|
Barry...
(I am trying not to prolong this thread on the Elecraft reflector...this will be my last thrust) Your idea to use dual-input monitors has come up repeatedly in the form of an "A-B Switch" for monitors. It is an extension of the primitive idea that one would un-plug one video source from a monitor and plug the second source into it. On my work desk, which I feel is reasonably typical, I am using one large monitor for everyday business on my PC, and a second one to run/monitor my ham radio stuff. I simply don't have space to use a 3rd monitor, though I have several that could be scavenged... Moreover, I don't want to give up the "live" monitoring of the windows that are in use...email, QRZ.com, vhf_info, fldigi, etc. So...along with a number of others who write to the E'craft server...I feel it would have been much more convenient if the P3/SVGA output were "windowed" on one of one's present monitors. Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present the P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the design decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor to present the P3/SVGA output. Recently, someone suggested use of frame-grabber or similar technology (e.g. http://rgb.com/) for this function. Unfortunately commercial units to do this are 10X more expensive than the price of the SVGA adapter + a small monitor to hook it to... So...there is no alternative to the "A-B" switch idea, or hanging a 3rd monitor from the ceiling. Actually, the screen on the P3 is not a bad solution. In my case however, the P3 lives a fair stretch of the arm from the operating position, and I had hoped to add the SVGA to put the output more directly in front of me. John Ragle -- W1ZI ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
> Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper > program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present > the P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the > design decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor > to present the P3/SVGA output. No, the person who made the design decision at Elecraft chose not to add additional hardware that would *further increase the cost* and waste time/effort to develop a series of display programs for multiple operating systems that would benefit a vanishingly small number of potential users. Again, if you want a windowed display, get SDR-IQ/SpectraVue or LP-PAN with a sound card and "son of PowerSDR". Both of those solutions are available today and cost less than the P3/P3SVGA with another monitor. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 1/15/2012 6:30 AM, John Ragle wrote: > Barry... > > (I am trying not to prolong this thread on the Elecraft > reflector...this will be my last thrust) Your idea to use dual-input > monitors has come up repeatedly in the form of an "A-B Switch" for > monitors. It is an extension of the primitive idea that one would > un-plug one video source from a monitor and plug the second source into it. > > On my work desk, which I feel is reasonably typical, I am using one > large monitor for everyday business on my PC, and a second one to > run/monitor my ham radio stuff. I simply don't have space to use a 3rd > monitor, though I have several that could be scavenged... > > Moreover, I don't want to give up the "live" monitoring of the > windows that are in use...email, QRZ.com, vhf_info, fldigi, etc. > So...along with a number of others who write to the E'craft server...I > feel it would have been much more convenient if the P3/SVGA output were > "windowed" on one of one's present monitors. > > Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper > program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present the > P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the design > decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor to present > the P3/SVGA output. > > Recently, someone suggested use of frame-grabber or similar > technology (e.g. http://rgb.com/) for this function. Unfortunately > commercial units to do this are 10X more expensive than the price of the > SVGA adapter + a small monitor to hook it to... > > So...there is no alternative to the "A-B" switch idea, or hanging a > 3rd monitor from the ceiling. Actually, the screen on the P3 is not a > bad solution. In my case however, the P3 lives a fair stretch of the arm > from the operating position, and I had hoped to add the SVGA to put the > output more directly in front of me. > > John Ragle -- W1ZI > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Joe,
While I respect the decision made on this particular module for the P3, I would like to say that I probably wouldn't buy it if I already had two monitors (or more) on the desk at my operating position. For someone that is in that position and already owns the P3, the suggestion to buy something else that would have to be connected in place of the P3 (or in parallel with it) isn't something that is going to be well liked. Matthew Pitts N8OHU Sent from my Wireless Device -----Original Message----- From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[hidden email]> Sender: [hidden email] Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 09:34:23 To: <[hidden email]>; <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] dual-input monitors... > Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper > program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present > the P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the > design decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor > to present the P3/SVGA output. No, the person who made the design decision at Elecraft chose not to add additional hardware that would *further increase the cost* and waste time/effort to develop a series of display programs for multiple operating systems that would benefit a vanishingly small number of potential users. Again, if you want a windowed display, get SDR-IQ/SpectraVue or LP-PAN with a sound card and "son of PowerSDR". Both of those solutions are available today and cost less than the P3/P3SVGA with another monitor. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 1/15/2012 6:30 AM, John Ragle wrote: > Barry... > > (I am trying not to prolong this thread on the Elecraft > reflector...this will be my last thrust) Your idea to use dual-input > monitors has come up repeatedly in the form of an "A-B Switch" for > monitors. It is an extension of the primitive idea that one would > un-plug one video source from a monitor and plug the second source into it. > > On my work desk, which I feel is reasonably typical, I am using one > large monitor for everyday business on my PC, and a second one to > run/monitor my ham radio stuff. I simply don't have space to use a 3rd > monitor, though I have several that could be scavenged... > > Moreover, I don't want to give up the "live" monitoring of the > windows that are in use...email, QRZ.com, vhf_info, fldigi, etc. > So...along with a number of others who write to the E'craft server...I > feel it would have been much more convenient if the P3/SVGA output were > "windowed" on one of one's present monitors. > > Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper > program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present the > P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the design > decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor to present > the P3/SVGA output. > > Recently, someone suggested use of frame-grabber or similar > technology (e.g. http://rgb.com/) for this function. Unfortunately > commercial units to do this are 10X more expensive than the price of the > SVGA adapter + a small monitor to hook it to... > > So...there is no alternative to the "A-B" switch idea, or hanging a > 3rd monitor from the ceiling. Actually, the screen on the P3 is not a > bad solution. In my case however, the P3 lives a fair stretch of the arm > from the operating position, and I had hoped to add the SVGA to put the > output more directly in front of me. > > John Ragle -- W1ZI > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
I have two HP 2311x monitors which I thought were reasonably priced at < $250 each. Each of them has three inputs HDMI, DVI and VGA. I bought these monitors for packet cluster display and software development, not the P3. These monitors have front panel control of the video source, so choosing the video source is not a big deal. When I purchase the Video module from Elecraft the VGA input of one of these will be connected to the P3 video output. I don't see a problem with the design of the P3 video system. On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:57:04 +0000, "Matthew Pitts" <[hidden email]> wrote: >Joe, > >While I respect the decision made on this particular module for the P3, I would like to say that I probably wouldn't buy it if I already had two monitors (or more) on the desk at my operating position. For someone that is in that position and already owns the P3, the suggestion to buy something else that would have to be connected in place of the P3 (or in parallel with it) isn't something that is going to be well liked. > >Matthew Pitts >N8OHU > [snip] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Amateur Radio Operator N5GE
|
|
Looks like HP has got the monitor your mentioning at a good price now in their home and office website. Nice looking monitor. Thanks for the info, Tom!
