|
I am amazed at what the touch screen can do and all the choices the 7300
offers. That said, I do not see me using a touch screen - too old school I guess. But, the video is interesting: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ic-7300/conversations/messages/2272 I am only posting this for informational purposes and do not wish to start a thread bashing anything. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I paid for my IC-7300 a few weeks back, and it has arrived with my dealer in the UK.
I am flying to the UK in two weeks time to fetch it. Super excited……but I am keeping my KX3 :) 73 John On 28 Mar 2016, at 5:02 PM, Bill <[hidden email]> wrote: I am amazed at what the touch screen can do and all the choices the 7300 offers. That said, I do not see me using a touch screen - too old school I guess. But, the video is interesting: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ic-7300/conversations/messages/2272 I am only posting this for informational purposes and do not wish to start a thread bashing anything. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Since this is Not an Elecraft product can this thread please be taken somewhere else? From: John Kramer <[hidden email]> To: Bill <[hidden email]> Cc: [hidden email] Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 12:02 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come I paid for my IC-7300 a few weeks back, and it has arrived with my dealer in the UK. I am flying to the UK in two weeks time to fetch it. Super excited……but I am keeping my KX3 :) 73 John On 28 Mar 2016, at 5:02 PM, Bill <[hidden email]> wrote: I am amazed at what the touch screen can do and all the choices the 7300 offers. That said, I do not see me using a touch screen - too old school I guess. But, the video is interesting: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/ic-7300/conversations/messages/2272 I am only posting this for informational purposes and do not wish to start a thread bashing anything. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas
that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. I did not intent to raise any ire over this post. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Im just too lazy to reach all the way up to the rig to touch the screen with my dirty fingers and smudge up the screen.
In a nutshell, why I dont like touchscreens on radios... George NE2I On Monday, March 28, 2016 6:39 PM, Bill <[hidden email]> wrote: Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. I did not intent to raise any ire over this post. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Bill-3
Bill
I agree, similarly with an Elad, not my choice BUT there is always the possibility some feature or other may be a popular item Elecraft can look at implementing in future FW and/or hardware. Competition drives innovation and that is good for all parties. Touch screen is not likely to be something I want in my radio but there IS a market for it no doubt. I just smile when I imagine a mobile with a touch screen, driving along, your contact asks you to go up 5 or something. I know I would end up either going somewhere I didn't expect or going off planet.....a bump in the road would be my downfall I reckon. 73 Gary -----Original Message----- From: "Bill" <[hidden email]> Sent: 29/03/2016 9:40 AM To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. I did not intent to raise any ire over this post. Bill W2BLC K-Line ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
I foresee Bluetooth or newer technology tablets or phone size units that
control our radio as an option to control our radios . So touchscreen control seems like more than a fad. On Monday, March 28, 2016, Gary <[hidden email]> wrote: > Bill > I agree, similarly with an Elad, not my choice BUT there is always the > possibility some feature or other may be a popular item Elecraft can look > at implementing in future FW and/or hardware. > Competition drives innovation and that is good for all parties. > Touch screen is not likely to be something I want in my radio but there IS > a market for it no doubt. I just smile when I imagine a mobile with a touch > screen, driving along, your contact asks you to go up 5 or something. I > know I would end up either going somewhere I didn't expect or going off > planet.....a bump in the road would be my downfall I reckon. > 73 > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Bill" <[hidden email] <javascript:;>> > Sent: 29/03/2016 9:40 AM > To: "[hidden email] <javascript:;>" <[hidden email] > <javascript:;>> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come > > Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas > that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For > example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not > care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many > things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. > > I did not intent to raise any ire over this post. > > Bill W2BLC K-Line > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] <javascript:;> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] <javascript:;> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] <javascript:;> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] <javascript:;> -- Rick, W8ZT Sent from Gmail Mobile ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
There is one overwhelming reason that we'll see touchscreens:
As radios become even more software driven, we'll see more and more new features added (like ESSB). The engineers and developers have to find a way to add those functions to existing buttons (push this button 3 times, or go to a menu, or something), provide a radio with blank buttons (which makes that new radio look unfinished, or a "stripped" version of a more expensive rig). ... or use a technology that allows buttons to be painted on the screen -- so the front of the radio can evolve along with the radio itself. I'm not ready for a rig that requires a separate device/computer to run. 73 -- Lynn On 3/28/2016 8:22 PM, Rick Robinson wrote: > I foresee Bluetooth or newer technology tablets or phone size units that > control our radio as an option to control our radios . So touchscreen > control seems like more than a fad. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Cars went through the patch where everything moved onto touch screens.
