|
I'm with W4TV on the 5-pole 200 Hz filter as my overall go to on close
in CW sigs. The 8-pole 250 Hz filter, which I also have, is actually about 350 Hz in width and way too wide for me. That said, I use either a 500 Hz or 400 Hz filter most of the time on CW/RTTY It is unfortunate that Elecraft no longer makes the 200 Hz filter. Shame. If I was going to get only one CW filter, it would probably be the 400 Hz jobber. 73, Dan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on CW -- though
I have the 1000 Hz filter for tuning on CW and one tighter one (2100 Hz) for more crowded SSB situations. If budget had been a concern, I'd have gone with 400 Hz and the stock 2700 Hz pair. 73, Phil W7OX On 9/28/15 12:35 PM, Dan Atchison wrote: > I'm with W4TV on the 5-pole 200 Hz filter as my > overall go to on close in CW sigs. The 8-pole > 250 Hz filter, which I also have, is actually > about 350 Hz in width and way too wide for me. > That said, I use either a 500 Hz or 400 Hz > filter most of the time on CW/RTTY > > It is unfortunate that Elecraft no longer makes > the 200 Hz filter. Shame. > > If I was going to get only one CW filter, it > would probably be the 400 Hz jobber. > > 73, > Dan ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Dan Atchison
Bob,
Good comments. I think those of us who have been in ham radio for many years still think of physical filters as doing the job of specifying the radio bandwidth and forget that today's radio often is digital or partially digital where DSP does the job and filters are only used supplementary to help reject off frequency interference. I have the 13-KHz filter for FM and can be used for AM which I only would use for sw bc where the KBPF3 operates. the 2.8-KHz filter serves 95% of my use even for CW. The exception is working CW-eme where I typically operate the DSP at 100-Hz. There the 400-Hz roofing filter helps improve overall noise rejection and maybe helps sensitivity by deepening the off freq skirts (a guess). I have no local QRM on eme. I typically tune eme in wide bw until a signal is detected by digital waterfall display which I then tune in and reduce bw to hear the signal. My sub-Rx only has the 2.8-KHz filter because I only use it for diversity using digital modes or SSB. But it took me awhile to get my mind to accept that Rx bw is done by the DSP and not the filters. PS: my new SYN3A and KBPF3 mod kit arrived in the mail today. Going to be interested to see if I see any improvement in Rx sensitivity on eme. Moving below 490-KHz is the other plus as most activity is now 472-479 KHz. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com "Kits made by KL7UW" Dubus Mag business: [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Phil Wheeler-2
Oops -- Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on SSB :-)
Phil W7OX On 9/28/15 11:35 PM, Phil Wheeler wrote: > Here 400 Hz on CW, 2800 Hz mostly on CW -- > though I have the 1000 Hz filter for tuning on > CW and one tighter one (2100 Hz) for more > crowded SSB situations. > > If budget had been a concern, I'd have gone with > 400 Hz and the stock 2700 Hz pair. > > 73, Phil W7OX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
