did make the measurements... > > http://www.hamradio.me/connectors/uhf-connector-test-results.html " > > John's test results and graphics make for even more interesting reading on the topic of UHF connectors. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Jim Brown <[hidden email]>wrote:
> ....the analysis in this tome is rather flawed... ========== Agreed, Jim. Nonetheless, the measurements therein confirm that a UHF connector is as good as any other at frequencies of 144 or less. This started out as a discussion of the new Elecraft 100W amp, which operates only up to 50 mhz, a range where there is nothing to be gained by replacing UHF connectors with something else. By now it should be clear that if you are looking for a way to improve your signal by 1/4 db, there are probably other places in your shack or antenna system that are more likely to be fruitful than changing all your connectors. Tony KT0NY -- http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Jim Brown-10
Folks, this thread has already been closed. Please take further
discussion off list inthe interest of keeping posting traffic under control. Eric List Noderator elecraft.com On 4/28/2013 7:53 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > This discussion is getting VERY far afield from the topic of > connectors used on HF equipment. > > However, the analysis in this tome is rather flawed, which renders the > conclusion the author draws misleading at best. T ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