Ergonomically, that is a really bad choice. Newer cars are moving back to having twist controls and buttons for some things that were tried as touch screen controls. The correct answer is to have common features using real buttons. Context sensitive buttons mixed between real buttons that are labeled on a screen of some sort and virtual buttons. The P(x)3 is a good example where you could use a touch screen in a natural and useful way. I think smart phones have really advanced how we can use touch screens. But at the same time, physical controls are really very much easier to use. For some ideas, look at the interfaces for small aircraft GPS/Glass Cockpit and similar systems. For some examples: http://explore.garmin.com/en-US/general-aviation/ Each generation changes the mix of physical controls, reassignable controls and touch screen controls. The truth is that some things are better done on a touch screen. Others with physical controls. And in a light aircraft, when you are in turbulence... touch screens are really hard to use! We are still in a bit of an experimental place, and I'm sure things will move towards a happy balance. - Brendon KK6AYI On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT < [hidden email]> wrote: > There is one overwhelming reason that we'll see touchscreens: > > As radios become even more software driven, we'll see more and more new > features added (like ESSB). > > The engineers and developers have to find a way to add those functions to > existing buttons (push this button 3 times, or go to a menu, or something), > provide a radio with blank buttons (which makes that new radio look > unfinished, or a "stripped" version of a more expensive rig). > > ... or use a technology that allows buttons to be painted on the screen -- > so the front of the radio can evolve along with the radio itself. > > I'm not ready for a rig that requires a separate device/computer to run. > > 73 -- Lynn > > On 3/28/2016 8:22 PM, Rick Robinson wrote: > >> I foresee Bluetooth or newer technology tablets or phone size units that >> control our radio as an option to control our radios . So touchscreen >> control seems like more than a fad. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Gregory-2
In a contest, particularly a serious effort at a weekend long contest, the
constant reaching from the keyboard to the front of the rig to operate a touch screen presents a repetitive motion problem whose outcome is anywhere between tired and injured. This is why many people use the keyboard to direct N1MM to QSY up or down instead of using the knob. Some folks use things like Pig Knob, or a keypad driving macros because it can be set next to the keyboard and used while still maintaining wrist support for the tuning hand. For those who have already been injured by repetitive motions at work, these simplifications may be what makes it possible for them to operate any extended time in a contest. 73, Guy K2AV On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Gary <[hidden email]> wrote: > Bill > I agree, similarly with an Elad, not my choice BUT there is always the > possibility some feature or other may be a popular item Elecraft can look > at implementing in future FW and/or hardware. > Competition drives innovation and that is good for all parties. > Touch screen is not likely to be something I want in my radio but there IS > a market for it no doubt. I just smile when I imagine a mobile with a touch > screen, driving along, your contact asks you to go up 5 or something. I > know I would end up either going somewhere I didn't expect or going off > planet.....a bump in the road would be my downfall I reckon. > 73 > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Bill" <[hidden email]> > Sent: 29/03/2016 9:40 AM > To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come > > Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas > that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For > example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not > care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many > things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. > > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
Interesting discussion. I'm not (yet?) a touchscreen fan for radio