I am eagerly awaiting my P3 and SVGA card in late February! I will be very happy with a nice big display!
Roger W5RDW
|
|
In reply to this post by John Ragle
You ever consider buying what you need/want? From all accounts the P3 does a fine job for what it was intended to do, but there are other solutions that would do pretty much exactly what you describe. I don't always agree with Elecraft's design choices either, but in this case it has been clear from day one that the P3 was intended to be independent of the requirement to have a companion PC and that the SVGA port would be simply that .. an SVGA port. If that wasn't what you wanted, why did you buy it? Or did you simply not pay attention? If you have positioned the P3 so that it isn't easily accessible you've already negated the buttons and cursor control that set it apart from alternative products like the LP-Pan, SDR-IQ, or QSR1 ... products that would window the display right on your computer monitor like you want. Dave AB7E On 1/15/2012 4:30 AM, John Ragle wrote: > Barry... > > (I am trying not to prolong this thread on the Elecraft > reflector...this will be my last thrust) Your idea to use dual-input > monitors has come up repeatedly in the form of an "A-B Switch" for > monitors. It is an extension of the primitive idea that one would > un-plug one video source from a monitor and plug the second source into it. > > On my work desk, which I feel is reasonably typical, I am using one > large monitor for everyday business on my PC, and a second one to > run/monitor my ham radio stuff. I simply don't have space to use a 3rd > monitor, though I have several that could be scavenged... > > Moreover, I don't want to give up the "live" monitoring of the > windows that are in use...email, QRZ.com, vhf_info, fldigi, etc. > So...along with a number of others who write to the E'craft server...I > feel it would have been much more convenient if the P3/SVGA output were > "windowed" on one of one's present monitors. > > Technically, this would have been fairly easy...a small helper > program (perhaps similar to flrig) would run on the PC and present the > P3/SVGA output in a window. Instead, the person who made the design > decision at Elecraft, chose to/*require */a dedicated monitor to present > the P3/SVGA output. > > Recently, someone suggested use of frame-grabber or similar > technology (e.g. http://rgb.com/) for this function. Unfortunately > commercial units to do this are 10X more expensive than the price of the > SVGA adapter + a small monitor to hook it to... > > So...there is no alternative to the "A-B" switch idea, or hanging a > 3rd monitor from the ceiling. Actually, the screen on the P3 is not a > bad solution. In my case however, the P3 lives a fair stretch of the arm > from the operating position, and I had hoped to add the SVGA to put the > output more directly in front of me. > > John Ragle -- W1ZI Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by N5GE
I am sure there are as many cleaver ways to display the new P3 VGA output. I plan on using an existing monitor and switching inputs too. I have 22" light weight LG E2241(street price less than $150 USD) with front panel selectable input switching. It has DVI, VGA and HDMI inputs. It has the standard four mounting holes on the back. CAUTION, not all monitors have those holes and if you intend on using an elevated monitor mount, those holes are a must. I might add that the LED monitors are about half the weight of previous technology. When using elevated mounting, less weight is desired. This monitor weighs less than six pounds. http://www.lg.com/us/computer-products/monitors/LG-led-monitor-E2241V-BN.jsp Here is a picture of the monitor (left) and my Elecraft station on my Flickr site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ak5x/6043294098/in/set-72157612687555968 The mount is here, there are many designs to choose from, mine is the MX desk mount: http://www.ergotron.com/ 73, Bill Hammond [hidden email] Bill Hammond-AK5X [hidden email] [hidden email] K3 #69 P3 #817 KPA500 # 149 K2/100 #4637 K1 #2033 KX1 #1023 T1 On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:40 AM, [hidden email] wrote: > > I have two HP 2311x monitors which I thought were reasonably priced at < $250 > each. Each of them has three inputs HDMI, DVI and VGA. I bought these monitors > for packet cluster display and software development, not the P3. These monitors > have front panel control of the video source, so choosing the video source is > not a big deal. When I purchase the Video module from Elecraft the VGA input of > one of these will be connected to the P3 video output. > > I don't see a problem with the design of the P3 video system. > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:57:04 +0000, "Matthew Pitts" > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Joe, >> >> While I respect the decision made on this particular module for the P3, I would like to say that I probably wouldn't buy it if I already had two monitors (or more) on the desk at my operating position. For someone that is in that position and already owns the P3, the suggestion to buy something else that would have to be connected in place of the P3 (or in parallel with it) isn't something that is going to be well liked. >> >> Matthew Pitts >> N8OHU >> > [snip] > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
He used to frequent this list
So I am attempting to establish contact. Thanks ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Hi,
Look him up on QRZ.com. His listing has an E-mail address. AB2TC - Knut
|
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
