|
I would like some sort of audible indication that a reasonable match has
been obtained with the autotuner. I sugggest "k" for a match, and "s" for swr alert. Failing that, and maybe easier since you have the switch tones in place, a high pitched beep for good match and low for no good. Being totally blind, this would sure increase my confidence operating the k3. What you all think? ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
Great idea, Gary -- now on my list, along with full CW or DVR feedback
for all controls. This will take time to complete, though. 73, Wayne N6KR Gary Lee wrote: > I would like some sort of audible indication that a reasonable match > has > been obtained with the autotuner. > I sugggest "k" for a match, and "s" for swr alert. > > Failing that, and maybe easier since you have the switch tones in > place, a > high pitched beep for good match and low for no good. --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Lee-2
______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Lee Buller wrote:
> > > May I suggest "C" and "N" The "C" is short hand in CW for yes (I > think it comes from the Spanish word for yes) and of course "N" would > be no. > C is normally sent if you choose the CW mode so I think this should be avoided for SWR purposes. The normal for modes is the first letter, L for LSB, U for USB etc so these need to be avoided elsewhere. 73 Ian -- Ian J Maude, G0VGS SysOp GB7MBC & HB9DRV-9 DX Clusters Member RSGB, GQRP, FISTS K2 #4044 |K3 #455 http://www.amateurradiotraining.org ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Actually the Kenwood TS-570 had such a scheme implemented. Whenever one
would press the mode button one would get some CW feedback and I've never been confused by that feedback. Signalling for high SWR was both on-screen and by an "SWR" message in CW. 73 Glenn ON4WIX ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Maude" <[hidden email]> To: "elecraft Reflector" <[hidden email]> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:12 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] firmware suggestion for k3 > Lee Buller wrote: >> >> >> May I suggest "C" and "N" The "C" is short hand in CW for yes (I >> think it comes from the Spanish word for yes) and of course "N" would >> be no. >> > C is normally sent if you choose the CW mode so I think this should be > avoided for SWR purposes. The normal for modes is the first letter, L > for LSB, U for USB etc so these need to be avoided elsewhere. > > 73 Ian > > -- > > Ian J Maude, G0VGS > SysOp GB7MBC & HB9DRV-9 DX Clusters > Member RSGB, GQRP, FISTS > K2 #4044 |K3 #455 > http://www.amateurradiotraining.org > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.18/1935 - Release Date: 02/04/09 16:35:00 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Administrator
|
This is also an excellent way to preserve and promote CW use :)
CW pops up in various consumer devices. I think it would be great for eyes-free texting on cellphones, too. Wayne N6KR On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:26 AM, ON4WIX wrote: > Actually the Kenwood TS-570 had such a scheme implemented. Whenever one > would press the mode button one would get some CW feedback and I've > never > been confused by that feedback. Signalling for high SWR was both > on-screen > and by an "SWR" message in CW.... --- http://www.elecraft.com ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Lee-2
I used to have a TS-570 and the audio indication of SWR on auto tune was
just fine, lets not re-invent another set of beeps. 73 Dave, G4AON K3/100 #80 ---------------- Actually the Kenwood TS-570 had such a scheme implemented. Whenever one would press the mode button one would get some CW feedback and I've never been confused by that feedback. Signalling for high SWR was both on-screen and by an "SWR" message in CW. 73 Glenn ON4WIX ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
In reply to this post by wayne burdick
Wayne,
I hope that this is not high on your list. With all respect to everyone, this does not really add something to the performance of the K3. In my list of ranking software releases: 1. bugfix 2. nice to have, can do without 3. improvement in essential performance / extending TX-RX capabilities 4. need to have This is a number 2. 73, Arie PA3A -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] Namens wayne burdick Verzonden: donderdag 5 februari 2009 20:58 Aan: ON4WIX CC: elecraft Reflector Onderwerp: Re: [Elecraft] firmware suggestion for k3 This is also an excellent way to preserve and promote CW use :) CW pops up in various consumer devices. I think it would be great for eyes-free texting on cellphones, too. Wayne N6KR On Feb 5, 2009, at 11:26 AM, ON4WIX wrote: > Actually the Kenwood TS-570 had such a scheme implemented. Whenever > one would press the mode button one would get some CW feedback and > I've never been confused by that feedback. Signalling for high SWR was > both on-screen > and by an "SWR" message in CW.... ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Arie Kleingeld PA3A wrote:
> Wayne, > > I hope that this is not high on your list. > > With all respect to everyone, this does not really add something to the > performance of the K3. > > In my list of ranking software releases: > 1. bugfix > 2. nice to have, can do without > 3. improvement in essential performance / extending TX-RX capabilities > 4. need to have > > This is a number 2. > guess? 73 Ian -- Ian J Maude, G0VGS SysOp GB7MBC & HB9DRV-9 DX Clusters Member RSGB, GQRP, FISTS K2 #4044 |K3 #455 http://www.amateurradiotraining.org ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
|
Ian,
Yes you are right. My apologies. 73 Arie PA3A -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Ian Maude [mailto:[hidden email]] Verzonden: donderdag 5 februari 2009 23:50 Aan: Arie Kleingeld PA3A CC: 'wayne burdick'; 'elecraft Reflector' Onderwerp: Re: [Elecraft] firmware suggestion for k3 Arie Kleingeld PA3A wrote: > Wayne, > > I hope that this is not high on your list. > > With all respect to everyone, this does not really add something to > the performance of the K3. > > In my list of ranking software releases: > 1. bugfix > 2. nice to have, can do without > 3. improvement in essential performance / extending TX-RX capabilities > 4. need to have > > This is a number 2. > This of course depends on whether you are blind or partially sighted I guess? 73 Ian -- Ian J Maude, G0VGS SysOp GB7MBC & HB9DRV-9 DX Clusters Member RSGB, GQRP, FISTS K2 #4044 |K3 #455 http://www.amateurradiotraining.org ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