control, especially during a contest. That being said (cough, cough), I am lately having some fun designing my own touch screen interface for an ANAN-100D. Someone came up with the software glue to recognize and map any midi control to any CAT command for the OpenHPSDR radios (including Apache/ANAN) and there's a $5 TouchOSC Android application that allows you to quickly design from scratch any type of virtual midi controller on an Android or iPad tablet. All this has been made possible by the Open Source nature of the software. So instead of a macro keyboard, I can use my 7 in tablet. The upshot is that I might be a fan of touchscreen if they were user configurable. I really like the idea of users being able to design their own front panels. 73, Barry N1EU On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV <[hidden email]> wrote: > In a contest, particularly a serious effort at a weekend long contest, the > constant reaching from the keyboard to the front of the rig to operate a > touch screen presents a repetitive motion problem whose outcome is anywhere > between tired and injured. This is why many people use the keyboard to > direct N1MM to QSY up or down instead of using the knob. > > Some folks use things like Pig Knob, or a keypad driving macros because it > can be set next to the keyboard and used while still maintaining wrist > support for the tuning hand. For those who have already been injured by > repetitive motions at work, these simplifications may be what makes it > possible for them to operate any extended time in a contest. > > 73, Guy K2AV > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Gary <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Bill > > I agree, similarly with an Elad, not my choice BUT there is always the > > possibility some feature or other may be a popular item Elecraft can look > > at implementing in future FW and/or hardware. > > Competition drives innovation and that is good for all parties. > > Touch screen is not likely to be something I want in my radio but there > IS > > a market for it no doubt. I just smile when I imagine a mobile with a > touch > > screen, driving along, your contact asks you to go up 5 or something. I > > know I would end up either going somewhere I didn't expect or going off > > planet.....a bump in the road would be my downfall I reckon. > > 73 > > Gary > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Bill" <[hidden email]> > > Sent: 29/03/2016 9:40 AM > > To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come > > > > Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas > > that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For > > example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not > > care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many > > things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Bill-3
Wayne and Eric are probably already aware of the competition and working on their own responses, but to me the UI advances I personally like are:
- visual representations of the band: panadapters with spectrum displays, waterfalls and the like - being able to easily QSY to items of interest on the representation. - get rid of the ghastly external computer. In the old old days, the curmudgeonly command to "listen listen listen!" meant endlessly scanning back and forth with the tuning knob. Which is perfectly fine and that's how I do it with my rigs right now, but this is a whole new technology that can supplement that with a visual counterpart like "use your eyes!". So what I like in the 7300 that I think Elecraft could think about moving towards: - integrated spectrum scope/screen, rather than an external device - touch-screen operation for QSY, close examination of segments, etc. What I don't like and would hope Elecraft would avoid in a competing solution: - messy implementation with all these horrible buttons around the spectrum scope. - horrible buttons also respond to touch, making goofs and accidental misses at the spectrum screen your usual iPad experience when you attempt to use an iPad for something useful. Screens and rotating things going all over the place, making a mess. Blech! So one idea would be a regular knob operated UI for controlling the rig itself and a separate spectrum screen on the side, for example, that responds to both knobs and touch perhaps. That way, fat fingers won't accidentally reset your rig into an unusable configuration like the iPad interface, but you do have the touch-screen capability at the spectrum scope, where fat fingers will do the least harm and skillful use will have the most benefit. Anyway, some of my ideas, 73, LS W5QD |
|
The IC-7300 display has hideous resolution. It can't even trace curves,
just a bunch of bars. Reminds me of the original 2002 Orion sweep display. Whatever Elecraft does going forward, please go to the highest resolution screen that is available and have the horsepower to draw a beautifully detailed panadapter trace. That's why pc-based panadapters are so popular right now. I'm skeptical about touch screen qsy. I can't see how you can quickly get right on frequency. IMHO, pandapter-centric visual tuning desperately needs a bandmap overlay with spotted stations (whether self-spotted or cluster) indicated to be truly useful. Barry N1EU On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:18 AM, lstavenhagen <[hidden email]> wrote: > Wayne and Eric are probably already aware of the competition and working on > their own responses, but to me the UI advances I personally like are: > > - visual representations of the band: panadapters with spectrum displays, > waterfalls and the like > - being able to easily QSY to items of interest on the representation. > - get rid of the ghastly external computer. > > In the old old days, the curmudgeonly command to "listen listen listen!" > meant endlessly scanning back and forth with the tuning knob. Which is > perfectly fine and that's how I do it with my rigs right now, but this is a > whole new technology that can supplement that with a visual counterpart > like > "use your eyes!". > > So what I like in the 7300 that I think Elecraft could think about moving > towards: > - integrated spectrum scope/screen, rather than an external device > - touch-screen operation for QSY, close examination of segments, etc. > > What I don't like and would hope Elecraft would avoid in a competing > solution: > - messy implementation with all these horrible buttons around the spectrum > scope. > - horrible buttons also respond to touch, making goofs and accidental > misses > at the spectrum screen your usual iPad experience when you attempt to use > an > iPad for something useful. Screens and rotating things going all over the > place, making a mess. Blech! > > So one idea would be a regular knob operated UI for controlling the rig > itself and a separate spectrum screen on the side, for example, that > responds to both knobs and touch perhaps. That way, fat fingers won't > accidentally reset your rig into an unusable configuration like the iPad > interface, but you do have the touch-screen capability at the spectrum > scope, where fat fingers will do the least harm and skillful use will have > the most benefit. > > Anyway, some of my ideas, > > 73, > LS > W5QD > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/IC-7300-video-things-to-come-tp7615622p7615666.html > Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
yep, I totally agree. This would be a TBD item for a UI designer, IMO: to what degree do we actually replace the tuning knob with touch-screen QSY? Do we make it capable of just getting into the neighborhood and then the user has to fine tune with the tuning knob? I.e. a kind of dual-capability approach. Or do we make it able to do exact tuning, completely replacing the tuning knob?
Probably one of those things that would have to be developed on a trial-and-error basis, IMO. One of the hazards of very powerful technologies - the club can be just as easily turned on _you_ as on your good intentions LOL. 73, LS W5QD |
|
In reply to this post by Bill-3
Touch Screen... No thank you. I get the
allure but ergonomically its going to be miserable the older we are. If you're reaching up to touch a screen, try doing that for a contest's worth when you have shoulder issues. If you don't have them now, you will after the contest is over. Have a touch pad on the table, You'll be hunched over it all the time you're using it and your neck will be screaming. Don't believe me? Good, I'm a Chiropractor and I'll be happy to see you & it'll be sooner than later. ;) 73, Gary KA1J ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Bill-3
Bill,
Your comment is appreciated. I am in your camp but we are a bit older and happy with our current campfire. Younger hams and new hams might be very engaged with a touchscreen interface. The “over $8 K” product managers seem to have peaked lately in their “plethora of knobs" approach to the “mature ham market”. Elecraft is still the primo innovator with regard to performance, packaging, reliability and clever circuit design. Alan/K6ADG ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Gary Smith-2
I may have missed something in this discussion but I question what is different from using a touch screen or the buttons on the radio as we have now? I operated a considerable amount of time in the WPX SSB test last weekend using a K3 and about all I ever changed was the tuning knob and the width control. And maybe he NR and NB a couple of times. Using N1MM+ I did not even need to change bands using the radio controls.
73 Jim KI7Y ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Smith" <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:08:45 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come Touch Screen... No thank you. I get the allure but ergonomically its going to be miserable the older we are. If you're reaching up to touch a screen, try doing that for a contest's worth when you have shoulder issues. If you don't have them now, you will after the contest is over. Have a touch pad on the table, You'll be hunched over it all the time you're using it and your neck will be screaming. Don't believe me? Good, I'm a Chiropractor and I'll be happy to see you & it'll be sooner than later. ;) 73, Gary KA1J ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] -- Jim Cassidy KI7Y ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by N1EU
Try using a touchscreen in a light aircraft on a bumpy air day and you will learn to hate a touch screen.
Earl, K4KAY -----Original Message----- From: Elecraft [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 10:13 AM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come Interesting discussion. I'm not (yet?) a touchscreen fan for radio control, especially during a contest. That being said (cough, cough), I am lately having some fun designing my own touch screen interface for an ANAN-100D. Someone came up with the software glue to recognize and map any midi control to any CAT command for the OpenHPSDR radios (including Apache/ANAN) and there's a $5 TouchOSC Android application that allows you to quickly design from scratch any type of virtual midi controller on an Android or iPad tablet. All this has been made possible by the Open Source nature of the software. So instead of a macro keyboard, I can use my 7 in tablet. The upshot is that I might be a fan of touchscreen if they were user configurable. I really like the idea of users being able to design their own front panels. 73, Barry N1EU On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Guy Olinger K2AV <[hidden email]> wrote: > In a contest, particularly a serious effort at a weekend long contest, the > constant reaching from the keyboard to the front of the rig to operate a > touch screen presents a repetitive motion problem whose outcome is anywhere > between tired and injured. This is why many people use the keyboard to > direct N1MM to QSY up or down instead of using the knob. > > Some folks use things like Pig Knob, or a keypad driving macros because it > can be set next to the keyboard and used while still maintaining wrist > support for the tuning hand. For those who have already been injured by > repetitive motions at work, these simplifications may be what makes it > possible for them to operate any extended time in a contest. > > 73, Guy K2AV > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Gary <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Bill > > I agree, similarly with an Elad, not my choice BUT there is always the > > possibility some feature or other may be a popular item Elecraft can look > > at implementing in future FW and/or hardware. > > Competition drives innovation and that is good for all parties. > > Touch screen is not likely to be something I want in my radio but there > IS > > a market for it no doubt. I just smile when I imagine a mobile with a > touch > > screen, driving along, your contact asks you to go up 5 or something. I > > know I would end up either going somewhere I didn't expect or going off > > planet.....a bump in the road would be my downfall I reckon. > > 73 > > Gary > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Bill" <[hidden email]> > > Sent: 29/03/2016 9:40 AM > > To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]> > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IC-7300 video - things to come > > > > Actually, this does effect Elecraft users. There may be some good ideas > > that we will want to see incorporated on future Elecraft products. For > > example, the use of a touch screen for a lot of its controls. I do not > > care for touch screen myself, but it is the sign of the times on many > > things and lots of folks are very comfortable with the concept. > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:[hidden email] > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to [hidden email] > Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
In reply to this post by Elecraft mailing list
I'm not the one here with the most money,
I'm absolutely positive of that, but that said; I can buy any rig I want and the dollars spent wouldn't in any way affect me, or anything I do in the future. I just bought a K3S because of the many things it represents but I'm not a martyr to buy USA when something else is better or, buy something wonderful that is software based only like the Flex 6700; I bought the K3s because to my discovery, it is the finest radio out there. Yes, this is the Elecraft reflector so most of us are already on board but I bought this radio (I upgraded from an updated K3) because it is to me, the pinnacle of today's equipment. I just worked the VK0KE on 160 last night. I honestly, to God do not think that any radio I have ever owned before, save the K3 with the updated synthesizer, would have heard the incredibly diminutive signal that I heard reply to me. I was the first NA station to post them in the cluster yesterday and that is because of the quality of this radio. The K3s Rocks. IC-7300 Video... Pffttt. 73, Gary Gary KA12J > Bill, > Your comment is appreciated. I am in your camp but we are a bit older and happy with our > current campfire. Younger hams and new hams might be very engaged with a touchscreen > interface. The "over $8 K" product managers seem to have peaked lately in their "plethora of knobs" > approach to the "mature ham market". Elecraft is still the primo innovator with regard to performance, > packaging, reliability and clever circuit design. > > Alan/K6ADG ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:[hidden email] This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to [hidden email] |
|
For me, even if touch-screen UI's were written for old people like myself, hi hi, I still think its a technology in its infancy.
The infantile part of it being primarily in its application, not so much just the mere fact that TS technology itself new and still in "1.x" revisions. When Garmin came out with touch-screen UIs on their aviation GPS products is when I recognized that the T-S train had skipped off the rails - I wondered if anyone at Garmin's aviation products division had ever even flown in a light aircraft before? And Apple continues to threaten to go all-iPad with every release, though I suppose if sanity could return somewhere Apple might be the most likely first place for it to do so. In amateur radio, my opinion is mixed. I can see myself having fun with T-S on a panadaptor, but the smile kind of fades from my face when thinking about using the radio in general on a greasy thumprinted, fussy screen with windows popping up all over the place.... All things being equal, though, I prefer knobs on a radio and not having to wash my hands with toilet bowl cleaner before I use it hi hi. Like I said, maybe a separate screen for the T-S spectrum scope, but everything else relegated to good ol' knobs hi hi. 73, LS W5QD |
| Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |
